2ND REBUTTAL NIGEL BROOKS BB FRAUD

[dgvreiman]

2ND REBUTTAL NIGEL BROOKS BB FRAUD

Again, just like it proved Nigel Brooks and gang have been lying about
what my military records prove or disprove (see URL below) ANOTHER US
Government Web Site irrefutably proves Nigel Brooks’ has been lying
about my use of the terms Butter Bar for years . . . once again Nigel
has been caught in mid con about me and what I have said in the past.

Several URL references of past posts below that prove Nigel Brooks has
been using his “serial lying” again to maliciously defame and smear
those that dare to refute his con game of using fraud, forgeries and
defamation to attack those he disagrees with.

http://tinyurl.com/cphu62 Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau caught lying about
my military records - US Government Web Site *confirms* they have been
lying about my military records for years!

See below for the other US Government site that proves and confirms
Nigel Brooks and gang have been lying about my Butter Bar quip also
for years:



----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.war.vietnam,us.military.army
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Can someone explain the logic behind

>>>
>>>"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
>>>news:6v6aibF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>> on Medicare next year? mebbe it's senility
>>>>
>>>> I'll never forgive him for validating Reiman's butter bar
>>>> explanation :-)
>>>>
>>>> Nigel Brooks

Doug’s Rebuttal: Here we see the true colors of Nigel Brooks. Brooks
said that if any one else that posts on alt.war.vietnam, and was a
Vet, confirms they also used the term “Butter Bar” to reference a
Platoon Leader, NCO or not, then Brooks said he would apologize for
his false accusations. Yet when a member of the alt.war.vietnam
group, and someone I have never met in my life, a Veteran by the name
of Eris posted that he had ALSO heard the Butter Bar term used in
the same manner as I had, and he had used the term the same way,
Brooks cowered and hid from his apology offer - and then he and his
gang started to attack Eris!

Now Brooks states above “he can never forgive Eris” simply because he
told the truth and exposed Brooks and his con gang for the fraud and
merchant they clearly are. Brooks openly lies about apologizing, and
then attacks anyone that tells the truth about this issue. No wonder
I have come to believe Nigel Brooks is a con man and a smear merchant.

Another more recent glaring fraud in respect to this issue is a post
Brooks posted just a few days ago that contained more of Brooks
outrageous, and provable fraud and deception. This con game is so
obvious one must wonder how tight this smear merchant is really
wrapped:

Here is an example of Brooks posting a complete deception and fraud
about this Butter Bar issue:

From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.war.vietnam,us.military.army
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Can someone explain the logic behind

Brooks said about me:

> A couple of days prior to that he claimed that he had been a Platoon
> Sergeant prior to going to OCS.

http://tinuyurl/q3c45

I replied with: Bullshit Brooks. Your link above is a complete
fraud. I
suspect you did not believe anyone would click on it.

Note that if you click on Brooks URL site, it will NOT produce what he
claims it will. Brooks has been caught in mid con and deception once
again! If you follow the link that Brooks’ claims confirms I said I
was a SFC *before* I went to OCS, you will find the complete opposite
of his claims, and the following information is what you will find
instead - which of course directly contradicts Nigel Brooks’ glaring
fraud and serial lying:

1. http://tinyurl.com/4jkvjn July 29, 2006 I had said many times
previously
that I made SFC E-7 long after I left OCS, and in fact had posted
several times that I was promoted to SSG E-6 and offered a very
unusual
assignment in France by the OCS School after I left OCS. (How could I
be
a SFC E-7 *before* I went to OCS if I was promoted to SSG E-6 only
after I
left OCS? This is typical of the BS Brooks distortions of the facts).
“

(Note that Brooks did find a typo that said “before” instead of
“after” and he connected that typo to another typo - but again Brooks
knew all about the mistake the typist made in this regard).

Brooks knows that my Google archived proved *132 times* I said I was
promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT OCS flies in the face of his
preposterous and fraudulent claim that I was claiming I was a SFC E-7
BEFORE I went to OCS - and it also proves irrefutably the (as a SFC)
phrase in the Butter Bar quip was originally out of place, and should
have been placed directly behind the terms Butter Bar so to further
explain what I meant by the Butter Bar phrase. Brooks knows the
overwhelming evidence proves he and his gang has been lying about this
issue for years. Brooks also knows that anyone that was ever in the
US Miltiary would know the rank of SFC E-7 DOES NOT come before that
of a SSG E-6 - and that mere fact proves Brooks is a liar and a con
man in respect to his fraudulent claims about my Butter Bar platoon
leader quip. So what did Brooks do to hide his glaring fraud?

When Brooks realized he was caught in mid con again, he simply forged
a post meaning out of thin air, claimed I said something in that post
that I clearly did not, and in fact I had said the opposite, and
Brooks used a deceptive URL link to try to desperately provide some
credibility to his false and deceptive claim. Brooks knew I never
said I was a Platoon Sergeant before I went to OCS, and his con gam of
providing false and forged URL’s and statements to try and prove
otherwise has just been exposed for what they are - typical Nigel
Brooks flim flam, con game, and serial lying. And people actually
gang up with this clown? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. What a group of
pathetic souls Brooks and his gaggle of clowns must really be!

I suspect Brooks gang’s propensity to hide the overwhelming evidence
that proves him a smear merchant and a serial liar only exposes the
gang members and Brooks as the fools they really are. I am reminded
of the following ism:
“ The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools.”
-- Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)


U.S. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS PROVES BROOKS IS LYING

Unfortunately for Mr. Brooks and his red faced gang, the
extemporaneous quip I made about being forced to become a Butter Bar
(as a SFC) in Vietnam due to the lack of commissioned platoon leaders
found its way into one of my copyrights - and was sent to the U.S.
Copyright office long before Nigel Brooks said a word about the old
Butter Bar typo post! So if it was my intent to say that I was a SFC
E-7 before I went to OCS, I sure as hell would not have copyrighted
the following passage, and I sure as hell would not have posted on
USENET 132 TIMES that I was promted to SSG E-6 **AFTER** I left OCS!

Copyrights can be discovered in the Library of Congress, and here is
precisely the unaltered excerpt, title, and TX number of the
*registered* copyright that contains the *correct* passage that was
included in my “WAR STORIES ONE” copyright:

The title of the *Registered* copyright is:

War Stories Doug Grant (Tm)

The Copyright Registration number is: 1Xu-300-978


Does Brooks sound like a man that is interested in the truth, or is
more interested in finding a way to use serial lying, smears, fraud,
forgeries and outright cons to defame and belittle his targeted
victims? Does his posts attacking everyone sound like a man that
suffers such a tremendous inferiority complex he must attack and smear
others just to bolster his own pathetic and feeble ego? Does Nigel
Brooks’ posts sound like a man who holds a grudge against those that
dare to defy him by posting the truth - such as Brooks statement about
Eris; “I will never forgive him” - simply because he told the truth
and exposed the con man Brooks outright fraud? It certainly does to
me - and can anyone be more pathetic than one of the Brooks smear
gang? Talk about pathological - whew! Here is some information about
smear gangs and how and why they operate:



Consider also , as yet another example of Nigel Brooks’ voluminous
fraud, when Brooks first found the extemporaneous typo quip about
Butter Bar he actually feigned some due diligence and asked me what I
meant in that quip. In his post (see the URL below) Brooks’
acknowledged the post in question was all about NCO’s, (that is why
he hides the rest of the post when he re-posts his context forgery) so
Brooks did, for the first and only time, actually ask me what my true
context was in respect to the Butter Bar quip.

Also note (as the URL below clearly confirms) that when Brooks asked
me what I meant by the Butter Bar quip, *he also asked me if my use of
the term Butter Bar meant something *other* than a 2nd Lieutenant!*
So obviously, as the following URL’s clearly prove, ol Nigel knew damn
well the term Butter Bar can be and is often used in several different
contexts. Which of course other “Regular Army” personnel (which
Brooks never was) have often confirmed, (see the URL below the term
“Butter Bar” is *often* used to denote a Platoon Leader, and that is
precisely how I used the term).


Yet when I replied to Brooks and told him (1) that the “(as an SFC)”
passage was clearly in the wrong position in the quip, a simple typo,
and that my use of the BB term was to denote a Platoon Leader, Brooks
did not like that answer:

Those true context facts meant that Nigel Brooks could not use the
typo he had found due to his months of maliciously searching through
35, 000 of posts that had been posted under my account for any typo,
any ambiguity, anything, he could distort, forge and lie about so as
to defame and con the readers about me. (Brooks and his smear gang
started off posting fraud and false accusations about me without any
basis whatsoever. Yet when evidence started to mount that I had been
telling the truth all along, Brooks and gang became desperate to
discredit me out of fear of a defamation lawsuit, so they started
compounding their first fraud with subsequent fraud, any forgery, any
lie they could think of to cover their pathetic con man asses).


This Butter Bar fraud and false accusation is classic Nigel Brooks:
Even *after* he knew full well I said the (as a SFC) entry in the quip
was out of place in the paragraph, and even *after* he knew I did not
use the Butter Bar quip to claim anything other than being a Platoon
Leader (as a SFC) - Nigel Brooks maliciously decided he would FORGE
some “new words” into my original quip, and then use his forgery to
con his gang and the readers that *his* forgery was really something I
said and intended - thereby giving his gang their cue to start assist
him in his smear and defamation campaign against me.

Yes, as the following Google archived URL clearly proves, Brooks
actually FORGED (added) the terms “(2nd Lieutenant)” after my Butter
Bar terms, so as to make it appear I was claiming to be a 2nd
Lieutenant, although Brooks *already knew* of the typo, and he knew
my use of the term meant a Platoon Leader SFC E-7 which was forced to
take over a platoon because of the absence of a commissioned officer.

Malicious Intent

So when someone does something false and fraudulent they *know* in
advance is false, fraudulent, and has been designed to use deception
and fraud to defame someone - how is that interpreted by the courts?
It is called “malice or malicious” in its intent and nature, and that
is precisely how you can describe Nigel Brooks in respect to most of
the posts he posts about me.

I have found the Nigel Brooks to be clearly a con man, serial liar,
fraud and smear merchant, and so has every expert that I have
consulted about Mr. Brooks posts about me. (No wonder Brooks ducks my
Arbitration and Lie Detector offers as fast as his legs will cower).

Please see the following URL’s to prove Nigel knew in advance about
the typo and the true context before the FORGED the “(2nd Lieutenant)”
terms after my Butter Bar phrase so as to completely, intentionally,
and maliciously distort my quip for the purpose of defaming, harassing
and inciting and using cyberstalking against me.

Nigel Brooks most Idiotic claim in respect to this issue:

BROOKS claim that a SFC E-7 rank comes *before* a SSG E-6 rank is
classic Nigel Brooks being caught in his own fraud:


A quick Google search will produce more than 132 hits on me as an
author talking about being promoted to SSG E-6 immediately after I
left OCS. Yet in contrast, Nigel Brooks found a single typo that
erroneously indicated that I was a SFC E-7 before I went to OCS, and
clearly the SFC E-7 was out of place in the paragraph. Yet Brooks,
true to his con man and smear merchant style, claims the single typo
was intentional and was meant to be true, and the other 132 clear and
unambiguous statements my me that said something completely different
were all lies. No wonder I nicknamed this clown “Inspector Cluso” as
only “Inspector Cluso” would ignore 132 pieces of contradictory
evidence and proclaim an obvious typo as the real intent by the same
author or dictator.

Only a clown like Nigel Brooks would be idiotic enough to make such a
preposterous claim. It is impossible to be promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER
I left OCS, and state that fact 132 times, and then in a single post,
*intend* for a typo to indicate that I was claiming to be a SFC E-7
BEFORE I even went to OCS! Obviously, something was written in error
and the “(as a SFC)” passage was not correctly placed directly behind
the terms “Butter Bar” where it belonged so as to explain I was
talking about an NCO that had to take the place of a commissioned
officer.

Would an honest “inspector” accept a “single error” as being
intentional, or instead accept 132 direct, unambiguous statements
contradicting the one error? We all, of course know the answer to
that one, yet it is Nigel Brooks that is howling and whining and
trying his best to con the readers that the one error he found about
this issue was “intentional” and the other 132 direct contradictory
statements are all lies! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

No Wonder I call this clown “Inspector Cluso!”

Context is a word Nigel Brooks has never heard of:


Doug Says: Common sense is to believe the intent of the author, and
not to try to exploit and use fraud and lies to misrepresent a simple
typo - and this is especially true when dozens of my posts prove
irrefutably that I said was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
after I LEFT OCS - and we all know that a SFC comes AFTER a SSG E-6 -
all of us except of course the net smear merchant and con man Nigel
Brooks.

NIGEL BROOKS CAUGHT FORGING AGAIN - A REBUTTAL TO MORE NIGEL BROOKS
FRAUD



Key Point: As the following URL below clearly proves, Nigel Brooks
FORGED the terms “(2nd Lieutenant) into my quip AFTER he was told by
me that was NOT want I meant, and I was referencing a Platoon Leader
that was a SFC E-7 taking the place of a missing commissioned
officer. Brooks not only has been caught maliciously and
deliberately lying about the context and the intent of my quip, he has
also been caught FORGING terms into my quip so as to deliberately and
fraudulently change the true context and meaning.

Do the terms: Con man and smear merchant apply to Nigel Brooks? If
forging terms and distorting context so as to post false accusations
about Veterans is not the hallmark of a con man and a smear merchant,
I cannot think of what is.


http://tinyurl.com/cdox5m

Here is a short list of Nigel Brook's more recent forgeries, and his
laughable claim that he "never forged anything in his life." Not only
has Brooks been caught lying and conning about his military service,
he has been caught lying about other people's military records. The
man is clearly a con man and a smear merchant in my opinion and in
the opinion of outside experts I have consulted.


BROOK BUTTER BAR FORGERY EXPOSED -REBUTTAL

1. See my post: http://tinyurl.com/47wgm3

POW'S LEFT BEHIND IN VIETNAM
- PROOF -REBUTTAL
REBUTTAL to Nigel Brooks fraud and false accusations in respect to
this issue.



http://tinyurl.com/3nm8yr

An Enormous Crime.

In a direct, flagrant and deliberate infringement on one of my
copyrighted articles that was about POWS' left in Vietnam and had
nothing to do with Nigel Brooks, Mr. Brooks' has once against
distorted the facts with fraud and false accusations.

Sp4 Brooks' not only infringed on my copyright, he added his usual
spiteful fraud and forgery about my Butter Bar reference when I
sarcastically mentioned I was forced to be a Platoon Leader when there
was an absence of Lieutenants. Note this long ago exchange included a
single typo that Brooks of course found during one of his back
searches of posts coming out of one of the accounts I used.

Brooks' back searches all of my posts searching for typos and such so
he can use fraud and false distorted interpretations of all typos
(except his and his gang members of course) to smear, defame, defraud,
lie about and falsely and fraudulently portray in a context and
meaning that was not intended by me nor the original author. (A.k.a.
"The Nigel Brooks' Flim Flam").

Nigel Brooks - World Record Holder?

It is not so much that Brooks has dredged up his own forgery about
something I said in the past, that practice is standard Nigel Brooks
and his fraud and false accusations are becoming legendary. (Brooks
probably holds the world Internet record for web sites forced down by
web managers due to defamation or lies or fraud or abuse or false
accusations or all five reasons).

Yet when Brooks laces his half-baked and generally goofy self-serving
opinions with outright fraud about me because I dared to present
something that he does not want Vietnam Vets to read - I believe that
malicious and unethical act goes beyond his typical fraud, copyright
violations, false accusations, serial lying, deceptions, distortions,
preposterous mind reading claims, outright forgeries, and traducement
posts about me and others.








Correcting Typos and Errors

If we find a typist error or typo or something that can be
fraudulently exploited due to any ambiguity, or an outright forgery
from Brooks or any of his gang members, we remove it from the Google
archive and replace the post with the typo, error or ambiguity
corrected.

Everyone knows only the original author can know the true intent and
meaning of anything he might write, and Nigel Brooks is soooooo stupid
I doubt if he even knows the true meaning of what *he* writes not to
mention anyone else. Brooks' has ZERO background in literary reviews
or critiques, and his background is more attuned to fraud, forgeries,
flim flam, serial lying and false accusations, so we can all see the
kind of person I am being forced to deal with.

Brooks and Gang Spend all their Time Searching through My Waste Basket
for Discarded Errors - how pathetic is that?

To further their typical fraud and false accusations, Nigel Brooks and
his gang like to dig discarded posts out of my waste basket that were
discarded due to error or typo, while ignoring the corrected post that
is replaced on USENET without the error. They spend hours and hours
back searching posts that were posted under one of the accounts I used
pathetically wasting their time searching for any typo, any error they
can forge and distort into something defaming or they can use to
continue their cyberstalking and harassment against me.

Out of the approximately 35,000 posts on USENET posted by many under
the account names I also used, so far they have found about five or
six key typos or errors they can fraudulently exploit or forge into
something that appears on the surface defaming. Yet on closer
inspection simply proves that Nigel Brooks and his gang are nothing
more than forgers that splice together post fragments years apart, and
then add or subtract their own words so as to make the post fragments
say something entirely different from what the original author wanted
to say or convey to the readers.

INTENT OF THE AUTHOR IGNORED BY THE BROOKS GANG


*Intent* of the author is the key, and every expert I have spoken with
has confirmed the obvious and known fact that only the original author
can determine the true context and meaning of anything he has written.
Others can question and ask his meaning if it could be ambiguous of
course, but Brooks and Rau and gang does not ask. They simply forge
the post fragments they find into something defaming they want it to
mean so they can then use their own forgeries for the purpose of
defaming their targeted smear and con victim.

Brooks' attempts to con the readers into believing he can read minds,
and he and only he can interpret all of the literary works in the
world, and he claims he even knows more about context and intent than
the original author. Add that to his Sp4 Draftee background yet based
upon that pathetic amount of service and rank he also claims he is an
expert on the US Military and some how, (mind reading or soothsaying
or a cyrstal ball - take your pick) he knows what every solider did or
did not do in his military service, and what you clearly are dealing
with in Nigel Brooks is a self delusional crackpot.

Here is some detailed information about Mr. Brooks propensity to
falsely interpret post fragments from other authors for the obvious
and deliberate purpose to defame the original author:

http://tinyurl.com/4z9o7m

BROOKS SPIN AND FRAUD REVEALED -REBUTTAL

Doug Says: It is very easy to prove the (as a SFC) typo was out of
place in the sentence. The correct positioning of the (as a SFC)
explains clearly that I was talking about performing the duties of a
Butter Bar as a SFC E-7 Platoon Sergeant, and here is the proof the
SFC E-7 typo was in fact an original typo and the statement above is
the correct one. First let's examine Brooks glaring typo version:

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I went to
OCS
and returned as a Butter Bar myself."

Google Archived FACT: I said 132 times I was promoted to SSG E-6
special orders 145, eight days after I arrived in France from the OCS
school in Ft. Benning. I was not promoted to SFC E-7 until December
1968 in Vietnam. According to Brooks' typo version below I would be
ridiculously claiming I was a SFC E-7 *before* I went to Vietnam, and
then after Vietnam I went to OCS - which is of course ass-backwards to
everything else I have ever said about my service.

http://tinyurl.com/4jkvjn

July 29, 2006 I had said many times previously that I made SFC E-7
long after I left OCS, and in fact had posted several times that I was
promoted to SSG E-6 and offered a very unusual assignment in France by
the OCS School after I left OCS. (How could I be a SFC E-7 before I
went to OCS if I was promoted to SSG E-6 only after I left OCS? This
is typical of the BS Brooks distortions of the facts).



http://tinyurl.com/42ew8o

July 28, 2006 Note the Above post proves that Dai Uy lied about me
"washing out of OCS" and further lied about my rank in Vietnam.

1. Then Nigel Brooks corrected his own gang member and confirmed that
I was promoted to SFC E-7 on December 1968 -"

http://tinyurl.com/4vara2

So by Nigel Brooks own mouth, he *had to know* he was lying about the
Butter Bar quip as he already knew I was promoted to SFC E-7 LONG
AFTER I LEFT OCS! Read his own post above that confirms that clear
fact.

SECTION CHARLIE PART II CAN BE FOUND AT THIS URL:

Nigel Brooks lie that I was never a Platoon Sergeant, his own Google
archived posts proves he is lying and using fraudulent
misrepresentations in this regard. Brooks
is also caught lying about my OCS assignments and my assignments after
OCS once again.. Included is Brook's confession (Google archived post
from Brooks) that contrary to his previous claims he now confesses he
"really does not know who wrote or posted the articles and forgeries
he has been attributing to me." (Evidence Included). Brooks is again
caught using fraudulent statements in respect to my assignments to
France and immediate promotion to SSG E-6.

http://tinyurl.com/msqv2

(Section Charlie).
SECTION DELTA PART II CAN BE FOUND AT THIS URL: In this section Nigel
Brook's is caught lying not only about his claims that I have a bad
discharge, but also lying about my OCS assignments, and my assignments
and promotion immediately after OCS. I include scanned orders proving
Nigel Brooks and his gang members are using lies and fraud to defame
me. (Evidence included). (Brooks also lies about my MOS duties, and my
duties outside of my MOS as well).

http://tinyurl.com/hw282



"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and >
> returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."

Brooks' knows his typo version he dug out of my waste basket is
completely false, misleading and fraudulent. Brooks' has even admitted
that I was not promoted to SFC E-7 until long after I left OCS and was
stationed in Vietnam. So by Brooks own mouth he has admitted to
posting a known forgery and false representation based upon his own
forgery - yet again. Whew! What a fraud merchant this Nigel Brooks
clown is!

PROOF BROOKS FORGED THE TERMS “(2ND LIEUTENANT)” INTO MY POST THEN
PANNED HIS FORGERY OFF AS SOMETHING I HAD WRITTEN

Now we shall prove that Brooks actually FORGED AND INSERTED the terms
(2nd Lieutenant) into my post after the Butter Bar term so as to
deliberately forge and lie about my intent and meaning of the post
fragment in question:

Here is the post that proves Mr. Brooks forged the terms (2nd
Lieutenant) into my post AFTER I told him I was sarcastically
referencing a Platoon Leader that was a Platoon Sergeant (SFC ) that
had to take over due to an absence of commissioned officers.

http://tinyurl.com/3em5ny



"Mr. Brooks, your claim that you never posted a forgery of any kind in
respect to your smear campaign against me is preposterous and
represents outright fraud - I can and will produce
dozens of out-of-context forgeries about me posted by you. One of your
first forgeries was adding the terms "2nd Lieutenant" after my Butter
Bar phrase although I specifically told you and you acknowledged that
my context and meaning of "Butter Bar" was that of a "Platoon Leader
that was a SFC E-7" and NOT a 2nd Lieutenant."

http://tinyurl.com/4esrnk
April 27

http://tinyurl.com/64kkux


Nigel Brooks Butter Bar forgery, where he ADDED the terms (2nd
Lieutenant) into the narrative of my post so as to change the context
of the post fragment he used to fraudulently claim I was claiming to
be a 2nd Lieutenant in Vietnam "Note that Brooks forged my post and
added the terms "(2nd Lieutenant)" even *after* I told him I was
referencing a Platoon Leader that was a SFC in absence of a
commissioned officer - so much for "honesty" in the Brooks gang)."

Nigel Brooks goes on with his fraud:

> "Joe" is of course Joe Schlatter a former frequent poster to
> alt.war.vietnam.
> The term "Butter Bar" is military slang used to identify the lowest
> commission officer rank of pay grade O-1. It's origin is derived
> from the
> insignia of rank worn by the individual, a yellow or gold colored
> single
> bar - hence the term "Butter Bar".

As the URL above clearly proves, Nigel Brooks has *admitted* the term
“Butter Bar” can mean many other things other than just a 2nd
lieutenant, and of course anyone in the US Army knows that fact. Yes I
have heard "Butter Bar" mean a dumb ass 2nd Lieutenant, but I have
also heard it used to denote a Platoon Leader, green officer, OCS
graduate, stupid officer, shaky officer,
contemptible officer, asshole officer, and even a cowardly officer. I
used it in the context to denote the common event when a Platoon
Leader was absent from his platoon and therefore the SFC (platoon
sergeant) had to become the "butter bar" platoon leader as well as the
platoon sergeant.

Some Other Evidence That Butter Bar Is Used to Mean Platoon Leader

http://tinyurl.com/3h9oxv


Another AWV poster (Eris) uses the Butter Bar name to denote a Platoon
Sergeant that also was forced into the position of Platoon Leader the
same as I did. Brooks said if anyone else confirmed the usage the same
as I did he would apologize and retract his fraud. I am still waiting
for his apology. I have often seen Brooks; demand evidence he is wrong
with a claim he would
retract or apologize for his fraud if that evidence is presented, but
in true Flim Flam style, when the evidence comes in proving he is
wrong he ducks his offer and pretends he never said it. Like I said,
this guy has the ethics of a Saigon Whore. (I wonder where he learned
to be so unethical?)

http://tinyurl.com/4fbmww


Here is another email I received from a person that confirms others in
the 25th Infantry division also heard the term Butter Bar used to
denote a Platoon Leader. I sent that email to CyberstalkerWebNames on
July 28, 2006.
>
> As to his claim that I have admitted the term butter bar can mean > anything other than a 2Lt - well that is pure and unadulterated bs. > But then Mr. Reiman is fond of mischaracterizing the facts - in fact > his propensity in that regard has even been commented on by the > United States Courts.
>
> Nigel Brooks
>
Doug Says: Brooks has been caught in mind con YET AGAIN!!!! In the
above URL Nigel Brooks asks me if I meant something other than a 2nd
Lieutenant when I referenced a Butter Bar. Brooks question clearly
proves he knew the term “Butter Bar” can and did mean something other
than just a 2nd Lieutenant - Brooks said so himself when he asked me
that question. Moreover we also see the following information in
which SEVERAL real regular army soldiers referred to a Butter Bar as a
Platoon Leader precisely the same as I did.

Moreover, Brooks said if anyone agreed with me on this issue he would
apologize. Eris posted the above that he also referred to his platoon
leader as a Butter Bar even when his Platoon Leader was a NCO! I
don’t know Eris, and did Brooks apologize? Of course not, Brooks
attacked Eris for posting the truth - in typical con man style!

http://tinyurl.com/dmpgrl In this post I provide volumes of evidence
that other Regular Army personnel (of which Mr. Brooks was never a
member of) have also heard and used the term Butter Bar to reference a
Platoon Leader. - URL’s are included.

I should also point out again that I was promoted to SSG E-6
immediately after I left OCS - so Brook’s obviously fraudulent claim
that I was claiming I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I even went to OCS is
clearly fraudulent, a lie, and his goofy fraud is equally clearly a
typo as the above corrected passage of the quip clearly proves.

As I said, Brooks regularly uses typos to smear and defame, while
“clarifying” his own:

As just one example, Brooks claimed that OCS members graduated as a
1st Lieutenant, but when challenged that claim he “clarified” his
erroneous statement as a “typo” - it seems that Nigel Brooks and gang
can make typos and correct or clarify them, but the gang’s smear
victims cannot. I wonder if the word “Hypocrite” means anything to
Nigel Brooks? It should.


http://tinyurl.com/aa3kls Brooks Platooon Sergeant Lie:

http://tinyurl.com/d833hg In This rebuttal I prove that Nigel Brooks
confirmed my promotion to SFC E-7 AFTER I left OCS - then he later
lied about it.

http://tinyurl.com/cnqp7v In this post Nigel Brooks confirms and
acknowledges that I said and was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
AFTER I left OCS. So how can ol Nigel now claim that I said I was a
SFC E-7 BEFORE I attended OCS? There are 132 posts on any Google
search that proves I said I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT
OCS! Many of which Nigel acknowledged by responding to them.
Obviously, the (SFC) entry in the original extemporaneous Butter Bar
quip was typographically placed in the wrong place in the sentence
Brooks is forging as the PREPONDERANCE of evidence clearly and
irrefutably proves. Which BTW, also proves that Brooks has been
caught in mid con yet again.

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and
returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."

It is clear the (SFC) entry was placed in the sentence to clarify what
I meant about being a Butter Bar, and if Brooks would ever show the
post in true context, it will prove that I was talking about NCO’s
taking the place of commissioned officers in the post - no wonder
Brooks hides the entire post - it would also prove his fraudulent and
forged context.




http://tinyurl.com/art5yk In this post I state again that I was
promoted to SSG E-6 eight days after I left OCS. So how can Nigel
Brooks now claim that I said I was a SFC before I went to OCS? Sp4
Brooks was of course never in the regular Army, but you would think
that even a SP4 personnel clerk draftee would know the rank of SFC E-7
comes AFTER the rank of SSG E-6? I suspect that Brooks does know
about that proper order of rank, but he needs to lie about it so he
can further his fraud about a clear and unmistakable typo that he is
trying to exploit into a means to con the readers again about
something I said in the past.

http://tinyurl.com/cnzpvf In this post I once again expose Nigel
Brooks fraud about my rank after I left OCS - which again Nigel ties
to lie about, and other lies.

http://tinyurl.com/5ttdjw Here is yet another post in which I clearly
state that I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I left OCS and was assigned
to France. “Which was if I was willing to delay my return to OCS, I
would be sent to France, promoted to SSG E-6,. . . “
Brooks and gang clearly knew that I had said dozens of times that I
was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT OCS - thereby making it virtually
impossible their claim that I said and meant I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I
went to OCS is true - we all know that E-7 comes AFTER E-6, and that
fact clearly, irrefutably, without question, proves Nigel Brooks and
gang has been caught in mid con yet again! Amazing how many times
this smear and fraud merchant exposes his own con game and fraud!


Like I said, there are not less than 132 posts found on any Google
search in which I said I was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
after I left OCS and arrived in France. So it is impossible for any
statement that I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I went to OCS to be correct and
intentional. Brooks was told this simple fact, and about the typo,
when he first asked about my meaning in respect to my extemporaneous
quip. As the following URL proves, I pointed out the typo and told
him that the typist simply placed the (SFC) acronym in the wrong place
in the sentence. Which is something that is done often by us all.
Yet Brooks had already been lying and conning about this issue, so he
could not admit that he was clearly wrong as not less than 32 Google
archived POSTS CLEARLY PROVE!

Brooks also stated that he knew the term Butter Bar could mean
something other than simply a 2nd Lieutenant - which the following URL
clearly proves - once again Nigel Brooks has been caught in mid con.

Even the tiniest of investigation into Nigel Brooks smear and
defamation irrefutably proves he is lying, conning and using fraud and
forgeries to do so. Brooks claim that a SFC E-7 comes before the rank
of SSG E-6 is a classic example of how Brooks trips up, and of course
his now infamous preposterous claim that people can receive Purple
Heart Medals in non-combat situations, which also has been exposed for
the fraud it clearly is. In fact Nigel Brooks has a propensity to use
forgeries and fraud to smear and defame, and it has been my experience
that he is easily caught if you take the time to simply do a little
investigation into his fraudulent accusations. Here are some more
examples of Nigel Brooks forgeries:

http://tinyurl.com/a5ff9z A sample listing of just a few of Nigel
Brook’s glaring forgeries - there are many more to come in addition to
this list - in fact when you see the listing of all the fraud and
serial lying Nigel Brooks has posted about me - you will realize that
Mr. Brooks is not only a fraud and smear merchant, he is a net con man
as well.

http://tinyurl.com/7zlbpm Here are some of Brooks outright frauds and
forgeries in respect to his fraudulent claims about the 5th Infantry
and me - more incredible revelations of a serial liar and con man that
thinks he can get away with such obvious fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/a4tkgy In this post I offer Nigel Brooks the
opportunity to take his fraud to the American Association of
Arbitrators - and if they confirm he is telling the truth then *I will
pay for the arbitration!* But if they determine he is lying then he
pays. I also offered Brooks and his gang the opportunity to place me
under a lie detector test and if that test determines I am lying I pay
for the test, if not, then Brooks pays. Note that Nigel Brooks, in
true con man and fraud merchant style, is ducking, hiding, cowering,
running from, ignoring, not mentioning, dodging, and avoiding my
Arbitration and lie detector offer, and he has done so more than
twelve times and counting. If he ducks this offer herein again, then
the count would be up to 13 times he has hid from this offer.

Conclusion: Nigel Brooks knows he is a complete fraud and a serial
liar. If not why duck independent arbitration and lie detector tests?

Doug Grant (Tm)