How It Works
This study guide should help you understand what to expect on the examand includes a summary of the topics the exam might cover and links toadditional resources. The information and materials in this documentshould help you focus your studies as you prepare for the exam.
This guide lists the competency areas and individual competencies against whichyou will be tested. There are also links to suggested resources online. Note thatthese resources form only a small portion of what is available online, and weencourage you to do your own research and study, based on your needs.
The CFRE Exam Compass Study Guide is the only official guide to navigating the CFRE Exam preparation process. Published by CFRE International, this study guide covers the need-to-know information so you can lose the exam jitters and focus on ramping up your knowledge.
Curated. I wish I could drop everything and devote myself to all the topics listed here, I love the sheer love of knowledge I perceive here.
I'm curating this because there are some people for whom this is invaluable guidance, and because I'd like to see more of this from other cutting-edge researchers. This post is more than a list of the topics the author happened to study, rather it comes with a whole worldview that I think is just as important as the list. I'd love to see more like this.
I happen to be quitting my job right now to go and spend some time on studying for general problem-solving ability. I'll be doing it full-time.
I wonder if you could give an estimate of how long it would take to do all of this.
My starting point is a bachelor's in AI, but perhaps it's best to give an estimate from the high-school level.
I don't think more than a year or two could be shaved off without somebody creating much better study material. (I do think a lot better study material could be made - the framing practica are an attempt at a prototype of that - but I found it very time intensive to make such things.) On the other side, I covered far more ground in college than the vast majority of people I know, and I don't know how much of that is limited by natural ability vs just wanting to do it, so it could take a lot longer.
I don't think this is an accurate description of the cultural difference between physicists and mathematicians. Tiny respective minorities of die-hard instrumentalists and formalists aside, both fields agree that the symbols are just tools for talking about the relevant objects of study more clearly and concisely than natural language permits. Plenty of published math research is formally incorrect in an extremely strong sense, but no one cares as long as all the errors can be corrected trivially. In fact, an important aspect of what's often called "mathematical maturity" is the ability to make those corrections automatically and mostly unconsciously, instead of either falling into genuine sloppiness or getting hung up on every little "the the".
The real core difference is the obvious one. To zeroth order: physicists study physics, and mathematicians study math. To first order: physicists characterize phenomena which definitely exist, mathematicians characterize structures which may or may not.
The universe definitely exists, it definitely has a structure, and any method which reliably makes correct predictions reflects a genuine aspect of that structure, whatever it might be. Put another way: physicists have an oracle for consistency. Mathematicians don't have that option, because structures are the things they study. That's what makes them mathematicians, and not physicists. They can retreat to higher and higher orders, and study classes of theories of logics for ..., but the regress has to stop somewhere, and the place it stops has to stand on its own, because there's no outside model to bear witness to its consistency.
I roughly agree with that value prop for physics. I'd add that physics is the archetype of the sciences, and gets things right that haven't necessarily been made a legible part of "the scientific method" yet, so it's important to study physics to get an intuitive idea of science-done-right beyond what we already know how to explain well. (Gears-level models are a good example here - physics is a good way to gain an intuition for "gears" and their importance, even if that's not explicitly brought to attention or made legible. Your point about how we use symbols and logic in physics is another good example.)
It is crucial for candidates to remember that while the study guide is a comprehensive resource, its overarching purpose is to GUIDE your studies and to be a part of your overarching study plan. It should not be your SOLE study resource. While the guide can help users develop and manage their studies, it should not be the sole resource used for NAB examination preparation. Please review the NAB Candidate Handbook for additional study tools and resources. These can also be found within the study guide.
This study guide is intended to aid applicants who are experienced in the field of electricity /electronics and/or mechanical/hydraulic principles in their preparation for entry-level examinations. By no means is this study guide intended for individuals who have not completed some form of formal technical training through a trade school, college or military training; nor should this guide be used as a sole preparation guide for examination purposes. This guide is divided into three sections: electrical/electronics studies, mechanical/hydraulic studies, and sources of reference material.
Hi all, I plan to take the JN0-102 exam and I'm searching study material for the exam. I learn junos as a second language, I know there is an online 90-minutes programe to help us to certify the exam. Besides this online program, is there any offical study guide, like those Cisco Press books for Cisco examination, to help us to certify the exams? Thanks.
To help Airmen prepare for their upcoming promotion exams, a no-cost audio version of the Air Force Handbook 1 Enlisted Study Guide is now available across a variety of online platforms. Users can listen to or download the enlisted promotion study guide by chapter on iTunes, as well as the AFH 1 website, or the AFH 1 Enlisted Study Guide podcast channel on Defense Visual Information Distribution Service. (U.S. Air Force graphic by 2nd Lt. Robert Guest)
These study guides contain examination information, tips for studying and test-taking, and sample test items developed and reviewed by content experts. Sample test answer keys include explanations of each correct answer, enabling you to expand your knowledge even further and commit new concepts to memory.
Start studying with practice questions right away from the convenience of your phone. Pocket Prep provides a mobile study app for the National Counselor Examination and the National Clinical Mental Health Counseling Examination.
Guaranteed Study Package: A product bundle complete with study manual and access to testing workshop videos and practice exams and Recommended Study Plan. Full money-back offer if the Recommended Study Plan is followed and you still do not pass. BONUS: Guaranteed Study Packages now include Counseling Theories Masterclass, weekly tutoring LIVE via Zoom, and access to recordings of all previous tutoring sessions (since June 2022)!
The National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC) does not endorse or uphold any claims made by vendors of study materials listed above. No enhanced performance on any NBCC examination is expressed or implied for individuals purchasing or using any of the study materials listed above. NBCC does not guarantee the accuracy of information provided by study material advertisers.
The PET Study Guide presents a comprehensive review of the principles and knowledge necessary for passing the Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board PET Specialty Examination. The updated version of the guide incorporates the latest innovations in imaging technology and FDA-approved PET radiopharmaceutical and imaging techniques and practices.
8d45195817