CORRECTED ANSWER TO CHIP'S FEB 16, 2003 STATEMENT

[Dietz]

CORRECTED ANSWER TO CHIP'S FEB 16, 2003 STATEMENT

> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
> > Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
terrorists.
> > Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
> > talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
shot > fired in anger in your life.
> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
That, to me is cowardice.

Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
received a purple heart card was in Lebanon, and that was not a
shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating
cowering, hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward
is
around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart card not received in
combat is about as cowardly as it gets.

Note the above post reply that was written and posted by my typist was
originally discarded in Google's "waste basket" because my typist did
not properly place the term "Card" in the three places indicated
above. As the statement from my typist confirms, I was read the above
post from Chip on the telephone, and my typist took his statement
above to say "I have a purple heart and a car" as meaning I have a
purple heart card (meaning a VA purple heart ID card that was a topic
of conversation I had with others before). I told her to respond as
the above post correction indicates. After someone brought her key
typo omissions to my attention, I of course replied to that person (in
2003) that any representation that my reply was about medals was a
"complete distortion and innuendo of what was written."

However, due to the typo, and because Google offers an "electronic
waste basket" for erred or posts containing such typographical
errors, I removed it from Google, told Google the reason it was being
removed, and Google placed the typo post in its "waste basket" dead
file.

However, smear merchants, being what smear merchants are, decided to
retrieve the erred post from the waste basket and then he FORGED the
term "Medals" into the post after the purple heart terms, thereby
fraudulently changing and altering the true context of the long
discarded typo post from "Cards" into "Medals." Then Nigel Brooks and
his gang used their own forgery to claim I was falsely claiming a
"medal" I did not possess. Yet Chip confirmed (in writing) he did not
have a Purple Heart medal and therefore could not have been talking
about medals, my typist confirmed (in writing) she took his purple
heart statement to be about Cards and not Medals, and she also
confirmed (in writing) that my answer to Chip clearly stated Purple
Heart Cards three times. Yet she also said that because she really
did not know the difference she simply mistakenly omitted the term
"Card" from the original reply to Chip. Of course when I replied to
the first person that questioned this post back in 2003 that it did
not mean medals, I spotted the typo, and consequently, threw it in
the electronic waste basket which Google provides for such erred
posts.

Yet since the smear merchants have been caught digging around in my
waste basket for erred and typo posts that have been long discarded to
try and find some unethical way to defame me, I have been advised to
provide this explanation and replace the post the way it was
originally intended. (My typist also states that she mentioned the
topic was about cards at the bottom of the post because it was
impossible to earn a purple heart medal in a non-combat situation,
which I clearly indicated Chip had done).

I have submitted this issue to an independent expert on the military
and the law, and he has replied that he agrees with me that the true
context of my typist's reply post was about "Cards" and NOT "Medals"
contrary to the misrepresentations and forgery by Nigel Brooks and his
gang.

Any continued forgery of medals into this post will be recognized as a
typical Nigel Brooks forgery, just one more of many.

Doug Grant (Tm)