On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 02:36:41AM -0700, Vlad wrote:
> It's the same that I saw. So I guess that the potential used in ND1 is a
> harmonic one (the stretching part), since after a huge stretching bonds
> start to recover their length
You need a toy forcefield for e.g. dragging and crude annealing, but
you also need a fine forcefield for checking structure stability,
including bond formation/dissociation. It doesn't have to be all
that realistic, since that would be computationally too expensive.
Way back I asked whether NE could run on a cluster, but today
it needs OpenCL support. That should give a very responsive system
on a modern high-end system. Of course, you still need clustering
(MPI) support for larger workloads.
> суббота, 20 октября 2012 г., 4:38:16 UTC+4 пользователь Godzilla1138
> написал:
> >
> > If NanoEngineer uses GROMACS for MD simulations and GROMACS is using
> > NanoDynamics-1 then I would say that it knows nothing about bonds breaking.
> > I think it's fun to scrunck up a molecule so the atoms are very close and
> > use a high temperature. The simulation shows all the atoms flying away from
> > each other but the bonds are stretching forever into infinity.
> >
> >
> > -Bruce
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Vlad <
justm...@gmail.com <javascript:>>wrote:
> >
> >> Does anybody know the details of nanodynamics-1 force field used in NE1?
> >> What kind of interatomic potentials are used? Is it possible to break and
> >> restore bonds while applying linear motor external force (to study the
> >> fracture of materials)?
> >
> >