BROOKS PROVES HE IS LYING -CONFIRMS TOPIC WAS VA CARDS
2 views
Skip to first unread message
dgvreiman
Jan 27, 2009, 4:15:30 PM1/27/09
to CYBERSTALKER WEB NAMES
BROOKS PROVES HE IS LYING -CONFIRMS TOPIC WAS VA CARDS
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang’s glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
BROOKS PROVES HE IS LYING -CONFIRMS TOPIC WAS VA CARDS
"Nigel Brooks" <1. nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message news:
6u744pF...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:5NednTnQpcjjz-PU...@giganews.com...
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:09:23 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Doug Says: Mr. Rau, READ YOUR OWN POSTS! You referenced the post
>>>yourself!
>>>Whew! Hint. It occured in April 2003! Obviously, if the context in Feb
>>>2003 to Chip was about medals (which of course it was not) that issue
>>>would
>>>have been confirmed and coroborated in my subsequent conversation with
>>>Chip
>>>at some time subsequent to that Feb 2003 post, and *certainly* during a
>>>conversation with him within 60 days of that Feb 2003 post. But the
>>>topic>>>of ALL subsequent post was NEVER medals, it was always purple heart VA
>>>cards!
>>
>> I look forward to laughing at your excuse for not providing a url to
>> the post(s) in April 2003 where you and Chip post about Purple Heart
>> VA Cards.
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6t6cmeF...@mid.individual.net...
>
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-
online.de!t-online.de!news-1.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!
individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-
media,alt.military,alt.military.retirement
Subject: Re: KOOK VOTES = SMEAR GANG PROOF
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:55:10 -0600
Lines: 89
Message-ID: <6t6cmeF...@mid.individual.net>
References: <gJednQOdgL9qFPDU...@giganews.com>
<sg9rm4he6ubb0pbo7...@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
qX7ZMNgKq4wnH4R4bpkeDgw3aKZMWXQ3XasmJBqFIqYryzcBw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:y23IUlvPP6H6R+a8JTmSO4Idtdo=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
Bytes: 4890
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.war.vietnam:737114
alt.politics:4316913 alt.news-media:262027 alt.military:427872
> "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> news:sg9rm4he6ubb0pbo7...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:45:05 -0800, "DGVREIMAN">> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>KOOK VOTES = SMEAR GANG PROOF
>>
>> ****************************************
>> 17. DGVREIMAN
>> View profile
>> (3 users) Hide options Feb 16 2003, 2:22 pm
>> Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
>> alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
>> From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
>> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
>> Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22 pm
>> Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
>> Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
>> | Report this message | Find messages by this author
>>
>> "Chip C" <c...@chipcom.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:MPG.18b9c7081...@news-server.neo.rr.com...
>>
>> - Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
>>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
>>
>>> Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
>> supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
>> terrorists.
>>> Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
>>> > talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
>> shot fired in anger in your life.
>>
>> CHIP SAYS:
>>> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
>>> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
>> much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
>> to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
>> That, to me is cowardice.
>>
>> Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
>> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
>> never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
>> received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
>> shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
>> Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one>> advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
>> hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
>> around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card not received in
>> combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
>> **************** ************
>
> And don't forget the
>
> http://tinyurl.com/54brkh post on June 11, 2008 where Reiman says:
>
> "You may also check with the Veterans Administration, as they treat me for
> service connected disabilities. We could conference that call also. I will
> call them for an appointment, they will grant it I assure you and verify
> my
> status is "service connected" purple heart designation on my records.
> (The VA places a Purple outline on the records jacket and on the ID card
> of
> all service connected disabled Vets regardless of whether they have a
> Purple
> Heart Medal or not. I do not have the Purple Heart medal, and I am
> referencing the VA Purple Heart Identification records jacket) "
>
> Compared to the original thread and response from April 5, 2003
> paying special attention to the very clear and unambiguous exchange of the
> thread in which Reimans claims are being questioned. In this original
> post
> Reiman very clearly and unambiguously is claiming that he is being treated
> for "service connected wounds" and that the VA would verify that his
> status
> is service connected purple heart.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8h9ktt
>
> "You may also check with the Veterans Administration, as they
> treat me for service connected wounds. We could conference that
> call also. I will call them for an appointment, they will grant
> it I assure you and verify my status is "service connected"
> purple heart on my records. "
>
>
> Reiman lies with such ease.
>
> Nigel Brooks
Doug Says: BWHAHAHAHAHAHA. Mr. Brooks you have just, once again,
proved
you have been lying about this issue all along:
In February 2003 my typist replied to Chip about purple heart cards,
as her
last sentence proves, and I verified that fact in my April 2003 post
with
Chip which Brooks has reproduced above. My April 2003 post above is
clearly talking about the Veterans Administration and NOT medals.
(Brooks
even admits I am talking about the Veterans Administration confirming
a
service connected disability and *not* medals in his own reference.)
We can all see the topic of the paragraph in April 2003 was about
contacting the Veterans Administration for verification of a "service
connected disability" which at that time was denoted with the purple
heart
colors ON the face of a service connected Veterans records jacket and
on the
face of the VA ID card.
If I was ever talking about a medal, 60 days prior in respect to my
typist's reply to Chip about his CAR(D), and now in April 2003 also
with
Chip, no doubt the term or reference to the "medal" would have
surfaced in
this conversation. But again, all we find is another reference to a VA
service connected disability record with a purple heart designation
(the
purple heart colors and the large purple V crest) ON the face of the
VA
record and on the face of the ID card - hence the reference to the
purple
heart designation/identification ON the VA record.
I noted in April 2003 to Chip the VA will "verify my VA status is
"service
connected" purple heart designation (identification) ON MY RECORDS."
In
fact I referenced this April 2003 post myself as evidence that within
60
days of my typist's reply with Chip we were once again talking about
VA
service connected records with a purple heart designation on their
face -
which of course proves the connection between the Feb 2003 post and
the
April 2003 post with the same person, in which BOTH were about purple
heart
VA Id cards and NOT about medals, as poor Nigel and Gang have been
caught
lying about.
If my typist was talking about medals in Feb 2003, that term "medal"
would
have of course came up in the exchange with Chip less than 60 days
later,
but it did not, only VA record jackets with a purple heart designation
on
their face was brought up. So what was clearly discussed and was the
true
context and topic both in April 2003 and in Feb 2003 as Brooks has
clearly
provided evidence above? Purple Heart designations on VA Records and
on ID
cards - which for the uninformed has nothing to do with a purple heart
medal, as the VA NEVER made any such Veteran distinction at that
time.
In April 2003, I obviously was referring again to the Purple Heart
colors
and large Purple V that was located *on* the face of my VA records and
*on* the face of my VA ID card, as did many others, as a purple heart
card/
record, or a purple heart designation *on* my VA records, which was
the
designation at that time that confirmed service connected disability.
(TheVA lumped all service connected Vets together whether they had the
purple
heart medal or not, and all service connected vets VA records jackets
and ID
cards were designated as service connected with the purple heart
colors on
the face of the records and ID cards, along with the large purple "V"
purple
heart crest).
Here is where Nigel has caught his own stupid self lying:
At that time (2003) the VA DID NOT note the purple heart *medal* EVER
on the
face of any VA records nor ID cards of any service connected Veteran.
The only purple heart designation *on my records* I could possibly be
talking about and which the VA would confirm in a conference call as I
offered is the purple heart colors and purple "V" that was placed *on*
the
face of my VA records and *on* the face of my VA ID card. At that time
all "service connected" disabled veterans were designated by the VA
with a
large Purple "V" on the face of their records jacket, and a the Jacket
also
was colored the same as the purple heart ribbon, white and purple, and
of
course the VA ID card carried the same large purple "V" and the same
purple
heart colors, white and purple.
So above in April 2003, I said "service connected" purple heart
designation
*on my VA records* and obviously I was NOT talking about the medal as
at
that time the VA did not even provide, nor designate, nor even
mention,
nor in any way denote or display or identify the purple heart medal on
any
service connected Veterans records or ID cards.
So sorry Nigel - foot mouth again!
Nigel's own post has just proved my typist's reference in Feb 2003 to
Chip
was about purple heart VA ID cards, just like she has said, and this
fact
was confirmed within 60 days in another conversation with Chip in
which I
brought up the purple heart designation ON my VA record jacket which
designated a service connected disability.
Once again, since at that time the VA never distinguished between
those
service connected Vets that had the purple heart medal and those that
did
not, the VA placed the purple heart colors and large purple V on the
face of
ALL service connected VA records and on the face of their VA ID Cards
as
well. Purple Heart/service designation ON MY RECORDS was a common
reference to the colors of the purple heart and crest which the VA
used to
denote a service connected disability.
(Nigel saw me post a reference to my April 2003 post to Tom Rau
proving that
my conversation with Chip was about the Veterans Administration and
not
medals, which occurred within 60 days of the Feb. 2003 post Nigel and
gang
have been lying about, so Nigel desperately wanted to misrepresent
what that
April 2003 post really said. He knew his lies were being exposed. But
weall can see the true topic of the April 2003 post was the Veterans
Administration purple heart designation ON my VA record jacket, and
not
medals - which much to the chagrin of Nigel and gang, proves
irrefutably my
typist's reply to Chip less than 60 days prior was related to this
conversation with Chip as well.
And the topic of the April 2003 paragraph? VA purple heart
designations
that designated service connected disabilities, and NOT medals. Nigel
has
just shot himself in his foot again. (Note for those that did not know
the
VA had purple heart colors designations on all service connected
Veterans'
record jackets and ID cards, I posted an explanation of that fact
later in
2008 so the gang could not again distort the clear and obvious meaning
and
context of a post into some fraudulent accusations, but even with the
obvious staring all in the face, Nigel just cannot help himself from
lying.
He had to know the VA placed those purple heart designations (colors
and V)
ON all service connected vets record jackets and ID cards at that time
regardless of whether the Vet actually had a purple heart medal or
not. I
even said so in my 2008 update! Brooks clearly was so eager to lie he
obviously missed that key fact).
Given enough time, ol Nigel will reveal his lies himself. I have found
this
to be commonly true with him and with his key gang member SteveL - who
also
confirmed that right after my typist posted her reply to Chip, when
someone
indicated that she was talking about medals, I replied that statement
was "a
complete distortion of what was written." And that was within about
two
weeks of the Feb 2003 post. So now we have SteveL AND Nigel both
providing
irrefutable proof they have been lying about this issue all along, and
they
are the ones that have confirmed the very evidence that proves they
have
been and are lying for years! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
I can't wait for the next one. Brooks is really on a self-destructive
roll.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:10095adb-318c-437e-
ae0b-0ad...@p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 14, 2:19 pm, SteveL <steve...@deletethisbitntlworld.com>
wrote:
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!
p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Dai Uy <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com>
Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam
Subject: Re: BROOKS PROVES TOPIC CARDS AND NOT MEDALS
Followup-To: alt.war.vietnam, alt.politics, alt.news-media,
alt.military,
alt.military.retired
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:05:54 -0800 (PST)Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 7
Message-ID:
<10095adb-318c-437e...@p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com>
References: <q9adnSF1u7-N4_PU...@giganews.com>
<9tWdnRqjbtCTHPPU...@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.85.140.235
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231985154 6137 127.0.0.1 (15 Jan 2009
02:05:54
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=75.85.140.235;
posting-account=l6ydPgkAAACG7fcUXyPBHjGRBjniySMl
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; en-
au)
AppleWebKit/525.27.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.2.1
Safari/525.27.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 1555
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.war.vietnam:737159
> (God. It's absolutely driving you NUTS isn't it? I love it!)
http://tinyurl.com/5uggfd
***
Doug Says: Mr. Rau, your confession above of maclious harassment to
"drive
me nuts" is hereby acknowledged.
However, as the above post clearly proves, you, Nigel Brooks and gang
have
been caught red handed lying about this purple heart card issue. Even
you
cannot lie your way out of the irrefutable proof above. But I do not
mind
repeating it if you wish.
Your admitted desire to harass and cyberstalk me with lies and fraud
have
been obvious to me for some time, and each time you and Brooks start a
new
con campaign against me you end up exposing your fraud and
malciousness to
all. I have better things to do than to prove you and Brooks and gang
the
abject fraud merchants and morons you are, but as long as you keep
lying, I
will keep posting my rebuttals. Count on it.
Moreover, I suspect the above URL applies more to Brooks and gang
since they
have seen the above post that proves irrefutably they have been lying
about the purple heart card for years.
Doug Grant (Tm)
> Brooks said:
>
> I really don't see how anyone in their right mind, when reading the entire
> exchange would believe that Reiman and ChipC were not both claiming to have
> been awarded the United States Military Award - The Purple Heart.
>
>
> Post 14 of thread:
> "I got my scars from war, Dougie...caused by the same bunch who
> thought they could *remake* the middle east into some pillar of
> democratic values."
>
> Post 15 of thread:
> "Doug Says: You need to be more specific. Are you talking about the Gulf
> war? "
> .
> .
> " I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are talking about, and
> I further suspect you have never seen a shot fired in anger in your life. "
>
> Post 16 of thread:
> "I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie."
>
> Post 17 of thread:
> "Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Cad also, and I received mine in a
> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
> never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
> received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
> shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
> Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
> advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
> hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
> around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card not received in
> combat is about as cowardly as it gets."
>
> The clear and unambiguous context of the exchange is of two individuals who
> are claiming to have received Purple Hearts - that is, the military
> decoration which is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces and
> other authorized personnel for wounds received as a direct result of enemy
> action.
Doug Says: Brooks admits above we said Chip never saw a shot fired in
anger in his life. Brooks also confirms Chip ducked our question
whether he was in the Gulf war. Which means ol Brooks has CONFIRMED
we did not believe Chip was ever in combat. Ergo, when he said he had
a purple heart card we responded in kind responding to his claim he
had a purple heart VA card which denoted service connected
disabilities. Our clear and unmistakable “no combat” belief about
means Brooks has confirmed we could not possibly be referencing a
purple heart medal in our reply as the medals MUST be awarded during
combat, which Brooks also has confirmed above.
Nigel Brooks has just confirmed that our mind-set in respect to my
typist's reply to Chip had to NOT be about the medals, no combat, no
medal possible!
No wonder Brooks offered to retract his claim the typist's post was
about medals, he knew he had been caught in mid con yet again. This
confirmation from Brooks also proves that my typist’s last sentence,
which she CONFIRMS she believed Chip was talking about something HE
DID NOT earn in combat, was right-on. Here is what she said in her
original post (card) is the proper clarification: “BTW, bragging
about a Purple Heart (Card) not received in combat is about as
cowardly as it gets."
Again, Brooks has confirmed our no combat belief about Chip, ergo, we
could not have possibly been talking about medals. (Brooks shoots foot
again). BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. These con men con so much and so often
they often become tangled in their own web of deceit, and Brooks is a
classic example of the "Tar Baby" effect.
Also note that Brooks is hiding all of the experts conclusions,
clarifications and other information related to this issue that
irrefutably prove the context of the typist's post was about purple VA
ID cards, and he only wants readers to read and focus on an isolated
paragraph that he knew was long discarded and ambiguous and later
clarified.
Why would Brooks want to dig up a single out of context paragraph from
Google's waste basket, that was confirmed removed in writing by Google
due to the Cards issue long before Brooks started his smear campaign
against me, and then fraudulently present the erred or ambiguous
discarded post fraudulent context of medals as intentional, while
ignoring all of the dozens of posts that prove his false context is a
complete fraud? (Brooks is hiding the dozens of posts in which, I said
I did not have a purple heart medal - for obvious reasons).
See above. Brooks is smear merchant, serial liar and a fraud. There
really can be no other explanation for his malicious and unethical
behavior in this regard.
Note also that independent experts have confirmed the topic was about
VA cards, and even the subsequent April 2003 post reconfirms Chip and
I were talking about purple heart VA cards.
See above for clear and unmistakable evidence Nigel Brooks has been
caught in mid con yet again.
He keeps lying, and I keep exposing them in my defense. This time he
actually added more proof that he has been lying all along. A
keeper. As I said, these con men con so much they actually start to
get caught in their own web of deceit = Tar Baby effect.
Doug Grant (Tm)
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang’s glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
BROOKS PROVES HE IS LYING -CONFIRMS TOPIC WAS VA CARDS
"Nigel Brooks" <1. nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message news:
6u744pF...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:5NednTnQpcjjz-PU...@giganews.com...
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:09:23 -0800, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Doug Says: Mr. Rau, READ YOUR OWN POSTS! You referenced the post
>>>yourself!
>>>Whew! Hint. It occured in April 2003! Obviously, if the context in Feb
>>>2003 to Chip was about medals (which of course it was not) that issue
>>>would
>>>have been confirmed and coroborated in my subsequent conversation with
>>>Chip
>>>at some time subsequent to that Feb 2003 post, and *certainly* during a
>>>conversation with him within 60 days of that Feb 2003 post. But the
>>>topic>>>of ALL subsequent post was NEVER medals, it was always purple heart VA
>>>cards!
>>
>> I look forward to laughing at your excuse for not providing a url to
>> the post(s) in April 2003 where you and Chip post about Purple Heart
>> VA Cards.
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6t6cmeF...@mid.individual.net...
>
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-
online.de!t-online.de!news-1.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!
individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.politics,alt.news-
media,alt.military,alt.military.retirement
Subject: Re: KOOK VOTES = SMEAR GANG PROOF
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:55:10 -0600
Lines: 89
Message-ID: <6t6cmeF...@mid.individual.net>
References: <gJednQOdgL9qFPDU...@giganews.com>
<sg9rm4he6ubb0pbo7...@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
qX7ZMNgKq4wnH4R4bpkeDgw3aKZMWXQ3XasmJBqFIqYryzcBw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:y23IUlvPP6H6R+a8JTmSO4Idtdo=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
Bytes: 4890
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.war.vietnam:737114
alt.politics:4316913 alt.news-media:262027 alt.military:427872
> "Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> news:sg9rm4he6ubb0pbo7...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:45:05 -0800, "DGVREIMAN">> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>KOOK VOTES = SMEAR GANG PROOF
>>
>> ****************************************
>> 17. DGVREIMAN
>> View profile
>> (3 users) Hide options Feb 16 2003, 2:22 pm
>> Newsgroups: alt.news-media, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa,
>> alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.security.terrorism
>> From: "DGVREIMAN" <dggr...@worldnet.att.net>
>> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:22:46 GMT
>> Local: Sun, Feb 16 2003 2:22 pm
>> Subject: Re: Al Qaeda Says Saddam an Infidel
>> Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
>> | Report this message | Find messages by this author
>>
>> "Chip C" <c...@chipcom.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:MPG.18b9c7081...@news-server.neo.rr.com...
>>
>> - Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
>>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:56:03 GMT, DGVREIMAN allegedly wrote...
>>
>>> Doug Says: We declared war on terrorism. Saddam is
>> supporting, financing, arming, training, aiding and harboring
>> terrorists.
>>> Duh. I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are
>>> > talking about, and I further suspect you have never seen a
>> shot fired in anger in your life.
>>
>> CHIP SAYS:
>>> I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie.
>>> There are other countries, some that are our allies, who are
>> much more active in supporting and arming terrorists...yet you want
>> to go after Iraq because you don't have the will to go after them.
>> That, to me is cowardice.
>>
>> Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Card also, and I received mine in a
>> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
>> never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
>> received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
>> shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
>> Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one>> advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
>> hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
>> around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card not received in
>> combat is about as cowardly as it gets.
>> **************** ************
>
> And don't forget the
>
> http://tinyurl.com/54brkh post on June 11, 2008 where Reiman says:
>
> "You may also check with the Veterans Administration, as they treat me for
> service connected disabilities. We could conference that call also. I will
> call them for an appointment, they will grant it I assure you and verify
> my
> status is "service connected" purple heart designation on my records.
> (The VA places a Purple outline on the records jacket and on the ID card
> of
> all service connected disabled Vets regardless of whether they have a
> Purple
> Heart Medal or not. I do not have the Purple Heart medal, and I am
> referencing the VA Purple Heart Identification records jacket) "
>
> Compared to the original thread and response from April 5, 2003
> paying special attention to the very clear and unambiguous exchange of the
> thread in which Reimans claims are being questioned. In this original
> post
> Reiman very clearly and unambiguously is claiming that he is being treated
> for "service connected wounds" and that the VA would verify that his
> status
> is service connected purple heart.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8h9ktt
>
> "You may also check with the Veterans Administration, as they
> treat me for service connected wounds. We could conference that
> call also. I will call them for an appointment, they will grant
> it I assure you and verify my status is "service connected"
> purple heart on my records. "
>
>
> Reiman lies with such ease.
>
> Nigel Brooks
Doug Says: BWHAHAHAHAHAHA. Mr. Brooks you have just, once again,
proved
you have been lying about this issue all along:
In February 2003 my typist replied to Chip about purple heart cards,
as her
last sentence proves, and I verified that fact in my April 2003 post
with
Chip which Brooks has reproduced above. My April 2003 post above is
clearly talking about the Veterans Administration and NOT medals.
(Brooks
even admits I am talking about the Veterans Administration confirming
a
service connected disability and *not* medals in his own reference.)
We can all see the topic of the paragraph in April 2003 was about
contacting the Veterans Administration for verification of a "service
connected disability" which at that time was denoted with the purple
heart
colors ON the face of a service connected Veterans records jacket and
on the
face of the VA ID card.
If I was ever talking about a medal, 60 days prior in respect to my
typist's reply to Chip about his CAR(D), and now in April 2003 also
with
Chip, no doubt the term or reference to the "medal" would have
surfaced in
this conversation. But again, all we find is another reference to a VA
service connected disability record with a purple heart designation
(the
purple heart colors and the large purple V crest) ON the face of the
VA
record and on the face of the ID card - hence the reference to the
purple
heart designation/identification ON the VA record.
I noted in April 2003 to Chip the VA will "verify my VA status is
"service
connected" purple heart designation (identification) ON MY RECORDS."
In
fact I referenced this April 2003 post myself as evidence that within
60
days of my typist's reply with Chip we were once again talking about
VA
service connected records with a purple heart designation on their
face -
which of course proves the connection between the Feb 2003 post and
the
April 2003 post with the same person, in which BOTH were about purple
heart
VA Id cards and NOT about medals, as poor Nigel and Gang have been
caught
lying about.
If my typist was talking about medals in Feb 2003, that term "medal"
would
have of course came up in the exchange with Chip less than 60 days
later,
but it did not, only VA record jackets with a purple heart designation
on
their face was brought up. So what was clearly discussed and was the
true
context and topic both in April 2003 and in Feb 2003 as Brooks has
clearly
provided evidence above? Purple Heart designations on VA Records and
on ID
cards - which for the uninformed has nothing to do with a purple heart
medal, as the VA NEVER made any such Veteran distinction at that
time.
In April 2003, I obviously was referring again to the Purple Heart
colors
and large Purple V that was located *on* the face of my VA records and
*on* the face of my VA ID card, as did many others, as a purple heart
card/
record, or a purple heart designation *on* my VA records, which was
the
designation at that time that confirmed service connected disability.
(TheVA lumped all service connected Vets together whether they had the
purple
heart medal or not, and all service connected vets VA records jackets
and ID
cards were designated as service connected with the purple heart
colors on
the face of the records and ID cards, along with the large purple "V"
purple
heart crest).
Here is where Nigel has caught his own stupid self lying:
At that time (2003) the VA DID NOT note the purple heart *medal* EVER
on the
face of any VA records nor ID cards of any service connected Veteran.
The only purple heart designation *on my records* I could possibly be
talking about and which the VA would confirm in a conference call as I
offered is the purple heart colors and purple "V" that was placed *on*
the
face of my VA records and *on* the face of my VA ID card. At that time
all "service connected" disabled veterans were designated by the VA
with a
large Purple "V" on the face of their records jacket, and a the Jacket
also
was colored the same as the purple heart ribbon, white and purple, and
of
course the VA ID card carried the same large purple "V" and the same
purple
heart colors, white and purple.
So above in April 2003, I said "service connected" purple heart
designation
*on my VA records* and obviously I was NOT talking about the medal as
at
that time the VA did not even provide, nor designate, nor even
mention,
nor in any way denote or display or identify the purple heart medal on
any
service connected Veterans records or ID cards.
So sorry Nigel - foot mouth again!
Nigel's own post has just proved my typist's reference in Feb 2003 to
Chip
was about purple heart VA ID cards, just like she has said, and this
fact
was confirmed within 60 days in another conversation with Chip in
which I
brought up the purple heart designation ON my VA record jacket which
designated a service connected disability.
Once again, since at that time the VA never distinguished between
those
service connected Vets that had the purple heart medal and those that
did
not, the VA placed the purple heart colors and large purple V on the
face of
ALL service connected VA records and on the face of their VA ID Cards
as
well. Purple Heart/service designation ON MY RECORDS was a common
reference to the colors of the purple heart and crest which the VA
used to
denote a service connected disability.
(Nigel saw me post a reference to my April 2003 post to Tom Rau
proving that
my conversation with Chip was about the Veterans Administration and
not
medals, which occurred within 60 days of the Feb. 2003 post Nigel and
gang
have been lying about, so Nigel desperately wanted to misrepresent
what that
April 2003 post really said. He knew his lies were being exposed. But
weall can see the true topic of the April 2003 post was the Veterans
Administration purple heart designation ON my VA record jacket, and
not
medals - which much to the chagrin of Nigel and gang, proves
irrefutably my
typist's reply to Chip less than 60 days prior was related to this
conversation with Chip as well.
And the topic of the April 2003 paragraph? VA purple heart
designations
that designated service connected disabilities, and NOT medals. Nigel
has
just shot himself in his foot again. (Note for those that did not know
the
VA had purple heart colors designations on all service connected
Veterans'
record jackets and ID cards, I posted an explanation of that fact
later in
2008 so the gang could not again distort the clear and obvious meaning
and
context of a post into some fraudulent accusations, but even with the
obvious staring all in the face, Nigel just cannot help himself from
lying.
He had to know the VA placed those purple heart designations (colors
and V)
ON all service connected vets record jackets and ID cards at that time
regardless of whether the Vet actually had a purple heart medal or
not. I
even said so in my 2008 update! Brooks clearly was so eager to lie he
obviously missed that key fact).
Given enough time, ol Nigel will reveal his lies himself. I have found
this
to be commonly true with him and with his key gang member SteveL - who
also
confirmed that right after my typist posted her reply to Chip, when
someone
indicated that she was talking about medals, I replied that statement
was "a
complete distortion of what was written." And that was within about
two
weeks of the Feb 2003 post. So now we have SteveL AND Nigel both
providing
irrefutable proof they have been lying about this issue all along, and
they
are the ones that have confirmed the very evidence that proves they
have
been and are lying for years! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
I can't wait for the next one. Brooks is really on a self-destructive
roll.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:10095adb-318c-437e-
ae0b-0ad...@p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 14, 2:19 pm, SteveL <steve...@deletethisbitntlworld.com>
wrote:
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!
p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Dai Uy <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com>
Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam
Subject: Re: BROOKS PROVES TOPIC CARDS AND NOT MEDALS
Followup-To: alt.war.vietnam, alt.politics, alt.news-media,
alt.military,
alt.military.retired
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:05:54 -0800 (PST)Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 7
Message-ID:
<10095adb-318c-437e...@p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com>
References: <q9adnSF1u7-N4_PU...@giganews.com>
<9tWdnRqjbtCTHPPU...@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.85.140.235
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231985154 6137 127.0.0.1 (15 Jan 2009
02:05:54
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=75.85.140.235;
posting-account=l6ydPgkAAACG7fcUXyPBHjGRBjniySMl
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; en-
au)
AppleWebKit/525.27.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.2.1
Safari/525.27.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 1555
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.war.vietnam:737159
> (God. It's absolutely driving you NUTS isn't it? I love it!)
http://tinyurl.com/5uggfd
***
Doug Says: Mr. Rau, your confession above of maclious harassment to
"drive
me nuts" is hereby acknowledged.
However, as the above post clearly proves, you, Nigel Brooks and gang
have
been caught red handed lying about this purple heart card issue. Even
you
cannot lie your way out of the irrefutable proof above. But I do not
mind
repeating it if you wish.
Your admitted desire to harass and cyberstalk me with lies and fraud
have
been obvious to me for some time, and each time you and Brooks start a
new
con campaign against me you end up exposing your fraud and
malciousness to
all. I have better things to do than to prove you and Brooks and gang
the
abject fraud merchants and morons you are, but as long as you keep
lying, I
will keep posting my rebuttals. Count on it.
Moreover, I suspect the above URL applies more to Brooks and gang
since they
have seen the above post that proves irrefutably they have been lying
about the purple heart card for years.
Doug Grant (Tm)
> Brooks said:
>
> I really don't see how anyone in their right mind, when reading the entire
> exchange would believe that Reiman and ChipC were not both claiming to have
> been awarded the United States Military Award - The Purple Heart.
>
>
> Post 14 of thread:
> "I got my scars from war, Dougie...caused by the same bunch who
> thought they could *remake* the middle east into some pillar of
> democratic values."
>
> Post 15 of thread:
> "Doug Says: You need to be more specific. Are you talking about the Gulf
> war? "
> .
> .
> " I suspect that you do not have clue about what you are talking about, and
> I further suspect you have never seen a shot fired in anger in your life. "
>
> Post 16 of thread:
> "I have a Purple Heart and a CAR that proves you wrong, Dougie."
>
> Post 17 of thread:
> "Doug Says: I have a Purple Heart Cad also, and I received mine in a
> real war, I can't imagine where you got yours since you have
> never fought in a war. About the only place you could have
> received a purple heart was in Lebanon, and that was not a
> shooting war, just a bombing due to the ineptitude of a gang of
> Marine officers. In respect to deposing Saddam, I am the one
> advocating removing Saddam, you are the one advocating cowering,
> hiding, and doing nothing. It is pretty clear who the coward is
> around here. BTW, bragging about a Purple Heart Card not received in
> combat is about as cowardly as it gets."
>
> The clear and unambiguous context of the exchange is of two individuals who
> are claiming to have received Purple Hearts - that is, the military
> decoration which is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces and
> other authorized personnel for wounds received as a direct result of enemy
> action.
Doug Says: Brooks admits above we said Chip never saw a shot fired in
anger in his life. Brooks also confirms Chip ducked our question
whether he was in the Gulf war. Which means ol Brooks has CONFIRMED
we did not believe Chip was ever in combat. Ergo, when he said he had
a purple heart card we responded in kind responding to his claim he
had a purple heart VA card which denoted service connected
disabilities. Our clear and unmistakable “no combat” belief about
means Brooks has confirmed we could not possibly be referencing a
purple heart medal in our reply as the medals MUST be awarded during
combat, which Brooks also has confirmed above.
Nigel Brooks has just confirmed that our mind-set in respect to my
typist's reply to Chip had to NOT be about the medals, no combat, no
medal possible!
No wonder Brooks offered to retract his claim the typist's post was
about medals, he knew he had been caught in mid con yet again. This
confirmation from Brooks also proves that my typist’s last sentence,
which she CONFIRMS she believed Chip was talking about something HE
DID NOT earn in combat, was right-on. Here is what she said in her
original post (card) is the proper clarification: “BTW, bragging
about a Purple Heart (Card) not received in combat is about as
cowardly as it gets."
Again, Brooks has confirmed our no combat belief about Chip, ergo, we
could not have possibly been talking about medals. (Brooks shoots foot
again). BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. These con men con so much and so often
they often become tangled in their own web of deceit, and Brooks is a
classic example of the "Tar Baby" effect.
Also note that Brooks is hiding all of the experts conclusions,
clarifications and other information related to this issue that
irrefutably prove the context of the typist's post was about purple VA
ID cards, and he only wants readers to read and focus on an isolated
paragraph that he knew was long discarded and ambiguous and later
clarified.
Why would Brooks want to dig up a single out of context paragraph from
Google's waste basket, that was confirmed removed in writing by Google
due to the Cards issue long before Brooks started his smear campaign
against me, and then fraudulently present the erred or ambiguous
discarded post fraudulent context of medals as intentional, while
ignoring all of the dozens of posts that prove his false context is a
complete fraud? (Brooks is hiding the dozens of posts in which, I said
I did not have a purple heart medal - for obvious reasons).
See above. Brooks is smear merchant, serial liar and a fraud. There
really can be no other explanation for his malicious and unethical
behavior in this regard.
Note also that independent experts have confirmed the topic was about
VA cards, and even the subsequent April 2003 post reconfirms Chip and
I were talking about purple heart VA cards.
See above for clear and unmistakable evidence Nigel Brooks has been
caught in mid con yet again.
He keeps lying, and I keep exposing them in my defense. This time he
actually added more proof that he has been lying all along. A
keeper. As I said, these con men con so much they actually start to
get caught in their own web of deceit = Tar Baby effect.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages