narayana-users

Hello, The Narayana team are proud to announce the release of version 7.2.2.Final of Narayana! The

Hi Chege, Thanks for your message :-) Please take a look at our jbosstm/quickstarts, particularly to

Thanks, May I also have your standalone.xml for the datasource definitions, the lookups (in methods

Hello, The Narayana team is proud to announce the release of version 7.2.1.Final of Narayana! The

Hello, The Narayana team are proud to announce the release of version 7.2.0.Final of Narayana! The

Looks good, thank you! Tom Jenkinson schrieb am Montag, 18. November 2024 um 10:45:16 UTC+1: The

We don't have any alternatives for EAP 7.x. However, I suppose that NTA can still be reworked for

Please be aware we have committed work upstream for this now. You can find a tracking issue at https:

We are pleased to be able to share that the artifacts for the release should now be available in

Hi everyone, hopefully you are enjoying Hacktoberfest. If you would like to work on any Narayana

It really seems https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JBTM-3880 should be able to resolve this issue and

Hopefully Manuel provided enough feedback on this thread earlier to mark this thread as resolved, so

The previous feedback provided from Michael should be sufficient to mark this thread as resolved

Very nice work, we should use your investigation and work as the basis for the related narayana

Hi Shubhankar, This is the community user group for the Narayana transaction manager and as I don

Adam, I think we have provided enough information on the narayana support for this, basically we don

We have subsequently further moved to Zulip. I will mark this as complete. On Monday, May 24, 2021 at

I think for now this should be marked as complete. If we want to re-open the topic we can. On

Hi Dave, As Marco indicated, they are buildable from the source. The Narayana project typically

Thank you for the information Tom! We may have a working sample using Spring Boot on Tomcat and based

The issue reference earlier is fixed so I will mark the question as complete. Note that we also have

I'm marking this question as complete, if you would like further input then please add a follow

Marking as answered, if you require further input then please re-post your question or ask here and

We have released a few versions since this question was raised so I am closing as complete.

The work is done, refer to issue JBTM-3577 for more details. On Thursday, 3 February 2022 at 10:28:07

I am marking this question as complete since the discussions have already happened (see issue https:/

Marking as complete. You may track our progress via the issue which I have marked with priority

In light of Marco's answer I am marking this question as complete. On Monday, 22 May 2023 at 15:

I am marking this question as answered. But do track our updates via our blogs and documentation etc

I am closing this question as complete, if there is something still to do on it please raise a JBTM.