Corrected Press Release: Nagaland Assembly Elections 2023: Analysis of Criminal Background, Financial, Education, Gender and other Details of Candidates

9 views
Skip to first unread message

ADR India

unread,
Feb 15, 2023, 2:19:25 AM2/15/23
to national-el...@googlegroups.com, national...@googlegroups.com
Press Release
15th February, 2023

Corrigendum: Due to some technical glitch, the images in the press draft released earlier were distorted. Kindly refer to the following press release.

Dear Friends, 

The Nagaland Election Watch and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analysed the self-sworn affidavits of all 184 candidates who are contesting in the Nagaland Assembly Elections 2023. Out of 184 candidates analysed, 68 are from National parties, 72 are from State parties, 25 are from registered unrecognized parties and 19 candidates are contesting independently.

The full reports in English and Hindi can be accessed here: https://adrindia.org/content/analysis-criminal-background-financial-education-gender-and-other-details-candidates-13

Summary and Highlights

image.png

Criminal Background

  • Candidates with Criminal Cases: Out of 184 candidates analyzed7(4%) candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves. In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, out of 193 candidates analysed, 3(2%) had declared criminal cases against themselves.
  • Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 4(2%) have declared serious criminal cases against themselves. In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, 3(2%) candidates had declared serious criminal cases against themselves.
image.png

 Figure: Comparative analysis of Candidates with declared Criminal Cases: 2018 vs 2023

  • Party wise Candidates with Criminal Cases: Among the major parties, 2(5%) out of 40 candidates analysed from NDPP, 1(5%) out of 20 candidates analysed from BJP, 1(5%) out of 22 candidates analysed from NPF and 1 (4%) out of 23 candidates analysed from INC have declared criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits. 
image.png
Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Candidates with Criminal Cases 
  • Party wise Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,1(3%) out of 40 candidates analysed from NDPP, 1(5%) out of 20 candidates analysed from BJP and 1 (5%) out of 22 candidates analysed from NPF have declared serious criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.
  • Candidates with declared cases related to murder: 2 candidates have declared cases related to murder (IPC Section-302) against themselves.
  • Candidates with declared cases related to attempt to murder: 1 candidate has declared a case related to Attempt to murder (IPC Section-307) against himself.
  • The directions of the Supreme Court have had no effect on the political parties in selection of candidates in the Nagaland Assembly Elections 2023 as they have again followed their old practice of giving tickets to around 4% candidates with criminal cases. All major parties contesting in Nagaland elections have given tickets to 4 % to 5 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. The Supreme Court in its directions dated 13th February, 2020 had specifically instructed political parties to give reasons for such selection and why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. As per these mandatory guidelines, the reasons for such selection has to be with reference to qualifications, achievements and merit of the candidate concerned. During the recent 7 State Assembly elections held in 2022, it was observed that political parties gave unfounded and baseless reasons like popularity of the person, does good social work, cases are politically motivated etc. These are not sound and cogent reasons for fielding candidates with tainted backgrounds. This data clearly shows that political parties have no interest in reforming the electoral system and our democracy will continue to suffer at the hands of lawbreakers who become lawmakers. 

Financial Background


image.png
Figure: Share of Wealth among the Contesting Candidates

  • Share of wealth among candidates: The share of wealth amongst the candidates contesting in the Nagaland assembly elections 2023 is as follows:

Value of assets (Rs.)

Number of candidates

Percentage of Candidates

5 crores and above

57

31%

2 crores to 5 crores

32

17%

50 lakhs to 2 crores

48

26%

10 lakhs to 50 lakhs

27

15%

less than 10 lakhs

20

11%

Table: Share of wealth amongst contesting candidates

  • Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 184 candidates, 116(63%) are crorepatis. In the 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, out of 193 candidates, 114 (59%) were crorepatis.
image.png

Figure: Comparative Analysis of Crorepati Candidates: 2018 Vs 2023

  • Party wise Crorepati Candidates: The role of money power in our elections is evident from the fact that all major political parties give tickets to wealthy candidates. Among the major parties 18(90%) out of 20 candidates analysed from BJP, 34(85%) out of 40 candidates analysed from NDPP, 13(59%) out of 22 candidates analysed from NPF, 4(57%) out of 7 candidates analysed from JD(U) and 6(26%) out of 23 candidates analysed from INC have declared assets valued more than Rs 1 crore.
image.png

Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Crorepati Candidates


  • Average assets: The average of assets per candidate contesting in the Nagaland Assembly Elections 2023 is Rs 5.13 Crores. In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, average assets per candidate for 193 candidates was Rs.3.76 Crores.
  • Party wise average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per candidate for 40 NDPP candidates analysed is Rs. 7.47 Crores23 INC candidates analysed is Rs 65.98 Lakhs22 NPF candidates analysed is Rs 2.32 Crores, 20 BJP candidates analysed is Rs 6.58 Crores and JD(U) candidates have average assets worth Rs.5.14 Crores.
  • High asset candidates: The details of top 3 candidates with highest declared assets, contesting in the Nagaland Assembly Elections are given below:

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Movable Assets (Rs)

Immovable Assets (Rs)

Total Assets (Rs)

PAN Given

1

Dr Sukhato A Sema

PUGHOBOTO

PUGHOBOTO (ST)

Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)

11,30,34,670

1,48,85,96,820

1,60,16,31,490
 160 Crore+

Y

2

Neiphiu Rio

KOHIMA

NORTHERN ANGAMI-II (ST)

NDPP

15,99,07,855

30,96,00,000

46,95,07,855
 46 Crore+

Y

3

Er Kahuli Sema

ZUNHEBOTO

ATOIZU (ST)

BJP

52,23,522

33,52,83,400

34,05,06,922
 34 Crore+

Y

Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets

  • Low assets candidates: The details of three candidates with lowest assets are as follows:

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Movable Assets (Rs)

Immovable Assets (Rs)

Total Assets (Rs)

PAN Given

1

T Ngampai Konyak

MON

PHOMCHING (ST)

INC

5,251

0

5,251
 5 Thou+

N

2

H Chingsak Konyak

MON

PHOMCHING (ST)

NPF

25,000

0

25,000
 25 Thou+

Y

3

Dr. Chingo Walim

MON

TEHOK (ST)

IND

50,000

0

50,000
 50 Thou+

Y

Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets  

  • Candidates with high liabilities: 40(22%) candidates have declared liabilities in their affidavits. The details of top three candidates with highest liabilities are given below:

S.No.

Name

District

Constituency

Party Name

Total Assets(Rs)

Liabilities (Rs)

PAN Given

1

H. Khehovi

ZUNHEBOTO

SURUHUTO (ST)

BJP

13,78,88,494
 13 Crore+

20,88,60,666
 20 Crore+

Y

2

Z. Kasheto Yeptho

DIMAPUR

GHASPANI-II (ST)

Republican Party of India (Athawale)

9,30,27,207
 9 Crore+

3,00,00,000
 3 Crore+

Y

3

Y. Vikheho Swu

PUGHOBOTO

PUGHOBOTO (ST)

NDPP

11,30,80,371
 11 Crore+

1,32,50,692
 1 Crore+

Y

 Table: Top three candidates with highest liabilities


  • Candidates with high income as declared in the ITR*: The details of top 3 candidates with high income declared in ITR are given below:

S.No.

Name

Party Name

Constituency

District

Total Asset (Rs)

Self-Source of Income

Spouse's Source of Income

The financial year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate

Total income shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs)

Self-income shown by candidate in ITR (Rs)

1

H. Tovihoto Ayemi

BJP

DIMAPUR-I

DIMAPUR

9,27,98,830 

 9 Crore+

MLA, Advisor, Power, Government of Nagaland, Business

Business

2022-2023

91,66,238  91 Lacs+

54,32,320  54 Lacs+

2

T N Mannen

NDPP

IMPUR (ST)

MOKOKCHUNG

15,42,02,035  

15 Crore+

Pension, House Rent

Monthly Pension, House Rent

2021-2022

73,63,760  73 Lacs+

28,77,800  28 Lacs+

3

Dr.Kekhrielhoulie Yhome

NDPP

NORTHERN ANGAMI-I (ST)

KOHIMA

14,12,68,343 

 14 Crore+

Salary / Miscellaneous

Salary

2021-2022

61,45,236  61 Lacs+

27,31,159  27 Lacs+

 Table: Top 3 candidates with highest income as declared in ITR

  • Undeclared PAN:  Only 1 candidate has not declared his PAN details. 

Other Background Details

  • Education details of candidates: 49(27%) candidates have declared their educational qualifications to be between 8th and 12th standard while 128 (70%) candidates have declared having an educational qualification of graduate or abovecandidates are Diploma holders. 1 candidate has declared himself to be just literate and candidates are Illiterates.
  • Age details of candidates: 19(10%) candidates have declared their age to be between 25 to 40 years while 112(61%) candidates have declared their age to be between 41 to 60 years. There are 51(28%) candidates who have declared their age to be between 61 to 80 years2 candidates have declared their age above 80 years.
  • Gender details of candidates: 4(2%) female candidates are contesting in the Nagaland assembly election 2023. In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, 5(3%) out of 193 candidates analysed were women.
Recommendations of ADR
  • To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and citizens. The Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required laws. 
  • Permanent disqualification of candidates convicted for heinous crimes like murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity, kidnapping etc.
  • Disqualification of persons from contesting elections to the public offices against whom charges have been framed for having committed serious criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of at least 5 years, and the case is filed at least 6 months prior to the election in question.
  • Cancellation of tax exemptions given to the political parties who field such tainted candidates.
  • Bringing political parties under the Right to Information Act.  
  • De-register and de-recognise any political party if it knowingly puts up a candidate with a tainted background.
  • Political parties should annually file the information on criminal antecedents of their Office Bearers and make such records available to the public, including NIL records.
  • Disqualification of candidates furnishing false information in the election affidavit (Form 26).  
  • Ensure trial of cases in which the politicians are accused to be concluded in a time bound manner.
  • Implementation of SC judgment dated 23rd September, 2013 (i.e provision of NOTA buttons on the EVMs) in its letter and spirit by ensuring a) if NOTA gets more votes than any of the candidates, none of the candidates should be declared elected, and a fresh election should be held; b) in the fresh election, none of the candidates in the earlier election, in which NOTA got the highest number of votes, should be allowed to contest.
  • Implementation of the 25th September, 2018 and 13th February, 2020 SC orders on 'publication of criminal cases against candidates selected by political parties along with reasons for such selection' in its letter and spirit by directing the Election Commission of India ato list out names of such tainted candidates selected by the political parties along with such reasons for such selection C8 including diligent publication of reasons in newspapers, T.V channels, party website etc, b) strict and constant reminders by ROs to the defaulters, c) list needs to be religiously prepared and submitted to the Supreme Court after every election, d) uploading of this list on ECI’s website for public inspection, e) a suitably heavy financial penalty levied on political parties for making insufficient disclosures, invalid and common reasons, selection of candidates based on winnability and f) Officer in-charge of a political party pertaining to submission of a compliance report should also be held accountable for such a breach. 
  • The Election Commission of India and all State Election Commissions should make it mandatory in all elections; Parliamentary, Assembly and Local Body elections to carry display boards outside each and every polling booth showing a summarised version of candidates’ affidavits. The polling booths should essentially display details of candidate’s criminal records, assets and liabilities and education qualification.
  • The Election Commission of India under its ‘Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation’ (SVEEP) as well as through other national campaigns on voter awareness held before every election should inform and aware the voters that (i) taking and giving cash or gifts/freebies for votes is a criminal offense, (ii) such instances should be brought to the notice of the ECI through its web application, (iii) inform voters that information on criminal records of candidates is available on the ECI website, outside polling booths and other sources that the ECI may use.
  • Political parties in India should be required to announce/publish the list of candidates contesting elections at least 3 months prior to elections.
  • Role of money and muscle power is evident from the fact that all major political parties in Nagaland assembly elections 2023 have fielded 26% to 90% candidates who are crorepatis and 4% to 5% candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. This close and alarming nexus between money power and muscle power has got so ingrained in our electoral system that the citizens are left hostage to the current situation.  Money and muscle power hurt the principles of 'free and fair elections', 'participatory democracy' and 'level playing field'.  The present circumstances therefore demand an extensive deliberation by the voters so that sanctity of elections is not ridiculed by tenacious entry of tainted candidates and candidates with abnormal multiplication of assets

Contact Details

Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch

 

Media and Journalist Helpline

 

+91 80103 94248

Email: a...@adrindia.org

Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)

Head

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

011 4165 4200,

+91 88264 79910

a...@adrindia.org,

anil...@adrindia.org

Prof JagdeepChhokar

IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

jchh...@gmail.com

Prof TrilochanSastry

IIM Bangalore

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

+91 94483 53285

tsa...@gmail.com



--
Association for Democratic Reforms

T-95, C.L. House, 2nd Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049

Mob No: +91 8010394248 
Fax No.: 011 4609 4248


Listen to Our Podcast on      
Support Us By Donating Here

Websites:   adrindia.org

    
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages