BROOKS CAUGHT MID CON BUTTER BAR - A REBUTTAL TO HIS FRAUD

[dgvreiman]

NIGEL BROOKS CAUGHT FORGING AGAIN - A REBUTTAL TO MORE NIGEL BROOKS
FRAUD

See below for the amount of times Nigel Brooks has been caught in mid
con yet again!

Path:
border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!
news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-
mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.war.vietnam,us.military.army
Subject: Re: Can someone explain the logic behind
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:45:11 -0600
Lines: 91
Message-ID: <6vc81sF...@mid.individual.net>
References: <kNSdnXWCj5t-4_HU...@supernews.com>
<FD-A2C143.23...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>
<123e28e0-d5c4-4ba9...@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com>
<6v5pv4F...@mid.individual.net>
<a5d32407-7a15-417a...@a39g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
<6v654oF...@mid.individual.net>
<kuljl.10349$pr6....@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com>
<6v6aibF...@mid.individual.net>
<m-GdneL95J4HLxLU...@giganews.com>
<4990cc1d....@news.webtv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
8JJv6Z3F+Z7yOxn4jUuBjwI6961iUkcUbSKR+L5IFw4i9N1Jk=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uk/bCSmt0TtIRAoREcUAu81L6Hg=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
Bytes: 4930
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.atheism:5438864
alt.war.vietnam:740008 us.military.army:787550


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.war.vietnam,us.military.army
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Can someone explain the logic behind


>
>
> "Sharky" <sh...@he11sgates.org> wrote in message
> news:4990cc1d....@news.webtv.com...
>> DGVREIMAN wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
>>>news:6v6aibF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Nine Toes" <awrli...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:kuljl.10349$pr6....@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com...
>>>>
>>>>> what I'd like to know is how you keep up with Eris....seems the
>>>>> stories change at every telling. and he's saying now he's
>>>>> going
>>>>> on Medicare next year? mebbe it's senility
>>>>
>>>> I'll never forgive him for validating Reiman's butter bar
>>>> explanation :-)
>>>>
>>>> Nigel Brooks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>Doug Says: Mr. Brooks, as you well know, YOU forged the terms
>>>("2nd Lieutenant') into my reference to a requirement for a SFC to lead a
>>>platoon because there was an absence of Butter Bars. Eris simply
>>>stated the obvious - you were lying then, and you are lying now.
>>>Would you like to see proof?
>>>
>>>Even when you are given time to ponder your obvious fraud, serial
>>>lying, and such without rebuttals, you just cannot help from
>>>attacking me. You need to find a cure for your pathetic obsession with me.
>>>I realize I am one of your victims that has taken the time to rebut
>>>your fraud and false accusations and thereby exposed you for what
>>>you are, a con man, fraud merchant and smear gang leader, but surely
>>>you
>>>can get over it? If you did not launch your smear and con campaign
>>>against me I would not be required to post my rebuttals to your
>>>serial
>>>lying and general dishonesty.
>>>
>>>Doug Grant (Tm)
>>
>> Bullshit! You lied about going to OCS and returning as a "Butter
>> Bar", which everyone knows is a nickname for a 2nd Lt. You were
>> attempting to bullshit someone into believing you hadn't been sent
>> packing from OCS, and that you became an officer. We now know
>> you're greatest achievement was becoming a personnel sergeant.
>>
>> Get help Doug, you're not mentally stable.
>
> Gee - and I thought he'd crawled back under his rock.
>
> But the clear and unambiguous meaning of the post he made in
> response to one made by my good friend Joe Schlatter,( Col.USA
> retired) is......................
>
> Well ............ Clear and Unambiguous.
>
> "Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
> Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I
> went to OCS and returned as a Butter Bar myself. Half of my
> graduating class in OCS Ft. Benning ended up dead or wounded.
>
> Doug Grant (Tm) "
>

>
> A review of Reiman's military records obtained under FOIA procedures
> revealed that:
>
> 1. His first tour of Vietnam began in early 1968.

Doug Says: More lies from Brooks.

> 2. He attended OCS in 1966

Doug Says: Of course.
> 3. His rank prior to attending OCS in 1966 was Specialist E-5 not
> SFC

Doug Says: Here Nigel Brooks proves he is a liar and a fraud, he knew
the SFC issue was simply an out-of-place typo, and when it is placed
in the right place in the paragraph the quip clearly states I was
talking about Platoon Leaders in respect to my Butter Bar reference.
Of course Brooks hides that fact, and he presents the quip with his
forged meaning and with a completely false context - yet his own
admission that I attended OCS as a Sp-5, and said so, and even said
that I made SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT OCS ABOUT A DOZEN TIMES proves that
ol con man Brooks has, once again, caught himself in his own fraud and
deception.

> 4. He failed to graduate from OCS and was re-assigned that same
> year at grade E-5.

Brooks hides the fact that I was promoted to SSG E-6 immediately after
I was reassigned from the OCS school while I was waiting for another
OCS class. He hides that fact as he wants to give the fraudulent
impression I washed out of OCS.

> 5. His claim that "half his graduating class in OCS Ft Benning
> ended up dead or wounded" is a fabrication. He failed to graduate
> from any OCS class.

Doug Says: Stating what happened to my OCS graduating class is clearly
not a statement that I graduated - especially when I stated about a
dozen times I did not! BWHAHAHAHAHA. The two issues are not even
connected! Brooks has been caught in mid con yet again! I clearly
was talking about those officers that *graduated* which clearly DID
NOT include me - Brooks is distorting context and forging context and
meaning so as to defame and smear in true con man style.

> 6. The term "Butter Bar" is military vernacular for the
> Commissioned Officer Rank of 2nd Lieutenant. It is derived from the
> yellow or gold colored insignia of rank.

Doug Says: Butter Bar, as we see below, is a term used for MANY
DIFFERENT references, and has been used by many to reference several
different positions and types of officers. (See the links below for
proof). Nigel Brooks was a Sp-4 personnel clerk that has lied about
his service, was never in the Regular Army, and is a known fraud and
smear merchant, and certainly is NOT an expert on US Army vernacular.
Brook's claim that "Butter Bar" was "exclusively" used to mean 2nd
Lieutenant is a flagrant lie - as the following links from real
soldiers prove.

> 7. His records are clear and unambiguous that he was never an
> Commissioned Officer.

Doug Says: Considering I never said I was a commissioned officer,
then I should reply that Mr. Brooks records are clear and unambiguous
that he never made the rank of Field Marshall either - both
statements have the same relevancy - and this is regardless of the
fact Nigel Brooks said he won two Victoria Crosses in Vietnam. Nigel
Brooks is presenting his con man BS as if I did say something I did
not, so he can use more con's and fraud to smear me about something he
knows I never said. Typical con man and typical Nigel Brooks style.
>
> As stated - the clear and unambiguous meaning of his post is clear
> and unambiguous. To believe any other explanation would require one
> to abandon common sense.
>
> Nigel Brooks

Doug Says: Common sense is to believe the intent of the author, and
not to try to exploit and use fraud and lies to misrepresent a simple
typo - and this is especially true when dozens of my posts prove
irrefutably that I said was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
after I LEFT OCS - and we all know that a SFC comes AFTER a SSG E-6 -
all of us except of course the net smear merchant and con man Nigel
Brooks.

NIGEL BROOKS CAUGHT FORGING AGAIN - A REBUTTAL TO MORE NIGEL BROOKS
FRAUD


I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.



NIGEL BROOKS CAUGHT FORGING AGAIN

Doug Says: I have posted about a dozen or so times that other US Army
personnel have referred to the term Butter Bar as a Platoon Leader.
Brooks was told immediately the SFC note in the quip he is forging was
simply out of place, (Brooks' idiotically proves he is lying above by
noting that I was a not a SFC when I went to OCS). However, so as to
completely fraudulently misrepresent what I had previously told Brooks
I had meant in this quip (Brooks is exploiting a typo for his
fraudulent purposes as the following post clearly proves) Brooks
FORGED - YES "FORGED" the terms "(2nd Lieutenant)" into my post so as
to completely change the quip into a context he already knew was
completely false and fraudulent so he could then continue his con game
and smear tactics.

Key Point: As the following URL below clearly proves, Nigel Brooks
FORGED the terms “(2nd Lieutenant) into my quip AFTER he was told by
me that was NOT want I meant, and I was referencing a Platoon Leader
that was a SFC E-7 taking the place of a missing commissioned
officer. Brooks not only has been caught maliciously and
deliberately lying about the context and the intent of my quip, he has
also been caught FORGING terms into my quip so as to deliberately and
fraudulently change the true context and meaning.

Do the terms: Con man and smear merchant apply to Nigel Brooks? If
forging terms and distorting context so as to post false accusations
about Veterans is not the hallmark of a con man and a smear merchant,
I cannot think of what is.





See below for all those other real Vets (people that actually served
in the Regular Army - unlike Brooks that referred to a Platoon Leader
as a Butter Bar) - and meanwhile check out all the fraud and other
forgeries Nigel Brooks has been posting about me for years.

http://tinyurl.com/cdox5m

Here is a short list of Nigel Brook's more
recent forgeries, and his laughable claim that he "never forged
anything in his life." Not only has Brooks been caught lying and
conning about his military service, he has been caught lying about
other people's military records. The man is clearly a con man and a
smear merchant in my opinion and in the opinion of outside experts I
have consulted.


BROOK BUTTER BAR FORGERY EXPOSED -REBUTTAL

1. See my post: http://tinyurl.com/47wgm3 POW'S LEFT BEHIND IN VIETNAM
- PROOF -REBUTTAL
REBUTTAL to Nigel Brooks fraud and false accusations in respect to
this issue.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of
your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legalco...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections reasonable
(considering the "reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will
then remove this post, or the offending passages contained therein,
from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is
to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers prior to
publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate,
or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on USENET or
elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment and
obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful and legitimate"
publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked, defamed or
harassed, or my copyrighted articles not interrupted nor infringed
upon, I clearly do not have a reason to respond with a rebuttal.
Please also note that I intend to notify any and all ISP's and web
hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site or other similar
entity about me after I give the offender an opportunity to retract,
apologize and remove said post from the Google archive).
IN ADDITION, considering the typical ridiculous, absurd and obviously
false claims about my military service that originates from the smear
merchant crackpot gang, I also hereby certify and attest this article
is NOT a secret coded message that only smear gang members such as the
anonymous cyberstalker SteveL and others can decode with his secret
Federal Agent midget decoder and mind reading ring. This means all
gang members inevitable claims that this article is me really claiming
in a soothsaying code (a code crackpots et al gang members can only
read of course which involves the standard nonsensical gang leader
mind reading claims) that (1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that
sniper killed Ho Chi Minh, HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803
enemy soldiers in Vietnam and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3)
that I was a secret member of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them
out) that I hunted down and murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir
boy) (4) that I was trained by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have
green blood, and retractable fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo"
was copied after my deeds in Vietnam and I still live in caves in the
northwest (6) and best of all, I went to the Carlise War College to
study WWII tactics even before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA. Such
preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims about me
are, as usual, blatantly false
and equally ridiculous. (Ask them for proof of their claims the
next time they make such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for
their rocks). Also, note that all of the smear gang's accusations
about me have been (or will be) submitted to a team of independent
and highly qualified investigators, experts on military issues, and
the law. I have already seen some of their written conclusions, and
so far all of the experts agree with me, and some believe I am being
smeared and defamed with fraud, false accusations and obloquy, and two
have recommended I take immediate legal action against members of this
smear gang that conspires together to defame and smear me on a
repeated and regular basis. I will publish all of their opinions about
the gang's accusations when all of their false accusations,
forgeries, fraud, false military record representations, and general
obloquy have been investigated and opined upon by experts).
Re my previous post:

http://tinyurl.com/3nm8yr An Enormous Crime.
In a direct, flagrant and deliberate infringement on one of my
copyrighted articles that was about POWS' left in Vietnam and had
nothing to do with Nigel Brooks, Mr. Brooks' has once against
distorted the facts with fraud and false accusations.

