Press Release: "Discrepancies between the votes cast and the votes counted in the 2024 Lok Sabha Election: Multiple perspectives"

404 views
Skip to first unread message

ADR India

unread,
Jul 29, 2024, 7:05:46 AM7/29/24
to national-el...@googlegroups.com, national...@googlegroups.com, ADR India
Press Release

Date: July 29, 2024

Dear Friends,

Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) organised a Press Conference today at the Press Club of India, New Delhi, on the topic- "Discrepancies between the votes cast and the votes counted in the 2024 Lok Sabha Election: Multiple perspectives". The live recording can be found here. During the Press Conference, we released ADR's report on the same topic. You can access the report here.

On 4th November, 2019, ‘Association for Democratic Reforms’ (ADR) and ‘Common Cause’ had filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India seeking directions from the court to order the Election Commission of India to completely stop the practice of announcing election results based on provisional and estimated data, prior to an actual and accurate reconciliation of data. The petition had relied on the Lok Sabha 2019 Elections where the Election Commission had announced election results in all constituencies on 23rd May 2019, based on estimated data. This was verified by the Election Commission’s Press Note dated 01 June 2019 that stated “…the final data on votes counted has been made available within a few days of declaration of results…..”

On 27th February, 2020 an application was filed in the court against the ‘mysterious rush and urgency’ shown by the Election Commission of India by destroying the VVPAT slips used in 2019 Lok Sabha elections in just four months after the results were declared. This was in contravention of the rules prescribed under Rule 94 (b) Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 which states that, “the used or printed slips in any election shall be retained for one year from the date of declaration of the results of the election and shall thereafter be destroyed.” This was also in contravention of Election Commission’s own directions to all the CEOs of States and Union Territories through its letter dated 23rd September, 2019 (Letter No. 51/8/EVM/2019-EMP) which had clearly instructed that “VVPAT slips pertaining to mock poll and actual poll cannot be disposed of if any election petition or court case is pending in the competent court and the paper slips shall be kept in the custody of District Election Officers till the final disposal of the Election petition or Court case.”

On 4th and 9th May,2024, two separate applications were filed asking the court to direct the ECI to disclose authenticated record of voter turnout by uploading on its website scanned legible copies of Form 17C Part-I (Account of Votes Recorded)of all polling stations after each phase of polling and to provide tabulated polling station-wise data in absolute figures of the number of votes polled as recorded in Form 17C Part- I after each phase of polling during the Lok Sabha, 2024 elections.

Hands off approach of the Supreme Court of India:

On 13th December, 2019, the Supreme Court of India had issued notices to the Election Commission of India and Union of India based on our petition. Since then, the matter has been pending before the court for a full hearing. No action or steps were taken by the highest court against the discrepancies found in the 2019 Lok Sabha election inspite of the various applications filed and repeated requests made for an urgent adjudication of the petition. On 24th May, 2024, taking a hands-off approach in between the elections, the court refused to hear the applications filed against the discrepancies and violations found in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and rather adjourned the matter along with the main petition filed by ADR and Common Cause in 2019. Had the court considered and heard the issues raised through the petition determinedly and in appropriate time, the discrepancies and apprehensions found in the recently concluded Lok Sabha 2024 elections could have been avoided.

Discrepancies found during the Lok Sabha, 2019 elections: During the 17th General Elections, while for the first 6 phases of the election, the voter turnout app displayed the exact number of voters, however, in the last phase i.e. the 7th phase of voting only percentage figures were given and previous data was removed by the Election Commission. As per the research conducted by a team of experts and ADR, serious discrepancies were found between the number of voters in different constituencies and the number of votes counted in the following way;

  1.  The Master summary of 542 constituencies showed discrepancies in 347 seats. 195 seats were without discrepancies whatsoever.
  2. The discrepancies ranged from 1 vote (lowest) to 101323 votes @ 10.49% of the total votes (highest).
  3. There were 6 seats where the discrepancy in votes was higher than the winning margin.
  4. The total volume of discrepancies was in the nature of 739104 votes put together.

 

Discrepancies found during the Lok Sabha, 2024 elections: Even during the 18th General Elections, 2024 serious discrepancies have been found in the total number of EVM votes cast and total actual number of EVM votes counted. In addition, the inordinate delay in the release of final voter turnout data, absence of disaggregated constituency and polling station figures in absolute numbers and whether the elections results were declared based on final reconciled data has raised concerns and public suspicion regarding the correctness of the election results. Details of the discrepancies in the votes counted and votes polled in the general elections 2024 are given in the tables in the report.

Role and Conduct of Election Commission of India:

It is not only a legal requirement of the Election Commission of India to declare final election results based on actual genuine data but it is also a constitutional duty as envisaged under Article 324 read with Article 19 (1) (a) of the Indian Constitution. Election commission of India not only has much wider and greater responsibility for the superintendence, direction and conduct of elections but it is also imperative that such elections are free and fair, rule of law is preserved and that the whole process of conducting elections should be fair, transparent and accountable. Election Commission of India is duty bound to make sure that the elections are driven by fairness, credibility and honesty and not by manipulation, misconduct and illegalities. In order to uphold and preserve the sanctity of elections, it is undeniably imperative that election results are accurate.

The Election Commission has so far failed to give any reasonable explanation in declaring the election results before releasing the final and authentic data on vote count, the mismatch in EVM votes polled EVM votes counted, increase in voter turn-out, non-disclosure of number of votes polled in numbers, unreasonable delay in release of votes polled data and the clean-up of certain data from its website. The ECI failing to address and take appropriate steps against the egregious incidents of violations, illegalities and irregularities seen in the Lok Sabha, 2019 and Lok Sabha Election 2024 elections has led to the trepidations in the mind of the electorate. These apprehensions must be seriously addressed and put to rest.

 

ADR’s Recommendations:

  1. In order to conduct free and fair elections, ECI should carry actual and accurate reconciliation of data before the declaration of the final result of any election.
  2. In order to uphold the voter’s confidence, it is necessary that the ECI should immediately disclose on its website scanned legible copies of Form 17C Part- I (Account of Votes Recorded) of all polling stations which contains the authenticated figures for votes polled, within 48hours of the close of polling.
  3. In order to maintain the credibility of the conduct of elections devoid of any manipulation or illegality, ECI should also upload scanned legible copies of Form 17C Part- II which contains the candidate-wise result of counting after the compilation of results of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections;
  4. In order to ensure easy accessibility of the data, a tabulation of the constituency and polling station wise figures of voter turnout in absolute numbers and in percentage form must also be disclosed.
  5. In order to maintain the purity and legitimacy of elections, ECI should publish the total number of electors in each Parliamentary Constituency, total number of voters as noted in register of voters and number of voters as per EVM for all PCs that have already gone to polls.
  6.  In order to remove any/all apprehensions from the minds of the voters, ECI should provide the following information in the public domain for the 2019 and 2024 Lok Sabha elections and for all future elections i.e Statutory forms 17C, Form 20, Form 21C, Form 21D & Form 21 E.
  7.  In order to be more accountable, answerable and transparent to the electorate, ECI should not only investigate the discrepancies which had taken place in the 17th and 18th Lok Sabha election results but the Commission should also formulate a robust procedure for all future elections for the investigation of any discrepancy found in the election data.


This report is prepared to highlight the discrepancies in the EVM votes polled and EVM votes counted by the ECI while declaring the results of the General elections 2024. Votes polled and counted showed significant discrepancies in 538 PCs, except Amreli, Attingal, Lakshadweep and Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman Diu. Surat PC was uncontested. Hence the total discrepancies in 538 PCs are 5,89,691. The data for all parliamentary constituencies has been compiled from the data available on the website of the ECI as per the links below:

EVM Votes Counted Data- https://results.eci.gov.in/PcResultGenJune2024/index.htm

EVM Votes Polled Data – Phase 1 to 5 https://www.eci.gov.in/eci-backend/public/api/download?url=LMAhAK6sOPBp%2FNFF0iRfXbEB1EVSLT41NNLRjYNJJP1KivrUxbfqkDatmHy12e%2FztfbUTpXSxLP8g7dpVrk7%2FYMdYo4qvd6YLkLk2XBNde3yLdalC2imUPRS60zr1MewdOFtn933icz0MOeiesxvsQ%3D%3D

Phase 6 -  https://www.eci.gov.in/eci-backend/public/api/download?url=LMAhAK6sOPBp%2FNFF0iRfXbEB1EVSLT41NNLRjYNJJP1KivrUxbfqkDatmHy12e%2FztfbUTpXSxLP8g7dpVrk7%2FYMdYo4qvd6YLkLk2XBNde03ZpEkiWFydOLAwp4sJFnwdOFtn933icz0MOeiesxvsQ%3D%3D

Phase 7 - https://www.eci.gov.in/eci-backend/public/api/download?url=LMAhAK6sOPBp%2FNFF0iRfXbEB1EVSLT41NNLRjYNJJP1KivrUxbfqkDatmHy12e%2FzIv7%2FZQ09etPKoyJV5h%2FcTj9Lk68T0pyXxxkkbtoGRDUi5PtyDIlU2XhD1Am81x1wsXQUwCbGU493NshNTgs7UQ%3D%3D

 

Overall difference between EVM votes counted and EVM votes polled: In 362 parliamentary constituencies a total of 5,54,598 votes counted are less than the votes polled. In 176 parliamentary constituencies, a total of 35,093 votes have been counted in excess of the votes polled. The summary of the same is shown below:

Votes counted less than votes polled

       5,54,598

Votes counted more than votes polled

       35,093

Total discrepancies in votes

       5,89,691

No. of Constituencies

362

No. of Constituencies

176

Discrepancies in the total constituencies

538




Summary of state wise difference between EVM votes polled and EVM votes counted

State

Total Constituencies

Votes counted less than votes polled

No. of Constituencies

Votes counted more than votes polled

No. of Constituencies

Discrepancies in the total Constituencies

Total discrepancies in votes

Andhra Pradesh

25

85777

21

3722

4

25

89499

Odisha

21

63123

18

2146

3

21

65269

Uttar Pradesh

80

53960

55

6124

25

80

60084

Tamil Nadu

39

51935

27

2485

12

39

54420

Assam

14

38872

12

3856

2

14

42728

Maharashtra

48

38710

35

1642

13

48

40352

West Bengal

42

34856

31

1037

11

42

35893

Jharkhand

14

26342

12

393

2

14

26735

Kerala

20

19848

14

775

5

19

20623

Chhattisgarh

11

16849

9

44

2

11

16893

Gujarat

26

15141

15

380

9

24

15521

Telangana

17

14969

15

84

2

17

15053

Karnataka

28

14649

15

593

13

28

15242

Madhya Pradesh

29

13529

15

4744

14

29

18273

Bihar

40

9924

19

5015

21

40

14939

Delhi

7

8159

7

0

0

7

8159

Manipur

2

7060

2

0

0

2

7060

Uttarakhand

5

6315

5

0

0

5

6315

Haryana

10

5959

5

93

5

10

6052

Rajasthan

25

3853

6

869

19

25

4722

Himachal Pradesh

4

3770

4

0

0

4

3770

Arunachal Pradesh

2

3617

2

0

0

2

3617

Nagaland

1

3353

1

0

0

1

3353

Jammu and Kashmir

5

3281

4

69

1

5

3350

Puducherry

1

3235

1

0

0

1

3235

Punjab

13

2750

6

740

7

13

3490

Sikkim

1

1896

1

0

0

1

1896

Meghalaya

2

1843

1

200

1

2

2043

Tripura

2

760

1

52

1

2

812

Mizoram

1

124

1

0

0

1

124

Ladakh

1

113

1

0

0

1

113

Andaman and Nicobar Islands

1

26

1

0

0

1

26

Goa

2

0

0

20

2

2

20

Chandigarh

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu

2

0

0

9

1

1

9

Lakshadweep

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

543

554598

362

35093

176

538

589691

 Table: Summary of state wise difference between EVM votes polled and EVM votes counted


Contact Details

 

Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch

 

Media and Journalist Helpline

 

+91 80103 94248

Email: a...@adrindia.org

Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)

Head

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

011 4165 4200,

a...@adrIndia.org,

anil...@adrindia.org

Prof Jagdeep Chhokar

IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

jchh...@gmail.com

Prof Trilochan Sastry

IIM Bangalore

Founder Member,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch

tsa...@gmail.com

Mr. Jaskirat Singh
Trustee,

Association for Democratic Reforms,

National Election Watch
jask...@gmail.com

 



--
Association for Democratic Reforms

T-95, C.L. House, 2nd Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049

Mob No: +91 8010394248 
Fax No.: 011 4609 4248


Listen to Our Podcast on      
Support Us By Donating Here

Websites:   adrindia.org

    
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages