BROOKS CAUGHT (AGAIN) LYING ABOUT MY MILITARY RECORDS - REBUTTAL

[dgvreiman]

BROOKS CAUGHT (AGAIN) LYING ABOUT MY MILITARY RECORDS - REBUTTAL

Note that I have received some email requesting that I reduce my
rebuttals into shorter posts so they can be read more carefully. I
will start this procedure with this series of rebuttals to Nigel
Brooks cons, fraud and false accusations:

(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.


If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
“reasonable person” doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain,
and to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to
determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way
cause anyone emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please
note that defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal
posts has been deemed a “lawful and legitimate” publication by my
legal counsel. If I am not attacked, libeled, defamed or harassed, or
my copyrighted articles not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly
do not have a reason to respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that
I intend to notify any and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or
calumnious post, web site or other similar entity about me after I
give the offender an opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said
post from the Google archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz

Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.


http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Just SOME of Nigel Brooks forgeries
revealed - proof.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

Clown Continues:
>
> He just can't get over the fact that his official military records
> failed to support his USENET boasts made about the nature of his
> service in Vietnam.

Doug’s Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks: The Clown is lying - my military
records of course can and will confirm everything I have said
provided one has my *complete* military records. The incomplete and
often redacted military records that Nigel Brooks received via a
fraudulent FOIA request cannot possibly confirm or deny what Nigel
Brooks is claiming they confirm or deny - as the following experts and
US Government web site clearly proves: (Note that thanks to a very
enterprising clerk at the National Personnel Records Center I have
recently been provided with some of my military records that have been
missing from my files for about 40 years. In respect to this
discovery, I have been advised to file yet another Board of
Corrections request - Brooks and gang are going to *hate* to see these
records when I reveal them. Although I probably will not bother to
file any more Correction requests - like I said - I do not pander for
medals.

http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks lied about my
military service and my military records.

>
> Boasts such as:


Vietnam Duties are NOT Boasts

Doug’s Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks: Everything A Vet did in Vietnam is
not a “boast.” According to the gang, any non-gang member that
mentions the unit he was assigned to, or some of the duties he
performed is “boasting” about his service in Vietnam (such accusations
applies only to non-gang members of course)

The facts and records confirm I performed duties that thousands of
others NCO’s also performed. I was no hero in Vietnam, nor did I
ever whine or pander for medals like many did, and I did nothing
special nor different from what others my rank and assignment also did
almost on a daily basis.

My simple, common and typical and very true Vietnam experiences are
not “boasts” - and if Nigel Brooks or his gang members never performed
any of the duties I performed in Vietnam then that is their problem
not mine. Twisting and distorting every story or experience someone
posts about their Vietnam service into a “boast” would mean that Nigel
Brooks and his gang have “boasted” about their experiences in Vietnam
tens of thousands of times!

But according to the Nigel Brooks, “boasts” in reference to Vietnam
or military service experiences do not apply to gang members. Such
defamation applies only to “non-gang members” when they speak about
their experiences in Vietnam.

I wonder, does the word “hypocrisy” mean anything to Nigel Brooks and
his gang members? If not, it should.

Boasting about Medals

However, people that brag about medals they received in Vietnam I do
consider boasting - as we all know many of those medals were based
upon fabricated after action reports - or medals bestowed on some for
what others did on a regular basis and did so without any special
awards, recognition or even hot chow! (Such as a combat medic or other
members of a squad treating their friends’ wounds under fire).

I also know that officers some times wrote up their own
recommendations for medals, (shades of John Kerry) and I and many of
the men I served with had nothing but contempt and revision for those
that pandered for medals due to every little scratch or wound, or
whined for medals for doing something that others did everyday. There
were those in Vietnam that coveted medals, and those that had nothing
but contempt for those that pandered for them.

If medals were provided on an equitable basis, I would be all for
them, but we all know they were not provided in such a manner in
Vietnam. (I hope those medal inequities and officer fraud has all
changed in Iraq and Afghanistan).

There is no Boasting Here

Since I cannot find anything untrue nor incorrect in the list of quips
below that Nigel Brooks calls “boasts” (but I cannot be sure until I
see the original post and context - some do appear to be forgeries) If
this clown Brooks wants to deny any of the following out-of-context
quips he needs to first provide them in their proper context (URL
reference would be great) and post his evidence they are not true.
When completed, then we can exchange questions and answers about each
quip - here are the general terms for such inquisitions - which the
Clown has seen several times before:

http://tinyurl.com/b8gkmt Grand Inquisitor Rules:

Doug’s Rebuttal to Brooks: I cannot think of a better example of
malicious and smear tactics coming from the Nigel Brooks smear gang
than the goofy and clearly out-of-context misrepresentations listed
below by Brooks. Note the absence of context, the absence of proof,
and the outright fraud these morons post - all ridiculously expecting
rational, fair-minded and reasonable people to believe such obvious
deceptions instead of roaring with derision at the gang’s obvious con
game:

>
> Yes I was in the 5th
> I interrogated prisoners in Vietnam
> I personally captured, interrogated and imprisoned blah blah
> I have witnessed several interrogation methods - blah blah - cooking
> fake babies etc etc
> I was almost a POW
> I witnessed two ambulances with Viet Cong blah blah
> I was wounded
> I have a Purple Heart also
> Two tours, two and a half tours
> I helped train the 101st
> A counter terrorist unit
> Expert on War and Terrorism
> Tour in South America
> I fought Cubans
> I killed a VC inside Cu Chi perimeter firing mortars
> I went directly to the CG of the 25th
> A former member of the 25th wrote The tunnels of Cu Chi
> I knew General Clarke
> I am retired from the American Military
> I advised Korean troops
> I fought in Nicaragua
> I was in Cambodia
> Butter Bar
> Only 3 wounded on my team - 1803 BC
> 122mm Rocket within 15 feet of me
> I was personally involved - Au Shaw Valley, Battle for Hue
> I had an 11B MOS as a primary or secondary for the duration of my
> time in the Army
> I spent 30 years in the military
> My last command was an MI command
> Special Intelligence Services for 7th Engineer Bn
> In respect to my involvement with S-2 and G-2 my records speak for
> themselves
> I debriefed MI personnel
> An organization I spent many years with (De oppresso liber)
> I know the Police Chief of Cu Chi personally
> Draftees as a general rule were never sent to Vietnam
> I have a PhD

Doug Grant (Tm)