EXPERTS AGREE BROOKS IS LYING - REBUTTAL

[dgvreiman]

EXPERTS AGREE BROOKS IS LYING - REBUTTAL

Note that I have received some email requesting that I reduce my
rebuttals into shorter posts so they can be read more carefully. I
will start this procedure with this series of rebuttals to Nigel
Brooks cons, fraud and false accusations - only one topic a rebuttal
from now on.

(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz

Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.


http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Just SOME of Nigel Brooks forgeries
revealed - proof.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
Clown Brooks Said:

> What makes the claims even more glaringly false are his hilarious
> attempts to revise and extend his remarks such as turning an obvious
> boast about being in the 5th to having served briefly on a reaction
> force for the 5th Mech.
>
> Reiman has an explanation for everything - none of which have any
> credibility.

Doug Says:



Forgeries (such as those Brooks publishes about me) cannot be defended
on USENET - only in the courts or in arbitration.

Doug’s rebuttal to Brooks: First, Nigel Brooks lies about what I
said, forges context and inserts HIS words into what I said in the
past, then claims I cannot prove his cons, lies, fraud, forgeries and
false accusations are false. NO ONE can disprove a negative - and
all that are rational and intelligent and fair-minded already know
that is how con men and smear merchants like Nigel Brooks operate.

INDEPENDENT EXPERTS AGREE BROOKS AND HIS GANG ARE LYING

I have proved everything I have ever claimed, not once, but several
times both on this forum and to *several* independent experts and
lawyers, and I have also proved Nigel Brooks is a con man, serial liar
and fraud merchant, dozens of times, and counting. (No wonder Nigel
Brooks refuses all my offers to see ALL of my military records, and
further refuses all of my offers for the American Association of
Arbitrators to review his fraudulent claims about me - loser pays.
Why would Brooks and his gang refuse such offers? Obviously because
he knows he is lying and his fraud and forgeries will be exposed).

Note that people with *real* law degrees that have been practicing law
for years, and have had experience in the past with smear gangs sent
“cease and desist” notices to Nigel Brooks and key members of his
smear gang.

Did those lawyers conclude the gang was lying and using smear
tactics? Of course.

Did they read all of my past posts in question? Of course.

Moreover, when independent web managers and hosts reviewed Nigel
Brooks’ web sites that contained information about me, and after they
completed their independent investigations as to if his statements
about me were true or defaming, they ALL concluded his content was
defaming and/or false, and therefore *forced down Brooks web sites -
all eleven of them!*

Web managers from all over the world came to the same conclusion -
that Nigel Brooks was violating their terms of service in respect to
defamation or fraud or hate.

Considering these web managers made money off of these sites (web
hosts partner up with individuals in respect to sharing income derived
from advertising on such sites, and they compensate the owner in
several ways, including providing a free site) they certainly would
not have permanently forced down ALL of Brooks web sites unless they
too had concluded Brooks was using defamation and or was lying. (Note
that Brooks has re-established some of those sites by not informing
the web hosts that his previous sites, containing the precise same
defamation , lies and fraud, had been previously forced down several
times after a web host investigation - and/or Brooks is now using a
different name ( or possibly one of his gang members’ name) - which
is an issue that is going to surface again as soon as I hear back from
my lawyers. Note again that such tactics this proves a gang is
operating with a conspired common purpose - such as to steal private
and personal information and traffic in such information.

MILITARY EXPERTS AGREE BROOKS IS LYING

I then took some of Brooks fraud and my rebuttals to independent
military experts. I contacted several, three on-line and two off
line, ALL CAME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION that I was telling the truth and
Brooks was lying and using defamation and false statements and
accusations about me.

As just one recent example, note above Nigel Brooks admits I was in
the 5th’s reactionary force - yet in the very next post he denied
making that statement!

Like I said, cons, forgeries, smears, fraud and serial lying - the
true hallmark and mantra of Nigel Brooks.
See below for more confirmation of that fact:

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/6syqvv Nigel Brooks -LAW DOG

http://tinyurl.com/5r93vg Gang is Dismayed and Desperate.

http://tinyurl.com/6s65vf More Cons from the Con Men.

http://tinyurl.com/5xuqzg Nigel Brooks’ whopper about me alone firing
back at the VC during the patrol that I was helping to lead was
ambushed and when two of my men, Olson and Nelson, were both wounded
and received the Purple Heart Medal. (This post also proves that
Brooks has been lying about me never being in combat all along - no
surprise there).

http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Just SOME of Nigel Brooks forgeries
revealed - proof.

Doug Grant (Tm)