MORE PURPLE HEART FRAUD FROM BROOKS - REBUTTAL

[dgvreiman]

MORE PURPLE HEART FRAUD - REBUTTAL

(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz

Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

"Nigel Brooks" <1. nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message news:
71tndoF...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> news:b13jr4hi88namboct...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:32:04 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
>>>gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
>>>the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
>>>times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal)...
>> SNIP
>> ***************************
>> For your convenience here is where you bragged about your PURPLE
>> HEART Card.
>> I have included the date and the HEADERS, the SUBJECT and the DATE
>> so anyone can go and check GOOGLE for themselves to ascertain the
>> degree of veracity in which you engage.
>>
>> A little later I will see about posting your bragging about being
>> wounded, about being "almost killed"...>> --Mac, the Medic
>> *********** PURPLE HEART, Doug Grant *********



http://tinyurl.com/6e6d3h Purple Heart Card post provided to an
independent expert on the US Military (30 year retired) and he
confirms the post was about cards and not medals. (Note this expert
and another has reconfirmed their original confirmation the context
was about VA ID cards and not medals - so if the poster is claiming I
lied about not having a Purple Heart VA ID card (which the VA itself
confirmed existed) then of course I can prove that at the time (2003)
I certainly DID possess that card.

>>
>> Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
>> alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
>> From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
>> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
>> Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22 pm
>> Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
>>
>>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
>> Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
>> supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
>> terrorists.
>> Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
>> talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
>> shot fired in anger in your life.
>> CHIP STATED:
>>> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
>>> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
>> much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
>> to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
>> That, to me is cowardice.
>>
>> Doug Says:
>> I have a Purple Heart card also, and I received mine in a
>> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
>> never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
>> received a purple heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a
>> shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
>> Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
>> advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
>> hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is>> around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart card not received in
>> combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
>>
>> *************** *************
>> Newsgroups: alt.news
>> From: "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net>
>> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:55:23 -0700
>> Local: Wed, Jun 11 2008 10:55 am
>> Subject: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
>>
>> Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
>> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have never
>> fought in a war. About the only place you could have received a purple
>> heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a shooting war, just a
>> bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of Marine officers. In respect
>> to deposing Saddam, I am the one advocating removing Saddam, you are
>> the
>> one advocating cowering, hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear
>> who the coward is around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card
>> not received in combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
>> Note: A purple heart medal cannot be awarded other than in combat.
>> Consequently, Chip must be talking about a Purple Heart VA ID card. My
>> purple heart card reference in my reply is not about the medal, but is
>> only referencing a purple heart ID card provided by the Veterans'
>> Administration for service connected disabilities which I have.
>>
>> ************ END ***********
>
> And of course the individuals whom I contacted in the Congressionally
> Chartered organization dedicated to preserving the integrity of the military
> decoration feel exactly the same as everyone else who have reviewed Reiman's
> initial postings and revisions.
>
> Nigel Brooks
Doug Says: Mr. Brooks, if you are claiming that you contacted someone
and lied to them about a typist talking about Purple Heart VA ID
Cards, and not purple heart medals, which has been proved irrefutably
by independent experts, I certainly would like to know to whom you
spoke? You certainly did tell them about the remedy of your confusion
about this matter?

Since you did post the context was about cards above, you must have
also mentioned to this mysterious "organization" all of the posts I
posted in which I clearly stated I did not have a purple heart medal,
and that I did not even write the post you and your gang keep forging
which you retrieved from my waste basket with full knowledge any
ambiguity had long been remedied - and of course, based upon the
information you posted above which included the term "cards" you have
acknowledged and I hope you conveyed that acknowledgement the person
that did write it was referencing the VA Purple Heart Cards that were
issued at that time?
Also, did you tell them that you and your gang have been lying about
the context of this post for several years, and this is in spite of
the overwhelming evidence that you and your gang are lying when you
claim the topic was about medals and not VA cards?

You did make those facts clear to all I hope, if not then I must
accept your statement above that you are intentionally sending
outright fraud, false statements, libel, defamation, con man bullshit
to third parties for the obvious purpose of unlawful harassment,
defamation and malicious libel. Please advise so I can take the
appropriate action if necessary - also, please name the organization
you contacted so I can check to see if you have just been caught in
mid con - yet again.


