Press Release: Jammu and Kashmir Assembly Elections 2024 Phase III: Analysis of Criminal Background, Financial, Education, Gender and other Details of Candidates

41 views

Skip to first unread message

ADR India

unread,

Sep 21, 2024, 3:37:36 AMSep 21

to national-el...@googlegroups.com, national...@googlegroups.com

Press Release

Date: September 21, 2024

Dear Friends,

The Jammu & Kashmir Election Watch and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analysed the self-sworn affidavits of all 415 candidates, who are contesting in the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Elections Phase III.

The full reports in English and Hindi can be accessed here: https://adrindia.org/content/Analysis-of-Criminal-Financial-and-other-Details-of-Candidates-Jammu-%2525252526-Kashmir-Assembly-Elections-2024-Phase-III

Summary and Highlights

Criminal Background

Candidates with Criminal Cases: Out of 415 candidates analyzed, 67 (16%) candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.

Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 52(13%) have declared serious criminal cases against themselves.

Candidates with cases related to Attempt to Murder: 5 candidates have declared cases of attempt to murder (IPC Section-307).

Party wise Candidates with Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,5(21%) out of 24 candidates analysed from INC, 4(12%) out of 33 candidates analysed from JKPDP, 2 (11%) out of 18 candidates analysed from JKNC, 1 (5%) out of 21 candidates analysed from BSP and 1 (3%) out of 29 candidates analysed from BJP have declared criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.

Party wise Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,3(13%) out of 24 candidates analysed from INC, 4(12%) out of 33 candidates analysed from JKPDP, 2 (11%) out of 18 candidates analysed from JKNC, 1 (5%) out of 21 candidates analysed from BSP and 1 (3%) out of 29 candidates analysed from BJP have declared serious criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.

Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Candidates with Criminal Cases

Red Alert Constituencies*: 11(28%) out of 40 constituencies are red alert constituencies. Red alert constituencies are those where 3 or more contesting candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.

The directions of the Supreme Court have had no effect on the political parties in selection of candidates in the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Elections Phase III as they have again followed their old practice of giving tickets to around 16% candidates with criminal cases. All major parties contesting in Jammu & Kashmir Elections Phase 3 have given tickets from 3 % to 21 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. The Supreme Court in its directions dated 13th February, 2020 had specifically instructed political parties to give reasons for such selection and why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. As per these mandatory guidelines, the reasons for such selection has to be with reference to qualifications, achievements and merit of the candidate concerned. During the recent 4 State Assembly elections held in 2024, it was observed that political parties gave unfounded and baseless reasons like popularity of the person, does good social work, cases are politically motivated etc. These are not sound and cogent reasons for fielding candidates with tainted backgrounds. This data clearly shows that political parties have no interest in reforming the electoral system and our democracy will continue to suffer at the hands of lawbreakers who become lawmakers.

Financial Background

Figure: Share of Wealth among the Contesting Candidates

Share of wealth among candidates: The share of wealth amongst the candidates contesting in the Jammu & Kashmir assembly elections 2024 phase III is as follows:

Value of assets (Rs.)	Number of candidates	Percentage of Candidates
Rs. 10 crores and above	28	7%
Rs. 5 crores to Rs. 10 crores	30	7%
Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 5 crores	111	27%
Rs. 20 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore	113	27%
less than Rs. 20 lakhs	133	32%

Table: Share of wealth amongst contesting candidates

Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 415 candidates, 169 (41%) are crorepatis.

Party wise Crorepati Candidates: The role of money power in our elections is evident from the fact that all major political parties give tickets to wealthy candidates. Among the major parties 16(89%) out of 18 candidates analysed from JKNC, 19(79%) out of 24 candidates analysed from INC, 22(76%) out of 29 candidates analysed from BJP, 12(36%) out of 33 candidates analysed from JKPDP and 7(33%) out of 21 candidates analysed from BSP have declared assets valued more than Rs 1 crore.

Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Crorepati Candidates

Average assets: The average of assets per candidate contesting in the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Elections 2024 Phase III is Rs 2.76 Crore.

Party wise average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per candidate for 29 BJP candidates analysed is Rs. 10.57 Crores, 18 JKNC candidates analysed is Rs 7.36 Crores, 24 INC candidates have average assets of Rs 4.15 Crores, 33 JKPDP candidates have average assets of Rs 3.61 Crores and 21 BSP candidates have average assets worth Rs. 1.78 Crores.

High assets candidates: The details of top 3 candidates with highest declared assets, contesting in the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Elections Phase III are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Movable Assets (Rs)	Immovable Assets (Rs)	Total Assets (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Devender Singh Rana	Jammu	Nagrota	BJP	28,12,42,167	98,69,22,413	1,26,81,64,580 126 Crore+	Y
2	Shabir Ahmed Mir	Baramulla	Gulmarg	Jammu & Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party	5,39,30,555	48,56,50,000	53,95,80,555 53 Crore+	Y
3	Taj Mohi Ud Din	Baramulla	Uri	IND	7,25,42,057	44,33,25,000	51,58,67,057 51 Crore+	Y

Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets

Zero assets candidates: There are 6 candidates who have declared zero assets. The details of these candidates are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Movable Assets (Rs)	Immovable Assets (Rs)	Total Assets (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Vishal Kumar	Jammu	Bishnah (SC)	IND	0	0	0	Y
2	Asif D.M	Jammu	Jammu East	IND	0	0	0	Y
3	Raj Kumar Lalotra	Jammu	Jammu West	IND	0	0	0	Y
4	Sudesh Kumar	Kathua	Kathua (SC)	Jammu & Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party	0	0	0	Y
5	Shahid Hussain Mir	Kupwara	Handwara	IND	0	0	0	Y
6	Zahid Mushtaq Sheikh	Kupwara	Handwara	IND	0	0	0	Y

Table: Candidates with declared zero assets

Low assets candidates: The details of three candidates with lowest assets (excluding zero assets candidates) are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Movable Assets (Rs)	Immovable Assets (Rs)	Total Assets (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Manzoor Ahmad Kaloo	Baramulla	Sopore	IND	6,000	0	6,000 6 Thou+	Y
2	Tajamul Hamid	Baramulla	Wagoora - Kreeri	IND	10,000	0	10,000 10 Thou+	Y
3	Muzafar Ahmad Dar	Baramulla	Rafiabad	IND	11,000	0	11,000 11 Thou+	Y

Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets

Candidates with high liabilities: 243(59%) candidates have declared liabilities in their affidavits. The details of top three candidates with highest liabilities are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Total Assets (Rs)	Liabilities (Rs)	Disputed liabilities (Rs)	PAN Given
1	**Sajad Gani Lone	Kupwara	Kupwara	Jammu & Kashmir People Conference	20,79,58,079 20 Crore+	7,34,84,411 7 Crore+	1,50,00,000 1 Crore+	Y
1	**Sajad Gani Lone	Kupwara	Handwara	Jammu & Kashmir People Conference	20,79,58,079 20 Crore+	7,34,84,411 7 Crore+	1,50,00,000 1 Crore+	Y
2	Devender Singh Rana	Jammu	Nagrota	BJP	1,26,81,64,580 126 Crore+	6,19,00,000 6 Crore+	18,18,260 18 Lacs+	Y
3	Darshan Kumar	Kathua	Basohli	BJP	10,30,87,223 10 Crore+	4,54,58,343 4 Crore+	0	Y

Table: Top three candidates with highest liabilities

**Candidate is contesting from more than one constituency

Candidates with high income as declared in the ITR*: The details of top 3 candidates with high income declared in ITR are given below:

S.No.	Name	Party Name	Constituency	District	Total Assets (Rs)	Self-Source of Income	Spouse's Source of Income	The financial year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate	Total income shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs)	Self-income shown by candidate in ITR (Rs)
1	Devender Singh Rana	BJP	Nagrota	Jammu	1,26,81,64,580 126 Crore+	Income From Business/ Rents, Salary	Income From Business	2023-2024	7,99,73,419 7 Crore+	1,17,10,120 1 Crore+
2	Surjeet Singh Slathia	BJP	Samba	Samba	16,84,47,529 16 Crore+	Salary, Interest Dividend, Agriculture Income	Salary, Transport Income, Interest, Agriculture Income	2023-2024	92,59,190 92 Lacs+	56,47,980 56 Lacs+
3	Dr Noor Ud Din Ahmad Shah	Jammu and Kashmir Apni Party	Trehgam	Kupwara	1,45,91,000 1 Crore+	Pension (Consultant at Noora Hospital Srinagar & Quality care Hospital Kupwara)	Govt Service	2023-2024	54,04,780 54 Lacs+	23,53,480 23 Lacs+

Table: Top 3 candidates with highest income as declared in ITR

Other Background Details

Education details of candidates: 187(45%) candidates have declared their educational qualifications to be between 5^th and 12^thstandard while 214(52%) candidates have declared having an educational qualification of graduate or above. 4 candidates are Diploma holders. 1 candidate has declared himself just literate and 9 candidates are Illiterates.

Age details of candidates: 133(32%) candidates have declared their age to be between 25 to 40 years while 198 (48%) candidates have declared their age to be between 41 to 60 years. There are 84(20%) candidates who have declared their age to be between 61 to 80 years.

Gender details of candidates: 28(7%) female candidates are contesting in the Jammu & Kashmir assembly election 2024 Phase III.

Recommendations of ADR

To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and citizens. Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required laws.
Permanent disqualification of candidates convicted for heinous crimes like murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity, kidnapping etc.
Disqualification of persons from contesting elections to the public offices against whom charges have been framed for having committed serious criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of at least 5 years, and the case is filed at least 6 months prior to the election in question.
Cancellation of tax exemptions given to the political parties who field such tainted candidates.
Bringing political parties under the Right to Information Act.
De-register and de-recognise any political party if it knowingly puts up a candidate with a tainted background.
Political parties should annually file the information on criminal antecedents of their Office Bearers and make such records available to the public, including NIL records.
Disqualification of candidates furnishing false information in the election affidavit (Form 26).
Ensure trial of cases in which the politicians are accused to be concluded in a time bound manner.
Implementation of SC judgment dated 23^rd September, 2013 (i.e provision of NOTA buttons on the EVMs) in its letter and spirit by ensuring a) if NOTA gets more votes than any of the candidates, none of the candidates should be declared elected, and a fresh election should be held; b) in the fresh election, none of the candidates in the earlier election, in which NOTA got the highest number of votes, should be allowed to contest.
Implementation of the 25^th September, 2018 and 13^th February, 2020 SC orders on 'publication of criminal cases against candidates selected by political parties along with reasons for such selection' in its letter and spirit by directing the Election Commission of India a) to list out names of such tainted candidates selected by the political parties along with such reasons for such selection C8 including diligent publication of reasons in newspapers, T.V channels, party website etc, b) strict and constant reminders by ROs to the defaulters, c) list needs to be religiously prepared and submitted to the Supreme Court after every election, d) uploading of this list on ECI’s website for public inspection, e) a suitably heavy financial penalty levied on political parties for making insufficient disclosures, invalid and common reasons, selection of candidates based on winnability and f) Officer in-charge of a political party pertaining to submission of a compliance report should also be held accountable for such a breach.
The Election Commission of India and all State Election Commissions should make it mandatory in all elections; Parliamentary, Assembly and Local Body elections to carry display boards outside each and every polling booth showing a summarised version of candidates’ affidavits. The polling booths should essentially display details of candidate’s criminal records, assets and liabilities and education qualification.
The Election Commission of India under its ‘Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation’ (SVEEP) as well as through other national campaigns on voter awareness held before every election should inform and aware the voters that (i) taking and giving cash or gifts/freebies for votes is a criminal offense, (ii) such instances should be brought to the notice of the ECI through its web application, (iii) inform voters that information on criminal records of candidates is available on the ECI website, outside polling booths and other sources that the ECI may use.
Political parties in India should be required to announce/publish the list of candidates contesting elections at least 3 months prior to elections.
Role of money and muscle power is evident from the fact that all major political parties in Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Elections 2024 Phase III have fielded 33% to 89% candidates who are crorepatis and 3% to 21 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. This close and alarming nexus between money power and muscle power has got so ingrained in our electoral system that the citizens are left hostage to the current situation. Money and muscle power hurt the principles of 'free and fair elections', 'participatory democracy' and 'level playing field'. The present circumstances therefore demand an extensive deliberation by the voters so that sanctity of elections is not ridiculed by tenacious entry of tainted candidates and candidates with abnormal multiplication of assets.