DE OPPRESSO LIBRE - FRAUD EXPOSED
2 views
Skip to first unread message
dgvreiman
Jan 18, 2009, 3:58:19 PM1/18/09
to CYBERSTALKER WEB NAMES
DE OPPRESSO LIBRE -FRAUD EXPOSED
Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau’s “secret squirrel code”
accusations about me in respect to the Green Bennies and Purple Heart
VA ID cards - irrefutable evidence presented below:
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang’s glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
DE OPPRESSO LIBRE -FRAUD EXPOSED
CLEAR SIGNS OF A SMEAR MERCHANT
1. Appoints himself Judge over other people. Gains a perverse and
sick pleasure out of smearing other people. Needs to do so to bolster
his/her pathetic ego and inferiority complex. Repeatedly labels their
smear targets “Kooks” and “Insane.”
RE: http://tinyurl.com/7ojpaj
KOOK VOTES - SMEAR GANG PROOF
http://tinyurl.com/96xeoj
KOOK VOTES ARE A FRAUD - NEVER HAPPENED
2. Smear Merchants maliciously writes search codes to conduct endless
malicious searches for typos, ambiguous statements, errors, poorly
written contexts, whatever can be forged or exploited to defame, in
past posts posted by their victim. The con men also maliciously
search for normal sentences that can be extracted, forged or spliced
into a completely different context than what the original author
intended, also for the exclusive and malicious purpose of defaming and
demonizing their targeted victim.
3. Smear Merchants’ work very hard and spend much time to cut and
paste different sentences together to form fraudulent meaning, intent
and context forgeries they then fraudulently attribute to the original
author. This is analogous to cutting and pasting different words and
sentences together to form a new message extracted from several
different articles from a newspaper, then once the forgery is complete
claiming the newspaper intended to and did publish the forgery! Of
course the words did come from the newspaper (from many different
sections) but the true context, meaning and intent of the forged
article ALL came from the forger smear merchant and clearly was NOT
intended by the author.
4. Experts (that are willing to testify in court) agree that many of
these dregs suffer from a psychosis. Some smear merchants *want* to
be exposed, some live in fantsey worlds, others are just plain ol
every-day con men. But they all have one thing in common. They use
fraud, serial lying, forgeries and deception to smear their targeted
victims, and Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and gang are no exception to this
seemingly constant rule about smear merchant/con men.
(Note also above when these con men find each other on the Internet in
the various groups set up and designed specifically to bring smear
merchants and con men together to target a specific victim - how they
then start to operate in a conspired common purpose as a “gang” or
“mob” to co-operatively smear their victim. (Note much more about
this issue will be presented later, directly from those experts that
have been consulted to review the smear campaign that Nigel Brooks and
Tom Rau and other gang members have been waging against me for several
years now).
5. Another tactic of the smear merchants/con men (which this post
alone will irrefutably prove) is they regularly insert or remove key
words from what their target victim wrote in the past so as to alter,
deceive, distort and fraudulently convey a meaning or context the
smear merchants can then use to defame and smear their victim.
Remember, absolutely *nothing* is below the ethics of the smear
merchant when it comes to finding a fraudulent way to smear his
targeted victim. Fraud, forgeries, outrageous and false juxtaposing
their fraud about their victim with real criminals, general deception
and repetitive fraud are the classic trademarks of a smear merchant.
(See above for information from experts on this issue.)
6. In respect to past posts or extemporaneous exchanges with others
their targeted victim has written, the smear merchant/con man will
maliciously and exclusively select sentences he can somehow
fraudulently distort into a defaming meaning, context or intent. If
one sentence or paragraph from his smear victim can be distorted to
defame the victim, yet there are dozens of other paragraphs in the
same post that will clearly prove the context, meaning and intent
the smear merchant is fraudulently expressing, the con man/smear
merchant will always ignore (or hide) the dozens of other sentences or
paragraphs in the same post or exchange that clearly prove his
defaming and forged context false. The smear merchant will always
zero in on the one error or single ambiguity that he can distort and
then exploit to defame his victim. Real evidence, the preponderance
of evidence, and/or corroboration of context and/or intent are terms
and methods the con man/smear merchant never mentions, ignores, and
in fact maliciously hides whenever possible.
7. The smear merchant also ignores and downplays his obvious pure
speculation about his targeted victim which seemingly emits from
crystal balls and soothsaying abilities that only the con man/smear
merchant possesses.
Example: A typist for the victim responds to a person she believed
was referencing Purple Heart Cards issued by the VA for service
connected veterans without initially spelling out her context was
cards, although her last sentence clearly proved her context had to be
cards and could not possibly be medals. The targeted victim however,
had already posted at least eight other times, prior to and subsequent
to the typist’s post that he DID NOT have a purple heart medal - and
the smear gang leaders had already acknowledged and responded to those
posts so they cannot deny they never saw them.
Yet the con men/smear merchants suddenly claim that the one typist’s
poorly written post means the victim *intended* to claim a purple
heart medal, which of course contradicts everything he said prior to
and after the post in question. The preponderance of evidence, and
the testimony of the typist, and the victim, clearly proves the smear
merchants/con men are lying. So the smear merchants/con men
deliberately *ignore* all of the overwhelming and preponderance of
evidence that proves without a doubt they are falsely accusing their
victim, and they never, never mention all the real evidence that
clearly proves the opposite of their claims. When their victim posts
proof of their lies, they instruct their gang to snip out that post as
fast as possible. Yet when the entire issue is brought to outside
experts, the outside experts agree completely with the victim, as
will, of course, the lawyers and the courts.
Their maliciousness and fraudulent intent to smear and defame by the
smear merchant/con man is obvious. And it relates to their general
fraudulent tactics, especially inserting and removing key words from
their victims past posts so as to alter the true context of the
sentence or paragraph, and their constant ignoring the preponderance
of evidence that proves the smear merchant/con man is using forgeries
and fraud to smear and defame, not to mention the pure speculation and
fraud they conjure up from those “crystal balls and soothsaying
abilities” only the con men/smear merchants seem to possess.
http://tinyurl.com/7tkghf The dozen or so times *I* posted on USENET
I DID NOT have a purple heart medal and the Google archive URL;s
references to such posts, AND the responses from Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau to those posts which clearly indicates these two smear merchants
knew about yet hid my statements BEFORE AND AFTER they started to post
fraud about my typist’s response to Chip about Purple Heart Cards, as
is presented below. (This post containing a list of the times I
posted I did NOT have a Purple Heart Medal, and never said I did, was
posted in November 2007, but references back previous posts from me
several years prior in which I clearly state I DID NOT have a Purple
Heart Medal - which of course the smear gang has been hiding for the
malicious reasons so specified above).
http://tinyurl.com/59hbuj Clarified and corrected Purple Heart Card
post, as so clarified by the original author. (Note only the author
(s) could possibly know the true context of anything they wrote - and
those con men that claim mind reading skills, and crystal balls to add
terms or take them away from someone’s else’s post, well, I suspect
the terms “con man” fits their description about as well as anything).
