Narayana LRA plans and ideas

[Ondra Chaloupka]

Hi,

for anybody interested in Narayana LRA we've created a document where we would like to collect ideas for future development of the Narayana LRA.

It's here: https://github.com/jbosstm/documentation/blob/master/discussions/lra/lra-plans-and-ideas.adoc

You can share ideas at the document in form of the PR or discuss here. Any idea and feedback are more than welcome.

Ondra

[Mark Little]

Do we have any feel for how much QE has been done around the current code and model? I'm all for pushing ahead with innovation but want to be confident it's on a solid base.

Mark.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "narayana-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to narayana-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/narayana-users/74eec5b9-e2d7-4372-8323-25fa1a0592c2n%40googlegroups.com.

---
Mark Little
mli...@redhat.com

JBoss, by Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, 6700 Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Co. Cork.
Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14 Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, No.304873

[Michael Musgrove]

Beyond the team and the TCK I would say there has been little to no testing.

We have had some external PR's raised against the code and have received a number of queries which leads me to believe that we do have users but nothing formal. 

Once the narayana implementation of MP-LRA v1.0 is released we will follow up with Quarkus and WildFly integration and once those are available I can expect we can make progress with evaluating the stability (and utility) of LRA with the community.