Sp4 Brooks' not only infringed on my copyright, he added his usual
spiteful fraud and forgery about my Butter Bar reference when I
sarcastically mentioned I was forced to be a Platoon Leader when
there was an absence of Lieutenants. Note this long ago exchange
included a single typo that Brooks of course found during one of his
back searches of posts coming out of one of the accounts I used.
Brooks' back searches all of my posts searching for typos and such so
he can use fraud and false distorted interpretations of all typos
(except his and his gang members of course) to smear, defame, defraud,
lie about and falsely and fraudulently portray in a context and
meaning that was not intended by me nor the original author. (A.k.a.
"The Nigel Brooks' Flim Flam").

It is not so much that Brooks has dredged up his own forgery about
something I said in the past, that practice is standard Nigel Brooks
and his fraud and false accusations are becoming legendary. (Brooks
probably holds the world Internet record for web sites forced down by
web managers due to defamation or lies or fraud or abuse or false
accusations or all five reasons).

Yet when Brooks laces his half-baked and generally goofy self-serving
opinions with outright fraud about me because I dared to present
something that he does not want Vietnam Vets to read - I believe
that unethical act goes beyond his typical fraud, copyright
violations, false accusations, serial lying, deceptions, distortions,
preposterous mind reading claims, outright forgeries, and traducement
posts about me and others.

Nigel Brooks Butter Bar Fraud and Forgeries Exposed
Brooks Said:
> Mr. Reiman has actually made his acquaintance also - for during
> December > 2003, in a thread entitled "Military Experts on Fox &
> CNN" the former Deputy > Director of the Defense POW-MIA office said
> this:
> "As an old retired officer whose young ass was saved by his platoon
> sergeant
> and his first sefeant mor than one, Amen. The Brits have an adage: A
> lieutenants mission is to show how to die with dignity"
> Mr. Reiman responded:
> "Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
> Butter
> Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I went to OCS
> and
> returned as a Butter Bar myself. Half of my graduating class in OCS
> Ft.
> Benning ended up dead of wounded."

Doug Says: Of course Brooks is NOT presenting the original
copyrighted response I made to Joe in its correct order. Brooks is
deliberately using a cut and paste that contains a known typo in the
above post fragment which has already been corrected about a dozen
times, and the original War Story article version and several other
posts I posted long ago proves the above post fragment contains a key
error in respect to the placement of the (as a SFC). (When you are
using typists that do not know anything about the US Military we
noticed lots of errors were made in respect to military comments or
issues).

Regardless of Brooks' knowledge of the glaring typo (which he has
acknowledged several times) he still deliberately and fraudulently
uses that same known typo in his repeated defamation posts about me,
while hiding from and ignoring the corrected passage which was
originally written and which is evidenced by our Library of
Congress. (The copyrighted version did not contain the typist's error
and that copyright was filed long before Brooks even started his smear
campaign against me).

Correcting Typos and Errors
If we find a typist error or typo or something that can be
fraudulently exploited due to any ambiguity, or an outright forgery
from Brooks or any of his gang members, we remove it from the Google
archive and replace the post with the typo, error or ambiguity
corrected.

Everyone knows only the original author can know the true intent and
meaning of anything he might write, and Nigel Brooks is soooooo stupid
I doubt if he even knows the true meaning of what *he* writes not to
mention anyone else. Brooks' has ZERO background in literary reviews
or critiques, and his background is more attuned to fraud, forgeries,
flim flam, serial lying and false accusations, so we can all see the
kind of person I am being forced to deal with.

Not that it is not easy to expose and rebut Nigel Brooks and his
gang's
fraud and traducements contained in all of their posts about
me, it just is time consuming. Yet we have a full time typist at work
(a volunteer working pro bono) and we have just about covered all of
Nigel Brooks fraud and lies he has posted about me with either
rebuttals already posted, or rebuttals pending. Soon these rebuttals
will also be supported with the opinions of genuine experts on the
law, investigation and the US Military as well as the detailed facts
presented in them.

To further their typical fraud and false accusations, Nigel Brooks and
his gang like to dig discarded posts out of my waste basket that were
discarded due to error or typo, while ignoring the corrected post that
is replaced on USENET without the error. They spend hours and hours
back searching posts that were posted under one of the accounts I used
pathetically wasting their time searching for any typo, any error they
can forge and distort into something defaming or they can use to
continue their cyberstalking and harassment against me.

Out of the approximately 35,000 posts on USENET posted by many under
the account names I also used, so far they have found about five or
six key typos or errors they can fraudulently exploit or forge into
something that appears on the surface defaming. Yet on closer
inspection simply proves that Nigel Brooks and his gang are nothing
more than forgers that splice together post fragments years apart, and
then add or subtract their own words so as to make the post fragments
say something entirely different from what the original author wanted
to say or convey to the readers.

INTENT OF THE AUTHOR IGNORED BY THE BROOKS GANG
*Intent* of the author is the key, and every expert I have spoken with
has confirmed the obvious and known fact that only the original author
can determine the true context and meaning of anything he has
written. Others can question and ask his meaning if it could be
ambiguous of course, but Brooks and Rau and gang does not ask. They
simply forge the post fragments they find into something defaming
they want it to mean so they can then use their own forgeries for the
purpose of defaming their targeted smear and con victim.
Brooks' attempts to con the readers into believing he can read minds,
and he and only he can interpret all of the literary works in the
world, and he claims he even knows more about context and intent than
the original author. Add that to his Sp4 Draftee background yet based
upon that pathetic amount of service and rank he also claims he is an
expert on the US Military and some how, (mind reading or soothsaying
or a cyrstal ball - take your pick) he knows what every solider did or
did not do in his military service, and what you clearly are dealing
with in Nigel Brooks is a self delusional crackpot.
Here is some detailed information about Mr. Brooks propensity to
falsely interpret post fragments from other authors for the obvious
and deliberate purpose to defame the original author:

http://tinyurl.com/4z9o7m BROOKS SPIN AND FRAUD REVEALED -REBUTTAL
Brooks' knows the (as a SFC) is out of place in the above false and
incorrect version of my response to Joe. I was clearly referencing
myself as a "Platoon Sergeant" that had to take over a platoon due to
the absence of a Lieutenant, which we can all see was the topic of
the Joe's comment I was responding to. Note that I had already said
I was a NCO in this post, and the post topic was all about NCO's not
2nd Lieutenants, and that is why Brooks hides the entire post. But we
can all see Joe's reference to a Platoon Sergeant saving his ass,
which prompted my reply:
> "Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
> Butter
> Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and
> returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC). Half of my graduating
> class in OCS Ft.
> Benning ended up dead of wounded."

Doug Says: It is very easy to prove the (as a SFC) typo was out of
place in the sentence. The correct positioning of the (as a SFC)
explains clearly that I was talking about performing the duties of a
Butter Bar as a SFC E-7 Platoon Sergeant, and here is the proof the
SFC E-7 typo was in fact an original typo and the statement above is
the correct one. First let's examine Brooks glaring typo version:

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I went to
OCS
and returned as a Butter Bar myself."

1. I was promoted to SSG E-6 special orders 145, eight days after I
arrived in France from the OCS school in Ft. Benning. I was not
promoted to SFC E-7 until December 1968 in Vietnam. According to
Brooks' typo version below I would be ridiculously claiming I was a
SFC E-7 *before* I went to Vietnam, and then after Vietnam I went to
OCS - which is of course ass backwards to everything else I have ever
said about my service.

http://tinyurl.com/4jkvjn July 29, 2006 I had said many times
previously that I made SFC E-7 long after I left OCS, and in fact had
posted several times that I was promoted to SSG E-6 and offered a very
unusual assignment in France by the OCS School after I left OCS. (How
could I be a SFC E-7 before I went to OCS if I was promoted to SSG E-6
only after I left OCS? This is typical of the BS Brooks distortions of
the facts).



http://tinyurl.com/42ew8o


July 28, 2006 Note the Above post proves
that Dai Uy lied about me "washing out of OCS" and further lied about
my rank in Vietnam.

1. Then Nigel Brooks corrected his own gang member and confirmed that
I was promoted to SFC E-7 on December 1968 -"

http://tinyurl.com/4vara2

SECTION CHARLIE PART II CAN BE FOUND AT THIS URL:
Nigel Brooks lie that I was never a Platoon Sergeant, his own Google
archived posts proves he is
lying and using fraudulent misrepresentations in this regard. Brooks
is also caught lying about my OCS assignments and my assignments after
OCS once again.. Included is Brook's confession (Google archived post
from Brooks) that contrary to his previous claims he now confesses he
"really does not know who wrote or posted the articles and forgeries
he has been attributing to me." (Evidence Included). Brooks is again
caught using fraudulent statements in respect to my assignments to
France and immediate promotion to SSG E-6.

http://tinyurl.com/msqv2


(Section Charlie).
SECTION DELTA PART II CAN BE FOUND AT THIS URL: In this section Nigel
Brook's is caught lying not only about his claims that I have a bad
discharge, but also lying about my OCS assignments, and my assignments
and promotion immediately after OCS. I include scanned orders proving
Nigel Brooks and his gang members are using lies and fraud to defame
me. (Evidence included). (Brooks also lies about my MOS duties, and my
duties outside of my MOS as well).

http://tinyurl.com/hw282

(Section Delta).

Doug Says: At last count there were 191 previous posts in which I said
I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I left OCS, and I was promoted to SFC
E-7 while I was in Vietnam. So obviously the version with the typo
Brooks is presenting is clearly in error:


"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC) then I went to
OCS
> and returned as a Butter Bar myself."

the correct version is as follows:

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and >
> returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."

Brooks' knows his typo version he dug out of my waste basket is
completely false, misleading and fraudulent. Brooks' has even
admitted that I was not promoted to SFC E-7 until long after I left
OCS and was stationed in Vietnam. So by Brooks own mouth he has
admitted to posting a known forgery and false representation based
upon his own forgery - yet again. Whew! What a fraud merchant this
Nigel Brooks is!

Now we shall prove that Brooks actually FORGED AND INSERTED the terms
(2nd Lieutenant) into my post after the Butter Bar term so as to
deliberately forge and lie about my intent and meaning of the post
fragment in question:

Here is the post that proves Mr. Brooks forged the terms (2nd
Lieutenant) into my post AFTER I told him I was sarcastically
referencing a Platoon Leader that was a Platoon Sergeant (SFC ) that
had to take over due to an absence of commissioned officers.

http://tinyurl.com/3em5ny

"Your claim that you never posted a forgery
of any kind in respect to your smear campaign against me is
preposterous and represents outright fraud - I can and will produce
dozens of out-of-context forgeries about me posted by you. One of your
first forgeries was adding the terms "2nd Lieutenant" in Paranthias
after my Butter Bar phrase although I specifically told you and you
acknowledged that my context and meaning of "Butter Bar" was that of a
"Platoon Leader that was a SFC E-7" and NOT a 2nd Lieutenant."

http://tinyurl.com/4esrnk April 27

.http://tinyurl.com/64kkux

Nigel Brooks Butter Bar forgery, where he
ADDED the terms (2nd Lieutenant) into the narrative of my post so as
to change the context of the post fragment he used to
fraudulentlyclaim I was claiming to be a 2nd Lieutenant in Vietnam
"Note that Brooks forged my post and added the terms "(2nd
Lieutenant)" even *after* I told him I was referencing a Platoon
Leader that was a SFC in absence of a commissioned officer - so much
for "honesty" in the Brooks gang)."

Nigel Brooks goes on with his fraud:

> "Joe" is of course Joe Schlatter a former frequent poster to
> alt.war.vietnam.
> The term "Butter Bar" is military slang used to identify the lowest
> commission officer rank of pay grade O-1. It's origin is derived
> from the
> insignia of rank worn by the individual, a yellow or gold colored
> single
> bar - hence the term "Butter Bar".

Nigel Brooks has admitted the term Butter Bar can mean many other
things other than just a 2nd lieutenant, and of course anyone in the
US Army knows that fact. Yes I have heard "Butter Bar" mean a dumb
ass 2nd Lieutenant, but I have also heard it used to denote a Platoon
Leader, green officer, OCS graduate, stupid officer, shaky officer,
contemptible officer, asshole officer, and even a cowardly officer. I
used it in the context to denote the common event when a Platoon
Leader was absent from his platoon and therefore the SFC (platoon
sergeant) had to become the "butter bar" platoon leader as well as the
platoon sergeant.

2. As soon as Brooks asked me what I meant about the Butter Bar post
fragment, and in the same post admitted I could not be talking about a
2nd Lieutenant specifically, I replied with precisely what my context
and meaning was and noted the typo. However, that response infuriated
Brooks because he knew he could no longer use his fraud to defame me,
so what did Brooks do? Of course ol Nigel ADDED the terms "(2nd
Lieutenant)" to my post immediately after my use of the terms' Butter
Bar so as to forge my post and convey a meaning that he knew I did not
intend and in fact had already told him I did not intend.

3. As soon as Brooks FORGED the terms (2nd Lieutenant) into my post
so he could make it mean what he had been saying it meant, the Brooks
gang picked up Brooks' outright forgery and posted his forgery
hundreds of times over the Internet associated with the fraudulent
claim that I had claimed to be a 2nd Lieutenant while I was in Vietnam
- which of course is a complete lie that is based upon Nigel Brooks
outright forgery and false representation of my post and my intent.
4. But this is how Nigel Brooks operates. Fraud, forgeries, lies,
smears, defamation, conning the readers, false associations, false
representations of his past service with the Custom Service to bolster
his out right fraud and forgeries designed to smear and defame, and
also his production of ringers and other "anonymous experts or self-
acclaimed Law Enforcement types" to falsely support and agree with
Brooks obvious fraud, and his gang members' lies and forgeries of what
they falsely claim I said in the past.

I have seen the Brooks' gang impersonate all kinds of people,
including me, Doctors and even a General so as to add false and
completely fraudulent credibility to their lies and false
accusations. When dealing with Nigel Brooks and gang you must always
remember you are dealing with unethical and dishonest people when it
comes to posting on USENET. They lie, and lie, and lie, and forge,
and impersonate, and that is what smear gangs do, and the Nigel Brooks
smear gang is legendary in its use of outright fraud and false
accusations.

Some Other Evidence That Butter Bar Is Used to Mean Platoon Leader
http://tinyurl.com/3h9oxv Another AWV poster (Eris) uses the Butter
Bar name to denote a Platoon Sergeant that also was forced into the
position of Platoon Leader the same as I did. Brooks said if anyone
else confirmed the usage the same as I did he would apologize and
retract his fraud. I am still waiting for his apology. I have often
seen Brooks; demand evidence he is wrong with a claim he would
retract or apologize for his fraud if that evidence is presented, but
in true Flim Flam style, when the evidence comes in proving he is
wrong he ducks his offer and pretends he never said it. Like I said,
this guy has the ethics of a Saigon Whore. (I wonder where he
learned to be so unethical?)

http://tinyurl.com/4fbmww Here is another email I received from a
person that confirms others in the 25th Infantry division also heard
the term Butter Bar used to denote a Platoon Leader. I sent that
email to CyberstalkerWebNames on July 28, 2006.

I feel confident that any rational and responsible expert on the law
and on the US Military will agree that Nigel Brooks and his smear
gang et al are perhaps one of the most (if not the most) dishonest
and fraudulent smear merchant gangs' operating on the Web. (This of
course does not include ringers, fake names, and impersonators
planted on the Newsgroup by the smear gang to fraudulently bolster
credibility for their outright fraud. No real name, no credentials,
then you can bet it is all gang bullshit).

Doug Grant (Tm)



"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:70bd5h...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Billzz" <billzz...@starband.net> wrote in message
> news:ecd36$499fae31$9440b19b$49...@STARBAND.NET...
>>
>> "tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.24094a433...@news.bytemine.net...
>>> In article <DMadnTeGtcZ0pALU...@giganews.com>,
>>> dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>>>> Nigel Brooks has admitted the term Butter Bar can mean many other
>>>> things other than just a 2nd lieutenant, and of course anyone in
>>>> the
>>>> US Army knows that fact. Yes I have heard "Butter Bar" mean a
>>>> dumb
>>>> ass 2nd Lieutenant, but I have also heard it used to denote a
>>>> Platoon
>>>> Leader, green officer, OCS graduate, stupid officer, shaky
>>>> officer,
>>>> contemptible officer, asshole officer, and even a cowardly
>>>> officer. I
>>>> used it in the context to denote the common event when a Platoon
>>>> Leader was absent from his platoon and therefore the SFC (platoon
>>>> sergeant) had to become the "butter bar" platoon leader as well
>>>> as the
>>>> platoon sergeant.
>>>
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-
online.de!t-online.de!news-1.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!
individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.war.vietnam,alt.military,alt.military.retired,alt.politics,alt.news-
media
Subject: Re: What A Steaming pile or BS.
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:22:39 -0600
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <70bd5h...@mid.individual.net>
References: <DMadnTeGtcZ0pALU...@giganews.com>
<MPG.24094a433...@news.bytemine.net>
<ecd36$499fae31$9440b19b$49...@STARBAND.NET>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net
qH5KaARyY4N4FdMMjhaHMwyECjkJuz2YQKy+UDiW4vSIpMAPA=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rwEFNtwJUAbYsObW6N+/9aLJA4k=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606
Bytes: 5112
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.war.vietnam:740942
alt.military:432451 alt.military.retired:445150 alt.politics:4738564
alt.news-media:265482


>
> I would imagine that the fixation is due to the fact that in a post
> made long ago, the writer was waxing eloquent about the Officer
> Corps.
>
> He was in fact in a conversation with retired Colonel (Joe
> Schlatter) and responding to Joe's observation that the Brits had an
> adage about a Lieutenants job http://tinyurl.com/pmjaz
>
> In that response, he remarked that he "gone through three butter
> bars during his first tour in Vietnam (as a SFC)" then had gone to
> OCS and returned as a butter bar himself. He went on to say that
> half of his graduating class in OCS Ft. Benning ended up dead or
> wounded.

Doug's Rebuttal to Brooks and his gang: No Mr. Brooks, you are
lying
as the above post clearly proves. If you read what was said I used
the term Butter Bar meaning a Platoon Leader, and I further clarified
what I meant by placing the terms (SFC) after the Butter Bar term so
that everyone that had half a brain would know what I meant. In the
same post I had already said I was a NCO in Vietnam. YOU forged the
terms "(2nd Lieutenant)" into my post, after you already knew my
reference to Butter Bar was that of a Platoon leader, just like
SEVERAL other real regular Army soldiers had referenced, see above,
Eris, and several others as well, all previously posted.

>
> A couple of days prior to that he claimed that he had been a Platoon
> Sergeant prior to going to OCS. http://tinuyurl/q3c45.

Doug Says: Bullshit Brooks. Your link above is a complete fraud. I
suspect you did not believe anyone would click on it. It only brings
you back to your own post. I have said about a dozen times, that I
was promoted to SSG E-6 immediately AFTER I left OCS, which of course
I was. So unless you believe that a rank of SFC E-7 comes before a
rank of SSG E-6, which apparently some members of your con man smear
gang do, and so do you, then obviously the (SFC) entry in the quip
was out of place, and here it the real post as it was intended once
again. You have been told about this typo at least twenty times -
yet
you persist on making a complete idiot out of yourself by claiming
that a rank of SSG E-6 comes after the rank of SFC E-7, which we all
know is a complete and outright fraud.

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and >
> returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."

>
> To the observer of those posts - one would fully expect that the
> writer was claiming to have served a tour in Vietnam prior to
> attending OCS and had received a commission (butter bar).

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and >
> returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."

Doug Says: Mr. Brooks is of course lying again. We all know that
SFC
E-7 is not a rank that comes before SSG E-6, and I said about a dozen
times that I was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days AFTER I left
OCS, so the prepoderance of evidence clearly proves that Nigel Brooks
has been caught, once again, in mid con. He knew the (SFC) was a
typo, all of my previous and subsequent posts prove that fact, and my
comments about OCS and that I was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight
days after I left OCS clearly proves to any rational person that (1)
my (SFC) entry was supposed to be placed in the quip where it is
above, and if I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I left OCS I *clearly*
am saying I did not graduate from OCS! No one other that a complete
idiot, fraud merchant, con man and someone bent on using obvious
typos
and such to smear and defame would conclude otherwise.

Even after I and ERis, and others confirmed that the term Butter Bar
was sometimes used to reference a platoon leader, Brooks then forged
the terms (2nd Lieutenant) into my post so as to completely change
the
context into an new and forged context that he already knew was false.

http://tinyurl.com/3em5ny "

Your claim that you never posted a forgery
of any kind in respect to your smear campaign against me is
preposterous and represents outright fraud - I can and will produce
dozens of out-of-context forgeries about me posted by you. One of your
first forgeries was adding the terms "2nd Lieutenant" in Paranthias
after my Butter Bar phrase although I specifically told you and you
acknowledged that my context and meaning of "Butter Bar" was that of a
"Platoon Leader that was a SFC E-7" and NOT a 2nd Lieutenant."

http://tinyurl.com/4esrnk April 27

.http://tinyurl.com/64kkux Nigel Brooks Butter Bar forgery, where he
ADDED the terms (2nd Lieutenant) into the narrative of my post so as
to change the context of the post fragment he used to
fraudulently claim I was claiming to be a 2nd Lieutenant in Vietnam
"Note that Brooks forged my post and added the terms "(2nd
Lieutenant)" even *after* I told him I was referencing a Platoon
Leader that was a SFC in absence of a commissioned officer - so much
for "honesty" in the Brooks gang)."

Nigel Brooks goes on with his fraud:

> "Joe" is of course Joe Schlatter a former frequent poster to
> alt.war.vietnam.
> The term "Butter Bar" is military slang used to identify the lowest
> commission officer rank of pay grade O-1. It's origin is derived
> from the
> insignia of rank worn by the individual, a yellow or gold colored
> single
> bar - hence the term "Butter Bar".

Nigel Brooks has admitted the term Butter Bar can mean many other
things other than just a 2nd lieutenant, and of course anyone in the
US Army knows that fact. Yes I have heard "Butter Bar" mean a dumb
ass 2nd Lieutenant, but I have also heard it used to denote a Platoon
Leader, green officer, OCS graduate, stupid officer, shaky officer,
contemptible officer, asshole officer, and even a cowardly officer. I
used it in the context to denote the common event when a Platoon
Leader was absent from his platoon and therefore the SFC (platoon
sergeant) had to become the "butter bar" platoon leader as well as the
platoon sergeant.

As soon as Brooks asked me what I meant about the Butter Bar post
fragment, and in the same post admitted I could not be talking about a
2nd Lieutenant specifically, I replied with precisely what my context
and meaning was and noted the typo. However, that response infuriated
Brooks because he knew he could no longer use his fraud to defame me,
so what did Brooks do? Of course ol Nigel ADDED the terms "(2nd
Lieutenant)" to my post immediately after my use of the terms' Butter
Bar so as to forge my post and convey a meaning that he knew I did not
intend and in fact had already told him I did not intend.

As soon as Brooks FORGED the terms (2nd Lieutenant) into my post
so he could make it mean what he had been saying it meant, the Brooks
gang picked up Brooks' outright forgery and posted his forgery
hundreds of times over the Internet associated with the fraudulent
claim that I had claimed to be a 2nd Lieutenant while I was in Vietnam
- which of course is a complete lie that is based upon Nigel Brooks
outright forgery and false representation of my post and my intent.
4. But this is how Nigel Brooks operates. Fraud, forgeries, lies,
smears, defamation, conning the readers, false associations, false
representations of his past service with the Custom Service to bolster
his out right fraud and forgeries designed to smear and defame, and
also his production of ringers and other "anonymous experts or self-
acclaimed Law Enforcement types" to falsely support and agree with
Brooks obvious fraud, and his gang members' lies and forgeries of what
they falsely claim I said in the past.
>
> The facts are of course that the writer did attend OCS, but had
> failed to complete the course. His rank at the time was SP5 E-5,
> and he was certainly neither an SFC or a Platoon Sergeant prior to
> that attendance.

Doug Says: Considering I have posted about a dozen times that I was
promoted to SSG E-6 immediately after I left OCS, golly gee and gosh,
you would think Nigel Brooks would know that a E-5 rank comes before
SSG E-6, and that a SFC E-7 comes AFTER SSG E-6. It seems that
experts on the US Military completely understand those simple facts,
and if you admit the order of rank I just presented is true, then you
also must conclude that Nigel Brooks is lying - and further conclude
that my (SFC) entry was simply a typo initially inserted in the wrong
place in the quip, which is a common mistake. Out of the 35,000 or
so
posts under the same accounts I used, ol Brooks the smear merchant
has
found about five he can exploit into something fraudulent and
defaming, even when he knows that all of the evidence proves he is
lying. We ALL know that SSG E-6 comes BEFORE SFC E-7 - and my dozens
of posts stating that I was promoted to SSG E-6 immediately after I
left OCS is evidence that Nigel Brooks and gang wants to hide from,
avoid mentioning, ignore, duck, run from, cower from, pretend does
not
exist, and other similar fraudulent and typical con man "steaming
pile
of BS" he and his gang regularly lie about.


>
> It was not until nearly two years later in 1968 that the writer was
> assigned to Vietnam.

Doug Says: No Kidding. This point of Brooks clearly means Brooks is
lying. Ask Brooks to provide a post where I said I was assigned to
Vietnam before I went to OCS as con man Brooks is stating - and
Brooks will scurry for his sewer. Brooks caught in mid con yet again/
>
> His observation that half of his graduating class ended up dead or
> wounded is also bullshit - he was assigned to OCS Class 13-66 but
> never completed the course.

Doug Says: Considering I said I never graduated about two dozen times,
and I was referring to those officers that *did* graduate, Brook’s con
above is clearly another fraudulent attempt to claim I said something
I never did. Ask Brooks to produce where I said I graduated from OCS
and watch Nigel Brooks scurry for his sewer. Brooks caught in mid con
yet again.
>
> You will note that in his multi line diatribe he accuses me of
> omitting the fact that shortly after his reassignment from OCS he
> was promoted to E-6. Whilst it is true he was promoted - it is
> irrelevant to the main thrust of the argument as to the meaning of
> his OCS and butter bar post.

Doug Says: This is typical con man deception and fraud. The key
issue in the Butter Bar post is the (SFC) entry. If the (SFC) entry
is in the right place it clearly shows I was referencing a NCO that
had to take the place of a missing commissioned officer in a Platoon.
Brooks says I said I was a SFC BEFORE I said I was a SSG E-6!

So the fact that Brooks hides this IMPOSSIBILITY and hides the 32 or
so Google archived posts in which I stated I was promoted to SSG E-6
AFTER I LEFT OCS, flies in the face and completely disproves Nigel’s
obvious con that I claimed to be a SFC E-7 *before* I even went to
OCS! And the con man says this issue is “irrelevant?”
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAQ. What this *fact* proves is that Nigel Brooks
has been caught in mid con yet again! No wonder the con man wants
everyone to ignore this fact that proves he has been lying about this
issue for years. I simply could not have said and meant I was an SFC
before I went to OCS after posting dozens of times that I was not
promoted to SSG E-6 until AFTER I left OCS. The typo is glaring, and
this is why Brooks wants to hide the facts that prove he has been
caught in mid con yet again!

WOW! 32 Google archived posts prove Brooks has been conning and using
serial lying about this issue, and 71 Google archived posts prove
Brooks was lying about the typists, and 37 Google archived posts prove
Brooks lied about the 5th Infantry, and 112 Google archived posts
proves Brooks lied about a purple heart medal awarded in *non-combat*
saturations, which of course experts are still laughing about.

The more Nigel Brooks cons and lies, the more evidence can be brought
to bear to prove his serial lying, cons, frauds, and malicious false
accusations. You would think the con man would remain in his sewer
for a while, he must realize that his fraud is glaring?
>
> It is also somewhat ironic that he in his zeal to accuse me of
> omitting his promotion - he failed to advise Joe that even though he
> attended OCS he failed to graduate.

Doug Says: Since I said I was a NCO, and that I was taking the place
of a commissioned officer as a NCO, Brooks claim that I did not say in
this extemporaneous quip paragraph that I did not grauduate is somehow
material is just another con. There was no need to elaborate, I said
I was a NCO in Vietnam in the same post about four times, and that is
why Brooks hides the entire post, he knows it praises NCO’s and
provides the true context. Conclusion:

Nigel Brooks has been caught in mid con yet again! (How many in this
post alone - is it a dozen cons yet?)
>
> As to his claim that I have admitted the term butter bar can mean
> anything other than a 2Lt - well that is pure and unadulterated bs.
> But then Mr. Reiman is fond of mischaracterizing the facts - in fact
> his propensity in that regard has even been commented on by the
> United States Courts.
>
> Nigel Brooks
>
Doug Says: In the above URL Nigel Brooks asks me if I meant something
other than a 2nd Lieutenant when I referenced a Butter Bar. Brooks
clearly knows that the term Butter Bar can mean something other than
just a 2nd Lieutenant - Brooks said so himself when he asked me that
question. Moreover we also see the following information in which
SEVERAL real regular army soldiers referred to a Butter Bar as a
Platoon Leader precisely the same as I did.

Moreover, Brooks said if anyone agreed with me on this issue he would
apologize. Eris posted the above that he also referred to his platoon
leader as a Butter Bar even when his Platoon Leader was a NCO! I
don’t know Eris, and did Brooks apologize? Of course not, Brooks
attacked Eris for posting the truth - in typical con man style!

http://tinyurl.com/dmpgrl In this post I provide more evidence that
other people have also heard and used the term Butter Bar to reference
a Platoon Leader. - URL’s are included. I also point out again that
I was promoted to SSG E-6 immediately after I left OCS - so Brook’s
obviously fraudulent claim that I was claiming I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE
I even went to OCS is clearly fraudulent, a lie, and his goofy fraud
is equally clearly a typo as the above corrected passage of the quip
clearly proves. As I said, Brooks regularly uses typos to smear and
defame, while “clarifying” his own. As just one example, Brooks
claimed that OCS members graduated as a 1st Lieutenant, but when
challenged he “clarified” that statement as a typo - it seems that
Brooks and gang can make typos and correct or clarify them, but his
smear victims cannot. I wonder if the word “Hypocrite” means anything
to Nigel Brooks?


http://tinyurl.com/aa3kls Brooks Platooon Sergeant Lie:

http://tinyurl.com/d833hg In This rebuttal I prove that Nigel Brooks
confirmed my promotion to SFC E-7 AFTER I left OCS - then he later
lied about it.

http://tinyurl.com/cnqp7v In this post Nigel Brooks confirms and
acknowledges that I said and was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
AFTER I left OCS. So how can ol Nigel now claim that I said I was a
SFC E-7 BEFORE I attended OCS? There are 32 posts on any Google
search that proves I said I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT
OCS! Many of which Nigel acknowledged by responding to them.
Obviously, the (SFC) entry in the original extemporaneous Butter Bar
quip was typographically placed in the wrong place in the sentence
Brooks is forging as the PREPONDERANCE of evidence clearly and
irrefutably proves. Which BTW, also proves that Brooks has been
caught in mid con yet again.

"Joe, the sad truth is the Brits are right. I went through three
Butter Bars during my first tour in Vietnam then I went to OCS and
returned as a Butter Bar myself (as a SFC)."

It is clear the (SFC) entry was placed in the sentence to clarify what
I meant about being a Butter Bar, and if Brooks would ever show the
post in true context, it will prove that I was talking about NCO’s
taking the place of commissioned officers in the post - no wonder
Brooks hides the entire post - it would also prove his fraudulent and
forged context.




http://tinyurl.com/art5yk Here I state I was promoted to SSG E-6
eight days after I left OCS. So how can Nigel Brooks now claim that I
said I was a SFC before I went to OCS? Sp4 Brooks was of course never
in the regular Army, but you would think that even a SP4 personnel
clerk draftee would know the rank of SFC E-7 comes AFTER the rank of
SSG E-6? I suspect that Brooks does know about that proper order of
rank, but he needs to lie about it so he can further his fraud about a
clear and unmistakable typo that he is trying to exploit into a means
to con the readers again about something I said in the past.

http://tinyurl.com/cnzpvf In this post I once again expose Nigel
Brooks fraud about my rank after I left OCS - which again Nigel ties
to lie about, and other lies.

http://tinyurl.com/5ttdjw Here is yet another post in which I clearly
state that I was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I left OCS and was assigned
to France. “Which was if I was willing to delay my return to OCS, I
would be sent to France, promoted to SSG E-6,. . . “
Brooks and gang clearly knew that I had said dozens of times that I
was promoted to SSG E-6 AFTER I LEFT OCS - thereby making it virtually
impossible their claim that I said and meant I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I
went to OCS is true - we all know that E-7 comes AFTER E-6, and that
fact clearly, irrefutably, without question, proves Nigel Brooks and
gang has been caught in mid con yet again! Amazing how many times
this smear and fraud merchant exposes his own con game and fraud!


Like I said, there are not less than 32 posts found on any Google
search in which I said I was promoted to SSG E-6 within eight days
after I left OCS and arrived in France. So it is impossible for any
statement that I was a SFC E-7 BEFORE I went to OCS to be correct and
intentional. Brooks was told this simple fact, and about the typo,
when he first asked about my meaning in respect to my extemporaneous
quip. As the following URL proves, I pointed out the typo and told
him that the typist simply placed the (SFC) acronym in the wrong place
in the sentence. Which is something that is done often by us all.
Yet Brooks had already been lying and conning about this issue, so he
could not admit that he was clearly wrong as not less than 32 Google
archived POSTS CLEARLY PROVE!

Brooks also stated that he knew the term Butter Bar could mean
something other than simply a 2nd Lieutenant - which the following URL
clearly proves - once again Nigel Brooks has been caught in mid con.

Even the tiniest of investigation into Nigel Brooks smear and
defamation irrefutably proves he is lying, conning and using fraud and
forgeries to do so. Brooks claim that a SFC E-7 comes before the rank
of SSG E-6 is a classic example of how Brooks trips up, and of course
his now infamous preposterous claim that people can receive Purple
Heart Medals in non-combat situations, which also has been exposed for
the fraud it clearly is. In fact Nigel Brooks has a propensity to use
forgeries and fraud to smear and defame, and it has been my experience
that he is easily caught if you take the time to simply do a little
investigation into his fraudulent accusations. Here are some more
examples of Nigel Brooks forgeries:

http://tinyurl.com/a5ff9z A sample listing of just a few of Nigel
Brook’s glaring forgeries - there are many more to come in addition to
this list - in fact when you see the listing of all the fraud and
serial lying Nigel Brooks has posted about me - you will realize that
Mr. Brooks is not only a fraud and smear merchant, he is a net con man
as well.

http://tinyurl.com/7zlbpm Here are some of Brooks outright frauds and
forgeries in respect to his fraudulent claims about the 5th Infantry
and me - more incredible revelations of a serial liar and con man that
thinks he can get away with such obvious fraud and false accusations.

http://tinyurl.com/a4tkgy In this post I offer Nigel Brooks the
opportunity to take his fraud to the American Association of
Arbitrators - and if they confirm he is telling the truth then *I will
pay for the arbitration!* But if they determine he is lying then he
pays. I also offered Brooks and his gang the opportunity to place me
under a lie detector test and if that test determines I am lying I pay
for the test, if not, then Brooks pays. Note that Nigel Brooks, in
true con man and fraud merchant style, is ducking, hiding, cowering,
running from, ignoring, not mentioning, dodging, and avoiding my
Arbitration and lie detector offer, and he has done so more than
twelve times and counting. If he ducks this offer herein again, then
the count would be up to 13 times he has hid from this offer.

Conclusion: Nigel Brooks knows he is a complete fraud and a serial
liar. If not why duck independent arbitration and lie detector tests?

Doug Grant (Tm)