8. But if you are a rational person you might say, “this is not
fair!” True, but remember, smear merchants are not interested in
“fair.” They are only interested in smearing and defaming their
target victim by any unethical means possible.
8.a. But then you say, “this is not honest!” True, also, but again
smear merchants/con men have no use for honestly, fairness, ethics nor
even the preponderance of evidence, due diligence, honor, truth, nor
to avoid conjecture and abject speculation about their targeted
victim. They will use any fraudulent and unethical tactic they can
dream up as long as it can harm their targeted victim. The intent of
the smear merchant and gang is to do harm to their victim, either
physically or mentally. Ethics means nothing to them, honesty means
nothing to them, fairness means nothing to them, intimidation,
bullying and inciting fear into their victims is what provides them
with their sick perverse pleasure.
9. The smear merchants might as well be working in a sleazy Carnival
game, or huckstering fake jewelry as real on some street corner in a
major city - they are clearly con men, but con men that in many cases
due to the internet believe they con anonymously, (a con man’s dream)
or at least feel they cannot be touched because they are using USENET
and prompting a rebuttal defense from their smear victim. Of course
they are completely wrong. These con men are not above our laws, and
they can be brought to justice.
CON MEN/SMEAR MERCHANTS CAN NEVER ADMIT THEY LIED
10.Con men/smear merchants know once they accuse their targeted smear
victim of some defaming statement or act, then they can never admit
they were lying and were using pure conjecture and fraud to do so.
They would lose all credibility if they admitted one single act of
demonizing or fraud against their smear victim.
10.A So even when their fraud and dishonesty is proved beyond any
reasonable doubt, they ignore the irrefutable proof and immediately
move on to yet another new and equally preposterous fraud and false
accusation about their smear victim - and if they cannot find another
statement to forge or distort to smear their victim, they will make
one up out of thin air:
As an example: The 5th Infantry, 25th Infantry and the “De Oppresso
Libre, Happy Birthday” accolade:
http://tinyurl.com/8v788a Feb 29, 2004. Another reference to the
25th Infantry Division and a quick synopses of my military history.
(Note this post was dated long before Nigel Brooks and his smear
gang started their smear campaign against me, which they commenced in
March 2005. Yet Mr. Brooks fraudulently howled and barked that he was
“appointing himself Judge over me because I refused to provide my unit
in Vietnam.” Brooks clearly was lying. Tom Rau said he checked me
out and Tom Rau fraudulently posted that I was never in the US Army,
and of course was never in Vietnam. Rau also said I was never a SFC
E-7 in Vietnam, and both Brooks and Rau and gang fraudulent implied
several times that I received a bad discharge. Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau and gang started out lying about me from the start, and as more
and more evidence started to trickle in that proved they were lying
all along, they started to become desperate to cover up their volumes
of clear and unmistakable fraud, forgeries, false accusations and
general obloquy they had already posted about me. As the following
irrefutable proof again clearly provides, the more lies Nigel Brooks,
Tom Rau and other gang members told about me to compound their first
lies, the more entangled they became in their own web of deceit:
Here is what I posted on February 24, 2004, long before Nigel Brooks
even knew my name:
Doug Says: I spent two tours in Vietnam, the first one with the
25th Infantry Division, at Tay Ninh and Cu Chi, and the other
with a LSA unit in Can Tho. I also spent a tour with the 7th
Infantry Division in Korea, helping to train ROK troops for
Vietnam service. I also have spent several other tours in Foreign
countries, and most of my service was outside of the USA with the
exception of my last command. I am also a former US Army
Recruiting Office Station Commander, and I have Honorable
discharges from both the US Marine Corps and the US Army (US
Marines was the reserves).
(Note that anyone associated with the US Army knows that station
commanders of Field Recruiting Stations are all mostly Non
commissioned officers). (Please note above no mention of any other
unit assignments in Vietnam. No “5th special forces, no “special
assassin units” and similar bullshit conjured up about me by the Nigel
Brooks smear gang).
http://tinyurl.com/6u3elu First Assignment 25th Infantry division
near the Cambodian border and the Iron Triangle. April 18, 2003.
This post was dated TWO YEARS before Nigel Brooks claimed I refused
to state my unit in Vietnam.
http://tinyurl.com/8fp2tp Assigned to the 25th Infantry Division
April 8, 2003. Again dated two years before Brooks started his smear
campaign against me.
THE DE OPPRESSO LIBRE ACCOLADE
11.
A RACE AGAINST TIME (Note I signed this post and others “De
Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday” but much to the chagrin of Nigel
Brooks and Tom Rau, I state in the same post I was assigned in
Vietnam to the 25th Infantry Division! So much for the fraudulent
claims from Brooks and Rau stating my Happy Birthday accolade was
some “secret code” meaning I was claiming I belonged to the Green
Bennies. Nothing could be further from the truth as these posts
clearly prove. How could I be using code to say I was assigned to the
Green Berets when I state in the very same post, clearly, with no code
whatsoever, that my assignment was the 25th Infantry Division? No
wonder Rau and Brooks hid these posts.
1.
alt.news-media - 27 posts - 12 authors - Last post: May 27, 2002. “As
an example; during my first tour in Vietnam I was assigned to the 25th
Infantry Division at Cu Chi. When I first arrived that Cu Chi base
camp was hit (At the end of this post the following accolade was
posted:)
“De Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday”
So did I state in no uncertain terms in the above May 27, 2002 post
that my assignment in Vietnam was the 25th Infantry division? Of
course. So how could my “Happy Birthday” accolade to Special Forces
represent some “secret squirrel code” that secretly means I am
claiming to be in a completely different unit than I just said I was
assigned to??? BWHAHAHAHAHA.
Brooks and Rau knew no non-gang reader would be stupid enough to
believe their false accusations and fraud about my Happy Birthday
accolade if they also read in the SAME POST that I clearly stated my
assignment was NOT in the Green Bennies. Brooks and Rau wanted to
deceive people to believe I was fraudulently claiming I was assigned
to the green bennies in Vietnam, but how could that be if in the same
post I clearly stated I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division and
NOT to the green bennies? So what was Brooks and Rau’s solution to
their dilemma? Of course, hide my past posts that proved them the
liars and smear merchants I know them to be.
http://tinyurl.com/9a8h2q November 11, 2001. “ During my first tour
of duty in Vietnam I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division at Cu
Chi. Cu Chi is infamous for its Tunnels, and I know how difficult and
costly it is to dig the enemy out of its elaborate tunnels with trap
doors, right angles, sealed doors, and labyrinths going down sometimes
100 meters or more. “
This post above was posted in November 2001! ABOUT FOUR YEARS before
Nigel Brooks claimed I never provided the name of my unit in Vietnam,
and that my Happy Birthday accolade meant in his “secret squirrel
code” that I was claiming to have been assigned to the Green Beret
type special forces. (I was assigned at one time to a new special
forces, but it was NOT that well-known Green Beret type special
forces, as we see in the irrefutable evidence from the 25th Infantry
archives presented below).
1.
http://tinyurl.com/8l4gwn November 12, 13, 14th 2001. I state
again and again in this thread I was assigned to the 25th Infantry
Division, yet at the end of the post, I again wished the Special
Forces that was doing a bang up job in Afghanistan the following
accolade:
De Oppresso Liber, Happy Birthday.
Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau have been hiding the above posts so they
could deceive and lie about what my accolade was truly representing.
Here is more proof Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau and the other smear gang
members that have echoed their fraud have been using serial lying and
outright fraud, and hiding the posts that proves their fraud so as to
further deceive the readers about me.
1. Dai Uy's Absent DD214 (Was Re: Credibility lost cannot be ...
alt.war.vietnam - 681 posts - 48 authors - Last post: Dec 17, 2005I
was in an straight leg Infantry unit Psycho Dai, not hiding in bunkers
and .... ridiculous hype and defamation such as when I wished SF
"Happy Birthday"
May 26, 2002.
A RACE AGAINST TIME http://tinyurl.com/8rvmb5 May 26, May 27, May 28,
2002:
“Doug Says: There is only one proven tactic that will defeat
terrorists: Attack, invade, occupy and control them and all of their
resources. As an example; during my first tour in Vietnam
I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division at Cu Chi. ...
Doug Grant (Tm)
1. --
De Oppresso Liber
Happy Birthday
12. Once again as the Google archived URL’s above prove, THREE YEARS
before Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau started lying about my Happy Birthing
accolade, and other statements they fraudulently claimed meant that I
was claiming I was in the Green Beret special forces in Vietnam, I
make it very clear IN THE SAME post in which I posted the Happy
Birthday accolade that I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division
and NOT to any Green Beret Special Forces unit. Again, Rau and Brooks
hid these posts so they could further their fraud about this issue.
TOM RAU AND NIGEL BROOKS “REMOVE” THE “HAPPY BIRTHDAY” FROM THE
ACCOLADE, AND PRESENT A FORGERY TO THE READERS AS IF IT CAME FROM ME
13. To further his fraud about his clearly fraudulent claims that I
said I was in the Green Beret special forces with some secret code,
Tom Rau removed my “Happy Birthday” accolade from my “De Oppresso
Libre, Happy Birthday” statement which was clearly an accolade I
posted at the bottom of some of my posts to honor the job the Special
Forces were doing in Afghanistan. Unlike Vietnam, these men were
finally allowed to fight and destroy the enemy instead of trying to
“win the hearts of minds of the population” and woo Village Chieftains
to send their young men out as cannon fodder. It appeared to me those
days were finally long over, and now the Green Berets were starting to
“take care of the business of war.” Ergo, I believe they well
deserved my present-day accolades and many more.
13.a. Yet Tom Rau and Nigel Brooks in their zeal to smear me with any
lie and fraud they could conjure up, removed (forged) the “Happy
Birthday” part of my accolade and then they fraudulently claimed that
I was signing the signature of the Green Beret special forces “De
Oppresso Libre” only at the end of my posts so as to use that as a
“code” to mean I was claiming I was assigned to the Green Beret
Special Forces in Vietnam.
13.b. Yet, like I said, smear merchants are not interested in the
truth. They deliberately ignore the preponderance of evidence that
proves them the liars and fraud merchants they are, and they proceed
with their deceptions and unethical fraud without regard to evidence,
fact, honesty, honor, ethics, nor even glaring evidence, such as I
presenting that irrefutable prove Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau’s
malicious claims is this regard are nothing more than their usual
trumped up fraud and outrageous deceptions:
13.c. Note that in the examples I posted above, starting with
November 2001, I posted that I was assigned to the 25th Infantry
Division in Vietnam - *and in the same post I posted my “De Oppresso
Libre, Happy Birthday” accolade at the end of those posts!*
13.d. To reiterate the obvious, consider that Nigel Brooks, and Tom
Rau, and other moronic gang members fraudulently want everyone to
believe that my Happy Birthday accolade was a “secret code” telling
people I was in the Green Beret Special Forces, *but in several of
those same posts in which I posted the Happy Birthday accolade I ALSO
specifically stated that I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division!
* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
13.e. Starting on November 11, 2001, then November 12, 13, 14 2001,
then again May 26, May 27, May 28, in all of those posts and several
others as we can see, I clearly stated my assignment in Vietnam was
the 25th Infantry Division, and in those very SAME posts I provided
my “De Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday, accolade at the end of those
posts.
13.f. So, how in the hell could I be claiming I was using a “secret
squirrel code” to say I was assigned to the Green Berets with my “De
Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday accolade at the end of my post, when
AT THE SAME TIME, AND IN THE SAME POST I CLEARLY STATED I WAS NOT
ASSIGNED TO A GREEN BERET SPECIAL FORCES UNIT, AND I FURTHER STATED I
WAS ASSIGNED TO A STRAIGHT LEG INFANTRY UNIT WHICH OF COURSE WAS THE
25TH INFANTRY DIVISION!
14. Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and gang are absolutely desperate to hide
these facts. They know I cannot possibly be implying with some
accolade I was assigned to a Green Beret Special Forces unit and in
the same post state the exact opposite! So they hid the posts in
which I clearly, and unmistakably said I was assigned to the 25th
Infantry and also used the “De Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday”
accolade at the end of my post.
14.a. And to even add to Brooks/Rau’s outright fraud, forgeries and
deceptions, they also “removed the Happy Birthday” part of the
accolade, and then republished (forged) some of my posts reflecting
only the “De Oppresso Libre” part of my accolade at the end of the
post. **This outright, flagrant and deceptive forgery clearly was
designed to deceive readers into fraudulently believing that I was
signing my posts with the Green Beret Special Forces motto - which
Brooks and Rau knew was a complete lie.* *
http://tinyurl.com/7r8qdn Proof Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau removed the
“Happy Birthday” from my accolade so as to forge the context and
meaning of my accolade.
BEYOND UNETHICAL AND BEYOND DISHONEST
15. Like I said, smear merchants/con men are not interested in the
truth, facts, fairness nor even honesty. They have one purpose; to
smear and defame by any unethical means possible.
16. Brooks and Rau knew no rational person would believe I was using
a secret code in an accolade to mean something that directly
contradicts what I said in the narrative of the post that contained
the accolade! So they carefully and maliciously hid the preponderance
of evidence posts that proved Brooks and Rau were using forgeries and
lies from the readers view.
17 igel Brooks and Tom Rau have been caught in mid smear and mid con
yet again. (Is anyone else keeping track of how many times these two
clowns have been caught lying about me? You will not believe the
summary of lies that is being compiled from these two smear gang
leaders alone).
PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE
18. Do a Google search using my name and add up all the times
overall I have said I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division:
18.a. A GOOGLE search produces 224 times I said I was assigned to the
25th Infantry Division in Vietnam, and 31 times I said I worked with
the 1/5th Infantry within that division at one time or another.
18.b. Now, do a Google search on my name and the terms Green Beret.
How many times does a Google search produce any statements from me
that I was assigned to any Green Beret Special Forces unit? (Please
do not count the times others made a false accusation about this issue
or someone thought my real name was “Grant” and confused me with
someone else - that has happened a few times as the name of “Grant”
was fairly common. As a case in point I received an email from a
former student that thought I was some Lt. Grant he met in the 25th
Infantry Division. And others have clearly confused me with some
other person they had in mind, but that is not my fault nor my words).
18.c. Answer: ZERO! The only special forces I was assigned to was
the special forces Reactionary that was approved by the DOA in January
1968. I *was* assigned to that force, and here is the excerpt from
the 25th Archives that proves that force existed and what its duties
were:
(The duties were NOT winning hearts and minds, I assure you).
http://tinyurl.com/8w76xj 25th Infantry Division Archives:
” Cu Chi
1. No lines at Cu Chu
2.
"Vietnam was a different war. It was a conflict where the front line
was not a trace on a map but was rather wherever the opposing combat
forces met and fought. The secure rear areas of past wars that were
so
necessary for support were nonexistent in Vietnam..."
During the 1968 Tet offensive and counter offensive months the Bunker
Line at Cu Chi was more like a WWII Battle line than a base camps
perimeter line - combat occurred almost nightly at one of the three
main 25th Infantry Division's Base Camp Bunker lines. Support Units
were exclusively responsible for camp defense at Cu Chi. RF
(reactionary force) platoons were manned by support officers, NCO's
and enlisted men that were mostly assigned to support units and not
to
main line infantry units.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The bunker line at Cu Chi consisted of observation towers, firing
positions with overhead cover, an earth berm, barbed wire
entanglements, spotlights, and minefields. The reactionary forces
developed from support battalions camped at Cu Chi were assigned
sectors of the defensive perimeter with very specific, rehearsed
plans
for reinforcement and counterattack. Artillery, countermortar fire,
sensors, communications, reconnaissance, combat patrols, air support,
and pacification all worked together to permit a large logistic and
command complex to survive in no man's land.
"----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At Cu Chi the 2d Brigade commander was usually appointed to run the
camp, and he named a full-time deputy to supervise the administrative
details of camp operation, base camp defense, and personnel overhead.
All commanders found that "semipermanent base camps require manpower,
equipment, and services beyond the organic capabilities of
battalions,
brigades, and divisions." Support units had to be used in combat
scenarios, patrols and other defenses to secure the 25th base camps.
and By 1968 the Department of the Army had authorized the use of key
Reactionary Forces trained and selected from all support units,
including administration, supply and logistics....
End excerpts:
19. Again, depending upon your definition of “Special Forces” the
only official special forces I was ever assigned to was the one
described above, and I have never said anything to the contrary.
During the 1968 Tet Offensive and Counteroffensive months, (which
Brooks and Rau both missed) there were *many* new special forces units
being established. Many of us new arrivals at that time which were
designated to participate in that new force were assigned to Tay Ninh
for some RVN combat training, and the rest of the combat training was
provided at Cu Chi. One or more of those the three 25th Infantry base
camps during that 1968 period were almost under continuous attack as
the author from the 25th Infantry archives describes above. The
Reactionary Forces also did precisely what the author described
above. If you do not believe what those reactionary forces did
represented combat, and intense combat from time to time, you are
living in the fraudulent dream world as Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau and
their gang members want you to live in.
19.a. Of course if you were not in Vietnam during the 1968 Tet
offensive and counteroffensives while assigned to a straight leg
Infantry Division, your perspective on Vietnam would be completely
different from mine. Brooks and Rau are also hiding the fact the
Vietnam war, depending upon assignment, unit, and time, really
represented several different wars. Comparing the 1968 Tet offensive
to guarding a lonely border in 1969, or performing Sp4 type personnel
duties in a major headquarters in 1967, is akin to comparing the
occupation of Berlin after WWII to the Normandy Invasion. The
differences are not only astounding, they represent in fact “two
completely different war experiences for the men that were assigned to
those events and times.”
20.a. Proving con men and smear merchants like Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau are lying and using fraud to smear and defame is relative easy as
these military archives are available to the public. However, I do
have better things to do. I am not on a crusade to expose smear
merchants and con men like Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and their smear
gang. I would not need to rebut and disprove these clown’s fraud if
they stopped posting it, but as long as they do expect to see
continuing hard evidence in rebuttal proving they are lying. In
fact, I have just started to defend myself from these clowns.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau’s “secret squirrel code”
accusations about me in respect to the Green Bennies and Purple Heart
VA ID cards - irrefutable evidence presented below:
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang’s glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
DE OPPRESSO LIBRE -FRAUD EXPOSED
CLEAR SIGNS OF A SMEAR MERCHANT
1. Appoints himself Judge over other people. Gains a perverse and
sick pleasure out of smearing other people. Needs to do so to bolster
his/her pathetic ego and inferiority complex. Repeatedly labels their
smear targets “Kooks” and “Insane.”
RE: http://tinyurl.com/7ojpaj
KOOK VOTES - SMEAR GANG PROOF
http://tinyurl.com/96xeoj
KOOK VOTES ARE A FRAUD - NEVER HAPPENED
2. Smear Merchants maliciously writes search codes to conduct endless
malicious searches for typos, ambiguous statements, errors, poorly
written contexts, whatever can be forged or exploited to defame, in
past posts posted by their victim. The con men also maliciously
search for normal sentences that can be extracted, forged or spliced
into a completely different context than what the original author
intended, also for the exclusive and malicious purpose of defaming and
demonizing their targeted victim.
3. Smear Merchants’ work very hard and spend much time to cut and
paste different sentences together to form fraudulent meaning, intent
and context forgeries they then fraudulently attribute to the original
author. This is analogous to cutting and pasting different words and
sentences together to form a new message extracted from several
different articles from a newspaper, then once the forgery is complete
claiming the newspaper intended to and did publish the forgery! Of
course the words did come from the newspaper (from many different
sections) but the true context, meaning and intent of the forged
article ALL came from the forger smear merchant and clearly was NOT
intended by the author.
4. Experts (that are willing to testify in court) agree that many of
these dregs suffer from a psychosis. Some smear merchants *want* to
be exposed, some live in fantsey worlds, others are just plain ol
every-day con men. But they all have one thing in common. They use
fraud, serial lying, forgeries and deception to smear their targeted
victims, and Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and gang are no exception to this
seemingly constant rule about smear merchant/con men.
(Note also above when these con men find each other on the Internet in
the various groups set up and designed specifically to bring smear
merchants and con men together to target a specific victim - how they
then start to operate in a conspired common purpose as a “gang” or
“mob” to co-operatively smear their victim. (Note much more about
this issue will be presented later, directly from those experts that
have been consulted to review the smear campaign that Nigel Brooks and
Tom Rau and other gang members have been waging against me for several
years now).
5. Another tactic of the smear merchants/con men (which this post
alone will irrefutably prove) is they regularly insert or remove key
words from what their target victim wrote in the past so as to alter,
deceive, distort and fraudulently convey a meaning or context the
smear merchants can then use to defame and smear their victim.
Remember, absolutely *nothing* is below the ethics of the smear
merchant when it comes to finding a fraudulent way to smear his
targeted victim. Fraud, forgeries, outrageous and false juxtaposing
their fraud about their victim with real criminals, general deception
and repetitive fraud are the classic trademarks of a smear merchant.
(See above for information from experts on this issue.)
6. In respect to past posts or extemporaneous exchanges with others
their targeted victim has written, the smear merchant/con man will
maliciously and exclusively select sentences he can somehow
fraudulently distort into a defaming meaning, context or intent. If
one sentence or paragraph from his smear victim can be distorted to
defame the victim, yet there are dozens of other paragraphs in the
same post that will clearly prove the context, meaning and intent
the smear merchant is fraudulently expressing, the con man/smear
merchant will always ignore (or hide) the dozens of other sentences or
paragraphs in the same post or exchange that clearly prove his
defaming and forged context false. The smear merchant will always
zero in on the one error or single ambiguity that he can distort and
then exploit to defame his victim. Real evidence, the preponderance
of evidence, and/or corroboration of context and/or intent are terms
and methods the con man/smear merchant never mentions, ignores, and
in fact maliciously hides whenever possible.
7. The smear merchant also ignores and downplays his obvious pure
speculation about his targeted victim which seemingly emits from
crystal balls and soothsaying abilities that only the con man/smear
merchant possesses.
Example: A typist for the victim responds to a person she believed
was referencing Purple Heart Cards issued by the VA for service
connected veterans without initially spelling out her context was
cards, although her last sentence clearly proved her context had to be
cards and could not possibly be medals. The targeted victim however,
had already posted at least eight other times, prior to and subsequent
to the typist’s post that he DID NOT have a purple heart medal - and
the smear gang leaders had already acknowledged and responded to those
posts so they cannot deny they never saw them.
Yet the con men/smear merchants suddenly claim that the one typist’s
poorly written post means the victim *intended* to claim a purple
heart medal, which of course contradicts everything he said prior to
and after the post in question. The preponderance of evidence, and
the testimony of the typist, and the victim, clearly proves the smear
merchants/con men are lying. So the smear merchants/con men
deliberately *ignore* all of the overwhelming and preponderance of
evidence that proves without a doubt they are falsely accusing their
victim, and they never, never mention all the real evidence that
clearly proves the opposite of their claims. When their victim posts
proof of their lies, they instruct their gang to snip out that post as
fast as possible. Yet when the entire issue is brought to outside
experts, the outside experts agree completely with the victim, as
will, of course, the lawyers and the courts.
Their maliciousness and fraudulent intent to smear and defame by the
smear merchant/con man is obvious. And it relates to their general
fraudulent tactics, especially inserting and removing key words from
their victims past posts so as to alter the true context of the
sentence or paragraph, and their constant ignoring the preponderance
of evidence that proves the smear merchant/con man is using forgeries
and fraud to smear and defame, not to mention the pure speculation and
fraud they conjure up from those “crystal balls and soothsaying
abilities” only the con men/smear merchants seem to possess.
http://tinyurl.com/7tkghf The dozen or so times *I* posted on USENET
I DID NOT have a purple heart medal and the Google archive URL;s
references to such posts, AND the responses from Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau to those posts which clearly indicates these two smear merchants
knew about yet hid my statements BEFORE AND AFTER they started to post
fraud about my typist’s response to Chip about Purple Heart Cards, as
is presented below. (This post containing a list of the times I
posted I did NOT have a Purple Heart Medal, and never said I did, was
posted in November 2007, but references back previous posts from me
several years prior in which I clearly state I DID NOT have a Purple
Heart Medal - which of course the smear gang has been hiding for the
malicious reasons so specified above).
http://tinyurl.com/59hbuj Clarified and corrected Purple Heart Card
post, as so clarified by the original author. (Note only the author
(s) could possibly know the true context of anything they wrote - and
those con men that claim mind reading skills, and crystal balls to add
terms or take them away from someone’s else’s post, well, I suspect
the terms “con man” fits their description about as well as anything).
8. But if you are a rational person you might say, “this is not
fair!” True, but remember, smear merchants are not interested in
“fair.” They are only interested in smearing and defaming their
target victim by any unethical means possible.
8.a. But then you say, “this is not honest!” True, also, but again
smear merchants/con men have no use for honestly, fairness, ethics nor
even the preponderance of evidence, due diligence, honor, truth, nor
to avoid conjecture and abject speculation about their targeted
victim. They will use any fraudulent and unethical tactic they can
dream up as long as it can harm their targeted victim. The intent of
the smear merchant and gang is to do harm to their victim, either
physically or mentally. Ethics means nothing to them, honesty means
nothing to them, fairness means nothing to them, intimidation,
bullying and inciting fear into their victims is what provides them
with their sick perverse pleasure.
9. The smear merchants might as well be working in a sleazy Carnival
game, or huckstering fake jewelry as real on some street corner in a
major city - they are clearly con men, but con men that in many cases
due to the internet believe they con anonymously, (a con man’s dream)
or at least feel they cannot be touched because they are using USENET
and prompting a rebuttal defense from their smear victim. Of course
they are completely wrong. These con men are not above our laws, and
they can be brought to justice.
CON MEN/SMEAR MERCHANTS CAN NEVER ADMIT THEY LIED
10.Con men/smear merchants know once they accuse their targeted smear
victim of some defaming statement or act, then they can never admit
they were lying and were using pure conjecture and fraud to do so.
They would lose all credibility if they admitted one single act of
demonizing or fraud against their smear victim.
10.A So even when their fraud and dishonesty is proved beyond any
reasonable doubt, they ignore the irrefutable proof and immediately
move on to yet another new and equally preposterous fraud and false
accusation about their smear victim - and if they cannot find another
statement to forge or distort to smear their victim, they will make
one up out of thin air:
As an example: The 5th Infantry, 25th Infantry and the “De Oppresso
Libre, Happy Birthday” accolade:
http://tinyurl.com/8v788a Feb 29, 2004. Another reference to the
25th Infantry Division and a quick synopses of my military history.
(Note this post was dated long before Nigel Brooks and his smear
gang started their smear campaign against me, which they commenced in
March 2005. Yet Mr. Brooks fraudulently howled and barked that he was
“appointing himself Judge over me because I refused to provide my unit
in Vietnam.” Brooks clearly was lying. Tom Rau said he checked me
out and Tom Rau fraudulently posted that I was never in the US Army,
and of course was never in Vietnam. Rau also said I was never a SFC
E-7 in Vietnam, and both Brooks and Rau and gang fraudulent implied
several times that I received a bad discharge. Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau and gang started out lying about me from the start, and as more
and more evidence started to trickle in that proved they were lying
all along, they started to become desperate to cover up their volumes
of clear and unmistakable fraud, forgeries, false accusations and
general obloquy they had already posted about me. As the following
irrefutable proof again clearly provides, the more lies Nigel Brooks,
Tom Rau and other gang members told about me to compound their first
lies, the more entangled they became in their own web of deceit:
Here is what I posted on February 24, 2004, long before Nigel Brooks
even knew my name:
Doug Says: I spent two tours in Vietnam, the first one with the
25th Infantry Division, at Tay Ninh and Cu Chi, and the other
with a LSA unit in Can Tho. I also spent a tour with the 7th
Infantry Division in Korea, helping to train ROK troops for
Vietnam service. I also have spent several other tours in Foreign
countries, and most of my service was outside of the USA with the
exception of my last command. I am also a former US Army
Recruiting Office Station Commander, and I have Honorable
discharges from both the US Marine Corps and the US Army (US
Marines was the reserves).
(Note that anyone associated with the US Army knows that station
commanders of Field Recruiting Stations are all mostly Non
commissioned officers). (Please note above no mention of any other
unit assignments in Vietnam. No “5th special forces, no “special
assassin units” and similar bullshit conjured up about me by the Nigel
Brooks smear gang).
http://tinyurl.com/6u3elu First Assignment 25th Infantry division
near the Cambodian border and the Iron Triangle. April 18, 2003.
This post was dated TWO YEARS before Nigel Brooks claimed I refused
to state my unit in Vietnam.
http://tinyurl.com/8fp2tp Assigned to the 25th Infantry Division
April 8, 2003. Again dated two years before Brooks started his smear
campaign against me.
THE DE OPPRESSO LIBRE ACCOLADE
11.
A RACE AGAINST TIME (Note I signed this post and others “De
Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday” but much to the chagrin of Nigel
Brooks and Tom Rau, I state in the same post I was assigned in
Vietnam to the 25th Infantry Division! So much for the fraudulent
claims from Brooks and Rau stating my Happy Birthday accolade was
some “secret code” meaning I was claiming I belonged to the Green
Bennies. Nothing could be further from the truth as these posts
clearly prove. How could I be using code to say I was assigned to the
Green Berets when I state in the very same post, clearly, with no code
whatsoever, that my assignment was the 25th Infantry Division? No
wonder Rau and Brooks hid these posts.
1.
alt.news-media - 27 posts - 12 authors - Last post: May 27, 2002. “As
an example; during my first tour in Vietnam I was assigned to the 25th
Infantry Division at Cu Chi. When I first arrived that Cu Chi base
camp was hit (At the end of this post the following accolade was
posted:)
“De Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday”
So did I state in no uncertain terms in the above May 27, 2002 post
that my assignment in Vietnam was the 25th Infantry division? Of
course. So how could my “Happy Birthday” accolade to Special Forces
represent some “secret squirrel code” that secretly means I am
claiming to be in a completely different unit than I just said I was
assigned to??? BWHAHAHAHAHA.
Brooks and Rau knew no non-gang reader would be stupid enough to
believe their false accusations and fraud about my Happy Birthday
accolade if they also read in the SAME POST that I clearly stated my
assignment was NOT in the Green Bennies. Brooks and Rau wanted to
deceive people to believe I was fraudulently claiming I was assigned
to the green bennies in Vietnam, but how could that be if in the same
post I clearly stated I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division and
NOT to the green bennies? So what was Brooks and Rau’s solution to
their dilemma? Of course, hide my past posts that proved them the
liars and smear merchants I know them to be.
http://tinyurl.com/9a8h2q November 11, 2001. “ During my first tour
of duty in Vietnam I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division at Cu
Chi. Cu Chi is infamous for its Tunnels, and I know how difficult and
costly it is to dig the enemy out of its elaborate tunnels with trap
doors, right angles, sealed doors, and labyrinths going down sometimes
100 meters or more. “
This post above was posted in November 2001! ABOUT FOUR YEARS before
Nigel Brooks claimed I never provided the name of my unit in Vietnam,
and that my Happy Birthday accolade meant in his “secret squirrel
code” that I was claiming to have been assigned to the Green Beret
type special forces. (I was assigned at one time to a new special
forces, but it was NOT that well-known Green Beret type special
forces, as we see in the irrefutable evidence from the 25th Infantry
archives presented below).
1.
http://tinyurl.com/8l4gwn November 12, 13, 14th 2001. I state
again and again in this thread I was assigned to the 25th Infantry
Division, yet at the end of the post, I again wished the Special
Forces that was doing a bang up job in Afghanistan the following
accolade:
De Oppresso Liber, Happy Birthday.
Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau have been hiding the above posts so they
could deceive and lie about what my accolade was truly representing.
Here is more proof Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau and the other smear gang
members that have echoed their fraud have been using serial lying and
outright fraud, and hiding the posts that proves their fraud so as to
further deceive the readers about me.
1. Dai Uy's Absent DD214 (Was Re: Credibility lost cannot be ...
alt.war.vietnam - 681 posts - 48 authors - Last post: Dec 17, 2005I
was in an straight leg Infantry unit Psycho Dai, not hiding in bunkers
and .... ridiculous hype and defamation such as when I wished SF
"Happy Birthday"
May 26, 2002.
A RACE AGAINST TIME http://tinyurl.com/8rvmb5 May 26, May 27, May 28,
2002:
“Doug Says: There is only one proven tactic that will defeat
terrorists: Attack, invade, occupy and control them and all of their
resources. As an example; during my first tour in Vietnam
I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division at Cu Chi. ...
Doug Grant (Tm)
1. --
De Oppresso Liber
Happy Birthday
12. Once again as the Google archived URL’s above prove, THREE YEARS
before Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau started lying about my Happy Birthing
accolade, and other statements they fraudulently claimed meant that I
was claiming I was in the Green Beret special forces in Vietnam, I
make it very clear IN THE SAME post in which I posted the Happy
Birthday accolade that I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division
and NOT to any Green Beret Special Forces unit. Again, Rau and Brooks
hid these posts so they could further their fraud about this issue.
TOM RAU AND NIGEL BROOKS “REMOVE” THE “HAPPY BIRTHDAY” FROM THE
ACCOLADE, AND PRESENT A FORGERY TO THE READERS AS IF IT CAME FROM ME
13. To further his fraud about his clearly fraudulent claims that I
said I was in the Green Beret special forces with some secret code,
Tom Rau removed my “Happy Birthday” accolade from my “De Oppresso
Libre, Happy Birthday” statement which was clearly an accolade I
posted at the bottom of some of my posts to honor the job the Special
Forces were doing in Afghanistan. Unlike Vietnam, these men were
finally allowed to fight and destroy the enemy instead of trying to
“win the hearts of minds of the population” and woo Village Chieftains
to send their young men out as cannon fodder. It appeared to me those
days were finally long over, and now the Green Berets were starting to
“take care of the business of war.” Ergo, I believe they well
deserved my present-day accolades and many more.
13.a. Yet Tom Rau and Nigel Brooks in their zeal to smear me with any
lie and fraud they could conjure up, removed (forged) the “Happy
Birthday” part of my accolade and then they fraudulently claimed that
I was signing the signature of the Green Beret special forces “De
Oppresso Libre” only at the end of my posts so as to use that as a
“code” to mean I was claiming I was assigned to the Green Beret
Special Forces in Vietnam.
13.b. Yet, like I said, smear merchants are not interested in the
truth. They deliberately ignore the preponderance of evidence that
proves them the liars and fraud merchants they are, and they proceed
with their deceptions and unethical fraud without regard to evidence,
fact, honesty, honor, ethics, nor even glaring evidence, such as I
presenting that irrefutable prove Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau’s
malicious claims is this regard are nothing more than their usual
trumped up fraud and outrageous deceptions:
13.c. Note that in the examples I posted above, starting with
November 2001, I posted that I was assigned to the 25th Infantry
Division in Vietnam - *and in the same post I posted my “De Oppresso
Libre, Happy Birthday” accolade at the end of those posts!*
13.d. To reiterate the obvious, consider that Nigel Brooks, and Tom
Rau, and other moronic gang members fraudulently want everyone to
believe that my Happy Birthday accolade was a “secret code” telling
people I was in the Green Beret Special Forces, *but in several of
those same posts in which I posted the Happy Birthday accolade I ALSO
specifically stated that I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division!
* BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
13.e. Starting on November 11, 2001, then November 12, 13, 14 2001,
then again May 26, May 27, May 28, in all of those posts and several
others as we can see, I clearly stated my assignment in Vietnam was
the 25th Infantry Division, and in those very SAME posts I provided
my “De Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday, accolade at the end of those
posts.
13.f. So, how in the hell could I be claiming I was using a “secret
squirrel code” to say I was assigned to the Green Berets with my “De
Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday accolade at the end of my post, when
AT THE SAME TIME, AND IN THE SAME POST I CLEARLY STATED I WAS NOT
ASSIGNED TO A GREEN BERET SPECIAL FORCES UNIT, AND I FURTHER STATED I
WAS ASSIGNED TO A STRAIGHT LEG INFANTRY UNIT WHICH OF COURSE WAS THE
25TH INFANTRY DIVISION!
14. Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and gang are absolutely desperate to hide
these facts. They know I cannot possibly be implying with some
accolade I was assigned to a Green Beret Special Forces unit and in
the same post state the exact opposite! So they hid the posts in
which I clearly, and unmistakably said I was assigned to the 25th
Infantry and also used the “De Oppresso Libre, Happy Birthday”
accolade at the end of my post.
14.a. And to even add to Brooks/Rau’s outright fraud, forgeries and
deceptions, they also “removed the Happy Birthday” part of the
accolade, and then republished (forged) some of my posts reflecting
only the “De Oppresso Libre” part of my accolade at the end of the
post. **This outright, flagrant and deceptive forgery clearly was
designed to deceive readers into fraudulently believing that I was
signing my posts with the Green Beret Special Forces motto - which
Brooks and Rau knew was a complete lie.* *
http://tinyurl.com/7r8qdn Proof Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau removed the
“Happy Birthday” from my accolade so as to forge the context and
meaning of my accolade.
BEYOND UNETHICAL AND BEYOND DISHONEST
15. Like I said, smear merchants/con men are not interested in the
truth, facts, fairness nor even honesty. They have one purpose; to
smear and defame by any unethical means possible.
16. Brooks and Rau knew no rational person would believe I was using
a secret code in an accolade to mean something that directly
contradicts what I said in the narrative of the post that contained
the accolade! So they carefully and maliciously hid the preponderance
of evidence posts that proved Brooks and Rau were using forgeries and
lies from the readers view.
17 igel Brooks and Tom Rau have been caught in mid smear and mid con
yet again. (Is anyone else keeping track of how many times these two
clowns have been caught lying about me? You will not believe the
summary of lies that is being compiled from these two smear gang
leaders alone).
PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE
18. Do a Google search using my name and add up all the times
overall I have said I was assigned to the 25th Infantry Division:
18.a. A GOOGLE search produces 224 times I said I was assigned to the
25th Infantry Division in Vietnam, and 31 times I said I worked with
the 1/5th Infantry within that division at one time or another.
18.b. Now, do a Google search on my name and the terms Green Beret.
How many times does a Google search produce any statements from me
that I was assigned to any Green Beret Special Forces unit? (Please
do not count the times others made a false accusation about this issue
or someone thought my real name was “Grant” and confused me with
someone else - that has happened a few times as the name of “Grant”
was fairly common. As a case in point I received an email from a
former student that thought I was some Lt. Grant he met in the 25th
Infantry Division. And others have clearly confused me with some
other person they had in mind, but that is not my fault nor my words).
18.c. Answer: ZERO! The only special forces I was assigned to was
the special forces Reactionary that was approved by the DOA in January
1968. I *was* assigned to that force, and here is the excerpt from
the 25th Archives that proves that force existed and what its duties
were:
(The duties were NOT winning hearts and minds, I assure you).
http://tinyurl.com/8w76xj 25th Infantry Division Archives:
” Cu Chi
1. No lines at Cu Chu
2.
"Vietnam was a different war. It was a conflict where the front line
was not a trace on a map but was rather wherever the opposing combat
forces met and fought. The secure rear areas of past wars that were
so
necessary for support were nonexistent in Vietnam..."
During the 1968 Tet offensive and counter offensive months the Bunker
Line at Cu Chi was more like a WWII Battle line than a base camps
perimeter line - combat occurred almost nightly at one of the three
main 25th Infantry Division's Base Camp Bunker lines. Support Units
were exclusively responsible for camp defense at Cu Chi. RF
(reactionary force) platoons were manned by support officers, NCO's
and enlisted men that were mostly assigned to support units and not
to
main line infantry units.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The bunker line at Cu Chi consisted of observation towers, firing
positions with overhead cover, an earth berm, barbed wire
entanglements, spotlights, and minefields. The reactionary forces
developed from support battalions camped at Cu Chi were assigned
sectors of the defensive perimeter with very specific, rehearsed
plans
for reinforcement and counterattack. Artillery, countermortar fire,
sensors, communications, reconnaissance, combat patrols, air support,
and pacification all worked together to permit a large logistic and
command complex to survive in no man's land.
"----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At Cu Chi the 2d Brigade commander was usually appointed to run the
camp, and he named a full-time deputy to supervise the administrative
details of camp operation, base camp defense, and personnel overhead.
All commanders found that "semipermanent base camps require manpower,
equipment, and services beyond the organic capabilities of
battalions,
brigades, and divisions." Support units had to be used in combat
scenarios, patrols and other defenses to secure the 25th base camps.
and By 1968 the Department of the Army had authorized the use of key
Reactionary Forces trained and selected from all support units,
including administration, supply and logistics....
End excerpts:
19. Again, depending upon your definition of “Special Forces” the
only official special forces I was ever assigned to was the one
described above, and I have never said anything to the contrary.
During the 1968 Tet Offensive and Counteroffensive months, (which
Brooks and Rau both missed) there were *many* new special forces units
being established. Many of us new arrivals at that time which were
designated to participate in that new force were assigned to Tay Ninh
for some RVN combat training, and the rest of the combat training was
provided at Cu Chi. One or more of those the three 25th Infantry base
camps during that 1968 period were almost under continuous attack as
the author from the 25th Infantry archives describes above. The
Reactionary Forces also did precisely what the author described
above. If you do not believe what those reactionary forces did
represented combat, and intense combat from time to time, you are
living in the fraudulent dream world as Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau and
their gang members want you to live in.
19.a. Of course if you were not in Vietnam during the 1968 Tet
offensive and counteroffensives while assigned to a straight leg
Infantry Division, your perspective on Vietnam would be completely
different from mine. Brooks and Rau are also hiding the fact the
Vietnam war, depending upon assignment, unit, and time, really
represented several different wars. Comparing the 1968 Tet offensive
to guarding a lonely border in 1969, or performing Sp4 type personnel
duties in a major headquarters in 1967, is akin to comparing the
occupation of Berlin after WWII to the Normandy Invasion. The
differences are not only astounding, they represent in fact “two
completely different war experiences for the men that were assigned to
those events and times.”
20.a. Proving con men and smear merchants like Nigel Brooks and Tom
Rau are lying and using fraud to smear and defame is relative easy as
these military archives are available to the public. However, I do
have better things to do. I am not on a crusade to expose smear
merchants and con men like Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and their smear
gang. I would not need to rebut and disprove these clown’s fraud if
they stopped posting it, but as long as they do expect to see
continuing hard evidence in rebuttal proving they are lying. In
fact, I have just started to defend myself from these clowns.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages