​Press Release: Telangana Assembly Elections 2023 : Analysis of Criminal Background, Financial, Education, Gender and other Details of Candidates

136 views
Skip to first unread message

ADR India

unread,
Nov 25, 2023, 4:05:25 AM11/25/23
to national-el...@googlegroups.com, national...@googlegroups.com
Press Release
Date: November  25, 2023
Dear Friends,

The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and Telangana Election Watch have analysed the self-sworn affidavits of all 2290 candidates, who are contesting in the Telangana 2023 Assembly Elections. Out of 2290 candidates analysed, 355 are from National parties, 175 are from State parties, 771 are from registered unrecognized parties and 989 candidates are contesting independently.



Party 

Total Contesting Candidates

Candidates with declared Criminal Cases

% of candidates with declared criminal cases

Candidates with declared serious criminal cases

% of candidates with declared serious criminal cases

No. of Crorepatis

Percentage of Crorepati Candidates

National Parties

355

216

61%

148

42%

241

68%

State Parties

175

75

43%

45

26%

141

81%

Registered Unrecognized Party

771

92

12%

70

9%

74

10%

Independent

989

138

14%

90

9%

124

13%

Total

2290

521

23%

353

15%

580

25%

Table: Party Category Wise Details

image.png

Summary and Highlights


image.png

Criminal Background  

  • Candidates with Criminal Cases: Out of the 2290 candidates analysed in Telangana Assembly elections 2023, 521(23%) candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves. In the 2018 Telangana Assembly Elections, out of 1777 candidates analysed, 368(21%) had declared criminal cases against themselves.
  • Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 353(15%) have declared serious criminal cases. In 2018 Telangana Assembly Elections, 231 (13%) candidates had declared serious criminal cases against themselves.

image.png
Figure: Comparative analysis of Candidates with declared Criminal Cases: 2018 vs 2023
  • Party wise Candidates with Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,85(72%) out of 118 candidates analysed from INC, 79(71%) out of 111 candidates analysed from BJP, 57(48%) out of 119 candidates analysed from BRS, 40 (37%) out of 107 candidates analysed from BSP, 12 (63%) out of 19 candidates analysed from CPI(M), 10 (24%) out of 41 candidates analysed from All India Forward Bloc and 5 (56%) out of 9 candidates analysed from All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen have declared criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.
  • Party wise Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,60(51%) out of 118 candidates analysed from INC, 54(49%) out of 111 candidates analysed from BJP, 34(29%) out of 119 candidates analysed from BRS, 28 (26%) out of 107 candidates analysed from BSP, 6 (32%) out of 19 candidates analysed from CPI(M), 7 (17%) out of 41 candidates analysed from All India Forward Bloc and 3 (33%) out of 9 candidates analysed from All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen have declared serious criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.
image.png
Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Candidates with Criminal Cases

Party

Telangana Assembly Elections 2018

Telangana Assembly Elections 2023

Number of Candidates Analysed

Number of candidates with Declared Criminal Cases

Percentage of candidates with Declared Criminal Cases

Number of Candidates Analysed

Number of candidates with Declared Criminal Cases

Percentage of candidates with Declared Criminal Cases

BRS

119

65

55%

119 

57

48%

INC

99

69

70%

118 

85

72%

BSP

100

27

27%

 107

40

37%

BJP

118

44

37%

 111

79

71%

All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen

8

6

75%

 9

5

56%

All India Forward Bloc

19

4

21%

41 

10

24%

CPI(M)

25

13

52%

19 

12 

63%

Independent

652

56

9%

 989

138

14%

Table: Party Wise Candidates with Declared Criminal Cases: 2018 vs 2023 

image.png
 Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Candidates with Declared Criminal Cases: 2018 vs 2023
  • Candidates with declared cases related to crime against women: 45 candidates have declared cases related to crime against women. Out of 45 candidates 3 candidates have declared cases related to rape (IPC Section-376).
  • Candidates with declared cases related to murder: 7 candidates have declared cases related to murder (IPC Section-302) against themselves.
  • Candidates with declared cases related to attempt to murder: 27 candidates have declared cases related to Attempt to murder (IPC Section-307) against themselves.
  • Red Alert Constituencies*: 96(81%) out of 119 constituencies are red alert constituencies. Red alert constituencies are those where 3 or more contesting candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves. 78 (66%) constituencies in the Telangana assembly elections 2018 had 3 or more candidates with declared criminal cases. 
  • The directions of the Supreme Court have had no effect on the political parties in selection of candidates in the Telangana Assembly Elections 2023 as they have again followed their old practice of giving tickets to around 23% candidates with criminal cases.  All major parties contesting in Telangana elections have given tickets from 24 % to 72 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. The Supreme Court in its directions dated 13th February, 2020 had specifically instructed political parties to give reasons for such selection and why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. As per these mandatory guidelines, the reasons for such selection has to be with reference to qualifications, achievements and merit of the candidate concerned. During the recent 4 State Assembly elections held in 2023, it was observed that political parties gave unfounded and baseless reasons like popularity of the person, does good social work, cases are politically motivated etc. These are not sound and cogent reasons for fielding candidates with tainted backgrounds. This data clearly shows that political parties have no interest in reforming the electoral system and our democracy will continue to suffer at the hands of lawbreakers who become lawmakers. 

Financial Background


image.png
Figure: Share of Wealth among the Contesting Candidates
  • Share of wealth among candidates: The share of wealth amongst the candidates contesting in the Telangana assembly elections 2023 is as follows:

Value of assets (Rs.)

Number of candidates

Percentage of Candidates

5 crores and above

270

11.79%

2 crores to 5 crores

150

6.55%

50 lakhs to 2 crores

381

16.64%

10 lakhs to 50 lakhs

539

23.54%

less than 10 lakhs

950

41.48%

Table: Share of wealth amongst contesting candidates

  • Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 2290 candidates analysed, 580(25%) are crorepatis. In 2018 Telangana Assembly Elections, out of 1777 candidates, 438(25%) were crorepatis.

image.png
Figure: Comparative Analysis of Crorepati Candidates: 2018 Vs 2023
  • Party wise Crorepati Candidates: The role of money power in our elections is evident from the fact that all major political parties give tickets to wealthy candidates. Among the major parties 114(96%) out of 119 candidates analysed from BRS, 111(94%) out of 118 candidates analysed from INC, 93(84%) out of 111 candidates analysed from BJP, 30(28%) out of 107 candidates analysed from BSP, 7(37%) out of 19 candidates analysed from CPI(M), 18(44%) out of 41 candidates analysed from All India Forward Bloc and 8(89%) out of 9 candidates analysed from All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen have declared assets valued more than Rs 1 crore.
image.png
Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Crorepati Candidates

Party

Telangana Assembly Elections 2018

Telangana Assembly Elections 2023

Number of Candidates Analysed

Number of Crorepati Candidates

Percentage of Crorepati Candidates

Number of Candidates Analysed

Number of Crorepati Candidates

Percentage of Crorepati Candidates

BRS

119

107

90%

119

114

96%

INC

99

79

80%

118

111

94%

BSP

100

26

26%

107

30

28%

BJP

118

86

73%

111

93

84%

All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen

8

5

63%

9

8

89%

All India Forward Bloc

19

7

37%

41

18

44%

CPI(M)

25

1

4%

19

7

37%

Independent

652

62

10%

989

124

13%

Table: Party Wise Crorepati Candidates: 2018 vs 2023

image.png
Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Crorepati Candidates: 2018 vs 2023

  • Average assets: The average of assets per candidate contesting in the Telangana Assembly Elections 2023 is Rs 4.71 Crores. In 2018 Telangana Assembly Elections, average assets per candidate for 1777 Candidates was Rs. 3.29 Crores.
  • Party wise average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per candidate for 119 BRS candidates analysed is Rs. 25.62 Crores, 118 INC candidates analysed is Rs 38 Crores, 111 BJP candidates have average assets of Rs 16.15 Crores, 107 BSP candidates have average assets of Rs 2.02 Crores, 19 CPI(M) candidates have average assets of Rs 1.01 Crore, 41 All India Forward Bloc candidates have average assets of Rs 2.94 Crores and 9 All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen have average assets worth Rs 10.46 Crores.
  • High asset candidates: The details of top 3 candidates with highest declared assets, contesting in the Telangana Assembly Elections 2023 are given below:

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Movable Assets (Rs)

Immovable Assets (Rs)

Total Assets (Rs)

PAN Given

1

Gaddam Vivekanand

Mancherial

Chennur (SC)

INC

3,80,76,38,171

2,25,91,48,700

6,06,67,86,871
 606 Crore+

Y

2

Komatireddy Raj Gopal Reddy

Nalgonda

Munugode

INC

3,01,55,35,078

1,56,84,04,037

4,58,39,39,115
 458 Crore+

Y

3

Ponguleti Srinivasa Reddy

Khammam

Palair

INC

3,96,99,99,485

36,93,35,395

4,33,93,34,880
 433 Crore+

Y

Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets
  •  Zero assets candidates: There are 25 candidates who have declared zero assets. The details of these candidates are given below:  

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Movable Assets (Rs)

Immovable Assets (Rs)

Total Assets (Rs)

PAN Given

1

Kolagani Suresh

Hanumakonda

Parkal

IND

0

0

0

Y

2

Kaja.Poorna Chander

Hyderabad

Musheerabad

Indian Praja Congress

0

0

0

Y

3

Mohammed Osman

Hyderabad

Goshamahal

IND

0

0

0

N

4

B. Kiran Kumar

Hyderabad

Secunderabad Cantt. (SC)

IND

0

0

0

Y

5

Mallaiah Marapelli

Jayashankar Bhupalpally

Bhupalpalle

CPI(ML)(L)

0

0

0

Y

6

Siripalli Rajaiah

Jayashankar Bhupalpally

Bhupalpalle

IND

0

0

0

Y

7

Ramachandraiah Jangam

Khammam

Madhira (SC)

IND

0

0

0

N

8

Noonavath Veeru

Khammam

Wyra (ST)

CPI(ML)(L)

0

0

0

N

9

Prasad Babu Narapogu

Khammam

Sathupalle (SC)

Mana Telangana Rashtra Samaikya Party

0

0

0

Y

10

Ravi Kumar Vankudothu

Mahabubabad

Dornakal (ST)

Telangana Jaghir Party

0

0

0

Y

11

Ambala Mahendar

Mancherial

Bellampalli (SC)

IND

0

0

0

Y

12

M. Krishna

Mancherial

Mancherial

IND

0

0

0

N

13

Maddila Venkateshwarlu

Mulugu

Mulug (ST)

IND

0

0

0

N

14

Talari Balavardhan

Nagarkurnool

Kollapur

IND

0

0

0

Y

15

Konda Mahender

Peddapalli

Manthani

Aabaad Party

0

0

0

Y

16

Pendyala Surender

Peddapalli

Peddapalle

IND

0

0

0

Y

17

Prathap Simha Raidu. J (Chinna Raidu)

Rangareddy

Ibrahimpatnam

Telangana Jaghir Party

0

0

0

Y

18

Pareekshith Reddy

Rangareddy

Ibrahimpatnam

IND

0

0

0

Y

19

Kathula Yadaiah

Rangareddy

Maheswaram

IND

0

0

0

Y

20

K Raghavendar

Rangareddy

Shadnagar

IND

0

0

0

N

21

Pothuraju Vijay

Suryapet

Huzurnagar

IND

0

0

0

Y

22

Gangireddy Kotireddy

Suryapet

Kodad

IND

0

0

0

N

23

Thandu Upendar

Suryapet

Kodad

IND

0

0

0

N

24

Jangam Laxmi Narsamma

Vikarabad

Vicarabad (SC)

IND

0

0

0

N

25

M. Krishna

Yadadri Bhuvanagiri

Alair

IND

0

0

0

N

Table: Candidates with declared zero assets

  • Low assets candidates: The details of three candidates with lowest assets (excluding zero assets candidates) are given below:

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Movable Assets (Rs)

Immovable Assets (Rs)

Total Assets (Rs)

PAN Given

1

Maddileti

Jogulamba Gadwal

Alampur (SC)

All India Samata Party

500*

0

500
 5 Hund+

Y

2

Mahendar Bhukya

Mahabubabad

Dornakal (ST)

Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party

500

0

500
 5 Hund+

Y

3

Vanguri Jayashanker

Nagarkurnool

Nagarkurnool

Bahujan Republican Socialist Party

500*

0

500
 5 Hund+

Y

Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets

* On assets value indicates that the candidate has not provided the total in their affidavits, it has been calculated on the basis of details provided by them in the same

  • Candidates with high liabilities: 1185(52%) candidates have declared liabilities in their affidavits. The details of top three candidates with highest liabilities are given below:

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Total Assets (Rs)

Liabilities (Rs)

PAN Given

1

Pailla Shekar Reddy

Yadadri Bhuvanagiri

Bhongir

BRS

2,27,51,86,867
 227 Crore+

1,12,75,13,860
 112 Crore+

Y

2

Ashannagari Jeevan Reddy

Nizamabad

Armur

BRS

22,95,78,708
 22 Crore+

50,73,56,437
 50 Crore+

Y

3

Danam Nagender

Hyderabad

Khairatabad

BRS

68,89,15,252
 68 Crore+

49,55,30,000
 49 Crore+

Y

 Table: Top three candidates with highest liabilities

  • Candidates with high income as declared in the ITR*: The details of top 3 candidates with high income declared in ITR are given below:

S.No.

Name

Party Name

Constituency

District Name

Total Asset (Rs)

Self Source of Income

Spouse's Source of Income

The financial year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate

Total income shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs)

Self income shown by candidate in ITR (Rs)

1

Komatireddy Raj Gopal Reddy

INC

Munugode

Nalgonda

4,58,39,39,115

458 Crore+

Business Income & Rentals from Commercial Property

Business Income & Rentals

2022-2023

71,18,73,201

71 Crore+

71,17,45,439

71 Crore+

2

Sunil Kumar Muthyala

INC

Balkonda

Nizamabad

1,04,13,19,139

104 Crore+

Business

Agriculture and Others

2022-2023

29,13,36,503

29 Crore+

29,07,00,163

29 Crore+

3

Gaddam Vivekanand

INC

Chennur (SC)

Mancherial

6,06,67,86,871

606 Crore+

Dividend, Agricultural, Interest

Salary, Dividend, Interest, Commission

2022-2023

15,86,92,450

15 Crore+

6,26,23,880

6 Crore+

 Table: Top 3 candidates with highest income as declared in ITR
  • Undeclared PAN:  A total of 84(4%) candidates have not declared their PAN details.

Other Background Details

  • Education details of candidates: 979(43%) candidates have declared their educational qualifications to be between 5th and 12th standard while 1143(50%) candidates have declared having an educational qualification of graduate or above. 53 candidates are Diploma holders. 26 candidates have declared themselves to be just literate and 89 candidates are Illiterates.
  • Age details of candidates: 1027(45%) candidates have declared their age to be between 25 to 40 years while 1062 (46%) candidates have declared their age to be between 41 to 60 years.  There are 200 (9%) candidates who have declared their age to be between 61 to 80 years and 1 candidate has declared his age 84 years old.
  • Gender details of candidates: 222(10%) female candidates are contesting in the Telangana Assembly Elections 2023.  In 2018 Telangana Assembly Elections, 136(8%) out of 1777 candidates analysed were women.

Party wise Gender Details


S.No.

Party Name

Total candidates analyzed

Men

Women

% of Women candidates

Third Gender

1

BRS

119

111

8

7%

0

2

INC

118

106

12

10%

0

3

BJP

111

98

13

12%

0

4

BSP

107

98

9

8%

0

5

CPI(M)

19

17

2

11%

0

6

Independent

989

902

87

9%

0

7

Jai Maha Bharath Party

13

0

13

100%

0

8

Dharma Samaj Party

101

91

10

10%

0

9

All India Forward Bloc

41

40

1

2%

0

10

Janasena Party

8

7

1

13%

0

11

Rashtra Samanya Praja Party

4

3

0

0%

1

12

Other Parties

660

594

66

10%

0

Total

2290

2067

222

10%

1

 Table: Party Wise analysis of candidates on the basis of gender

Recommendations of ADR
  • To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and citizens. Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required laws. 
  • Permanent disqualification of candidates convicted for heinous crimes like murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity, kidnapping etc.
  • Disqualification of persons from contesting elections to the public offices against whom charges have been framed for having committed serious criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of at least 5 years, and the case is filed at least 6 months prior to the election in question.
  • Cancellation of tax exemptions given to the political parties who field such tainted candidates.
  • Bringing political parties under the Right to Information Act.  
  • De-register and de-recognise any political party if it knowingly fields a candidate with a tainted background.
  • Political parties should annually file the information on criminal antecedents of their Office Bearers and make such records available to the public, including NIL records.
  • Disqualification of candidates furnishing false information in the election affidavit (Form 26).  
  • Ensure trial of cases in which the politicians are accused to be concluded in a time bound manner.
  • Implementation of SC judgment dated 23rd September, 2013 (i.e provision of NOTA buttons on the EVMs) in its letter and spirit by ensuring a) if NOTA gets more votes than any of the candidates, none of the candidates should be declared elected, and a fresh election should be held; b) in the fresh election, none of the candidates in the earlier election, in which NOTA got the highest number of votes, should be allowed to contest.
  • Implementation of the 25th September, 2018 and 13th February, 2020 SC orders on 'publication of criminal cases against candidates selected by political parties along with reasons for such selection' in its letter and spirit by directing the Election Commission of India ato list out names of such tainted candidates selected by the political parties along with such reasons for such selection C8 including diligent publication of reasons in newspapers, T.V channels, party website etc, b) strict and constant reminders by ROs to the defaulters, c) list needs to be religiously prepared and submitted to the Supreme Court after every election, d) uploading of this list on ECI’s website for public inspection, e) a suitably heavy financial penalty levied on political parties for making insufficient disclosures, invalid and common reasons, selection of candidates based on winnability and f) Officer in-charge of a political party pertaining to submission of a compliance report should also be held accountable for such a breach. 
  • The Election Commission of India and all State Election Commissions should make it mandatory in all elections; Parliamentary, Assembly and Local Body elections to carry display boards outside each and every polling booth showing a summarised version of candidates’ affidavits. The polling booths should essentially display details of candidate’s criminal records, assets and liabilities and education qualification.  
  • The Election Commission of India under its ‘Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation’ (SVEEP) as well as through other national campaigns on voter awareness held before every election should inform and aware the voters that (i) taking and giving cash or gifts/freebies for votes is a criminal offense, (ii) such instances should be brought to the notice of the ECI through its web application, (iii) inform voters that information on criminal records of candidates is available on the ECI website, outside polling booths and other sources that the ECI may use.
  • Political parties in India should be required to announce/publish the list of candidates contesting elections at least 3 months prior to elections.
  • Role of money and muscle power is evident from the fact that all major political parties in Telangana Assembly Elections 2023 have fielded 28% to 96% candidates who are crorepatis and 24% to 72 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. This close and alarming nexus between money power and muscle power has got so ingrained in our electoral system that the citizens are left hostage to the current situation.  Money and muscle power hurt the principles of 'free and fair elections', 'participatory democracy' and 'level playing field'.  The present circumstances therefore demand an extensive deliberation by the voters so that sanctity of elections is not ridiculed by tenacious entry of tainted candidates and candidates with abnormal multiplication of assets.
Contact Details

Telangana Election Watch


Mr. Rakesh Reddy Dubbudu
+91-98854-19012
rakesh....@gmail.com

 

Association for Democratic Reforms/ National Election Watch

 

Media and Journalist Helpline

 

+91 80103 94248

Email: a...@adrindia.org

Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)

Head

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

011 4165 4200,

+91 87997 18472

a...@adrIndia.org,

anil...@adrindia.org

Prof Jagdeep Chhokar

IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

jchh...@gmail.com

Prof Trilochan Sastry

IIM Bangalore

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

+91 94483 53285

tsa...@gmail.com




--
Association for Democratic Reforms

T-95, C.L. House, 2nd Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049

Mob No: +91 8010394248 
Fax No.: 011 4609 4248


Listen to Our Podcast on      
Support Us By Donating Here

Websites:   adrindia.org

    
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages