INVASION OF PRIVACY = 20 YEARS IN JAIL!

[dgvreiman]

INVASION OF PRIVACY = 20 YEARS!


(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the “reasonable person” doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a “lawful and
legitimate” publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz

Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay

TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:


http://tinyurl.com/bjslzh Invasion of privacy attack on Sarah Palin
facing 20 years in Jail.

“A 21-year old student accused of 1. accessing Sarah Palin's email
account and publishing what he found is facing 20 years in prison.
David Kernell, son of Democratic Tennessee state representative Mike
Kernell, faces four charges: intentionally accessing the account
without authorization; fraud; unlawful electronic transmission of
material outside Tennessee; and attempts to conceal records to impede
an FBI investigation.
If convicted, Kernell faces 20 years in prison, a fine of up to
$250,000 (£182,000) and five years' supervised release.
Kernell is charged with using publically available data to guess the
password on then vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin's Yahoo email
account. He then passed the emails to online information site
Wikileaks.


CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY: http://tinyurl.com/23m28a

“In the 1. criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between natural
persons to break the law at some time in the future, and, in some
cases, with at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement.
There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and,
in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to
put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to
the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is
a continuing one and parties may join "the plot" later and incur joint
liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have
been acquitted and/or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or
more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence.”

End Excerpts:

I wonder, would the above charges apply to a smear gang member that
illegally accessed private Government records about a targeted smear
gang victim, (the gang had been attacking the victim for years and
were demanding personal information from him that he refused to
provide) and stole private and personal information from those
records, (such as social security numbers, signature copies,
photographs, and his wife’s private and personal information as well)
and further maliciously sabotaged those records in the process - and
the gang member further published and trafficked in that stolen
information amongst other gang members and other third parties?

I wonder, would attempting to hide the connections between those gang
members that received, accessed or otherwise were provided or knew
about such stolen information be a violation of “attempting to
conceal records?” As Mr. Kernell was charged with above?

It would appear to me that all gang members that were involved with
the gang at the time of this crime, especially in respect to special
newsgroups, web sites, and especially those gang members that
published and trafficked in this stolen information would be involved
in a criminal conspiracy? But then, I wonder what Nigel Brooks would
have to say about all this? Would Nigel Brooks condone and protect a
gang member that illegally accessed government records and then
trafficked in that information, while simultaneously sabotaging the
contents of those said records so as to maliciously harm Nigel’s
targeted smear victim?

What about it Nigel, know anything about all this?

(If you want to know what I am talking about - just ask Nigel - I
understand many a contact has been already made over this issue -back
channel contacts especially ).

I suspect that due to the gang’s continuing obsession to use fraud and
false accusations to smear and demonize me, there will be MUCH MORE
about this issue coming in the future - six year criminal statutes
considered - which also can be used in a civil case.

Doug Grant (Tm)