STYLE AND SUBSTANCE???

[dgvreiman]

STYLE AND SUBSTANCE??


(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang’s glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

STYLE AND SUBSTANCE???


Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau’s recent preposterous statements
they can use “Style and Substance” to determine who in my group wrote
what posts and when and their contradictory statements that I wrote
all of those tens of thousands of posts!

CLOWNS SPEAK

According to Nigel Brooks (Clown#1) and Tom Rau (Clown#2) they both
claim they can determine who wrote what on USENET even if they never
met the author. Wow! They could really sell a lot of books if they
would reveal the astonishing magic they use to accomplish such an
amazing feat!

Can you imagine, just reading a few posts from someone and know
instantly who was the author of that post even if you have never met
the person in your entire life! What a fantastic ability! This feat
is beyond the great Carnack, beyond the OZ Wizard, and way beyond the
President of the Soothsayer’s and Little Chicken Killer’s Association
of East Texas!

But how does Clown #1 and Clown#2 accomplish this incredible, amazing
and fantastic feat of “Extra Sensory Perception” when all of the other
professionals in the entire world cannot duplicate what they claim to
do on a regular basis - you may ask?

Perhaps some of the following rituals provides the Clownies with
their amazing Extra Sensory and Soothsaying inside information:

1. Crystal ball up Clown#1's ass which all gang members are forced
to view on a regular basis? No?

2. How about a cult-gang ritual where they all meet at KFC and
dissect an Original Recipe Chicken Leg and little chicken fairies
emerge and whisper in their ears the names of all those typists and
other authors they never met in their lives? No?

3. Then how about a BIG bond fire for the gang on top of an East
Texas Mesa, and Clown #1 runs around it chanting “get doogie” “get
doogie” while the rest of the gang chants “Lawsuit - Lawsuit” while
Clown#2 chases Clown#1 and tries his best to get his head up
Clown#1's ass to see the magic light and hear the little squeeky
voices that tell them all of this mind–reading, Carnack, soothsaying,
crystal ball reading sack of horse shit the “Clowns” try to pan off as
“Style and Substance.”

I swear - I have been to a lot of three-ring circuses in my life, but
I have never seen Clowns perform as idiotically as these two Clowns.
I cannot imagine what they will dream up next - that I am a member of
MOSAD or the IDF because I wrote so many posts praising Israel?

IF I MENTION A UNIT, ORGANIZATION OR ENTITY - CLOWNS SAY THAT IS A
SECRET SQUIRREL CODE FROM ME STATING I AM A MEMBER OF THAT UNIT,
ORGANIZATION OR ENTITY

It seems that anytime I write anything praising anything or in favor
of anything, or anything I mention in my posts, the little voices that
jump around in the Clown’s heads tell them that mention is some
special code that really means (forget the written word and the
English definition) but really means (in secret squirrel code only
Clowns can read of course) that I really was, am, once was, a member
in good standing of all units, nations, forces and organizations I
have ever mentioned in any of my posts! And, all those 71 posts
that state we used typists to type many of our posts, (see above for
Typist’s Galore) which were posted long before the Clowns even started
their bizarre false accusations about me and are evidenced above, were
all false post - false for some reason #1 Clown Carnack can never
explain.

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS PROVES BROOKS AND RAU ARE LYING ABOUT NO OTHER
AUTHORS OR TYPISTS POSTING UNDER MY ACCOUNTS

Of course the Google archive above “Typists Galore” proves that Nigel
Brook’s claim that I never mentioned typists before he started his
smear campaign against me is a bald face lie. And that post also
proves the Brooks/Rau claim that I wrote all of those tens of
thousands of exchanges and posts myself is also beyond an idiotic lie
(note that some typists even posted under their own names).

But another very interesting point to all these false claims by
Brooks and gang is had the gang bothered to check with the Library of
Congress in respect to many of the articles they have plagiarized from
me and published on their web sites, which of course they contribute
exclusively to me, they would have found a listing of *other authors*
on many of those official copyrights other than me. Now why would we
list other authors on copyrighted materials long before the “screwem
and smearem” Brooks gang ever found out my name from the anonymous
cyberstalker SteveL?

OF COURSE other people typed, wrote and posted information under the
accounts I used, why do you think we sign Doug Grant (Tm)? Even
someone as stupid as Brooks should know you cannot trademark a
personal name. “Doug Grant” is trade name, and has been one for many
years (common-law trademark). Amazing the Clowns would not think of
the Library of Congress proving they are lying - but next I suspect we
will hear from the Clowns the Library of Congress is lying on my
behalf, just like we heard the claim that First Sergeant that agreed
with me and proved “Da Clowns” wrong was also “lying.” NOT!

But the real proof Brooks is lying comes from his own mouth:

Here is Nigel Brooks confession that he knew all along that other
people were posting under the accounts I used:

Here is what Nigel Brooks stated, with evidence below in the
following
Tiny URL:
1"Trouble is - you can never be sure that he (Reiman) was doing the
posting.. Could've been someone on his team, or a typo by one of his
typists who didn't get his dictation down right."
Nigel Brooks
http://tinyurl.com/rhlvz 9 April, 2006.

Then of course we heard the exact opposite from Brooks lately that:


"Nigel Brooks" <1nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6tp9stF...@mid.individual.net...
Jan 16, 2009

“The point being that I for one do not believe for one minute that
Reiman
> used a typist, secretary or anyone else to transcribe his remarks to
> USENET. I am of the firm belief that he and he alone is the author and
> typist of those remarks.”
>
> Nigel Brooks


Obviously, Nigel Brooks is a liar.

If Clowns want to claim mind reading abilities, and rename such
fantastic self-acclamations “Style and Substance” I guess we should
test their acumen in this respect - only fair to do so. I will post
something below that someone other than me wrote, and let’s see if
any of the clowns’ can come up with the name of the typist?

“BTW, bragging about a purple heart (card) not earned in combat is
about as cowardly as it gets.”

So let’s put the Clowns to the test. Name of the typist that wrote
the above sentence please? (If they name me watch this come back to
haunt them later as the person who actually wrote that passage has
said so in writing, and there was NO WAY I could have typed that
passage and posted it at the time it was written and posted even if I
wanted to do so). But I will play - name please guys.

Let the soothsaying begin!!! I did write one word of the above
passage - before they howl about it - but someone else wrote the
rest. If these circus employees are really soothsayers, we should
hear a name back from them. If not, well, we have all heard Nigel
Brooks/Tom Rau bullshit before - no surprise there.


Doug Grant (Tm)