On 4th November, 2019, ‘Association for Democratic Reforms’ (ADR) and ‘Common Cause’ had filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India seeking directions from the court to order the Election Commission of India to completely stop the practice of announcing election results based on provisional and estimated data, prior to an actual and accurate reconciliation of data. The petition had relied on the Lok Sabha 2019 Elections where the Election Commission had announced election results in all constituencies on 23rd May 2019, based on estimated data. This was verified by the Election Commission’s Press Note dated 01 June 2019 that stated “…the final data on votes counted has been made available within a few days of declaration of results…..”
On 27th February, 2020 an application was filed in the court against the ‘mysterious rush and urgency’ shown by the Election Commission of India by destroying the VVPAT slips used in 2019 Lok Sabha elections in just four months after the results were declared. This was in contravention of the rules prescribed under Rule 94 (b) Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 which states that, “the used or printed slips in any election shall be retained for one year from the date of declaration of the results of the election and shall thereafter be destroyed.” This was also in contravention of Election Commission’s own directions to all the CEOs of States and Union Territories through its letter dated 23rd September, 2019 (Letter No. 51/8/EVM/2019-EMP) which had clearly instructed that “VVPAT slips pertaining to mock poll and actual poll cannot be disposed of if any election petition or court case is pending in the competent court and the paper slips shall be kept in the custody of District Election Officers till the final disposal of the Election petition or Court case.”
On 4th and 9th May,2024, two separate applications were filed asking the court to direct the ECI to disclose authenticated record of voter turnout by uploading on its website scanned legible copies of Form 17C Part-I (Account of Votes Recorded)of all polling stations after each phase of polling and to provide tabulated polling station-wise data in absolute figures of the number of votes polled as recorded in Form 17C Part- I after each phase of polling during the Lok Sabha, 2024 elections.
Hands off approach of the Supreme Court of India:
On 13th December, 2019, the Supreme Court of India had issued notices to the Election Commission of India and Union of India based on our petition. Since then, the matter has been pending before the court for a full hearing. No action or steps were taken by the highest court against the discrepancies found in the 2019 Lok Sabha election inspite of the various applications filed and repeated requests made for an urgent adjudication of the petition. On 24th May, 2024, taking a hands-off approach in between the elections, the court refused to hear the applications filed against the discrepancies and violations found in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and rather adjourned the matter along with the main petition filed by ADR and Common Cause in 2019. Had the court considered and heard the issues raised through the petition determinedly and in appropriate time, the discrepancies and apprehensions found in the recently concluded Lok Sabha 2024 elections could have been avoided.
Discrepancies found during the Lok Sabha, 2019 elections: During the 17th General Elections, while for the first 6 phases of the election, the voter turnout app displayed the exact number of voters, however, in the last phase i.e. the 7th phase of voting only percentage figures were given and previous data was removed by the Election Commission. As per the research conducted by a team of experts and ADR, serious discrepancies were found between the number of voters in different constituencies and the number of votes counted in the following way;
Discrepancies found during the Lok Sabha, 2024 elections: Even during the 18th General Elections, 2024 serious discrepancies have been found in the total number of EVM votes cast and total actual number of EVM votes counted. In addition, the inordinate delay in the release of final voter turnout data, absence of disaggregated constituency and polling station figures in absolute numbers and whether the elections results were declared based on final reconciled data has raised concerns and public suspicion regarding the correctness of the election results. Details of the discrepancies in the votes counted and votes polled in the general elections 2024 are given in the tables in the report.
Role and Conduct of Election Commission of India:
It is not only a legal requirement of the Election Commission of India to declare final election results based on actual genuine data but it is also a constitutional duty as envisaged under Article 324 read with Article 19 (1) (a) of the Indian Constitution. Election commission of India not only has much wider and greater responsibility for the superintendence, direction and conduct of elections but it is also imperative that such elections are free and fair, rule of law is preserved and that the whole process of conducting elections should be fair, transparent and accountable. Election Commission of India is duty bound to make sure that the elections are driven by fairness, credibility and honesty and not by manipulation, misconduct and illegalities. In order to uphold and preserve the sanctity of elections, it is undeniably imperative that election results are accurate.
The Election Commission has so far failed to give any reasonable explanation in declaring the election results before releasing the final and authentic data on vote count, the mismatch in EVM votes polled EVM votes counted, increase in voter turn-out, non-disclosure of number of votes polled in numbers, unreasonable delay in release of votes polled data and the clean-up of certain data from its website. The ECI failing to address and take appropriate steps against the egregious incidents of violations, illegalities and irregularities seen in the Lok Sabha, 2019 and Lok Sabha Election 2024 elections has led to the trepidations in the mind of the electorate. These apprehensions must be seriously addressed and put to rest.
ADR’s Recommendations:
This report is prepared to highlight the discrepancies in the EVM votes polled and EVM votes counted by the ECI while declaring the results of the General elections 2024. Votes polled and counted showed significant discrepancies in 538 PCs, except Amreli, Attingal, Lakshadweep and Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman Diu. Surat PC was uncontested. Hence the total discrepancies in 538 PCs are 5,89,691. The data for all parliamentary constituencies has been compiled from the data available on the website of the ECI as per the links below:
EVM Votes Counted Data- https://results.eci.gov.in/PcResultGenJune2024/index.htm
EVM Votes Polled Data – Phase 1 to 5 https://www.eci.gov.in/eci-backend/public/api/download?url=LMAhAK6sOPBp%2FNFF0iRfXbEB1EVSLT41NNLRjYNJJP1KivrUxbfqkDatmHy12e%2FztfbUTpXSxLP8g7dpVrk7%2FYMdYo4qvd6YLkLk2XBNde3yLdalC2imUPRS60zr1MewdOFtn933icz0MOeiesxvsQ%3D%3D
Overall difference between EVM votes counted and EVM votes polled: In 362 parliamentary constituencies a total of 5,54,598 votes counted are less than the votes polled. In 176 parliamentary constituencies, a total of 35,093 votes have been counted in excess of the votes polled. The summary of the same is shown below:
|
Votes counted less than votes polled |
5,54,598 |
Votes counted more than votes polled |
35,093 |
Total discrepancies in votes |
5,89,691 |
|
No. of Constituencies |
362 |
No. of Constituencies |
176 |
Discrepancies in the total constituencies |
538 |
Summary of state wise difference between EVM votes polled and EVM votes counted
|
State |
Total Constituencies |
Votes counted less than votes polled |
No. of Constituencies |
Votes counted more than votes polled |
No. of Constituencies |
Discrepancies in the total Constituencies |
Total discrepancies in votes |
|
Andhra Pradesh |
25 |
85777 |
21 |
3722 |
4 |
25 |
89499 |
|
Odisha |
21 |
63123 |
18 |
2146 |
3 |
21 |
65269 |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
80 |
53960 |
55 |
6124 |
25 |
80 |
60084 |
|
Tamil Nadu |
39 |
51935 |
27 |
2485 |
12 |
39 |
54420 |
|
Assam |
14 |
38872 |
12 |
3856 |
2 |
14 |
42728 |
|
Maharashtra |
48 |
38710 |
35 |
1642 |
13 |
48 |
40352 |
|
West Bengal |
42 |
34856 |
31 |
1037 |
11 |
42 |
35893 |
|
Jharkhand |
14 |
26342 |
12 |
393 |
2 |
14 |
26735 |
|
Kerala |
20 |
19848 |
14 |
775 |
5 |
19 |
20623 |
|
Chhattisgarh |
11 |
16849 |
9 |
44 |
2 |
11 |
16893 |
|
Gujarat |
26 |
15141 |
15 |
380 |
9 |
24 |
15521 |
|
Telangana |
17 |
14969 |
15 |
84 |
2 |
17 |
15053 |
|
Karnataka |
28 |
14649 |
15 |
593 |
13 |
28 |
15242 |
|
Madhya Pradesh |
29 |
13529 |
15 |
4744 |
14 |
29 |
18273 |
|
Bihar |
40 |
9924 |
19 |
5015 |
21 |
40 |
14939 |
|
Delhi |
7 |
8159 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
8159 |
|
Manipur |
2 |
7060 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7060 |
|
Uttarakhand |
5 |
6315 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6315 |
|
Haryana |
10 |
5959 |
5 |
93 |
5 |
10 |
6052 |
|
Rajasthan |
25 |
3853 |
6 |
869 |
19 |
25 |
4722 |
|
Himachal Pradesh |
4 |
3770 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3770 |
|
Arunachal Pradesh |
2 |
3617 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3617 |
|
Nagaland |
1 |
3353 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3353 |
|
Jammu and Kashmir |
5 |
3281 |
4 |
69 |
1 |
5 |
3350 |
|
Puducherry |
1 |
3235 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3235 |
|
Punjab |
13 |
2750 |
6 |
740 |
7 |
13 |
3490 |
|
Sikkim |
1 |
1896 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1896 |
|
Meghalaya |
2 |
1843 |
1 |
200 |
1 |
2 |
2043 |
|
Tripura |
2 |
760 |
1 |
52 |
1 |
2 |
812 |
|
Mizoram |
1 |
124 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
124 |
|
Ladakh |
1 |
113 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
113 |
|
Andaman and Nicobar Islands |
1 |
26 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
|
Goa |
2 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
|
Chandigarh |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu |
2 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
|
Lakshadweep |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
543 |
554598 |
362 |
35093 |
176 |
538 |
589691 |
Table: Summary of state wise difference between EVM votes polled and EVM votes counted
Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch
|
Media and Journalist Helpline
Email: a...@adrindia.org |
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd) Head Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch 011 4165 4200, a...@adrIndia.org, |
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.) Founder Member, Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |
Prof Trilochan Sastry IIM Bangalore Founder Member, Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |
Mr. Jaskirat Singh Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |