PURPLE HEART CARD REBUTTAL TO NIGEL BROOKS FRAUD

[dgvreiman]

PURPLE HEART CARD REBUTTAL TO NIGEL BROOKS FRAUD

Note that I have received some email requesting that I reduce my
rebuttals into shorter posts so they can be read more carefully. I
will start this procedure with this series of rebuttals to Nigel
Brooks cons, fraud and false accusations:

(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.

This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).

Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)

Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz

Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.


http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Just SOME of Nigel Brooks forgeries
revealed - proof.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

NIGEL BROOKS AND GANG POSTED MORE FRAUD ABOUT MY TYPISTS PURPLE HEART
VA ID CARD POST - HERE IS MY REBUTTAL TO SUCH OUTRAGEOUS AND GLARING
LIES - BROOKS IS DEFAMING ALL THAT HAVE RECEIVED THE PURPLE HEART
MEDAL BY CLAIMING THE VA PURPLE HEART CARD THAT USED TO DENOTE SERVICE
CONNECTED DISABILITY IS ONE AND THE SAME AS THE MEDAL - I ASSURE YOU
IT IS NOT!

"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:71pv92F...@mid.individual.net...

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-
online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!
individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-
media,alt.military,alt.military.retired
Subject: Re: "Yes. I was in the 5th."
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:13:45 -0500
Lines: 110
Message-ID: <71pv92F...@mid.individual.net>
References:
<4ec73ab1-df8a-464a...@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
<1oasq4dsb2unisvpt...@4ax.com>
<uzvrl.14050$D32....@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com>
<O9wrl.13675$W06....@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com>
<71c39724-5df1-40d5...@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
<71e94oF...@mid.individual.net>
<uY-dnVP9fONopSrU...@giganews.com>
<lgper4lc1lt6bne4b...@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
TexkUqLrUecLCq9uVAqOhABRBg3WXMf+ahQKP4XK8LdH7Pfzw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xc2vONgG13bnmjq/PuZpa0kJwSo=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
Bytes: 6042
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.war.vietnam:742784
alt.politics:4761902 alt.news-media:267294 alt.military:434221
alt.military.retired:445708


>

>>>Not withstanding Nigel Brook's "organized defamation" that he seems
>>>to use against those he disagrees with, or those that post some
>>>tidbits about their service in Vietnam, it seems to me that Nigel Brooks
>>>attacks other vets that have real "war stories" perhaps because he
>>>has none.
>> *******************


>> That sure sounds as if you are projecting YOUR ANTICS upon Mr.
>> Brooks.
>> Don't forget your bragging about that Purple Heart you got in a
>> "real
>> war"... ‘


Doug’s Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks: The Nigel Brooks smear gang members
just “love” to maliciously omit the word “card” after the purple
heart phrase, so as to fraudulently misrepresent the context of the
post was about medals and not about those Purple VA ID Cards, which
was of course the true topic and true context of the post in question
- as we all know by now: (see below for proof).

Here is the chronology of this issue - you be the Judge as to what the
true context was:

1. In February 2003, a typist that was typing dictation for me (I
could not type anything at that time) replied to a smear gang member
by the name of Chip. She had thought Chip was talking about a Purple
Heart VA ID card the VA issued at that time for service connected
disabilities. In fact her last sentence of her reply proved that fact
irrefutably as she mentioned that Chip did not receive his Purple
Heart card in combat - and of course we all know that Purple Heart
*medals* HAD to be awarded in combat, so it was clear to anyone that
was ever in the US Military that her reference was NOT the medals, but
was all about the Purple VA cards.

2. Prior to and subsequent to this post I had already posted on
USENET that I DID NOT have a Purple Heart Medal. (At least ten
times).


3. A couple of weeks after my typist posted the post reply to Chip,
another smear gang member, Mr. Jim McCulloch (former proud SDS
member) suggested her reply to Chip was about medals - and that I
had been shot in the head. I replied to that former SDS member and
smear gang member that his reference to “medals” was a “complete
distortion of what was said” (or words to that effect). I also
reiterated to this hate America gang member that I had posted several
times that I did NOT have a Purple Heart Medal.

4. Within 60 days of the my typists’ reply to Chip about Purple Heart
Cards, I had an occasion to again converse with Chip about the same
topic. This occurred in April, 2003. In that post *I again
confirmed, restated, and reiterated my Purple Heart reference then and
before was about the VA Purple Heart Cards the Veterans Administration
used to issue to service connected disabled vets at that time - and
NOT about the medals. (Note that Nigel Brooks and Tom Rau both read
this April 2003 post several times, and Rau actually re-posted it - so
they had to know the topic of my typist’s post was about the VA Cards
and not Medals and that fact was confirmed with this post withing 60
days of the first post about this topic!)

5. On or about early 2004, and because the Non-Veteran smear merchant
gang member Jim M had tried to fraudulently suggest the typist was
referencing medals and not VA cards (he clearly did not know that the
medals had to be issued due to combat - and my typists last sentence
stating she was talking about something Chip had received that was
*not* issued during combat which could have only been the purple
service connected VA cards) was far to complicated for him to
understand - or he was feigning stupidity for the purpose of
defamation which I suspect Brooks, Rau also did - I decided to remove
the post from the Google archive and disambiguate it like I had done
with several previous erred or ambiguous posts.

6. I informed Google the reason I was removing the post was due to an
ambiguity - and the post was about VA cards. I have offered anyone
the opportunity to read my statements to Google in this regard, and
Google’s reply to me verifying my typist’s reply to Chip post had
been removed due to the VA cards ambiguity. The Brooks smear gang
ducked that offer - as they really did not want the truth about this
issue to be exposed for their own self-serving reasons.

7. After the post was removed due to its ambiguity, I thought nothing
more about it for years. Meanwhile, as any Google search will clearly
prove, I had posted several times on USENET that I DID NOT have a
Purple Heart Medal.

8. In March 2005 when the SteveL gang member brought his fraud and
his gang’s fraudulent posts to the attention of the Nigel Brooks smear
gang, the two gangs joined as one for the purpose of furthering a
smear campaign against me.



9. During the entire year of 2005, and the first six months of 2006,
Nigel Brooks, Tom Rau and other gang members acknowledged DOZENS OF
TIMES that I often said I did not have a purple heart medal. Some
gang members postulated that I should have received such a medal
because I said I had been wounded. But for the most part, Brooks and
his smear accepted and acknowledged my dozens of posts (which can be
easily found on Google) that confirmed I had said reiterated many
times that I did not have a purple heart medal. In fact, Nigel Brooks
offered to help me obtain such a medal, but of course I was not
interested in any of that smear gang leader’s Crocodile offers. (I
should also mention that I wrote a letter to the Board of Corrections
and also stated to them I DID NOT have a purple heart medal, and I
also made the same statement under oath in a court case - so there
were and still are VOLUMES of public evidence confirming that I had
never claimed I had received a purple heart medal).

10. In 2006 the SteveL gang member (who is a computer consultant)
managed to write malicious code so as to maliciously interfere with my
contractual agreements with Google, and he managed to resurrect
several erred or ambiguous posts that I had previously removed from
accounts I owned years before and had subsequently clarified or
disambiguated. (Some were even clarified or disambiguated in
registered copyrights with the Library of Congress - again more public
confirmation of the truth).

11. In June 2006, After the con man Stevel managed to rummage through
my waste basket and find discarded erred posts, and maliciously
interfere with my contractual agreements with Google, he and Nigel
Brooks, and other members of the Nigel Brooks smear gang started re-
posting those long discarded and long re-written posts as “intentional
posts coming from me.” Although my account name was missing from the
discarded posts, the SteveL person that resurrected the long discarded
erred posts re-inserted the original account name and message ID’s
into the post HE published - thereby trying to fraudulently show it
was again coming from me and from one of my accounts. However,
tracing the origin of the post clearly shows it came from accounts and
news servers that I never used. Nevertheless, the gang started
posting on USENET their “waste basket” forgeries and fraud as if
those forgeries were intentionally being posted by me.

12. When I challenged the gang’s new use of forgeries and long
discarded erred posts as a fraudulent and deceptive means to continue
to smear and demonize me, the gang then started posting my typist’s
reply to Chip *thousands of times* replete with their inserted account
name fraud, and with their outrageous and completely fraudulent
forged context that she was referencing medals and not what she
clearly was referencing, which were the Purple Heart VA ID Cards the
VA issued at that time to service connected Vets.

13. The big con from the gang was that, regardless of those dozens of
posts and public records in which I clearly stated I DID NOT have a
Purple Heart Medal, and regardless of the fact that Nigel Brooks and
his gang members had responded to those posts and acknowledged DOZENS
OF TIMES that I did not ever say I had received a purple heart medal,
and Brooks even said that although I did not have a purple heart medal
he would try to help be obtain one, suddenly, the new con and smear
starting in June 2006 was that I had claimed a purple heart medal that
I did not have.

14. At last count, the Nigel Brooks smear and con gang have posted
this same outright and obvious con and smear about me more than TWO
THOUSAND TIMES - AND HAVE FURTHER SENT THEIR FORGERIES AND FRAUD TO
DOZENS OF THIRD PARTIES!

15. Eventually, Brooks admitted he was wrong and offered to retract
his con about this post being about medals and not VA ID cards. But
right after he made that offer his gang members started to howl and
bark at him for doing so, and Brooks immediately withdrew his fleeting
moment of honesty.

16. Knowing full-well the Nigel Brooks smear gang was using
forgeries and fraud about this issue, I then took the entire
controversy to several independent experts on the military, some on-
line and some private. ALL agreed the typist’s context was NOT about
purple heart medals like the Nigel Brooks smear gang had tried to con
the readers into believing.

17. When one gang member (Tom Rau) tried to claim the VA never issued
any VA ID cards known as a “purple heart card” - I then wrote the
Veterans Administration and asked them to verify that a VA ID card
with that name existed - I received back a reply from the Veterans
Administration stating they are hereby verifying that such a card
did exist. (The gang immediately started lying about the VA’s
confirmation the purple heart card existed by hiding the question I
sent to the VA and then taking the VA’s reply out of context).

18. When the same member of the smear gang claimed I withheld a copy
of the VA Purple Heart Card card to the First Sergeant with 30 years
service that concluded my typist’s context was VA ID cards and not
medals so as to deceive him, I re-contacted the First Sergeant and
asked him if that claim from the smear merchant was true - he said it
was not, that he had never asked me to see any card, that he had said
he had already seen one, and he reiterated his opinion that the topic
of my typist’s reply to Chip was NOT about the Purple Heart Medal, and
was in fact about the Purple VA ID Cards that were issued at that
time. (The gang members also called the First Sergeant, independent
expert, someone I have never met in my life, a liar).

19. The con men, smear merchants and gang leaders have been exposed
for what they are about this issue several times. No fair-minded
person in the world would believe them once the facts are revealed
about this issue. The clear and fraudulent purpose of the smear gang
is to demonize and defame me with outright fraud and forgeries, and I
can think of no better example of their cons and fraud than this
issue. See below for verification of everything I have said.





http://tinyurl.com/59hbuj Clarified and corrected Purple Heart Card
post, as so clarified by the original author. (Note only the author
(s) could possibly know the true context of anything they wrote - and
those con men that claim mind reading skills, and crystal balls to add
terms or take them away from someone’s else’s post, well, I suspect
the terms “con man” fits their description about as well as
anything). Any ambiguity in respect to this issue was remedied years
ago, yet Brooks and gang fished the ambiguous typist statement out of
my waste basket and fraudulently claimed that was intentional, and all
of the dozens of posts I posted that said I did NOT have a purple
heart medal, well, the Brooks gang likes to ignore those posts.


http://tinyurl.com/6e6d3h Purple Heart Card post provided to an
independent expert on the US Military (30 year retired) and he
confirms the post was about cards and not medals. (Note this expert
and another has reconfirmed their original confirmation the context
was about VA ID cards and not medals - so if the poster is claiming I
lied about not having a Purple Heart VA ID card (which the VA itself
confirmed existed) then of course I can prove that at the time (2003)
I certainly DID possess that card.

http://tinyurl.com/dkr9ym Nigel Brooks Confirms Purple Heart quip was
about VA ID Cards.



http://tinyurl.com/6buu77 Irrefutable evidence the SteveL anonymous
con man and cyberstalker and key member of the Nigel Brooks smear gang
maliciously retrieved erred posts that were long discarded in my
Google waste basket for the express purpose of malicious libel,
defamation, harassment and cyberstalking.


http://tinyurl.com/5m2xwu Irrefutable proof that Nigel Brooks
maliciously forged the term Purple Heart “Medal” into a post he knew
was about Purple Heart VA ID Cards and records that were issued by the
VA at the time of the original typist’s post.

http://tinyurl.com/55xefk Nigel Brooks admitting he maliciously lied
about forging the term Medal into a post he knew was about Cards, and
his offer to retract his lie and fraud.

http://tinyurl.com/6e6d3h Purple Heart Card post again provided to an
independent expert on the US Military (30 year retired) and he
confirms the post was about cards and not medals.

http://tinyurl.com/6z2thj Rebuttal to the Nigel Brooks’ smear gang
fraud and false accusations about wounds and purple heart medals.

http://tinyurl.com/6syqvv Nigel Brooks - Law Dog experts will not
change their opinion.


http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.

http://tinyurl.com/2ah57c SteveL caught in fraud about PH Medal.

1. http://tinyurl.com/2obwh3 In this June 2006 post I again state
the only post that was ever removed that had anything to do with
a Purple Heart was about Purple Heart Cards and was not written
nor posted by me. This post was posted more than 18 months ago,
confirming again the true context of Post 17 that was removed.


1. http://tinyurl.com/3b59wt May 17, 2006 long before Brooks started
posting his forged version of what Chip and my typist said:
In this post I again reference a Purple Heart Card that I
possessed:

Note the key passage above:
1. " I am an American Veteran, and when I arrive at the VA I am
forced to show my Purple Heart card ID before they will even talk
to me (note before the cyberstalkers start to wail and howl about
what I just said be assured that I am not saying possession of a
Purple Heart card indicates that I have a "Purple Heart Medal" I
do not have that medal - and that is just the old slang for the
card as it used to contain the image of a purple V -the newer
ones have an American flag background on them)"
Strange how Brooks, Rau and gang howl and whine when the Google
archives prove them the forgers and liars I know they are . . .

And Nigel Says in the same post above:
1. “My reporting of that post was on June 10, 2006. You immediately
responded, claiming forgeries and denying authorship of the post. It
wasn't until just over a year later in 2007 that you came up with the
"Purple Heart Card" explanation.
1. Why didn't you just explain it when challenged in 2006?” Nigel
Brooks went on to say in the above post?”

Nigel Brooks
Doug’s Rebuttal: What Nigel Brooks is stating above is that because I
did not mention Purple Heart Cards when he first brought up my
discarded post in 2006, and I did not even mention the missing term
“Cards” until 2007, then I was lying about the post meaning Cards and
not Medals. Mr. Brooks is, in the alternative, stating if I DID bring
up the term “Cards” back when he first brought up my discarded post,
then of course that “Cards” reference would have been proof positive
that the post in question was about Cards and not Medals. Well
surprise Mr. Brooks, because I DID precisely state that post was
about
Cards when you first brought up my discarded post, and I also stated
clearly way back then that someone else had typed and posted the post
in question:
Here are my Google archived Purple Heart URL’s that not only prove
Mr.
Brooks claim that I never mentioned “Cards” before 2007 an outright
lie and fraud, but because I did mention precisely what he claims I
should have said. Brooks has now admitted he was wrong and the true
context of the post was Cards and not Medals, just like I said it
was:
Purple heart card Google references:
http://tinyurl.com/yxkndv June 12, 2006: Victoria Crosses and purple
hearts posts where I again state clearly "Purple Heart Card" I
state:
"(The only post removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple
Heart" associated with the dggrant universal account used by dozens
of
other people was a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple
Heart Card" in a follow up conversation about VA benefits.)"
(Note the date of my post. Brooks said he first mentioned the
discarded purple heart post on June 10th, and Brooks said I did not
reply with any “Card” reference to his post until 2007, and Brooks
also implied that had I replied right away about the “Card” issue
then
that prompt reply would have represented proof positive that the
intended topic of the discarded post was Cards and not Medals. YET
THAT PROMPT REPLY IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID AND DID ON JUNE 12, 2006,
IN REPLY TO BROOKS JUNE 10, 2006 POST AS THE ABOVE GOOGLE ARCHIVE
CLEARLY PROVES!
Here is the paragraph I stated on June 12, 2006 TWO DAYS after Mr.
Brooks started his BS about this long discarded post, as the above
URL
from Google clearly proves:
From my June 12, 2006 Post:
“And what "post" is BS Brooks talking about above? I never made any
claim for any medal that I did not receive. Not once, ever. If BS
Brooks claims otherwise then let's see it along with proper
Message ID's and evidence that it was posted by me. (The only post
removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart" associated
with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other people was
a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple Heart Card" in a
follow up conversation about VA benefits.)”

Apparently, this Google archive alone proves Mr. Brooks lied about
when I first said anything about removing a post about Purple Heart
Cards. In fact this post even mentions that someone else other than
me wrote the post! According to Brooks, since I DID mention Cards at
the very time he started to question me about this post, the topic
was
clearly Cards and not Medals. No wonder Mr. Brooks offered to retract
his forgery that the post context was Medals - he knew he was caught
lying and the overwhelming proof was the context of the post was
Cards.
Mr. Brooks also posted the following lie:
> “The URL

http://tinyurl.com/3n7wvg which you provided, leads one to a
> post you made to your private google group just over 5 years after the
> initial Purple Heart post, and about 2 years after you were challenged
> on the initial post. It is self serving, and most certainly not
> evidence.”

Nigel Brooks claims about that I never mentioned the PH post was
about
Cards until TWO YEARS after I was challenged on the initial post by
him, which of course means he fraudulently claimed the topic was
Medals, which of course he denies saying below. . . again. Weooooooo.
The Victoria Crosses and Purple Hearts post URL below first proves
that Brooks has again been caught in an outright lie in his “I did
not
reply with Cards until 2 years after first challenged” which also
again reverses his claim that because I did not reply my typist’s
correction post was not evidence. However, since Brooks has been
caught lying, and in fact I DID reply that the topic was Cards almost
immediately after he challenged that post, then clearly the
alternative is true and my typist’s corrected post DOES represent yet
more evidence that (1) the true topic of the post in question was
Cards and not Medals, and ONCE AGAIN Nigel Brooks and his gang have
been caught in mid con and lie - so what else is new?
More evidence the intended topic was Cards:
1. http://tinyurl.com/yhrpg2 In this URL I mention that I am forced
to
show
my "Purple Heart Card" (May 17, 2006). Note the date, long before Mr.
Brooks said a word about this post which he says above started on
June
10, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/yxkndv June 12, 2006: Victoria Crosses and purple
hearts posts where I again state clearly "Purple Heart Card" "(The
only post removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart"
associated with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other
people was a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple
HeartCard" in a follow up conversation about VA benefits.)" (Note the
date, Brooks said he first mentioned the purple heart post on June
10th, and I did not reply with any Card reference to the post until
2007, and had I replied right away about the Card then that would
have
been proof positive that the topic was Cards and not Medals. BUT THAT
IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID ON JUNE 12, 2006, IN REPLY TO BROOKS, AS THE
ABOVE GOOGLE ARCHIVE CLEARLY PROVES!
Here is the paragraph I stated on June 12, 2006 TWO DAYS after Mr.
Brooks started his BS about this long discarded post, as the about
URL
from Google clearly proves:
“And what "post" is BS Brooks talking about above? I never made any
claim for any medal that I did not receive. Not once, ever. If BS
Brooks claims otherwise then let's see it along with proper
Message ID's and evidence that it was posted by me. (The only post
removed by Google that contained the terms "Purple Heart" associated
with the dggrant universal account used by dozens of other people was
a post typed by EH that was talking about a "Purple Heart Card" in a
follow up conversation about VA benefits.)”

Apparently, this Google archive along proves Mr. Brooks lied about
when I first said anything about removing a post about Purple Heart
Cards, and in fact this post even mentions that someone else other
than me wrote the post! According to Brooks, since I DID mention
Cards at the very time he started to question me about this post, the
topic was clearly Cards and not Medals, and no wonder Mr. Brooks
offered to retract his forgery that it was Medals, he knew he was
caught lying and the proof was overwhelming the context was Cards.
More evidence the intended topic was Cards:
http://tinyurl.com/y3yvb9 In this post I make it clear that I
referenced a Purple Heart Card and not a Purple Heart Medal - and the
difference between the two.
In the above URL, Mr. Brooks also told the following lie:
“He's doing the same now - by trying to insert the word "medal" into
the
argument. Well no-one is accusing him of claiming to have had a
"Purple Heart Medal" - but the record shows he has claimed to have
had
a Purple
Heart, and that he received it in a real war. "
Doug Says: First Mr. Brooks says the context of my typist’s post was
about medals, then he says he never said the context was about medals
and I was the only person that brought up that subject. Then he
switches back and lies and says my typist and I were talking about
medals. One lie after another, flip and flopping between lies, offers
to retract, lies about my posts about Cards, back to the lie of him
never fraudulently claiming I was talking about medals, to an
outright
claim that I was.
Weeeeeeeeoooooeoeoeo - This Nigel Brooks character needs some serious
help if you ask me.
Nigel Brooks next lie: “Make up your mind - you have previously
denied
removing the post. In fact on June 29, 2006 you commented as follows
on the posting: “

Doug Says: I said it was a forgery, and it was as it did not
reference
anywhere the term Medals as you were misrepresenting, and in fact the
last sentence of the post alone proves the context was not medals,
and
I did not write it nor post it as my June 12, 2006 post referenced
above clearly proves.
Nigel Brooks next lie: (Now he is refuting his own claim above) “”You
are the one who first used the term "medal" in connection with that
post. My commentary was directly related to your use of the term. I
was observing that were playing your usual games with words. Post
number 17 said the following: " I have a Purple Heart also"
Doug Says: Brooks says my typist’s reply was about medals, then he
says it wasn’t, then he says he never said that it was, then he
offers
a retraction of him saying it was about medals, then he ignores his
own retraction offer and again claims the topic was about
medals. . . This man lies so much and is so convoluted he must meet
himself when he goes around corners.
On April 20, 2008 Nigel Brooks made the following unsolicited offer
to
me:
http://tinyurl.com/6zxk3y
Nigel Said:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> "I'll offer you the following - If you post the confirmation you
> received > from the US Army that Chip was telling the truth about him not being
> awarded any Purple Heart medals or ever being in combat or earning
> combat badges to your > http://groups.google.com/group/namesofcyberstalkers
> group in an appropriate format that would tend to prove its
> authenticity (a jpeg > of the document showing the US Army logo should be sufficient - an
> example would be the one you have previously posted to your group here
> http://tinyurl.com/3wymqc) - I will do the following:
> I will author and post to the forums an original posting which
> indicates that I have reviewed all of your evidence concerning the
> exchange in question and am satisified that your most recent revision
> of the post is supported by the evidence.
> The only proviso that I include with this offer is that I reserve the
> right to file an FOIA with the US Army for a copy of the communication
> that you claim to have received from them regarding Mr. Ciamaichella
> (" I also have since received confirmation from the US Army that Chip
> was telling the truth about him not being awarded any Purple Heart
> medals or ever being in combat or earning combat badges.")
> Awaiting your reply
> Nigel Brooks"

In this post Mr. Brooks confirmed his retraction offer, his
verification that my typist’s correction which includes the terms
Cards is true and correct and is “supported by the evidence.” Mr.
Brooks also appointed a third party, a Mr. Henry Cook to accept the
proof he had requested and I agreed to provide:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.war.vietnam/msg/529102b2a 15528a5?
http://tinyurl.com/5j8ums


http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Nigel Brooks forgeries revealed - proof.