Please note the following posts that of course prove Nigel Brooks and
gang fraud about this issue is of course, outright fraud.


http://tinyurl.com/6e6d3h Purple Heart Card post provided to an
independent expert on the US Military (30 year retired) and he
confirms the post was about cards and not medals.


http://tinyurl.com/59hbuj Clarified and corrected Purple Heart Card
post, as so clarified by the original author. (Note only the author
(s) could possibly know the true context of anything they wrote - and
those con men that claim mind reading skills, and crystal balls to add
terms or take them away from someone’s else’s post, well, I suspect
the terms “con man” fits their description about as well as
anything). Any ambiguity in respect to this issue was remedied years
ago, yet Brooks and gang fished the ambiguous typist statement out of
my waste basket and fraudulently claimed that was intentional, and all
of the dozens of posts I posted that said I did NOT have a purple
heart medal, well, the Brooks gang likes to ignore those posts.

http://tinyurl.com/dkr9ym Nigel Brooks Confirms Purple Heart quip was
about VA ID Cards.



http://tinyurl.com/6buu77 Irrefutable evidence the SteveL anonymous
con man and cyberstalker and key member of the Nigel Brooks smear gang
maliciously retrieved erred posts that were long discarded in my
Google waste basket for the express purpose of malicious libel,
defamation, harassment and cyberstalking.


http://tinyurl.com/5m2xwu Irrefutable proof that Nigel Brooks
maliciously forged the term Purple Heart “Medal” into a post he knew
was about Purple Heart VA ID Cards and records that were issued by the
VA at the time of the original typist’s post.

http://tinyurl.com/55xefk Nigel Brooks admitting he maliciously lied
about forging the term Medal into a post he knew was about Cards, and
his offer to retract his lie and fraud.

http://tinyurl.com/6z2thj Rebuttal to the Nigel Brooks’ smear gang
fraud and false accusations about wounds and purple heart medals.

http://tinyurl.com/6syqvv Nigel Brooks - Law Dog experts will not
change their opinion.


http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/2ah57c SteveL caught in fraud about PH Medal.

2. http://tinyurl.com/2obwh3 In this June 2006 post I again state
the only post that was ever removed that had anything to do with
a Purple Heart was about Purple Heart Cards and was not written
nor posted by me. This post was posted more than 18 months ago,
confirming again the true context of Post 17 that was removed.


1. http://tinyurl.com/3b59wt May 17, 2006 long before Brooks started
posting his forged version of what Chip and my typist said:
In this post I again reference a Purple Heart Card that I
possessed:

Note the key passage above:
1. " I am an American Veteran, and when I arrive at the VA I am
forced to show my Purple Heart card ID before they will even talk
to me (note before the cyberstalkers start to wail and howl about
what I just said be assured that I am not saying possession of a
Purple Heart card indicates that I have a "Purple Heart Medal" I do
not have that medal - and that is just the old slang for the
card as it used to contain the image of a purple V -the newer
ones have an American flag background on them)"
Strange how Brooks, Rau and gang howl and whine when the Google
archives prove them the forgers and liars I know they are . . .

And Nigel Says in the same post above:
1. “My reporting of that post was on June 10, 2006. You immediately
responded, claiming forgeries and denying authorship of the post. It
wasn't until just over a year later in 2007 that you came up with the
"Purple Heart Card" explanation.
1. Why didn't you just explain it when challenged in 2006?” Nigel
Brooks went on to say in the above post?”

Nigel Brooks
Doug’s Rebuttal: What Nigel Brooks is stating above is that because I
did not mention Purple Heart Cards when he first brought up my
discarded post in 2006, and I did not even mention the missing term
“Cards” until 2007, then I was lying about the post meaning Cards and
not Medals. Mr. Brooks is, in the alternative, stating if I DID bring
up the term “Cards” back when he first brought up my discarded post,
then of course that “Cards” reference would have been proof positive
that the post in question was about Cards and not Medals. Well
surprise Mr. Brooks, because I DID precisely state that post was
about
Cards when you first brought up my discarded post, and I also stated
clearly way back then that someone else had typed and posted the post
in question:
Here are my Google archived Purple Heart URL’s that not only prove
Mr.
Brooks claim that I never mentioned “Cards” before 2007 an outright
lie and fraud, but because I did mention precisely what he claims I
should have said. Brooks has now admitted he was wrong and the true
context of the post was Cards and not Medals, just like I said it
was:
Purple heart card Google references:
http://tinyurl.com/yxkndv June 12, 2006: Victoria Crosses and purple
hearts posts where I again state clearly "Purple Heart Card" I
state:
"(The only post removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple
Heart" associated with the dggrant universal account used by dozens
of
other people was a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple
Heart Card" in a follow up conversation about VA benefits.)"
(Note the date of my post. Brooks said he first mentioned the
discarded purple heart post on June 10th, and Brooks said I did not
reply with any “Card” reference to his post until 2007, and Brooks
also implied that had I replied right away about the “Card” issue
then
that prompt reply would have represented proof positive that the
intended topic of the discarded post was Cards and not Medals. YET
THAT PROMPT REPLY IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID AND DID ON JUNE 12, 2006,
IN REPLY TO BROOKS JUNE 10, 2006 POST AS THE ABOVE GOOGLE ARCHIVE
CLEARLY PROVES!
Here is the paragraph I stated on June 12, 2006 TWO DAYS after Mr.
Brooks started his BS about this long discarded post, as the above
URL
from Google clearly proves:
From my June 12, 2006 Post:
“And what "post" is BS Brooks talking about above? I never made any
claim for any medal that I did not receive. Not once, ever. If BS
Brooks claims otherwise then let's see it along with proper
Message ID's and evidence that it was posted by me. (The only post
removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart" associated
with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other people was
a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple Heart Card" in a
follow up conversation about VA benefits.)”

Apparently, this Google archive alone proves Mr. Brooks lied about
when I first said anything about removing a post about Purple Heart
Cards. In fact this post even mentions that someone else other than
me wrote the post! According to Brooks, since I DID mention Cards at
the very time he started to question me about this post, the topic
was
clearly Cards and not Medals. No wonder Mr. Brooks offered to retract
his forgery that the post context was Medals - he knew he was caught
lying and the overwhelming proof was the context of the post was
Cards.
Mr. Brooks also posted the following lie:
> “The URL

http://tinyurl.com/3n7wvg which you provided, leads one to a
> post you made to your private google group just over 5 years after the
> initial Purple Heart post, and about 2 years after you were challenged
> on the initial post. It is self serving, and most certainly not
> evidence.”
Nigel Brooks claims about that I never mentioned the PH post was
about
Cards until TWO YEARS after I was challenged on the initial post by
him, which of course means he fraudulently claimed the topic was
Medals, which of course he denies saying below. . . again. Weooooooo.
The Victoria Crosses and Purple Hearts post URL below first proves
that Brooks has again been caught in an outright lie in his “I did
not
reply with Cards until 2 years after first challenged” which also
again reverses his claim that because I did not reply my typist’s
correction post was not evidence. However, since Brooks has been
caught lying, and in fact I DID reply that the topic was Cards almost
immediately after he challenged that post, then clearly the
alternative is true and my typist’s corrected post DOES represent yet
more evidence that (1) the true topic of the post in question was
Cards and not Medals, and ONCE AGAIN Nigel Brooks and his gang have
been caught in mid con and lie - so what else is new?
More evidence the intended topic was Cards:
1. http://tinyurl.com/yhrpg2 In this URL I mention that I am forced
to
show
my "Purple Heart Card" (May 17, 2006). Note the date, long before Mr.
Brooks said a word about this post which he says above started on
June
10, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/yxkndv June 12, 2006: Victoria Crosses and purple
hearts posts where I again state clearly "Purple Heart Card" "(The
only post removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart"
associated with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other
people was a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple
HeartCard" in a follow up conversation about VA benefits.)" (Note the
date, Brooks said he first mentioned the purple heart post on June
10th, and I did not reply with any Card reference to the post until
2007, and had I replied right away about the Card then that would
have
been proof positive that the topic was Cards and not Medals. BUT THAT
IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID ON JUNE 12, 2006, IN REPLY TO BROOKS, AS THE
ABOVE GOOGLE ARCHIVE CLEARLY PROVES!
Here is the paragraph I stated on June 12, 2006 TWO DAYS after Mr.
Brooks started his BS about this long discarded post, as the about
URL
from Google clearly proves:
“And what "post" is BS Brooks talking about above? I never made any
claim for any medal that I did not receive. Not once, ever. If BS
Brooks claims otherwise then let's see it along with proper
Message ID's and evidence that it was posted by me. (The only post
removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart" associated
with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other people was
a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple Heart Card" in a
follow up conversation about VA benefits.)”

Apparently, this Google archive along proves Mr. Brooks lied about
when I first said anything about removing a post about Purple Heart
Cards, and in fact this post even mentions that someone else other
than me wrote the post! According to Brooks, since I DID mention
Cards at the very time he started to question me about this post, the
topic was clearly Cards and not Medals, and no wonder Mr. Brooks
offered to retract his forgery that it was Medals, he knew he was
caught lying and the proof was overwhelming the context was Cards.
More evidence the intended topic was Cards:
http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also told the following lie:
“He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the
argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have
had
a Purple
Heart, and that he received it in a real war. "
Doug Says: First Mr. Brooks says the context of my typist’s post was
about medals, then he says he never said the context was about medals
and I was the only person that brought up that subject. Then he
switches back and lies and says my typist and I were talking about
medals. One lie after another, flip and flopping between lies, offers
to retract, lies about my posts about Cards, back to the lie of him
never fraudulently claiming I was talking about medals, to an
outright
claim that I was.
Weeeeeeeeoooooeoeoeo - This Nigel Brooks character needs some serious
help if you ask me.
Nigel Brooks next lie: “Make up your mind - you have previously
denied
removing the post. In fact on June 29, 2006 you commented as follows
on the posting: “

Doug Says: I said it was a forgery, and it was as it did not
reference
anywhere the term Medals as you were misrepresenting, and in fact the
last sentence of the post alone proves the context was not medals,
and
I did not write it nor post it as my June 12, 2006 post referenced
above clearly proves.
Nigel Brooks next lie: (Now he is refuting his own claim above) “”You
are the one who first used the term "medal" in connection with that
post. My commentary was directly related to your use of the term. I
was observing that were playing your usual games with words. Post
number 17 said the following: " I have a Purple Heart also"
Doug Says: Brooks says my typist’s reply was about medals, then he
says it wasn’t, then he says he never said that it was, then he
offers
a retraction of him saying it was about medals, then he ignores his
own retraction offer and again claims the topic was about
medals. . . This man lies so much and is so convoluted he must meet
himself when he goes around corners.
On April 20, 2008 Nigel Brooks made the following unsolicited offer
to
me:
http://tinyurl.com/6zxk3y
Nigel Said:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> "I'll offer you the following - If you post the confirmation you
> received > from the US Army that Chip was telling the truth about him not being
> awarded any Purple Heart medals or ever being in combat or earning
> combat badges to your > http://groups.google.com/group/namesofcyberstalkers
> group in an appropriate format that would tend to prove its
> authenticity (a jpeg > of the document showing the US Army logo should be sufficient - an
> example would be the one you have previously posted to your group here
> http://tinyurl.com/3wymqc) - I will do the following:
> I will author and post to the forums an original posting which
> indicates that I have reviewed all of your evidence concerning the
> exchange in question and am satisified that your most recent revision
> of the post is supported by the evidence.
> The only proviso that I include with this offer is that I reserve the
> right to file an FOIA with the US Army for a copy of the communication
> that you claim to have received from them regarding Mr. Ciamaichella
> (" I also have since received confirmation from the US Army that Chip
> was telling the truth about him not being awarded any Purple Heart
> medals or ever being in combat or earning combat badges.")
> Awaiting your reply
> Nigel Brooks"
In this post Mr. Brooks confirmed his retraction offer, his
verification that my typist’s correction which includes the terms
Cards is true and correct and is “supported by the evidence.” Mr.
Brooks also appointed a third party, a Mr. Henry Cook to accept the
proof he had requested and I agreed to provide:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.war.vietnam/msg/529102b2a
15528a5?
http://tinyurl.com/5j8ums


http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Nigel Brooks forgeries revealed - proof.








Doug Grant (Tm)
>