BROOKS JOHN DOE SUBPOENA FRAUD - REBUTTAL

[dgvreiman]

BROOKS JOHN DOE SUBPOENA FRAUD REBUTTAL

Note that I have received some email requesting that I reduce my
rebuttals into shorter posts so they can be read more carefully. I
will start this procedure with this series of rebuttals to Nigel
Brooks cons, fraud and false accusations:

(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
legal...@comcast.net.

If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
“reasonable person” doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain,
and to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to
determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way
cause anyone emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please
note that defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal
posts has been deemed a “lawful and legitimate” publication by my
legal counsel. If I am not attacked, libeled, defamed or harassed, or
my copyrighted articles not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly
do not have a reason to respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that
I intend to notify any and all ISP’s and web hosts of any annoying or
calumnious post, web site or other similar entity about me after I
give the offender an opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said
post from the Google archive).

SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.

This means the Brownie crackpots’ inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary’s
definitions of simple terms, such as “we” “estimated” “involved”
“retired from” and “not representing any biographical claim” are all
incorrect, and only their “special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the
gang’s standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that
(1) I was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.

Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.

I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.

Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.

As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years’ long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.

In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.

The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang’ preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow “sinister” and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).

Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist’s, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)

Also, in response to the smear gang’s et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:


http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz

Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the Nigel Brooks con and smear gang
is all about.

http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay
TYPISTS’ GALORE POST proves there were about 71 previous posts prior
to the gang’s glaring lie that I never mentioned others posting under
the same accounts I used until after the gang leaders started to use a
few typos, errors and post fragments written by many different people,
years apart, never written on any military forum, deceptively spliced
together with forged words added into or subtracted from the
hodgepodge of different context post fragments so as to fraudulently
alter their meaning or context.


http://tinyurl.com/8hesja Just SOME of Nigel Brooks forgeries
revealed - proof.


End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:

Clown continues:

>> 2.) refused to follow through on your threats...
>> 2b.) That one Court Case last year in the
>> State of Washington wherein the Judge refused
>> to participate in your little witch-hunt and sending
>> forth hundreds of "subponea's" doesn't count.

Doug’s Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks: Court case? There was no court case
last year? There was a John Doe lawsuit filed to determine the
identities of smear merchants before I went to the trouble of actually
suing them - (based upon a written recommendation from a Giganews
Lawyer) and to determine their ability to pay my legal fees as such.
But that case was never served on any defendants and of course never
went to court - such representations that a court case evolved from
that John Doe filing are blatantly false - (why do these clowns lie so
much??)

Moreover, if you are referencing that John Doe lawsuit, the Judge
simply asked for a different procedure and/or for evidence in respect
to a single subpoena request. He DID NOT *refuse* to do anything as
Clown claimed. Judge’s cannot *refuse* the standard procedures of the
rules of Federal lawsuit procedure, all they can do is require certain
conditions and evidence in connection with those procedures, which is
precisely what the Judge did.

In fact he (the Judge appointed to oversee the John Doe case) even
recommended that I file a pre-discovery motion, which would have been
more effective and better than a subpoena, but as my motion to remove
the suit and hold it in abeyance to be filed later was approved by the
Judge without prejudice, all that became moot.

(In the history of Federal Lawsuits I doubt seriously if there has
ever been a case in which a Judge actually *refused* the process of
subpoena’s, provided of course those subpoena’s were adhering to the
rules, conditions and provisions of the court - which can change based
upon the district. This Clown’s claim that a Judge “refused” the
standard procedures of a lawsuit is beyond ridiculous - but then
consider the source.

Doug Grant (Tm)