Date: February 4, 2025
Dear Friends,
Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has analysed Format C7 of 118 out of 699 candidates, who declared criminal cases against themselves and are contesting in the Delhi Assembly Election 2025 (excluding independent candidates).
The full English and Hindi reports along with the detailed Observations and Recommendations can be accessed here: https://adrindia.org/content/Analysis-of-Format-C7-Delhi-Assembly-Elections-2025
Summary and Highlights
This data has been compiled
from political parties' websites as well as social media handles that were
functional before and during the period of the Delhi assembly elections. Most
political parties published details as per form C7 on their social media
handles such as Twitter. It must be noted that in some cases, parties may have
published these details elsewhere and it may not have appeared in our records.
Elections |
Total Contesting Candidates |
Number of Political Parties Analysed (whose candidates have declared criminal cases) |
Number of Candidates Analysed with Declared Criminal Cases |
No. of Candidates with Criminal Cases having a Published Format C7 |
Delhi Assembly 2025 |
699 |
22 |
118 |
94 |
In the Delhi Assembly Elections 2025, out of 105 political parties which are contesting the election, the following 22 political parties have been analysed whose candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves, for this report.
S.No. |
Party Name |
S.No. |
Party Name |
1 |
Aam Aadmi Party |
12 |
Rashtrawadi Janlok Party (Satya) |
2 |
Indian National Congress |
13 |
New India United Party |
3 |
Bharatiya Janata Party |
14 |
All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen |
4 |
People's Party of India (Democratic) |
15 |
Bhartiya Rashtriya Jansatta |
5 |
Nationalist Congress Party |
16 |
Abhinav Bharat Party |
6 |
Bhartiya Rashtrawadi Party |
17 |
Samata Party |
7 |
Jai Maha Bharath Party |
18 |
National Loktantrik Party |
8 |
Aapki Apni Party (Peoples) |
19 |
Blue India Party |
9 |
Sarvodaya Prabhat Party |
20 |
Bhartiya Insan Party |
10 |
Azad Adhikar Sena |
21 |
Peoples Green Party |
11 |
Delhi Janta Party |
22 |
Rashtravadi Loktantrik Party (India) |
S.No. | District | Constituency | Candidate | Party | No. of cases | Serious IPC/BNS Counts | Reasons for selection of candidate with criminal cases pending | Reasons as to why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected |
1 | South-East | Okhla | Amanatullah Khan | AAP | 19 | 15 | Present MLA with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated. | Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support. |
2 | New Delhi | New Delhi | Arvind Kejriwal | AAP | 15 | 5 | Ex Chief Minister and Party National Convener with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated. | Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support. |
3 | North | Shakur Basti | Satyendar Jain | AAP | 14 | 0 | Present MLA & Ex Minister with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated. | Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support. |
4 | North-East | Mustafabad | Mohd. Tahir Hussain | All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen | 11 | 38 | The selected candidate is very sincere & is very dedicated towards the party. The Candidate has a very good reputation in the society as he is doing social work at large scale in his area. | The cases registered against above named candidate, are relating to the political enmity as he has a long political history in his area so he is found more suitable candidate to be selected as an MLA. |
5 | North | Model Town | Akhilesh Pati Tripathi | AAP | 10 | 11 | Present MLA with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated. | Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support. |
Reasons for selection of candidate with criminal cases pending | Reasons as to why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected |
Present MLA with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated. | Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support. |
Candidate has been working among the people for more than a decade. He has good organisational skills and has been trying to improve the situation of the constituency through his efforts. | Candidate has been an accessible leader and enjoys good community support. He is committed to the ideals of the party and was found to be good choice amongst. |
The candidate is a respectable member of the society and is very popular amongst the local population and enjoys support of the local electorate. There is only one FIR against him for raising his voice against irrational behaviour of a Govt. servant. Thus, the party deemed it fit to select him as a candidate. He is a popular youth leader of the party and hence enjoys considerable support of the electorate. | Keeping in view, the services being rendered by him in the constituency and considering the FIR against him is foisted as a result of political vendetta, the party has preferred him over any other candidate. He is a familiar and popular face among the voters. |
The selected candidate is very sincere & is very dedicated towards the party. The Candidate has a very good reputation in the society as he is doing social work at large scale in his area. | The cases registered against above named candidate, are relating to the political enmity as he has a long political history in his area so he is found more suitable candidate to be selected as an MLA. |
Political Party | Total no. of contesting candidates with criminal cases pending | No. of Candidates with Format C7 | Percentage of candidates with Format C7 |
AAP | 44 | 42 | 95% |
INC | 29 | 29 | 100% |
BJP | 20 | 20 | 100% |
All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen | 2 | 2 | 100% |
National Loktantrik Party | 1 | 1 | 100% |
Peoples Party of India (Democratic) | 2 | 0 | 0% |
NCP | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Bhartiya Rashtrawadi Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Jai Maha Bharath Party | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Aapki Apni Party (Peoples) | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Sarvodaya Prabhat Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Azad Adhikar Sena | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Delhi Janta Party | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Rashtrawadi Janlok Party (Satya) | 1 | 0 | 0% |
New India United Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Bhartiya Rashtriya Jansatta | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Abhinav Bharat Party | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Samata Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Blue India Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Bhartiya Insan Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Peoples Green Party | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Rashtravadi Loktantrik Party (India) | 1 | 0 | 0% |
*At the time of making this report, format C7 data of some political parties was not available on the websites and social media handles. However, it may have been posted earlier by the parties and removed later.
S.No. |
District |
Constituency |
Candidate |
Party |
Total Cases |
1 |
New Delhi |
New Delhi |
Mukesh Jain |
Rashtrawadi Janlok Party (Satya) |
4 |
2 |
North-West |
Sultan Pur Majra |
Jitender |
Jai Maha Bharath Party |
3 |
3 |
West |
Madipur |
Randhir Singh Tandi |
Jai Maha Bharath Party |
3 |
Name of the Party |
Remarks |
AAP |
Refer Party Website Link Given Here: https://aamaadmiparty.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/33X47-PAGE-3_merged.pdf
why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. |
AIMIM |
For both candidates with cases against them the party has given the same word to word reason in the both sections for selection of candidate with criminal background and reason as to why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. Refer Party Twitter Link Given Here: https://x.com/aimim_national/status/1879539385940717713/photo/1 https://x.com/aimim_national/status/1879539228037755025/photo/1 |
|
S.No. |
District |
Constituency |
Candidate |
Party |
Total Criminal Cases Declared in the Affidavit (Form 26) |
Total Criminal Cases Declared in the Format C7 |
1 |
North |
Shakur Basti |
Satyendar Jain |
AAP |
14 |
4 |
2 |
East |
Kondli |
Kuldeep Kumar |
AAP |
7 |
6 |
3 |
East |
Gandhi Nagar |
Naveen Chaudhary (Deepu) |
AAP |
4 |
3 |
4 |
South-East |
Sangam Vihar |
Dinesh Mohaniya |
AAP |
4 |
2 |
5 |
West |
Tilak Nagar |
Jarnail Singh |
AAP |
4 |
2 |
6 |
South-West |
Bijwasan |
Surender Bhardwaj |
AAP |
3 |
2 |
7 |
Central |
Burari |
Sanjeev Jha |
AAP |
2 |
1 |
S. No. |
District |
Constituency |
Candidate |
Party |
Cases Total |
Serious IPC/BNS Counts |
Total Assets (Rs.) |
1 |
West |
Rajouri Garden |
Manjinder Singh Sirsa |
BJP |
5 |
0 |
2,48,85,52,444 |
2 |
East |
Krishna Nagar |
Gurcharan Singh (Raju) |
INC |
1 |
0 |
1,30,90,52,000 |
3 |
New Delhi |
New Delhi |
Parvesh Sahib Singh |
BJP |
1 |
0 |
1,15,63,83,180 |
Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch/Delhi Election Watch
Media and Journalist Helpline
Email: a...@adrindia.org |
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd) Head Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch 011 4165 4200, a...@adrIndia.org, |
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.) Founder Member, Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |
Prof Trilochan Sastry IIM Bangalore Founder Member, Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |