Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

Press Release: Analysis of Format C7 - Publication of Reasons Given for Selection of Candidates with Criminal Cases by Political Parties in the Delhi Assembly Elections, 2025

14 views
Skip to first unread message

ADR India

unread,
Feb 4, 2025, 4:37:03 AMFeb 4
to national-el...@googlegroups.com, national...@googlegroups.com
Press Release 
                                                                                                                Date: February 4, 2025

Dear Friends,

Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has analysed Format C7 of 118 out of 699 candidates, who declared criminal cases against themselves and are contesting in the Delhi Assembly Election 2025 (excluding independent candidates).


The full English and Hindi reports along with the detailed Observations and Recommendations can be accessed herehttps://adrindia.org/content/Analysis-of-Format-C7-Delhi-Assembly-Elections-2025


Summary and Highlights

This data has been compiled from political parties' websites as well as social media handles that were functional before and during the period of the Delhi assembly elections. Most political parties published details as per form C7 on their social media handles such as Twitter. It must be noted that in some cases, parties may have published these details elsewhere and it may not have appeared in our records.

Elections

Total Contesting Candidates

Number of Political Parties Analysed

(whose candidates have declared criminal cases)

Number of Candidates Analysed with Declared Criminal Cases

No. of Candidates with Criminal Cases having a Published Format C7

Delhi Assembly 2025

699

22

118

94



Political parties analysed:

In the Delhi Assembly Elections 2025, out of 105 political parties which are contesting the election, the following 22 political parties have been analysed whose candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves, for this report.  


S.No.

Party Name

S.No.

Party Name

1

Aam Aadmi Party

12

Rashtrawadi Janlok Party (Satya)

2

Indian National Congress

13

New India United Party

3

Bharatiya Janata Party

14

All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen

4

People's Party of India (Democratic)

15

Bhartiya Rashtriya Jansatta

5

Nationalist Congress Party

16

Abhinav Bharat Party

6

Bhartiya Rashtrawadi Party

17

Samata Party

7

Jai Maha Bharath Party

18

National Loktantrik Party

8

Aapki Apni Party (Peoples)

19

Blue India Party

9

Sarvodaya Prabhat Party

20

Bhartiya Insan Party

10

Azad Adhikar Sena

21

Peoples Green Party

11

Delhi Janta Party

22

Rashtravadi Loktantrik Party (India)



Criminal Background
  • Candidates with Criminal Cases: Out of 699 contesting candidates analysed, 118 candidates belonging to the aforementioned political parties have declared criminal cases against themselves.
  • Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Out of 118 candidates with declared criminal cases, 71 have declared serious criminal cases against themselves.
  • Reasons furnished for nominating candidates with criminal antecedents:
    • Out of 118 candidates with criminal cases, reasons have been furnished for 94 (80%) candidates.
    • Out of 71 candidates with serious criminal cases, reasons have been furnished for 54 (76%) candidates.
    • For 24 (20%) candidates with criminal background, no reasons for their selection have been provided by political parties.
  • Reasons given for top 5 candidates with highest number of total criminal cases pending:

S.No.

District

Constituency

Candidate

Party

No. of cases

Serious IPC/BNS Counts

Reasons for selection of candidate with criminal cases pending

Reasons as to why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected

1

South-East

Okhla

Amanatullah Khan

AAP

19

15

Present MLA with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated.

Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support.

2

New Delhi

New Delhi

Arvind Kejriwal

AAP

15

5

Ex Chief Minister and Party National Convener with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated.

Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support.

3

North

Shakur Basti

Satyendar Jain

AAP

14

0

Present MLA & Ex Minister with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated.

Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support.

4

North-East

Mustafabad

Mohd. Tahir Hussain

All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen

11

38

The selected candidate is very sincere & is very dedicated towards the party. The Candidate has a very good reputation in the society as he is doing social work at large scale in his area.

The cases registered against above named candidate, are relating to the political enmity as he has a long political history in his area so he is found more suitable candidate to be selected as an MLA.

5

North

Model Town

Akhilesh Pati Tripathi

AAP

10

11

Present MLA with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated.

Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area.

 No other candidate with similar support.

Table: Reasons given for top 5 candidates with highest number of total criminal cases pending
  • Most commonly stated reasons by political parties for selection of candidates with criminal cases pending:

Reasons for selection of candidate with criminal cases pending

Reasons as to why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected

Present MLA with good reputation among the masses & the cases are politically motivated.

Candidate was selected by consensus among the party workers in the area. No other candidate with similar support.

Candidate has been working among the people for more than a decade. He has good organisational skills and has been trying to improve the situation of the constituency through his efforts.

Candidate has been an accessible leader and enjoys good community support. He is committed to the ideals of the party and was found to be good choice amongst.

The candidate is a respectable member of the society and is very popular amongst the local population and enjoys support of the local electorate. There is only one FIR against him for raising his voice against irrational behaviour of a Govt. servant. Thus, the party deemed it fit to select him as a candidate. He is a popular youth leader of the party and hence enjoys considerable support of the electorate.

Keeping in view, the services being rendered by him in the constituency and considering the FIR against him is foisted as a result of political vendetta, the party has preferred him over any other candidate. He is a familiar and popular face among the voters.

The selected candidate is very sincere & is very dedicated towards the party. The Candidate has a very good reputation in the society as he is doing social work at large scale in his area.

The cases registered against above named candidate, are relating to the political enmity as he has a long political history in his area so he is found more suitable candidate to be selected as an MLA.

Table: Most commonly stated reasons by political parties for selection of candidates with criminal cases pending
  • Political parties that did not publish reasons for selection of candidates with criminal cases pending*: Only 5 out of 22 analysed parties have made their candidates Format C7 publicly available.

Political Party

Total no. of contesting candidates with criminal cases pending

No. of Candidates with Format C7

Percentage of candidates with Format C7

AAP

44

42

95%

INC

29

29

100%

BJP

20

20

100%

All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen

2

2

100%

National Loktantrik Party

1

1

100%

Peoples Party of India (Democratic)

2

0

0%

NCP

2

0

0%

Bhartiya Rashtrawadi Party

1

0

0%

Jai Maha Bharath Party

2

0

0%

Aapki Apni Party (Peoples)

1

0

0%

Sarvodaya Prabhat Party

1

0

0%

Azad Adhikar Sena

1

0

0%

Delhi Janta Party

2

0

0%

Rashtrawadi Janlok Party (Satya)

1

0

0%

New India United Party

1

0

0%

Bhartiya Rashtriya Jansatta

1

0

0%

Abhinav Bharat Party

2

0

0%

Samata Party

1

0

0%

Blue India Party

1

0

0%

Bhartiya Insan Party

1

0

0%

Peoples Green Party

1

0

0%

Rashtravadi Loktantrik Party (India)

1

0

0%

Table: Political parties that did not publish Format C7 for candidates with criminal cases pending

*At the time of making this report, format C7 data of some political parties was not available on the websites and social media handles. However, it may have been posted earlier by the parties and removed later.

  • Top 3 candidates with highest criminal cases whose reasons for selection have not been published: 

S.No.

District

Constituency

Candidate

Party

Total Cases

1

New Delhi

New Delhi

Mukesh Jain

Rashtrawadi Janlok Party (Satya)

4

2

North-West

Sultan Pur Majra

Jitender

Jai Maha Bharath Party

3

3

West

Madipur

Randhir Singh Tandi

Jai Maha Bharath Party

3

 Table: Top 3 candidates with highest criminal cases whose reasons for selection have not been published
  • Other discrepancies in Format C7 of some candidates:

Name of the Party

Remarks

AAP

  • The Form C7 was uploaded on their party website but there is no signature of the office bearer. 
Refer Party Website Link Given Here: https://aamaadmiparty.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/33X47-PAGE-3_merged.pdf

  • For all candidates with cases against them the party has given the same word to word reason in the sections for reason as to 
why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates.

AIMIM

For both candidates with cases against them the party has given the same word to word reason in the both sections for selection

of candidate with criminal background and reason as to why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected

as candidates. Refer Party Twitter Link Given Here: https://x.com/aimim_national/status/1879539385940717713/photo/1

https://x.com/aimim_national/status/1879539228037755025/photo/1

  • A portion of Format C7 for Sunil Kumar (National Loktantrik Party) is not available. Hence, the reasons for selection of the candidate cannot be ascertained.


S.No.

District

Constituency

Candidate

Party

Total Criminal Cases Declared in the Affidavit (Form 26)

Total Criminal Cases Declared in the Format C7

1

North

Shakur Basti

Satyendar Jain

AAP

14

4

2

East

Kondli

Kuldeep Kumar

AAP

7

6

3

East

Gandhi Nagar

Naveen Chaudhary (Deepu)

AAP

4

3

4

South-East

Sangam Vihar

Dinesh Mohaniya

AAP

4

2

5

West

Tilak Nagar

Jarnail Singh

AAP

4

2

6

South-West

Bijwasan

Surender Bhardwaj

AAP

3

2

7

Central

Burari

Sanjeev Jha

AAP

2

1

Table: Candidates who have declared different number of criminal cases in the Affidavit (form 26) and Format C-7

Financial Background
  • Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 118 candidates from parties with declared criminal cases, 84 (71%) are crorepatis.
  • High Assets Declared: Highest declared total assets of top 3 candidates, along with details of their criminal cases pending:

S. No.

District

Constituency

Candidate

Party

Cases Total

Serious IPC/BNS Counts

Total Assets (Rs.)

1

West

Rajouri Garden

Manjinder Singh Sirsa

BJP

5

0

2,48,85,52,444
 248 Crore+

2

East

Krishna Nagar

Gurcharan Singh (Raju)

INC

1

0

1,30,90,52,000
 130 Crore+

3

New Delhi

New Delhi

Parvesh Sahib Singh

BJP

1

0

1,15,63,83,180
 115 Crore+

Table: Top 3 candidates having highest declared assets with criminal cases pending

Contact Details 

Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch/Delhi Election Watch 

Media and Journalist Helpline

 

+91 80103 94248

Email: a...@adrindia.org

Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)

Head

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

011 4165 4200,

a...@adrIndia.org,

anil...@adrindia.org

Prof Jagdeep Chhokar

IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

jchh...@gmail.com

Prof Trilochan Sastry

IIM Bangalore

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

tsa...@gmail.com

--

Association for Democratic Reforms

T-95, C.L. House, 2nd Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049

Mob No: +91 8010394248 
Fax No.: 011 4609 4248


Listen to Our Podcast on      
Support Us By Donating Here

Websites:   adrindia.org

    
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages