NIGEL'S VILLAGE RATS - A REBUTTAL
1 view
Skip to first unread message
dgvreiman
Mar 11, 2009, 5:00:36 PM3/11/09
to CYBERSTALKER WEB NAMES
NIGEL’S VILLAGE RATS - A REBUTTAL
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz
Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
> "Billzz" <1. billzz...@starband.net> wrote in message
> news:95de1$49a39807$9440b19b$20...@STARBAND.NET...
>
>> It's not worth talking about, but the only thing I can think is
>> that if the truth is not written then the self-serving liars of the
>> world take over. I do not know the man, and I wish him well, and
>> no harm to him, we all served after all, but do not take away from
>> those who actually did serve in combat, by saying that they didn't.
>
>Brooks whined:
> True words.
>
> If no-one counters the liars of this world then their lies become
> the truth.
Doug Says: More true words. I am glad that Nigel Brooks understands
why I rebut his serial lying, con man bull, outright fraud, false
accusations after false accusations. He should pay attention to the
sage words above - it is clear that others are finally starting to see
through Nigel Brooks outright fraud and lies about other Vets - and he
has been lying about me for years - as the URL's below clearly prove.
(See below for the US Government site and experts that Brooks has been
lying about my combat duties in Vietnam for years - hell Brooks is now
even lying about his own posts and the units HE SAID my records said I
was assigned to.)
http://tinyurl.com/awr2vc In this Post the outright fraud, serial
lying and con game Nigel Brooks has been posting about me not
experiencing combat in Vietnam is proved the con we all know it is -
Brooks caught yet again!
>
Brooks conned the readers again by whining about my comments about
“Village Rats” and claiming “I voluntarily” entered the
(alt.war.vietnam) newsgroup - yet we all know nothing could be further
from the truth:
Brooks said:
> I've been on this newsgroup (alt.war.vietnam) for the past 11 years
> and Reiman is without a doubt the most despicable individual I have
> ever encountered here - his venom far surpassed that of any troll
> who wandered in here for fun.
In respect to my often stated opinion about Village Rats; in short, I
detested them.
They were the filth of the US Army in my opinion. We all know what a
Village rat was. It seems to me many members of the Nigel Brooks
smear, defame and serial lying gang to this day still “love”
Vietnam! They appear to believe it was the best place in the
world!
The pathetic and misfit Village Rats I had the misfortune to know in
the US Army could not believe they could actually score a whore with
only 100 Piasters! I suspect that some of these dregs were so
pathetic that the only women they could *ever* find in their lives
were some disease riddled Vietnamese whores they shacked up with and
bought as cheaply as they would buy a glass of green Vietnamese beer.
(Some of these dregs and social misfits actually *married* Vietnamese
whores and dragged them back to the States to infect the States!” And
Brooks wants me to *respect* these dregs? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA).
As a Senior NCO, I cannot tell you how hard I tried to talk men out
of being so stupid when I was in Vietnam, and now Brooks wants me to
“respect them” for being a social misfit and dumb enough to actually
marry a Vietnamese whore? BWHAHAHAHAHA. No thanks, I still remember
Vietnam clearly enough not to buy into that Nigel Brooks’ stinky
bullshit.
To these “civilian” misfits Vietnam was “heaven” - and the filth,
hatred, murder, butchery, diseases, heat and stink of Vietnam all
represented “heaven on Earth” to these Village Rats as at least in
such a place they could be a rich man among many poor, and thereby
purchase anything they wanted, and purchase things they could never
get back in the states - whores abounding, drugs, pot, and stolen
vehicles seem to bubble to the top of the typical Village Rat’s shit
pot.
Without their big bucks earned at the expense of the GI’s, these
civilian “rats” could not buy their whores and other parts of a normal
life these pathetic social misfits and dregs on society could NEVER
achieve back in the real world.
Nigel Brooks has boasted often about taking a Village Rat discharge
in Vietnam, and living as a civilian in Vietnam, and possessing and
driving around in stolen vehicles. That does sound familiar. All of
those “civilians” I met in Vietnam were also involved in the black
market in some manner or another same as Brooks, and stealing or using
stolen military vehicles that real soldiers desperately needed is NOT
something anyone should respect, nor even condone. In my opinion,
Village Rats were the scum of the earth - then and now. (Clearly
nothing has changed).
Moreover, what Nigel Brooks ”thinks” is unbelievable or not has
nothing to do with his con man fraud, forgeries and outright con game
all designed to distort and lie about what I have said in the past.
In truth, I could care less what social misfits and psychopaths think,
do, or drool within the repugnant confines of their diseased and
pathetic tiny brains. Village Rats start out sick, and just get
sicker, my opinion of course.
Nevertheless, when these social misfits and dregs claim they have
appointed themselves “a judge over me” (which Nigel Brooks’ did) then
of course such dregs and misfits should expect to see rebuttals
containing the truth about their fraud, forgeries, false accusations
and serial lying.
(Brooks and gang likes to con people by telling them I came to this
newsgroup and voluntarily posted information that Brooks could lie
about. But in truth if you note all of the few typos and errors
Brooks exploits they ALL came from other newsgroups. I did not arrive
on this Newsgroup until Nigel Brooks’ claimed that he “had appointed
himself as a Judge over me” which is akin to a Vietnamese Whore
judging an ethics contest. Sp4 draftee, two year service - never in
the regular army - Village Rat Nigel Brooks could not judge a
cockroach eating contest, not to mention a SFC E-7 that served in
several countries Brooks never went to in his life, IN THE REGULAR
ARMY, and that was promoted on a fast track from Pvt E-1 to SFC E-7
in six short years. (If you know anyone else promoted that fast I
would like to know about them).
Brooks said:
> I've been on this newsgroup (alt.war.vietnam) for the past 11 years
> and Reiman is without a doubt the most despicable individual I have
> ever encountered here - his venom far surpassed that of any troll
> who wandered in here for fun.
Doug’s Rebuttal:
Strange how Nigel Brooks has forgotten that he (1) brought me into
this newsgroup by claiming he has appointed himself a “Judge” over me:
(See below for the hard evidence Nigel Brooks desperately wants to
hid). (2) he also claimed to be a “Federal Agent” and invited me to
“check him out” and when I did he was so embarrassed about his lie
that he accused me of arbitrarily contacting his former employer. (3)
AND BROOKS INVITED ME to post my rebuttals on this newsgroup! (See
below).
Now Brooks is whining to those that are also noting that he is lying
by claiming I *intentionally* entered this newsgroup and posted
information that was not invited. But the following post from Nigel
Brooks proves ol Nigel has been caught in mid con yet again.
Note the date of the post, and this was around the time when I first
started posting my rebuttals to Nigel Brooks outrageous fraud - and
note his invitation for me to do so and his claim that he has
“appointed himself a Judge over me.”
So according to Brooks above, he now claims that I am just a troll
that came on this newsgroup to post venom - but the truth of the
matter is, as usual, completely different from Nigel Brook’s
statements of facts - as the following post from March 2005 clearly
proves:
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.news-media,alt.war.vietnam
Subject: Re: IS NIGEL CLAIMING TO BE GOD? (WAS Re: WILL NIGEL
APOLOGIZE? -- TODAY'S THE BIG DAY
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:43:32 -0600
Lines: 195
Message-ID: <3aegq0F...@individual.net>
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3ae72bF...@individual.net...
>> Nigel Says - Tell you what. Seeing as how you feel it is necessary to
>> ask an author exactly what he meant so as to avoid misunderstanding over
>> what he has written why don't you do the following:
>>
>> 1. Go over all of your previous posts to the various newsgroups where
>> you have written of your experiences in Vietnam.
>> 2. Take another look at the postings of yours which I have raised
>> questions about.
>> 3. In the event that you feel that your postings might have been
>> misinterpreted or misunderstood - first paste that posting and provide an
>> explanation underneath of those matters which you feel should be
>> corrected (for example - did you really witness two ambulances with VC in
>> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field)
>
> Doug Says: There you go again Nigel, putting words in my mouth. You want
> me to explain *your version* of what I said, not *what I really said!"
> Amazing that you keep doing these incredible distortions in post after
> post! Moreover, I have already looked at all of your distortions so far
> and I can prove everyone was nothing more than a self-serving distortion
> that was factitiously interpreted by you so as to defame me. You never
> asked me to interpret anything I said before you libeled me! You
> distorted what I said, then demanded how I could do what you distorted!
> You simply re-posted out of context statements, fabricated some, (just like
> you fabricated the statement you attributed to me above) distorted others,
> then after you got through with your list of distortions and "self
> serving" interpretations, you then libeled me in the same post. As an
> example, please post where I said "I witnessed two ambulances with VC in
> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field" those precise
> words please Nigel and in the context you stated them, or you have just
> been caught fabricating and attributing your own self-serving
> fabrications to me again.
Brooks said:
>> Once I have received the records I have requested using the FOIA - I
>> will compare those records to your stories. I will take into account any
>> corrections to those original stories which you have posted on the
>> various usenet groups. And I will give you the opportunity to fully
>> explain the reason for any discrepancies or omissions in the official
>> government records as they relate to your stories. I will post the
>> original usenet postings, the official government records, and any
>> further usenet activity on your part which explains any discrepancies.
>> The reader will then have the whole ball of wax and will be able to make
>> their own judgment as to the veracity of any claims made concerning
>> Vietnam
>>
>> Now you can't ask for anything fairer than that can ya?
>
> Doug Says: You and I both know that IF you receive any records from the
> FOIA (I doubt if you will but we shall see) they will be incomplete and
> will not prove anything. That can be the only reason I can think of why
> you are refusing to exchange ALL of my records and refusing to agree to
> sign Form180's. I believe you are refusing to look at all of my records
> because you know if ALL of my records are revealed, and I explain your
> distortions and self-serving lies and libel, which I can easily do, you
> will be proved a liar in front of all your friends.
>>
> Doug Says: You want fair? Exchange ALL military records with me and sign
> Form180. Also, stop challenging my Vietnam memories and reflections with
> your own goofy, inaccurate and self-serving distortions on out-of-context
> excerpts that you attribute to me and have taken from other newsgroups.
> The statements you attributed to me that you posted did not even come from
> this newsgroup Nigel, you took the time and *hunted* them down on other
> newsgroups for a reason. That reason had a purpose, and that purpose was
> clearly to find a way to defame and libel me. You clearly went out of your
> way to defame me, and that fact will be more than obvious to the court.
> Moreover, you have even taken your libel to yet another forum (a web site)
> and you are even bragging about including the US Government agency in your
> future libel! And you call that "fair?" Not to mention the fact that
> your distorted self-serving "interpretations" of what I really said was so
> far off the mark they were downright deceptive, underhanded and clearly
> meant to defame me.
> Also, Nigel, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but no one appointed
> you my judge and jury, and no one appointed you as the overseer of the
> memories of all Vietnam Veterans. And your Draftee type two years of
> military service working for supply or PX DOES NOT QUALIFY you to judge
> anyone's military service!
****************************************************************
Nigel says - I have appointed myself as judge - I will rely on the
readers
of the website to do the jury bit - I might even put up a poll -
something
like - "Hero or Bullshit Artist"
****************************************************************
> Your constant quotations of inaccurate and notoriously incorrect After
> Action Reports and newspaper accounts as a basis to denigrate and defame
> the recollections and memories of Vietnam Veterans is about the most
> egregious tactic I have ever seen one Veteran use on another.
Nigel says - I'm posting the official government records old chap.
(Note that Nigel Brooks repeatedly posts newspaper and AAR about
events in which the very authors of those accounts and after action
reports have testified before Congress that they were *ordered to lie*
in those articles and After Action Reports! In fact, as the very
authors of those reports have testified in front of Congress, most, if
not all of the reports they wrote and published, which Brooks uses as
“fact” were completely false! Of course if Brooks had ever been in
combat and then read later an account of any of his missions he would
have know all about those lies).
> The way I see it, you have two obvious talents Nigel; you can search the
> web and you can distort, other than those two abilities, I cannot see
> anything else you possess that would make you an expert on the reflections
> and memories of any Vietnam Veteran's service. They are my memories
> Nigel, not yours! You cannot claim you know that my memory is a lie
> without libeling me. YOU CANNOT READ MINDS Nigel!
> I know you have claimed that somehow you can tell when someone is lying or
> remembering incorrectly, or correctly, but I assure you no one in their
> right mind, especially my lawyers, and the Judge is going to believe you
> have those supernatural powers. Memories are relative, notoriously
> inaccurate, and they are fleeting. No one remembers events the same way,
> no one remembers every detail. But when you say that because someone did
> not remember a certain detail, or stated something that was
> misinterpreted, or even misstated something in the heat of an argument, or
> mis-spoke, or even exaggerated, is therefore lying about his Vietnam
> service and therefore is "a disgrace to all Vietnam Veterans!" - You are
> doing nothing more than defaming and libeling all Vietnam Veterans that
> have ever repeated a memory or wrote about an event he participated in or
> heard about while he was in Vietnam.
> You have refused to apologize for your libel, and you just continue with
> some kind of self-appointed inquisition on my memories and reflections of
> my Vietnam service, that if not produced or stated to your personal
> satisfaction, you then threaten to continue to publicly libel and
> defame me. You have even set up a web site for the purpose of libeling
> and defaming me more than you have already! In my opinion that
> intimidation and threat to do your bidding or you will increase your libel
> against me represents extortion Nigel. You are using the threat of
> further libel and public defamation as extortion to force me to do your
> bidding and accept you as my judge and jury in respect to my memories
> and reflections of my service in Vietnam. You want the right to say that
> my memory is not a memory but is a lie instead. And if I do not give you
> that authority over me, you threaten me with more libel and defamation!
(Note that Nigel Brooks probably hold the world record for Web sites
forced down by Web Hosts due to his posting of fraud or defamation or
hate, which of course violated the Web Site’s terms of service.
Moreover, although Brook’s eleven or web sites were set up with the
Web Hosts to make money in an advertisement partnership agreement
(which agreements I have in my possession)with the Web Hosts, the Web
Hosts, after an impartial investigation, STILL forced down Brooks
eleven web sites!
Brooks then later lied and claimed his web sites were not designed to
provide him any compensation of any kind - which of course is another
lie. Creating a controversy with defamation, fraud and serial lying
and then trying to move that controversy to a profit web site sounds
like a racket to me - “defamation for profit” seems to be a new web
scam that Mr. Brooks obviously wanted to employ - but when the web
managers caught on to his scam they forced down his web sites. Web
managers do not like to lose money - yet they still forced down
Brooks’ ELEVEN web sites because, according to their own independent
investigation, Brooks’ was violating their terms of service with his
fraud, or hate, or vilifications and/or his false accusations.)
Isn’t it strange that when *independent* experts, and *independent*
lawyers, and Web Managers, who are not a part of Brooks smear cabal,
review his accusations and claims, they all believe his versions are
based upon outright personal attacks and fraud?
NO WONDER Nigel Brooks refused to agree, as far back as March 2005,
to exchange ALL military records with me, and has consistently refused
to agree to any official independent arbitration of his claims about
me.
Note above as far back as March 2005, and several times thereafter, I
offered Nigel Brooks the opportunity to sign Form 180 and thereby
receive ALL of my military records, and I his. Yet Brooks ducked and
hid from that offer. Why would Brooks want to receive *incomplete*
records based upon his fraudulent FOIA request when he could possess
ALL of my military records in minute detail instead? They answer to
that question is obvious:
1. Brooks knows full well he is lying about my military service -
which the experts and even the US Government has proved in the URL
below.
2. Brooks knows that FOIA derived information is always incomplete,
and therefore Brooks can then continue to lie about me by
implication, or continuing to lie about me by defaming suggestion or
lie by defaming question - which is the hallmark of most con men and
fraud merchants. COMPLETE and accurate military records will of
course prove that Nigel Brooks has been lying about me all along -
which also would represent hard evidence in a court of law that his
smear campaign has been malicious. Moreover, my COMPLETE records
would also expose Nigel Brooks to the USENET community for what I
already believe he is - a con man, fraud merchant and a pathetic
serial liar and smear gang leader. So Brooks has many reasons to
constantly duck my offer to see ALL of my records. He averts his eyes
from the facts, as he knows those facts will prove him the serial liar
I know him to be.
To prove this issue I have often also offered Mr. Brooks the
opportunity to take our dispute to an independent organization to
investigate his claims and my rebuttals. I suggested the American
Arbitration Association, and even offered to take lie detector tests.
I said that if the ABA found in Brooks favor, I would pay for the
Arbitration, but if it found that it was Brooks that was using false
accusations and fraud against me, then Brooks and his gang would pay
for the Arbitration - and the same offer was made for lie detector
tests, and this standing offer is hereby offered again.
(See below for my standing offer.)
Yet Brooks and gang repeatedly runs, hides, cowers, ducks, avoids,
averts eyes, and ignores my offers for independent review of our
dispute. Why? The only reason is that Nigel Brooks knows he and his
key gang members have been caught in mid con, lies, fraud and they
know damn well I can prove everything I have said, and prove Brooks
has been lying for years - and there is no other rational reason why
Brooks would duck this offer.
In respect to combat, of course I was in combat, and I even named two
of my men that were wounded on a patrol I was helping to lead. When
has Brooks or Rau or any other members of his group done the same? Try
never! I have proved every statement I have ever made, and then
some. I could now name many more, but Brooks would just ignore that
irrefutable evidence as well.
Moreover, how can Brooks rationally appoint himself a “judge” over
me? How can a Sp4 two-year draftee personnel clerk that was not even
in the Regular Army, that constantly quotes newspaper and Action
Reports of events in Vietnam that occurred long after he was out of
the service, and which were admitted lies and fraud by the very
authors of those said articles and After Action Reports, become the
“Judge” of the military service of a soldier that was promoted on a
fast track in the US Army from E-1 to SFC E-7 within only six years of
service, and performed duties under several of different MOS’s, combat
included, and was assigned to 2&1/2 tours of duty in Vietnam, and
tours of duty in Korea, France and Germany as well? Not to mention
worked as a civilian in a security force in South and Central
America? How can some Sp4 draftee personnel clerk that was caught
lying about his military service, Village Rat dreg - “judge” all of
those experiences?
Like I said, Nigel Brooks is a con man, smear. merchant and a serial
liar, and if he thinks his fraud and con's are going to stop me from
rebutting his attacks, he has a lot to learn about me. I have not even
started to defend myself from his blatant serial lies, forgeries and
fraud.
Here is my Arbitration officer that Brooks runs and hide's from:
http://tinyurl.com/a4tkgy Arbitration loser pays offer that scares
the hell out of Nigel Brooks.
Here are independent experts that have concluded Brooks has been
lying
about my military records for years:
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks lied about my
military service and my military records.
http://tinyurl.com/awr2vc In this Post the outright fraud, serial
lying and con game Nigel Brooks has been posting about me not
experiencing combat in Vietnam is proved the con we all know it is -
Brooks caught yet again!
Here is some outrageous lies Brooks has spun about his own military
service.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
Here is just a "short list" of Nigel Brooks outright forgeries about
me and my life and military service - you should see the long list
that is being prepared.
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.news-media,alt.war.vietnam
Subject: Re: IS NIGEL CLAIMING TO BE GOD? (WAS Re: WILL NIGEL
APOLOGIZE? -- TODAY'S THE BIG DAY
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:43:32 -0600
Lines: 195
Message-ID: <3aegq0F...@individual.net>
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3ae72bF...@individual.net...
>> Nigel Says - Tell you what. Seeing as how you feel it is necessary to
>> ask an author exactly what he meant so as to avoid misunderstanding over
>> what he has written why don't you do the following:
>>
>> 1. Go over all of your previous posts to the various newsgroups where
>> you have written of your experiences in Vietnam.
>> 2. Take another look at the postings of yours which I have raised
>> questions about.
>> 3. In the event that you feel that your postings might have been
>> misinterpreted or misunderstood - first paste that posting and provide an
>> explanation underneath of those matters which you feel should be
>> corrected (for example - did you really witness two ambulances with VC in
>> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field)
>
> Doug Says: There you go again Nigel, putting words in my mouth. You want
> me to explain *your version* of what I said, not *what I really said!"
> Amazing that you keep doing these incredible distortions in post after
> post! Moreover, I have already looked at all of your distortions so far
> and I can prove everyone was nothing more than a self-serving distortion
> that was factitiously interpreted by you so as to defame me. You never
> asked me to interpret anything I said before you libeled me! You
> distorted what I said, then demanded how I could do what you distorted!
> You simply re-posted out of context statements, fabricated some, (just like
> you fabricated the statement you attributed to me above) distorted others,
> then after you got through with your list of distortions and "self
> serving" interpretations, you then libeled me in the same post. As an
> example, please post where I said "I witnessed two ambulances with VC in
> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field" those precise
> words please Nigel and in the context you stated them, or you have just
> been caught fabricating and attributing your own self-serving
> fabrications to me again.
>> Once I have received the records I have requested using the FOIA - I
>> will compare those records to your stories. I will take into account any
>> corrections to those original stories which you have posted on the
>> various usenet groups. And I will give you the opportunity to fully
>> explain the reason for any discrepancies or omissions in the official
>> government records as they relate to your stories. I will post the
>> original usenet postings, the official government records, and any
>> further usenet activity on your part which explains any discrepancies.
>> The reader will then have the whole ball of wax and will be able to make
>> their own judgment as to the veracity of any claims made concerning
>> Vietnam
>>
>> Now you can't ask for anything fairer than that can ya?
>
> Doug Says: You and I both know that IF you receive any records from the
> FOIA (I doubt if you will but we shall see) they will be incomplete and
> will not prove anything. That can be the only reason I can think of why
> you are refusing to exchange ALL of my records and refusing to agree to
> sign Form180's. I believe you are refusing to look at all of my records
> because you know if ALL of my records are revealed, and I explain your
> distortions and self-serving lies and libel, which I can easily do, you
> will be proved a liar in front of all your friends.
>>
>>
> Doug Says: You want fair? Exchange ALL military records with me and sign
> Form180. Also, stop challenging my Vietnam memories and reflections with
> your own goofy, inaccurate and self-serving distortions on out-of-context
> excerpts that you attribute to me and have taken from other newsgroups.
> The statements you attributed to me that you posted did not even come from
> this newsgroup Nigel, you took the time and *hunted* them down on other
> newsgroups for a reason. That reason had a purpose, and that purpose was
> clearly to find a way to defame and libel me. You clearly went out of your
> way to defame me, and that fact will be more than obvious to the court.
> Moreover, you have even taken your libel to yet another forum (a web site)
> and you are even bragging about including the US Government agency in your
> future libel! And you call that "fair?" Not to mention the fact that
> your distorted self-serving "interpretations" of what I really said was so
> far off the mark they were downright deceptive, underhanded and clearly
> meant to defame me.
> Also, Nigel, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but no one appointed
> you my judge and jury, and no one appointed you as the overseer of the
> memories of all Vietnam Veterans. And your Draftee type two years of
> military service working for supply or PX DOES NOT QUALIFY you to judge
> anyone's military service!
****************************************************************
Nigel says - I have appointed myself as judge - I will rely on the
readers
of the website to do the jury bit - I might even put up a poll -
something
like - "Hero or Bullshit Artist"
****************************************************************
> Your constant quotations of inaccurate and notoriously incorrect After
> Action Reports and newspaper accounts as a basis to denigrate and defame
> the recollections and memories of Vietnam Veterans is about the most
> egregious tactic I have ever seen one Veteran use on another.
Nigel says - I'm posting the official government records old chap.
>
> The way I see it, you have two obvious talents Nigel; you can search the
> web and you can distort, other than those two abilities, I cannot see
> anything else you possess that would make you an expert on the reflections
> and memories of any Vietnam Veteran's service. They are my memories
> Nigel, not yours! You cannot claim you know that my memory is a lie
> without libeling me. YOU CANNOT READ MINDS Nigel!
> I know you have claimed that somehow you can tell when someone is lying or
> remembering incorrectly, or correctly, but I assure you no one in their
> right mind, especially my lawyers, and the Judge is going to believe you
> have those supernatural powers. Memories are relative, notoriously
> inaccurate, and they are fleeting. No one remembers events the same way,
> no one remembers every detail. But when you say that because someone did
> not remember a certain detail, or stated something that was
> misinterpreted, or even misstated something in the heat of an argument, or
> misspoke, or even exaggerated, is therefore lying about his Vietnam
> service and therefore is "a disgrace to all Vietnam Veterans!" - You are
> doing nothing more than defaming and libeling all Vietnam Veterans that
> have ever repeated a memory or wrote about an event he participated in or
> heard about while he was in Vietnam.
> You have refused to apologize for your libel, and you just continue with
> some kind of self-appointed inquisition on my memories and reflections of
> my Vietnam service, that if not produced or stated to your personal
> satisfaction, you then threaten to continue to publicly libel and
> defame me. You have even set up a web site for the purpose of libeling
> and defaming me more than you have already! In my opinion that
> intimidation and threat to do your bidding or you will increase your libel
> against me represents extortion Nigel. You are using the threat of
> further libel and public defamation as extortion to force me to do your
> bidding and accept you as my judge and jury in respect to my memories
> and reflections of my service in Vietnam. You want the right to say that
> my memory is not a memory but is a lie instead. And if I do not give you
> that authority over me, you threaten me with more libel and defamation!
> Here is the American Heritage's Dictionary of "Extort" Nigel, just in
> case you claim you do not know what you are doing later in court:
>
> ex·tort (¹k-stôrt") tr.v. ex·tort·ed, ex·tort·ing, ex·torts. To obtain
> from another by coercion or intimidation. [Latin extorqu¶re, extort-, to
> wrench out, extort : ex-, ex- + torqu¶re, to twist; see terkw-
> below.] --ex·tort"er n. --ex·tor"tive adj.
>
>
Nigel Brooks
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz
Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
> "Billzz" <1. billzz...@starband.net> wrote in message
> news:95de1$49a39807$9440b19b$20...@STARBAND.NET...
>
>> It's not worth talking about, but the only thing I can think is
>> that if the truth is not written then the self-serving liars of the
>> world take over. I do not know the man, and I wish him well, and
>> no harm to him, we all served after all, but do not take away from
>> those who actually did serve in combat, by saying that they didn't.
>
>Brooks whined:
> True words.
>
> If no-one counters the liars of this world then their lies become
> the truth.
Doug Says: More true words. I am glad that Nigel Brooks understands
why I rebut his serial lying, con man bull, outright fraud, false
accusations after false accusations. He should pay attention to the
sage words above - it is clear that others are finally starting to see
through Nigel Brooks outright fraud and lies about other Vets - and he
has been lying about me for years - as the URL's below clearly prove.
(See below for the US Government site and experts that Brooks has been
lying about my combat duties in Vietnam for years - hell Brooks is now
even lying about his own posts and the units HE SAID my records said I
was assigned to.)
http://tinyurl.com/awr2vc In this Post the outright fraud, serial
lying and con game Nigel Brooks has been posting about me not
experiencing combat in Vietnam is proved the con we all know it is -
Brooks caught yet again!
>
Brooks conned the readers again by whining about my comments about
“Village Rats” and claiming “I voluntarily” entered the
(alt.war.vietnam) newsgroup - yet we all know nothing could be further
from the truth:
Brooks said:
> I've been on this newsgroup (alt.war.vietnam) for the past 11 years
> and Reiman is without a doubt the most despicable individual I have
> ever encountered here - his venom far surpassed that of any troll
> who wandered in here for fun.
In respect to my often stated opinion about Village Rats; in short, I
detested them.
They were the filth of the US Army in my opinion. We all know what a
Village rat was. It seems to me many members of the Nigel Brooks
smear, defame and serial lying gang to this day still “love”
Vietnam! They appear to believe it was the best place in the
world!
The pathetic and misfit Village Rats I had the misfortune to know in
the US Army could not believe they could actually score a whore with
only 100 Piasters! I suspect that some of these dregs were so
pathetic that the only women they could *ever* find in their lives
were some disease riddled Vietnamese whores they shacked up with and
bought as cheaply as they would buy a glass of green Vietnamese beer.
(Some of these dregs and social misfits actually *married* Vietnamese
whores and dragged them back to the States to infect the States!” And
Brooks wants me to *respect* these dregs? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA).
As a Senior NCO, I cannot tell you how hard I tried to talk men out
of being so stupid when I was in Vietnam, and now Brooks wants me to
“respect them” for being a social misfit and dumb enough to actually
marry a Vietnamese whore? BWHAHAHAHAHA. No thanks, I still remember
Vietnam clearly enough not to buy into that Nigel Brooks’ stinky
bullshit.
To these “civilian” misfits Vietnam was “heaven” - and the filth,
hatred, murder, butchery, diseases, heat and stink of Vietnam all
represented “heaven on Earth” to these Village Rats as at least in
such a place they could be a rich man among many poor, and thereby
purchase anything they wanted, and purchase things they could never
get back in the states - whores abounding, drugs, pot, and stolen
vehicles seem to bubble to the top of the typical Village Rat’s shit
pot.
Without their big bucks earned at the expense of the GI’s, these
civilian “rats” could not buy their whores and other parts of a normal
life these pathetic social misfits and dregs on society could NEVER
achieve back in the real world.
Nigel Brooks has boasted often about taking a Village Rat discharge
in Vietnam, and living as a civilian in Vietnam, and possessing and
driving around in stolen vehicles. That does sound familiar. All of
those “civilians” I met in Vietnam were also involved in the black
market in some manner or another same as Brooks, and stealing or using
stolen military vehicles that real soldiers desperately needed is NOT
something anyone should respect, nor even condone. In my opinion,
Village Rats were the scum of the earth - then and now. (Clearly
nothing has changed).
Moreover, what Nigel Brooks ”thinks” is unbelievable or not has
nothing to do with his con man fraud, forgeries and outright con game
all designed to distort and lie about what I have said in the past.
In truth, I could care less what social misfits and psychopaths think,
do, or drool within the repugnant confines of their diseased and
pathetic tiny brains. Village Rats start out sick, and just get
sicker, my opinion of course.
Nevertheless, when these social misfits and dregs claim they have
appointed themselves “a judge over me” (which Nigel Brooks’ did) then
of course such dregs and misfits should expect to see rebuttals
containing the truth about their fraud, forgeries, false accusations
and serial lying.
(Brooks and gang likes to con people by telling them I came to this
newsgroup and voluntarily posted information that Brooks could lie
about. But in truth if you note all of the few typos and errors
Brooks exploits they ALL came from other newsgroups. I did not arrive
on this Newsgroup until Nigel Brooks’ claimed that he “had appointed
himself as a Judge over me” which is akin to a Vietnamese Whore
judging an ethics contest. Sp4 draftee, two year service - never in
the regular army - Village Rat Nigel Brooks could not judge a
cockroach eating contest, not to mention a SFC E-7 that served in
several countries Brooks never went to in his life, IN THE REGULAR
ARMY, and that was promoted on a fast track from Pvt E-1 to SFC E-7
in six short years. (If you know anyone else promoted that fast I
would like to know about them).
Brooks said:
> I've been on this newsgroup (alt.war.vietnam) for the past 11 years
> and Reiman is without a doubt the most despicable individual I have
> ever encountered here - his venom far surpassed that of any troll
> who wandered in here for fun.
Doug’s Rebuttal:
Strange how Nigel Brooks has forgotten that he (1) brought me into
this newsgroup by claiming he has appointed himself a “Judge” over me:
(See below for the hard evidence Nigel Brooks desperately wants to
hid). (2) he also claimed to be a “Federal Agent” and invited me to
“check him out” and when I did he was so embarrassed about his lie
that he accused me of arbitrarily contacting his former employer. (3)
AND BROOKS INVITED ME to post my rebuttals on this newsgroup! (See
below).
Now Brooks is whining to those that are also noting that he is lying
by claiming I *intentionally* entered this newsgroup and posted
information that was not invited. But the following post from Nigel
Brooks proves ol Nigel has been caught in mid con yet again.
Note the date of the post, and this was around the time when I first
started posting my rebuttals to Nigel Brooks outrageous fraud - and
note his invitation for me to do so and his claim that he has
“appointed himself a Judge over me.”
So according to Brooks above, he now claims that I am just a troll
that came on this newsgroup to post venom - but the truth of the
matter is, as usual, completely different from Nigel Brook’s
statements of facts - as the following post from March 2005 clearly
proves:
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.news-media,alt.war.vietnam
Subject: Re: IS NIGEL CLAIMING TO BE GOD? (WAS Re: WILL NIGEL
APOLOGIZE? -- TODAY'S THE BIG DAY
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:43:32 -0600
Lines: 195
Message-ID: <3aegq0F...@individual.net>
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3ae72bF...@individual.net...
>> Nigel Says - Tell you what. Seeing as how you feel it is necessary to
>> ask an author exactly what he meant so as to avoid misunderstanding over
>> what he has written why don't you do the following:
>>
>> 1. Go over all of your previous posts to the various newsgroups where
>> you have written of your experiences in Vietnam.
>> 2. Take another look at the postings of yours which I have raised
>> questions about.
>> 3. In the event that you feel that your postings might have been
>> misinterpreted or misunderstood - first paste that posting and provide an
>> explanation underneath of those matters which you feel should be
>> corrected (for example - did you really witness two ambulances with VC in
>> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field)
>
> Doug Says: There you go again Nigel, putting words in my mouth. You want
> me to explain *your version* of what I said, not *what I really said!"
> Amazing that you keep doing these incredible distortions in post after
> post! Moreover, I have already looked at all of your distortions so far
> and I can prove everyone was nothing more than a self-serving distortion
> that was factitiously interpreted by you so as to defame me. You never
> asked me to interpret anything I said before you libeled me! You
> distorted what I said, then demanded how I could do what you distorted!
> You simply re-posted out of context statements, fabricated some, (just like
> you fabricated the statement you attributed to me above) distorted others,
> then after you got through with your list of distortions and "self
> serving" interpretations, you then libeled me in the same post. As an
> example, please post where I said "I witnessed two ambulances with VC in
> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field" those precise
> words please Nigel and in the context you stated them, or you have just
> been caught fabricating and attributing your own self-serving
> fabrications to me again.
Brooks said:
>> Once I have received the records I have requested using the FOIA - I
>> will compare those records to your stories. I will take into account any
>> corrections to those original stories which you have posted on the
>> various usenet groups. And I will give you the opportunity to fully
>> explain the reason for any discrepancies or omissions in the official
>> government records as they relate to your stories. I will post the
>> original usenet postings, the official government records, and any
>> further usenet activity on your part which explains any discrepancies.
>> The reader will then have the whole ball of wax and will be able to make
>> their own judgment as to the veracity of any claims made concerning
>> Vietnam
>>
>> Now you can't ask for anything fairer than that can ya?
>
> Doug Says: You and I both know that IF you receive any records from the
> FOIA (I doubt if you will but we shall see) they will be incomplete and
> will not prove anything. That can be the only reason I can think of why
> you are refusing to exchange ALL of my records and refusing to agree to
> sign Form180's. I believe you are refusing to look at all of my records
> because you know if ALL of my records are revealed, and I explain your
> distortions and self-serving lies and libel, which I can easily do, you
> will be proved a liar in front of all your friends.
>>
> Doug Says: You want fair? Exchange ALL military records with me and sign
> Form180. Also, stop challenging my Vietnam memories and reflections with
> your own goofy, inaccurate and self-serving distortions on out-of-context
> excerpts that you attribute to me and have taken from other newsgroups.
> The statements you attributed to me that you posted did not even come from
> this newsgroup Nigel, you took the time and *hunted* them down on other
> newsgroups for a reason. That reason had a purpose, and that purpose was
> clearly to find a way to defame and libel me. You clearly went out of your
> way to defame me, and that fact will be more than obvious to the court.
> Moreover, you have even taken your libel to yet another forum (a web site)
> and you are even bragging about including the US Government agency in your
> future libel! And you call that "fair?" Not to mention the fact that
> your distorted self-serving "interpretations" of what I really said was so
> far off the mark they were downright deceptive, underhanded and clearly
> meant to defame me.
> Also, Nigel, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but no one appointed
> you my judge and jury, and no one appointed you as the overseer of the
> memories of all Vietnam Veterans. And your Draftee type two years of
> military service working for supply or PX DOES NOT QUALIFY you to judge
> anyone's military service!
****************************************************************
Nigel says - I have appointed myself as judge - I will rely on the
readers
of the website to do the jury bit - I might even put up a poll -
something
like - "Hero or Bullshit Artist"
****************************************************************
> Your constant quotations of inaccurate and notoriously incorrect After
> Action Reports and newspaper accounts as a basis to denigrate and defame
> the recollections and memories of Vietnam Veterans is about the most
> egregious tactic I have ever seen one Veteran use on another.
Nigel says - I'm posting the official government records old chap.
(Note that Nigel Brooks repeatedly posts newspaper and AAR about
events in which the very authors of those accounts and after action
reports have testified before Congress that they were *ordered to lie*
in those articles and After Action Reports! In fact, as the very
authors of those reports have testified in front of Congress, most, if
not all of the reports they wrote and published, which Brooks uses as
“fact” were completely false! Of course if Brooks had ever been in
combat and then read later an account of any of his missions he would
have know all about those lies).
> The way I see it, you have two obvious talents Nigel; you can search the
> web and you can distort, other than those two abilities, I cannot see
> anything else you possess that would make you an expert on the reflections
> and memories of any Vietnam Veteran's service. They are my memories
> Nigel, not yours! You cannot claim you know that my memory is a lie
> without libeling me. YOU CANNOT READ MINDS Nigel!
> I know you have claimed that somehow you can tell when someone is lying or
> remembering incorrectly, or correctly, but I assure you no one in their
> right mind, especially my lawyers, and the Judge is going to believe you
> have those supernatural powers. Memories are relative, notoriously
> inaccurate, and they are fleeting. No one remembers events the same way,
> no one remembers every detail. But when you say that because someone did
> not remember a certain detail, or stated something that was
> misinterpreted, or even misstated something in the heat of an argument, or
> mis-spoke, or even exaggerated, is therefore lying about his Vietnam
> service and therefore is "a disgrace to all Vietnam Veterans!" - You are
> doing nothing more than defaming and libeling all Vietnam Veterans that
> have ever repeated a memory or wrote about an event he participated in or
> heard about while he was in Vietnam.
> You have refused to apologize for your libel, and you just continue with
> some kind of self-appointed inquisition on my memories and reflections of
> my Vietnam service, that if not produced or stated to your personal
> satisfaction, you then threaten to continue to publicly libel and
> defame me. You have even set up a web site for the purpose of libeling
> and defaming me more than you have already! In my opinion that
> intimidation and threat to do your bidding or you will increase your libel
> against me represents extortion Nigel. You are using the threat of
> further libel and public defamation as extortion to force me to do your
> bidding and accept you as my judge and jury in respect to my memories
> and reflections of my service in Vietnam. You want the right to say that
> my memory is not a memory but is a lie instead. And if I do not give you
> that authority over me, you threaten me with more libel and defamation!
(Note that Nigel Brooks probably hold the world record for Web sites
forced down by Web Hosts due to his posting of fraud or defamation or
hate, which of course violated the Web Site’s terms of service.
Moreover, although Brook’s eleven or web sites were set up with the
Web Hosts to make money in an advertisement partnership agreement
(which agreements I have in my possession)with the Web Hosts, the Web
Hosts, after an impartial investigation, STILL forced down Brooks
eleven web sites!
Brooks then later lied and claimed his web sites were not designed to
provide him any compensation of any kind - which of course is another
lie. Creating a controversy with defamation, fraud and serial lying
and then trying to move that controversy to a profit web site sounds
like a racket to me - “defamation for profit” seems to be a new web
scam that Mr. Brooks obviously wanted to employ - but when the web
managers caught on to his scam they forced down his web sites. Web
managers do not like to lose money - yet they still forced down
Brooks’ ELEVEN web sites because, according to their own independent
investigation, Brooks’ was violating their terms of service with his
fraud, or hate, or vilifications and/or his false accusations.)
Isn’t it strange that when *independent* experts, and *independent*
lawyers, and Web Managers, who are not a part of Brooks smear cabal,
review his accusations and claims, they all believe his versions are
based upon outright personal attacks and fraud?
NO WONDER Nigel Brooks refused to agree, as far back as March 2005,
to exchange ALL military records with me, and has consistently refused
to agree to any official independent arbitration of his claims about
me.
Note above as far back as March 2005, and several times thereafter, I
offered Nigel Brooks the opportunity to sign Form 180 and thereby
receive ALL of my military records, and I his. Yet Brooks ducked and
hid from that offer. Why would Brooks want to receive *incomplete*
records based upon his fraudulent FOIA request when he could possess
ALL of my military records in minute detail instead? They answer to
that question is obvious:
1. Brooks knows full well he is lying about my military service -
which the experts and even the US Government has proved in the URL
below.
2. Brooks knows that FOIA derived information is always incomplete,
and therefore Brooks can then continue to lie about me by
implication, or continuing to lie about me by defaming suggestion or
lie by defaming question - which is the hallmark of most con men and
fraud merchants. COMPLETE and accurate military records will of
course prove that Nigel Brooks has been lying about me all along -
which also would represent hard evidence in a court of law that his
smear campaign has been malicious. Moreover, my COMPLETE records
would also expose Nigel Brooks to the USENET community for what I
already believe he is - a con man, fraud merchant and a pathetic
serial liar and smear gang leader. So Brooks has many reasons to
constantly duck my offer to see ALL of my records. He averts his eyes
from the facts, as he knows those facts will prove him the serial liar
I know him to be.
To prove this issue I have often also offered Mr. Brooks the
opportunity to take our dispute to an independent organization to
investigate his claims and my rebuttals. I suggested the American
Arbitration Association, and even offered to take lie detector tests.
I said that if the ABA found in Brooks favor, I would pay for the
Arbitration, but if it found that it was Brooks that was using false
accusations and fraud against me, then Brooks and his gang would pay
for the Arbitration - and the same offer was made for lie detector
tests, and this standing offer is hereby offered again.
(See below for my standing offer.)
Yet Brooks and gang repeatedly runs, hides, cowers, ducks, avoids,
averts eyes, and ignores my offers for independent review of our
dispute. Why? The only reason is that Nigel Brooks knows he and his
key gang members have been caught in mid con, lies, fraud and they
know damn well I can prove everything I have said, and prove Brooks
has been lying for years - and there is no other rational reason why
Brooks would duck this offer.
In respect to combat, of course I was in combat, and I even named two
of my men that were wounded on a patrol I was helping to lead. When
has Brooks or Rau or any other members of his group done the same? Try
never! I have proved every statement I have ever made, and then
some. I could now name many more, but Brooks would just ignore that
irrefutable evidence as well.
Moreover, how can Brooks rationally appoint himself a “judge” over
me? How can a Sp4 two-year draftee personnel clerk that was not even
in the Regular Army, that constantly quotes newspaper and Action
Reports of events in Vietnam that occurred long after he was out of
the service, and which were admitted lies and fraud by the very
authors of those said articles and After Action Reports, become the
“Judge” of the military service of a soldier that was promoted on a
fast track in the US Army from E-1 to SFC E-7 within only six years of
service, and performed duties under several of different MOS’s, combat
included, and was assigned to 2&1/2 tours of duty in Vietnam, and
tours of duty in Korea, France and Germany as well? Not to mention
worked as a civilian in a security force in South and Central
America? How can some Sp4 draftee personnel clerk that was caught
lying about his military service, Village Rat dreg - “judge” all of
those experiences?
Like I said, Nigel Brooks is a con man, smear. merchant and a serial
liar, and if he thinks his fraud and con's are going to stop me from
rebutting his attacks, he has a lot to learn about me. I have not even
started to defend myself from his blatant serial lies, forgeries and
fraud.
Here is my Arbitration officer that Brooks runs and hide's from:
http://tinyurl.com/a4tkgy Arbitration loser pays offer that scares
the hell out of Nigel Brooks.
Here are independent experts that have concluded Brooks has been
lying
about my military records for years:
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks lied about my
military service and my military records.
http://tinyurl.com/awr2vc In this Post the outright fraud, serial
lying and con game Nigel Brooks has been posting about me not
experiencing combat in Vietnam is proved the con we all know it is -
Brooks caught yet again!
Here is some outrageous lies Brooks has spun about his own military
service.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
Here is just a "short list" of Nigel Brooks outright forgeries about
me and my life and military service - you should see the long list
that is being prepared.
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.news-media,alt.war.vietnam
Subject: Re: IS NIGEL CLAIMING TO BE GOD? (WAS Re: WILL NIGEL
APOLOGIZE? -- TODAY'S THE BIG DAY
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:43:32 -0600
Lines: 195
Message-ID: <3aegq0F...@individual.net>
>
> "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3ae72bF...@individual.net...
>> Nigel Says - Tell you what. Seeing as how you feel it is necessary to
>> ask an author exactly what he meant so as to avoid misunderstanding over
>> what he has written why don't you do the following:
>>
>> 1. Go over all of your previous posts to the various newsgroups where
>> you have written of your experiences in Vietnam.
>> 2. Take another look at the postings of yours which I have raised
>> questions about.
>> 3. In the event that you feel that your postings might have been
>> misinterpreted or misunderstood - first paste that posting and provide an
>> explanation underneath of those matters which you feel should be
>> corrected (for example - did you really witness two ambulances with VC in
>> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field)
>
> Doug Says: There you go again Nigel, putting words in my mouth. You want
> me to explain *your version* of what I said, not *what I really said!"
> Amazing that you keep doing these incredible distortions in post after
> post! Moreover, I have already looked at all of your distortions so far
> and I can prove everyone was nothing more than a self-serving distortion
> that was factitiously interpreted by you so as to defame me. You never
> asked me to interpret anything I said before you libeled me! You
> distorted what I said, then demanded how I could do what you distorted!
> You simply re-posted out of context statements, fabricated some, (just like
> you fabricated the statement you attributed to me above) distorted others,
> then after you got through with your list of distortions and "self
> serving" interpretations, you then libeled me in the same post. As an
> example, please post where I said "I witnessed two ambulances with VC in
> them shoot up the planes at the Can Tho Army Air Field" those precise
> words please Nigel and in the context you stated them, or you have just
> been caught fabricating and attributing your own self-serving
> fabrications to me again.
>> Once I have received the records I have requested using the FOIA - I
>> will compare those records to your stories. I will take into account any
>> corrections to those original stories which you have posted on the
>> various usenet groups. And I will give you the opportunity to fully
>> explain the reason for any discrepancies or omissions in the official
>> government records as they relate to your stories. I will post the
>> original usenet postings, the official government records, and any
>> further usenet activity on your part which explains any discrepancies.
>> The reader will then have the whole ball of wax and will be able to make
>> their own judgment as to the veracity of any claims made concerning
>> Vietnam
>>
>> Now you can't ask for anything fairer than that can ya?
>
> Doug Says: You and I both know that IF you receive any records from the
> FOIA (I doubt if you will but we shall see) they will be incomplete and
> will not prove anything. That can be the only reason I can think of why
> you are refusing to exchange ALL of my records and refusing to agree to
> sign Form180's. I believe you are refusing to look at all of my records
> because you know if ALL of my records are revealed, and I explain your
> distortions and self-serving lies and libel, which I can easily do, you
> will be proved a liar in front of all your friends.
>>
>>
> Doug Says: You want fair? Exchange ALL military records with me and sign
> Form180. Also, stop challenging my Vietnam memories and reflections with
> your own goofy, inaccurate and self-serving distortions on out-of-context
> excerpts that you attribute to me and have taken from other newsgroups.
> The statements you attributed to me that you posted did not even come from
> this newsgroup Nigel, you took the time and *hunted* them down on other
> newsgroups for a reason. That reason had a purpose, and that purpose was
> clearly to find a way to defame and libel me. You clearly went out of your
> way to defame me, and that fact will be more than obvious to the court.
> Moreover, you have even taken your libel to yet another forum (a web site)
> and you are even bragging about including the US Government agency in your
> future libel! And you call that "fair?" Not to mention the fact that
> your distorted self-serving "interpretations" of what I really said was so
> far off the mark they were downright deceptive, underhanded and clearly
> meant to defame me.
> Also, Nigel, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but no one appointed
> you my judge and jury, and no one appointed you as the overseer of the
> memories of all Vietnam Veterans. And your Draftee type two years of
> military service working for supply or PX DOES NOT QUALIFY you to judge
> anyone's military service!
****************************************************************
Nigel says - I have appointed myself as judge - I will rely on the
readers
of the website to do the jury bit - I might even put up a poll -
something
like - "Hero or Bullshit Artist"
****************************************************************
> Your constant quotations of inaccurate and notoriously incorrect After
> Action Reports and newspaper accounts as a basis to denigrate and defame
> the recollections and memories of Vietnam Veterans is about the most
> egregious tactic I have ever seen one Veteran use on another.
Nigel says - I'm posting the official government records old chap.
>
> The way I see it, you have two obvious talents Nigel; you can search the
> web and you can distort, other than those two abilities, I cannot see
> anything else you possess that would make you an expert on the reflections
> and memories of any Vietnam Veteran's service. They are my memories
> Nigel, not yours! You cannot claim you know that my memory is a lie
> without libeling me. YOU CANNOT READ MINDS Nigel!
> I know you have claimed that somehow you can tell when someone is lying or
> remembering incorrectly, or correctly, but I assure you no one in their
> right mind, especially my lawyers, and the Judge is going to believe you
> have those supernatural powers. Memories are relative, notoriously
> inaccurate, and they are fleeting. No one remembers events the same way,
> no one remembers every detail. But when you say that because someone did
> not remember a certain detail, or stated something that was
> misinterpreted, or even misstated something in the heat of an argument, or
> misspoke, or even exaggerated, is therefore lying about his Vietnam
> service and therefore is "a disgrace to all Vietnam Veterans!" - You are
> doing nothing more than defaming and libeling all Vietnam Veterans that
> have ever repeated a memory or wrote about an event he participated in or
> heard about while he was in Vietnam.
> You have refused to apologize for your libel, and you just continue with
> some kind of self-appointed inquisition on my memories and reflections of
> my Vietnam service, that if not produced or stated to your personal
> satisfaction, you then threaten to continue to publicly libel and
> defame me. You have even set up a web site for the purpose of libeling
> and defaming me more than you have already! In my opinion that
> intimidation and threat to do your bidding or you will increase your libel
> against me represents extortion Nigel. You are using the threat of
> further libel and public defamation as extortion to force me to do your
> bidding and accept you as my judge and jury in respect to my memories
> and reflections of my service in Vietnam. You want the right to say that
> my memory is not a memory but is a lie instead. And if I do not give you
> that authority over me, you threaten me with more libel and defamation!
> Here is the American Heritage's Dictionary of "Extort" Nigel, just in
> case you claim you do not know what you are doing later in court:
>
> ex·tort (¹k-stôrt") tr.v. ex·tort·ed, ex·tort·ing, ex·torts. To obtain
> from another by coercion or intimidation. [Latin extorqu¶re, extort-, to
> wrench out, extort : ex-, ex- + torqu¶re, to twist; see terkw-
> below.] --ex·tort"er n. --ex·tor"tive adj.
>
>
Nigel Brooks
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages