THE PLACE OF NDI-IGBO IN NIGERIA’S SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
By
Ikechukwu Daniel Ikerionwu
Department of Peace and Conflicts Studies
University of Massachusetts, Lowell, USA
ABSTRACT
The advent of European colonialism radically altered the Igbo consciousness and compelled them to
draw upon opportunities of the ‘new order’ to meet social and economic demands. The twentieth
century was a period when the Nigerian people had to come to terms with the ‘new order’ introduced
by their forceful integration into the global capitalist system. New music had been introduced; new
dance steps were required.
This study examines how the Igbo, in response to and in spite of these dynamics, carved a distinct
place for themselves in Nigeria’s social and economic development. Indeed, the nature of the place of
the Igbo vis-à-vis the country’s socio-economic evolution provokes intellectual fermentation. Are they
taking their place in the sun or are they hewers of wood and fetchers of water in the Nigerian super
structure? What factors have shaped their development? To what extent have external dynamics
shaped the Igbo socio-economic factor? What are the omens for the future?
Introduction
The Igbo economy was dominated by agriculture, trade and local manufactures. Between the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Aro people (whose historical origins are influenced by Ibibio
and other riverine links) developments nearly became an economic hegemony over Igboland.
This is
significant because the Igbo, unlike many other ethnic groups that make up Nigeria, were never
wielded into a large empire or state.( http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Aro_people)
1
The Aro
were both priests and clever traders and traveled and traded extensively in Igbo and Ibibio lands.
Consequently, various Aro settlements were established and dominated the local markets. They also
specialized in buying and selling of slaves, whereas the coast communities received slaves and other
commodities for their vital export trade. Their trade routes in the hinterland that the Aro controlled and “The Aro People “http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Aro_people monitored radiated in all directions; however, Aro’s domination did not accumulate to a
comprehensive political control.(Anene 1979)
Following the British destruction of the Ibinu Ukpabi, (Aro's central instrument of religious
practices and business domination) the process that forcefully brought the Igbo nation into Nigeria
commenced. Today, Igbos dominate the South-Eastern Nigeria states of Imo, Abia, Anambra, Enugu,
and Ebonyi. These Igbo communities also form sizeable minorities in Delta State that is located west
of the River Niger and the semi-coastal of River State.
Igbo Entrepreneurship in the Colonial Period
Pre-colonial Igbo economy had basically three foundations: agriculture, trade and
manufactures. Agriculture was the mainstay of the country’s economy. It was largely subsistence in
nature and everyone, irrespective of gender, fully participated. Yam was the staple crop. Initially
emphasis on agriculture superseded that of trade.
Ecological differences and varied vegetation were the
major factors behind the development of local and regional trade amongst the Igbo. The inhabitants of
northern and central Igboland, whose soils were over-farmed, resorted to trade. The discovery of iron
ore in Awka, salt in Uburu and Okposi, and lead in Abakaliki encouraged mineral exploitation and the
growth of crafts and manufactures such as the famous blacksmithing forges in Awka (Anene 1979)
There were commercial links between the Igbo and their Benin, Igalla, Idoma, Ibibio and Ijaw
neighbors during the pre-Colonial Era. The Aro extended their commercial links far and wide and
thereby subsumed into Aro economic hegemony. It is a fact that the coastal demand for slaves whetted
Aro’s greed and did not work successfully with the earlier trade links.
During the period of the nineteenth century, the new developments that shaped Igbo social and
economic evolution were outlined and projected for the next century.
Although the Aro successfully
kept much of Igboland under its control with its dreaded Ibinu Ukpabi and renowned Abam
mercenary-warriors, they could not withstand the forerunners of British colonial rule. Olutayo
highlights these developments:
The major crisis of the Aro oligarchy began with the persistent expansion of European
influence. . . Christianity became established on the Niger. From the late 1830s, the British
began to sign slave trade treaties with various communities. The establishment of British
consuls, first, at the Bights of Benin and Biafra, and later, at the Oil Rivers, after being made a
protectorate under the United African Company, and so on, all contributed to weakening the
religious and economic supremacy of the Aro. The people started to jettison the traditional
religion and beliefs. The establishment of consular agents also assisted the British in abolishing
human sacrifice, especially through the establishment of Native Courts under MacDonald’s
administration in 1891.
The building of roads did not follow the old trade routes, and the
administrative headquarters gradually moved trade away from the Aro trade route network.
(Olutayo 1999)
4
Coastal traders and some pro-British groups among the Igbo saw economic advantages and
helped the British abolish the Aro oligarchy. This new situation gave the Igbo hinterland producers of
palm oil and allied products direct access to coastal traders who had dealt with the Aro middlemen.
Some of these coastal traders were also Igbo. It also gave the Igbo access from the areas adjacent to the
North, and more coastal-bound compatriots, direct access to the Europeans.
Over time, the Northern Igbo became more favorably disposed towards trade and alliances with
the Europeans to the detriment of their Southern counterparts (Olutayo 1999).
These were just a few
of the dynamics to proclaim Igbo entrepreneurship during the colonial period. In most economies, the
agrarian foundations were made up of Nigerian entities and stopped the mercantilist industrial
capitalism of the colonialists. Undoubtedly, the colonial master was motivated by self-interest but the
building of modern infrastructure, the development of modern communication, the encouragement of
growth of cash crop production, introduction of portable currency, western education, urbanization and
other hallmarks of integration into a capitalist and monetized system implied that opportunities and
challenges stood before the Nigerian people.
The Igbo communities, in comparison to the Yoruba, had a relatively late start in taking
advantage of these opportunities. This is primarily because of the latter's earlier contact with Europeans,
Brazilians and other non-African factors. However, with a dynamism that characterizes the innate Igbo
flexibility, they came to terms with the new world demands.
The political economy of the Igbo had been self-motivated Nigerians moved from the pre-
colonial economy into the slave trade era (an epoch that extended into the colonial economy). One
major contribution that cannot be disputed by Africanists is the fact that colonial capitalism
subordinated the pre-existing social structure within, which many people participated in.
Unlike in the
northern part of Nigeria where, according to Shenton, merchant capitalism did not subordinate the
existing social structure well enough (Shenton 1986).
6
Eastern Nigeria witnessed an appreciable
transformation of its social structure. It was within the eastern region, unlike in the other parts of
Nigeria that capitalism had a free hand, to do whatever it wanted. The colonial government catalyzed
this process immensely (Olutayo 1999).
Colonialism boosted the so-called legitimate trade in its own interest. The Igbo communities
gained relatively free access to the trade in palm produce because of the British destruction of Aro and
associated interest especially with the coastal ones. The twentieth century gave the gleam of
opportunity to the Igbo entrepreneur. Nonetheless, this process increased the number of people
participating in trade, which a majority of these participants were peasants, producing and trading on a
small scale since they had little or no access to loans and interest whereas the Aros and other coastal
traders had possessed (Olutayo 1999).
8
This situation facilitated the imposition of colonial rule and the subsequent development of
infrastructure to boost European commercial activity.
In this new dispensation, the Europeans needed
indigenous agents who could neither on their own export commodities nor import foreign goods. With
wholesale discrimination against Nigerian entrepreneurs by the banks and effective European
combinations to muscle out new entrants into the market, it was obvious that the Igbo were not going
to find things easy in the new socio-economic dispensation.
However, the new Western way of life has
become the primary hope of survival and achievement for the younger Igbo, and for all Nigerians.
Trade replaced agriculture and manufacturing and became the preferred profession alongside civil
service for Nigerians and was noted as the quickest avenue of integrating into the monetized economy.
In the 1920s, 1930s and even beyond, foreign companies like the Royal Niger Company, Miller
Brothers, John Holt, United African Company, G. B. Ollivants, and other businesses subjugated large-
scale commercial activities. As early as 1931, a few rich Igbo individuals gained foothold in the palm
oil trade as agents of major European firms (Nzimiro 1972).
The quest for survival and success would
not allow the Igbo to accept the pecking order that was consigned in this new dispensation.
The great population density, the overworked soil, the ineffective communal mode of
production and the rewards and glamour of the new capitalist system, encouraged massive migration
by the Igbo to the cities created in the wake of colonial rule. Though this was not peculiar to the Igbo.
Pax Britannica and the demands of the new economy compelled previously home-bound people to
seek new frontiers. Igbo were probably the most adversely affected by poor natural and economic
conditions at home, and became remarkably footloose, in comparison to the Hausa-Fulani. Nnoli
points out:
By 1952 about 99,000 Igbo residents lived in the Midwest and Lagos. They
constituted 8 percent the total urban population of these areas of 1.2 million, and
51 percent of the non-indigenous population. In Lagos, Benin, Kano and
Kaduna, they constituted over 30 percent of the non-indigenous residents.
Therefore, unlike the more materially-developed Hausa and Yoruba linguistic
peoples, the Igbo were more impelled to move (Okwudiba 1978).
However, as the Igbo gained access in the bureaucracy, other professions, and commerce, there
was competition with other nationalities. Against the background of the agitation for self-government
between the 1930s and 1950s, this trend was occasioned by many factors. First was the depression of
the 1930s, which led to fall in the prices of export cash crops. The small African producer or trader
was adversely affected and struggled fiercely against his fellow African for economic success. It was
not until the advent of World War II that increasingly rose in the global demand for African raw
materials and changed the previous equation. Yet, other challenges still remained.
The increasing attraction of politics was open opportunities to the good life; however,
independence worsened its friction between the Nigerian nationalities. Not to be underestimated was
the strategic economic head start of the Yoruba as manifested in the location of Lagos. Olutayo
succinctly sums up the situation:
The location of Lagos and its nearness to Yoruba societies coupled with the
earliest involvement in colonial administration and multinational corporations –
in large proportion – gave them headway in establishing their own
entrepreneurial outfits. The Igbo were visible in trading second-hand materials,
including motor spare parts (Olutayo 1999).
This trade only became lucrative with their migration to Lagos, Port Harcourt, and the North
through transportation on the roads and railways provided by the colonial government. Given that the
emerging indigenous elite within this era were also seeking for control of the economy, particularly in
the Eastern and Western parts of Nigeria, since the entire British colonial structure was weakening and
willing to shift their practices to regain power. Foreign companies channeled their resources to large-
scale manufacturing, and from 1957, they moved to more technologically advanced trades.
Interestingly, the various regional governments, probably in recognition of their economic weakness,
set up development boards and corporations that encouraged foreign industries with tax reliefs and
other measures.
These regional industries partnered with foreign firms that inhibited the formation of
private Nigerian capital and deprived the Nigeria entrepreneur of full commercial access.
The Igbo and the Challenges of Social and Economic Development in the Colonial Era
Despite its obvious flaws and continued foreign domination, the socio-economic situation in
the period of quest for self-rule had some opportunities that the Igbo could turn to their advantage. The
Nigeria economy, under British capitalist monopoly, faced stiff competition from new traders because
of the massive growth demand occasioned by rapid increase in peasant agricultural export earnings.
Demand for imported goods rose from twenty million pounds in 1946 to sixty-two million in 1950.
By
1954, it was one hundred and fourteen million pounds and one hundred and sixty-six million in 1958.
Barriers to new sellers greatly reduced as merchant firms, manufacturers, sales agencies, and Nigerian
traders, made great in-roads into a commerce that was monopolized by British and Indian companies
(Kilby 1975).
12
To adapt to the times, since their age-old commercial, agrarian and manufacturing practices
could not earn them success even when their integration into the monetized economy could not help,
the Igbo turned to their famed communal civic spirit. This spirit of ofu obi and onye aghala nwanne
ya, became the basis of Igbo entrepreneurial success and the apprenticeship system that vitalizes
commercial achievement.
Since the bid to gain access to the new world bred stiff inter-ethnic competition, it was
necessary that the Igbo be effective to mobilize politically. Early as 1949, Nnamdi Azikiwe, the doyen
of independence politics, sought to mobilize his people into a cohesive unit. He openly advocated that
God had chosen the Igbo to lead Africans out of colonial bondage and reflected this stance in a quest
for Igbo advancement. This stance attracted hostility from the Yoruba anti-colonial politicians
(Olutayo 1999).
However, these efforts yielded success for the Igbo. Outside Igbo-land, the Igbo
formed mutual benefit associations, credit societies, and improvement organizations that had ties with
the homeland. An Igbo Union formed in 1934, its expansion became the Igbo State Union. It embraced
all Igbo associations within and outside Nigeria. The progressive or improvement unions functioned as
organs of local self-government and enabled the Igbo to come to terms with the challenges of the
urban area. This strategy of indigenous mobilization was unknown and unused by the Yoruba and
Hausa-Fulani until years later. Consequently, the Igbo successfully bridged the social and economic
gap between them and other nationalities.
The following statistics indicated the successes of the Igbo
for their quest of social and economic advancements through their well-organized team efforts.
By 1952, there were one hundred and fifteen Igbo students as opposed to one hundred and
eighteen Yoruba students at the University College in Ibadan.
By 1959, there were more pupils and
teachers in Eastern Nigeria than elsewhere (despite the West’s pursuit of a free education program). In
the Ports Authority and the military, the Igbos occupied many of the upper-management positions. At
the economic level, the Igbo through their communal associations had the highest numbers of small
scale entrepreneurs: 68,220 individuals in credit associations, as compared to 5,776 for the West and
2,407 for the North (Olutayo 1999).
The period between the 1930s and 1950s witnessed the
emergence of Igbo millionaires who occupied the pride of place in the country’s emerging elite and
corporate power houses. Statistically, they were few but their impacts were far-reaching. Thus Sir
Louis Odumegwu Ojukwu, probably Nigeria’s first millionaire, was the pioneer president of the
Nigerian Stock Exchange and a director of Shell. The renowned entrepreneur, Patrick Nwokoye
Okeke-Ojiudu, became Eastern Nigeria’s pioneer agriculture minister and spearheaded the region’s
agricultural transformation under Premier Michael Okpara. Thus the colonial era that began on less
than a cheerful note for the Igbo quest for social and economic development ended on a promising
one.
Ndi-Igbo in Nigeria’s Socio-Economic Development From 1960 – 1966
The first six years of independence had far-reaching consequences for the Igbo quest for socio-
economic advancement within Nigeria and developments within this period were mostly political and
they had their roots in the colonial period.
By 1960, the Igbo had become the significant players in the national economy. They also
occupied important administrative positions and made impressive forays into other aspects of life.
However, with the deliberate construction of Nigeria by the colonial masters, they left political affairs in the
control of their protégés from other regions. Such control would not work well for Ndi-Igbo, which
are not enamored by British affairs and openly resisted during the Colonial Era. For example, the
Aba women’s uprising was perceived as a threat to the new post-colonial order. This does not by any
means suggest that they ignored the complex differences between the different groups in which united
them into an independent Nigeria. These differences and other contradictions of the new state
germinated the seed sown by British imperialism. Although the agricultural output of Eastern Nigeria
has never been abundant, the region is endowed with a variety of agricultural resources.
The
governments of Premiers Nnamdi Azikiwe, and particularly Michael Okpara, harnessed them. The
famous farm settlements and palm plantations were established. The National Crop Research Institute
in Umuahia came into existence.
Under the leadership of Patrick Nwokoye Okeke-Ojiudu, important economic institutions of
the region were either established or revitalized. The Universal Insurance Company was set up; the
Eastern Nigeria Development Corporation and Nigerian Construction and Furniture Corporation were
re-organized (Okeke-Ojiudu 2010).
On the national scene the Igbo were an apparent success story.
By 1964, the Igbo were allegedly occupying 270 of the 431 senior posts in the Nigeria Railway
Corporation. Three-quarters of staff of Nigeria’s Foreign Service were of Igbo extraction, and the vice-
chancellors of the Universities of Ibadan and Lagos by the same period were Igbo professors (Olutayo
1999). It was inevitable that these roaring achievements would create some friction between the Igbo
and their compatriots. The stiff competition in the urban areas between the rapidly expanding Igbo
migrants, other migrants, and the indigenous population for scarce resources in an overwhelmingly
monetized economy was expected.
Consequently, this social and economic situation might not have
been so potent if the struggle for political supremacy had not been present. As independence
approached and party politics began, all the groups in the country came to see political power as the
key to the advancement of their interests. Each group wanted one of its leaders, its ‘son’ to be the head
the affairs of the local government area or region it belonged to, including to control the federal
government. Whoever had an upper-management position in the government, such as the regional
and federal governments, one had control over the operational allocation and distribution of political
and other benefits that came with all central and regional levels within the federal polity (or known as
system of rewards). The head of government had the power to determine industries locations and
which areas would have pipe-borne water, electricity, and tarred roads. They also had the power to
determine who would be granted loans and awarded contracts, and who would be employed in the civil
service and government-owned companies (Okeke 1998).
Moreover, the quest for political power
became a way to attain and sustain economic growth, and create more economic opportunities.
The Igbo’s principal political instrument between 1960 and 1966 was the National Convention
of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC). The NCNC’s involvement at regional and federal government levels
was to promote Igbo interest, even at the expense of other groups in Eastern Nigeria. They could not
develop a pan regional identity for all the ethnic groups in the East because the minorities felt excluded
from an Igbo-dominated government. Nonetheless, given the Igbo pressure for economic and social
empowerment, the NCNC government had to meet the Igbo needs. The pressure on the NCNC
partially compelled it to take political measures which contributed to national friction and these
political antics were not unusual to the NCNC. For example, in the North, the Northern People’s
Congress led government affairs pursued a Northernization policy that excluded non-Northerners,
particularly the Igbo, out of paid employment in the region and harassed their commercial access
(Okeke 1998)
Yet, Igbo entrepreneurship forged ahead, partly because of the people’s determination
to succeed, unique institutional dynamics, and the need for their services in a growing Nigerian
economy.
As different political crises challenged the young Republic, a recurring decimal became
obvious. The Igbo seemed to be against the ruling elite, even though they were part of the bourgeoisie.
Inter-group relations generally were tense, exacerbated by the actions of the political class. This type
of pattern indicated that with the relative emasculation of the Yoruba via the Action Group crisis of
1962, the scene was set for the politically dominant Hausa-Fulani and the economically dominant Igbo
to wrestle for supremacy.
Professors Dudley and O’ Connell Dudley and Connel 1966)
20
argued that though nearly at par
with the Yoruba socially and economically at this time, the Igbo were deeply alienated. Their party
could not meet their aspirations. Unemployment was at its highest in Igbo land. Igbos also suffered from the
demands of the Northernization policy. With less hope facing ethnic cohesion and solid representation
in the military, they challenged the government. By no means was the January 15, 1966 coup a part of
an Igbo agenda to rule the country, as every evidence available shows.
However, the reaction of
Easterners and Ironsi’s emergence as the Head of State showed signs of approval.
With the massacres of May – September 1966 and the emergence of Yakubu Gowon as the
Head of State, following Ironsi’s overthrow, it became clear that the political equation excluded the
Igbo. The massive and brutal disruption of their economic, social, and educational balance through the
pogrom began the reversal of the Igbo socio-economic attainments of the Colonial Era.
An Overview of Impacts of the Civil War on the Socio-Economic Evolution of Ndi-Igbo
One major and unique trait of the Igbo entrepreneurs is the courage, perseverance, and
determination in which they carried on despite their bad experiences and losses during the Nigerian
Civil war from 1967 to 1970 (Dudly 1974).
By the outbreak of the civil war, despite the crises that
had taken place in Nigeria in 1966, the Igbo still occupied impressive heights in the social and
economic spectrum. Although they had been dislodged by the pogrom of 1966 from different parts of
Nigeria, except the East, Igbo entrepreneurship still thrived.
The great Louis Odumegwu-Ojukwu died,
yet his legacies remained vibrant and other economic titans followed such as P.N. Okeke – Ojiudu, Joe
Madukwe, and so forth to maintain the façade of grand Igbo capitalism. Displaced Igbo intellectuals,
writers, diplomats and socialites still kept Igbo socio-economic life in Eastern Nigeria vibrant.
However, as the national crises of 1966 traveled rapidly towards civil war, Igbo socio-
economic development was bound to be adversely affected. The first major blow to Igbo economic
growth during the Civil War period occurred in 1967 when the Federal Government imposed
economic sanctions on the Eastern Region. These sanctions emanated from the East’s response to the
Federal Government interpretation of decisions reached between it and the Eastern Regional
government at the 4 -5 January 1967 conference at Aburi, Ghana. Following the Federal Government’s
publication of Decree No. 8 as the official version of the Aburi speech, the Eastern government passed
some edicts that empowered it to make use of Federal Government revenue collected in the region. In
response, the Federal Government imposed sanctions.
These measures were a massive economic
blockade of the East which was enforced by the Nigerian Military (Madiebo 1980).
22
When one realizes that the heartbeat of Eastern Nigeria is commerce and that the nature of the
terrain requires extensive contact with their neighbors for survival, one begins to understand how the
blockade posed a stiff challenge to the region’s collective economic survival.
The famous Onitsha market, a commercial hub worth millions of pounds, was seriously
affected. The only time the blockade was informally but not officially broken by Eastern Nigeria
was in the period between August and October 1967. This was during the war when the Eastern
Nigeria, now self – declared Biafra, invaded and briefly occupied the Mid-western region. On the other
hand, with the reversal of Biafra military fortunes, the blockade was re-imposed and made even more
stringent (Madiebo 1974).
Throughout the war, the Igbo economy suffered from stagnation and retrogression. Schools
were closed down; economic activities were channeled to the execution of the war and above all there
was a massive destruction of infrastructure and loss of the productive manpower as casualties of war.
Night markets became the norm for the entrepreneurial people. Such markets were designed to
operate at hours when the competitors were deemed unlikely to operate. In the latter stages of the war,
a majority of Biafra came under federal control, and a survival-based type of trade began, known as an
“ahia
24
attack”. It involved daring Biafrans that entered into Nigeria-held areas to buy all the needed
necessities and then resold to their beleaguered compatriots. While the ethical foundation of such
commerce was questionable, it represented the continued and determined Igbo economic ingenuity in
the midst of adversity. Due to the measures of drastic changes to the currency held by the Nigerian
government in 1968 and seizure of Biafra and pro-Biafra business people’s assets, survival became
excruciating and also compelled people to seek alternative methods of economic expression.
The Dawn of Modern Igbo Industry
In the pre-colonial economy of Ndi-Igbo, manufacturing and indigenous industry were
corollary of farming and trade. However, certain areas of Igboland became famous for specific
manufactures (e.g. the blacksmiths of Awka and the weavers of Akwete). Colonial monetization of the
economy made these indigenous manufactures unattractive. With the outbreak of the Civil War, Igbo
people’s traditional technological ingenuity was rejuvenated. As discussed in the previous pages, the
colonial and early post-colonial period had witnessed Ndi-Igbo pulling themselves and focused on the
pinnacle of educational and economic achievement. Now, they capitalized on them. It can be argued
that these were desperate measures caused by desperate times, and not a concerted effort at
industrialization, until one realizes that some of their essential components come from the basis of
contemporary Igbo industrial process.
It must be acknowledged that the modern Igbo industrialization
process commenced during the war.
To solve its military and industrial needs in the wake of the blockade, the Biafran government
constituted some of its best scientists and technicians into the Research and Production Board (RAP).
According to Madiebo, RAP worked with the belief that no problem was impossible to solve Madiebo
1974).
25
Working with local resources and content, they delved into virtually all areas of production,
from the building of refineries to the production of home grown wine. The local arms industry
developed by RAP was specifically for the situation and was unsophisticated compared to
contemporary standards.
Nevertheless, the Biafra hand-made grenades, ogbunigwe,
26
rockets, and
guns kept Biafra steady long after they lost access to official external sources.
It should not be assumed that the war-time industrial efforts of the Igbo implied that the
blueprint for the industrialization of Igboland began during this period. If such an agenda existed in the
secessionist enclave, the demands of survival and the raging war precluded it. The significant fact is
that the war-time technological efforts laid the basis for the Igbo innovations that came years after the
war. Since the Civil War the Igbo have moved from trade to industry, this was beginning the next
phase of the Igbo quest for economic advancement.
The 3Rs and the Post Civil War Igbo Condition
The ideas of reconstruction, rehabilitation, and reconciliation have essential common features.
In general parlance, reconstruction connotes the process of changing or improving the condition of
something or the way it works; the process of putting something into the state it was before; the
activity of building again something that has been damaged or destroyed. Rehabilitation connotes the
process of helping someone to have a normal, useful life again after he/she has been deprived for a
long time; to begin to consider that someone is good or acceptable, after a long period during which
he/she was considered bad or unacceptable; to return a building to its previous good condition.
Reconciliation represents an end to a disagreement and the start of a good relationship again, the
process of making it possible for two ideas, facts, etc. to exist together without being opposed to each
other.
Dokun Oyeshola (Oyeshola 2005),
27
presents that reconciliation as a conflict handling
mechanism entails the following core elements namely:
1. Honest acknowledgement of human injury each party has inflicted on the other.
2. Sincere regrets and remorse for the injury done.
3. Readiness to apologize for one’s role in inflicting the injury.
4. Readiness of the conflicting parties to ‘let go’ of the anger and bitterness caused by the
conflict and the injury.
5. Commitment by the offender not to repeat the injury.
6. Sincere effort to redress past grievances that caused the conflict and compensate the
damage caused to the extent possible.
Entering into a new mutually enriching relationship.
The consequence of the above processes leading to a new relationship is referred to as
reconciliation and one of it’s byproducts is the mending of deep emotional wounds generated by the
conflict. Scholars have documented post-war Nigerian economic development, to dominantly involve
infrastructural reconstruction and construction of oil related industrial structures. There is evidence
that whereas the government was overwhelmed in the development of the oil and allied industries, no
effort was directed at reconciling the fundamental contending issues for which the civil war was
fought. All further agitations have reflected a repetition of the fundamental differences.
Although Okechuku Okeke observed that ‘at the end of the civil war’ in January 1970, the
Federal Military Government remained moderate in such a victory: it proclaimed a ‘No Victor, No
Vanquished’ policy and granted general amnesty to the people of the defeated side in the war.
28
This
was to a large extent of mere lip service because the above Dokuns’s proposed mechanism was never
put in place. While it could be true that General Yakubu Gowon, the Nigerian Head of State, meant
well towards the defeated Biafrans, the nature of official policy towards them spelt something
different.
Therefore, the 3R-programme of the Gowon government aimed for reconciliation,
rehabilitation and reconstruction in the war-ravaged region, but its economic and social repercussions
for Ndi-Igbo who constituted the majority of the defeated people was across-the-board.
Before the war ended, (around 1969) the Nigerian government introduced a new revenue
allocation formula that became binding on the East-Central state (i.e. the defeated Igbo heartland as
they reintegrate into Nigeria). The policy was based on the outcome of the work of the Interim
Revenue Allocation Review Committee led by I.O. Dina. The committee was mandated by the
government to make changes in the existing revenue allocation system and suggested new ways of
revenue generation for both the federal and state governments (Okeke 1998).
29
The committee’s suggestion that derivation cease for revenue allocation was not fully accepted
by the federal and state commissioners of finance.
The federal government, beginning in early 1970,
implemented most of the committee’s recommendations. The federal government reduced the weight
of derivation and increased the sources of funds payable into the Distributive Pool Allocation (DPA).
The East-Central state got massive grants earmarked for reconstruction projects. Indeed, with the rise
in Nigeria’s oil revenues in 1973-74, the East-Central state’s statutory allocation of N58.3 million was
the second highest to Mid-Western and Rivers states (Okeke 1998).
30
What did these sums translate
into for the rehabilitation of Ndi-Igbo into the mainstream of Nigeria’s economy?
Regardless of this
background, the searchlight inevitably beams on the post-Civil War economic programs of the
Nigerian government and what was implied for Ndi-Igbo. From all indications the Economic
Indigenization Program spearheaded by the Gowon government was a far-reaching, bold measure
aimed at ensuring indigenous control of the economy. It is apt to note the aim of the decree was to give
birth to the economic indigenization program.
On February 23, 1972, the Federal Military Government promulgated a new law called the
Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Decree and established an Institution called the Nigerian Enterprises
Promotion Board, whose main Function was to advance and develop the promotion of enterprises
where the citizens of Nigeria will participate fully and play a dominant role (Federal Republic of
Nigeria, Nigeria Enterprises Promotion Decree, Official Gazette 1972).
The Indigenization decree classified enterprises and levels of participation for Nigerians and
non-Nigerians. While the scope of this work could not include an in-depth analysis of the decree it
only focused on the schedules and enterprises that were drawn up in the law:
Schedule 1:
This contained 22 enterprises only Nigerians could invest in, control, and operate. The
only foreigners allowed to participate in Schedule 1 were citizens of African countries that their
governments allowed Nigerians to do similar businesses within the countries.
Schedule 2:
This included 33 enterprises or ‘types of activity’ (according to the decree) that allowed
foreign involvement due to major financial and technological demands. The small ones among them
had a paid-up share capital of less than 200,000 pounds or an annual turn-over of less than 500,000
pounds each that were reserved exclusively for Nigerians. Those enterprises under Schedule 2 that had
paid-up share capital or annual turn-over exceeded these limits were open to foreign participation.
Exception to foreign participation in these enterprises was not in its entirety, Nigerians required to
have at least 40 percent equity participation in them (Federal Republic of Nigeria, Nigeria Enterprises
Promotion Decree, Official Gazette 1972).
One may ask: were Ndi-Igbo capable of participating in this revolutionary economic blueprint
that was a cardinal component of the country’s Second National Development Plan? Ostensibly, the
answer is no. Historically, the matters were more complex. It was not just that the Igbo were
unequipped in any way to adapt to the new economic order. It was that official policy, despite the
claims deprived the Igbo to succeed by the new indigenous economic summit.
Under the guidance of Obafemi Awolowo, the Federal Commissioner of Finance under
Gowon, a policy was introduced and all inhabitants of the war-ravaged area were entitled to the sum of
20 pounds, irrespective of the sum already in banks or elsewhere within Nigeria. The policy was
clearly aimed at emasculating Ndi-Igbo financially. Additionally, the Nigerian economy needed
additional funds after its war-time financial overstretch.
This policy incapacitated the Igbo from full-scale involvement in Indigenization or other lofty
economic programs of the government. The lopsidedness of the spatial distribution of the indigenized
enterprises and a widespread belief that the various parts of the country did not have equal access to
the shares sold by the indigenized enterprises made some critics from some sections of the country
condemn the program and its authors.
For instance, many opinion leaders in Igboland claimed that since the program was launched
barely two years after the Civil War (when Ndi-Igbo were not financially stable). At this time, the
Yoruba were more solvent and dominated the federal civil service, where they were able to buy a large
amount of the shares that was sold to Nigerians through alien enterprises that were affected by the
indigenization laws (Olutayo 1999).
33
In order to survive and flourish the Igbo accepted the new dispensation. Shortly after the war,
mass migration to other parts of Nigeria and even outside the country began with the Igbo. In the
minority areas of Southern Nigeria, especially present-day Rivers and Bayelsa states, there were
flashpoints of hostility over controversies surrounding properties abandoned by the Igbo during the
war. Nevertheless, economic and social interaction between the Igbo and other Nigerians continued
alongside the pre-Civil War patterns.
Igbo technological advances during the war were survival-oriented. Overall, peace was geared
towards the basics of industrial processes. This process involved sending equipment manufactured in
Europe to some of the Asian countries such as Taiwan, Japan, and China for duplication that were
imported back into Nigeria.
34
It was in the 1970s and early 1980s that Igboland began to be known for
rudimentary, copy-cat industrialization. Towns like Aba and Nnewi gained fame in this regard,
although they had been reputed as entrepóts before this period. The new dynamics of inter-group
relations in post-Civil War, Nigeria determined how far the Igbo would be involved in the new
dispensation.
The 1970s and 1980s: A Period of Mixed Blessings for Ndi-Igbo
Nearly two decades after the war, the Igbo regained their socio-economic equilibrium. This
was partly because the Igbo were no longer a decisive factor in the country’s political structure.
Notwithstanding the tokens of reintegration, the age-old competition resurfaced and the ‘system of
rewards’ was practiced again. Successive military governments from 1970 to 1979 experienced
economic dynamics, political and administrative incompetence, and other challenges that reflected on
the economy. It is noteworthy that industrialization within Igboland during this period was privately
driven.
The restoration of civilian rule in 1979 was not disastrous for Igbo socio-economic
development. An Igbo held a federal government position as the Vice-President, numerous Igbos held
prestigious positions too. Proposed industrial sites were intended for all states in Nigeria, but did not
include Imo and Anambra that are also Igbo states during this period. The proposals made to develop
the power sources at Oji near Enugu remained illusionary. The allocations made by the Shagari-led
federal government to River Basin Development authorities in Nigeria in 1983 gave the Igbo states
one of the lowest allocations. Unlike some other areas with low allocations, the Igbos faced the
challenge of a high population density and a relatively infertile terrain. Below are the figures: (Okeke
1998)
River Basin Authority Region Amount Allocated
Anambra/Imo South N20,470,276
Benin/Owena South N20,449,484
Chad Basin Upper North N32,010,606
Cross River South N14,523,723
Hadejia/Jama'are Upper North N83,733,186
Lower Benue Middle Belt
N22,398,409
Niger Delta South N18,795,420
Niger River Middle Belt N46,229,448
Ogun/Oshun South N27,852, 638
Sokoto/Rima Upper North N102,392,691
Upper Benue Middle Belt N38,425,063
The oil glut of the 1980s and the food crisis in the country within this period encouraged a
massive food importation exercise by the Shagari government. There was no account of this program
as a basis for agricultural, let alone, industrial advancement. However, in the peculiar Nigerian milieu,
this created a class of millionaires who had access to rice importation licenses because of their political
affinity. From 1982 to 1983, when this importation bazaar was supreme, Igbo businessmen were
largely eclipsed from the upper echelon, only a few people associated with the ruling National Party of
Nigeria.
If Igbo bourgeoisie profited, it was at lower levels as agents and middlemen.
The Babangida regime (1985-93) instituted policies that had far-reaching implications for Igbo
mercantilist capitalism. In the usual fierce inter-ethnic competition that characterizes group relations
among Nigerians other groups also sought benefits from the regime’s policies.
In 1986 when the global price for oil fell as low as 12 dollars per barrel, the Babangida regime
adopted the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP). By its nature, SAP was laissez-faire; it encouraged
open markets, foreign investments, trade liberalization and deregulation of government involvement in
business. This was a boom for Igbo entrepreneurs who had been stifled by the indigenization program.
The Igbo needed only little opportunity to find their feet economically. The liberalization policies of
the Babangida regime enabled Igbo businessmen access previously ‘closed’ businesses. However, the
deregulation of the naira, continued public sector inadequacies and the removal of subsidies seriously
affected the emerging Igbo enterprises. Therefore in the Babangida years, a new class of Igbo
millionaires began to emerge. A sufficient number of agents were involved in foreign capital and
government cronies.
Very few stood out for their entrepreneurial vision and shortly after the
Babangida years, things moved into new dimensions.
Igbo Quest for Socio-Economic Advancement in the Abacha Years (1993-1998)
I will adopt Olutayo’s observation that ‘with little or no government assistance, the Igbo have
moved from trade to industry since the end of the civil war’ (Olutayo 1999), as the background for
analyzing the Igbo quest for socio-economic advancement in the Abacha years (1993-1998).
There is statistical evidence to support the claim that in terms of private contribution to national
wealth, the Igbos all over the country account for a far greater percentage of the non-oil Gross National
Product than any other ethnic group. It would be a good test of this claim to have all Igbo-owned
businesses in Nigeria close shop for a day and see what becomes of the national economy.
At the level of management of resources, Igboland contains the highest percentage of persons
who typify the classical capitalist myth of rags to riches in Nigeria. They have the ability to convert
hopeless adversity to astounding wealth within a very short time without depending on government
patronage and handouts.
There is no refuting the fact that Igbo enterprise drew little or no breath from
a formal government welfare plan. Clearly, the Igbo have prospered without it, with minimal
limitations. Like all good capitalists, what an average Igbo have always sought after are favorable
political conditions for their mercantile interests without getting unduly involved in the power game.
On account of its human rights excesses and anti-democratic credentials, the Abacha regime
faced stiff economic sanctions from the West.
The government promptly tilted its foreign policy to
meet the requirements in the East. Countries like China became significant players in Nigeria’s
economy. China’s economic and technological prominence needs no explanation. The Nigeria-Chinese
relation is a fairly recent phenomenon.
For the entrepreneurial Igbo, commercial contact with Asia
dated back to the late nineteenth century (Nwaozichi 2000). Countries like China and Taiwan were
instrumental to the industrial evolution of Igbo towns like Nnewi.
With the imprimatur of the Abacha government, Igbo-Asian mercantile soared. Asian
countries’ electronic goods, clothing, vehicle spare parts, etc. flooded Igbo entrépots. Igbo
manufacturers duplicated their partners’ designs and gave them “more acceptable” labels. Auto spare
parts production companies in Igboland sourced components from their Asian partners. Chinese
companies were ready to partner with Igbo businessmen whose market knowledge was unsurpassed.
Thus by the post-Abacha years and the return of civilian rule in 1999, the ‘Asian Tigers’
(China, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, etc.) had gained a strong foothold in the contemporary Igbo
economy.
However, Igbo renaissance in these contemporary times was a complex phenomenon shaped
by various factors.
Igbo Renaissance and the One-Man-Show Syndrome
Between the end of the Civil War and the contemporary period, the Igbo have experienced
tremendous change. Although this change has been negative and rooted in the region’s loss of socio-
economic foundation laid before the war, some intellectuals argue that there have been other
developments that may be tagged a sign of renaissance. Igbo entrepreneurship and industry within this
era is a success story. They (the Igbo) engage in all sorts of activities, especially trade, in order to
achieve the aim of survival and status mobility.
While trying to be successful in all endeavors, they
have been faced with enormous impediments which, with dogged courage, determination, and
perseverance, they attempt to prevail. The successes attained in these endeavors have been remarkable.
Innovation is a cardinal aspect of the new wave of Igbo industrialization.
Companies like Cutix
Plc and Adswitch Plc (both quoted in the second-tier securities market of the Nigerian Stock
Exchange) are renowned for the manufacturing of electric cables and electric switchgear. Respectively,
Ebunso manufactures process equipment, John White manufactures fan belts, Uru Industries
manufactures brake cables, Edison manufactures brake pads, shoes and linings, and OCE Filters
manufactures oil filters while Godwin-Kris specializes in rubber auto parts, Coscharis Group of
Companies manufactures timing and roller chains, and Niger Auto Industries manufactures motor
parts.
The numbers of industries in this category are numerous; all are championed by Igbo individuals
without any input from the government. The assembling of motorcycles in Nnewi with local brand
names is no longer a news item. What is now in vogue is motor vehicle manufacturing.
Before now, Anambra Motor Manufacturing Company (ANAMCO) was the only vehicle
assembly plant in the whole of the South East. ANAMMCO was conceived in the 1970s as a joint
venture between the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) and Daimler-Benz AG (“Daimler”) of
Germany to import and assemble Completely Knocked Down (CKD) units of Mercedes Benz trucks
and buses in Nigeria (Anamco 2010), and was being managed by foreigners.
In March 2007, FGN through the Bureau for Public Enterprises (BPE) sold 24% out of its 35%
interest in ANAMMCO to G. U. Okeke & Sons Limited (GUO), a company owned by Chief Godfrey
Ubaka Okeke (an Igbo transporter/industrialist).
GUO also acquired 3% of ANAMMCO’s equity from
Leventis Ltd. and another 0.5% from Hon. Nnamdi Njoku, another shareholder, thereby making GUO
a major shareholder of ANAMCO (Anamco 2010).
40
Today, ANAMCO is allegedly accused of fraud because of mis-management done by the
shareholders and directors. As a result of these managerial hiccups, patronage has faded away and
customers have decided to buy directly from countries like Brazil, China instead of ANAMCO.
Therefore, this company is no longer in business.
There are several other Igbo owned industries that also closed shops due to the result of internal
squabbles, unfavorable government policies, and managerial incompetence.
One of the valid reasons
for most Igbo businesses closures were fashioned towards the ‘Okoli and Sons Enterprises’ inclination,
where the individual and close relatives owned and operated everything. This model served Nigerians
well when the emphasis was on developing and servicing the local markets in Nigeria and neighboring
countries.
To be able to function and become competitive at the next level, to surpass the ability, and
to leverage the capital market, international strategic alliances will make the difference to adopt the
prerequisite corporate culture that governs contemporary global business relationships.
Innoson Vehicle Manufacturing Company represents the new face of Igbo industrialization. It
is noteworthy that this company, unlike many of its contemporaries, locally designs and manufactures
motorcycles, tricycles and motor vehicles – save the engine blocks that are sourced from their foreign
partners. All indicators show that it will release a fully built made-in-Nigeria car within a few years.
Assembling of vehicles by Innoson and similar high-powered companies within Igboland is based on
effective harnessing of foreign technology adapted to local conditions. Consequently, Innoson stands
out as probably Nigeria’s first indigenous vehicle manufacturing company.
What marks out this industrialization process is that it combines the very best of indigenous
ingenuity and modern capabilities. Although vast and still expanding, the new Igbo industrial
enterprise is ironically constrained by ‘Okoli and Sons Enterprises’ tendency.
Innoson is not excluded
from the trend. It restricts access to foreign investment from those who may be uncomfortable with
potential nepotism. The limited access to the capital market, banks, and other growth outlets by the
Igbo entrepreneurial class may be partly blamed on this trend. Granted, every business partner is
secure with qualified and trusted hands. But in today’s high-tech world, entrepreneurial risk is much
more than a necessity; it is a fundamental requirement.
Conclusion
From the dawn of colonialism to the contemporary era, the Igbo have contended against great
odds to attain social and economic advancement in Igboland and beyond. To a great extent, they have
grappled with the challenges of each period.
The post-war era, especially during the 1990s and 2000s has provided a lot of prospects for the
Igbo renaissance. Yet this development requires informed men and women who understand the
dynamics of the Information Age. It is a tragedy that in recent years there has been a major educational
decline among Igbo youths, particularly the males. The quest to learn a trade and get rich quick is a
chimera that needs to be corrected by Igbo scholars in the Diaspora. Typically, it is not peculiar to Ndi-
Igbo, yet other than any other ethnic group in Nigeria they stand less likely to succeed if not addressed.
Due to a substantial exclusion from Nigeria’s power structure; they must find other ways to get with
the system of things.
It is also important for our corporate elites to ‘think about their home effort’ when investing
and for the Igbo state governments to create suitable conditions for these investors. Tax relief can be
given to Igbos entrepreneurs in Igboland to veer more toward industrialization rather than trade. Igbo
industrialists should gradually move away from the solo mentality if they must thrive in the new
world.
Like the Nnewi motorcycle dealers, those who participated in building materials and
automotive spare parts businesses – especially those in Auto Spare and Machinery Dealers Association
ASPMDA, Trade Fair Complex in Lagos State, should strategize on how to bring the home depots and
technology gurus of businesses to Nigeria as partners. This way they can also take advantage of the
large consumer market and many under-developed economies. Industrial clusters should be modeled
after the Brazilian Shoe Cluster of Sinos Valley in Brazil, Sialkot Surgical Instrument Industrial
Clusters in Pakistan and others, for the resultant forward and backward linkages rewards.
Our survival in these competitive markers must be sought through alternative means through
de-emphasized reliance on upper-managerial employers at the Aso Rock.
We must, as a necessity, re-
focus our goals to build for the future, through our spirited pursuit of creating new wealth in the
private sector.
The extent of Igbo involvement in commerce – clothing, automobiles and their service parts,
cosmetics, transportation, real sector, oil and gas, entertainment, etc., throughout the length and
breadth of Nigeria and beyond, places them at a unique position to elevate the economy to a new
height by inculcating the best practices of global industrial development and trade. We should plan and
implement a new approach in the private sector to replace the present corrupt and inefficient economic
management methods that steadily impoverishes the average citizen everyday.
The first task is to re-ignite our characteristic of an entrepreneurial spirit that gives
prominence to discipline, hard work and calculated risk taking for the purposes of new wealth
creation and resultant enhancement in societal development for the welfare of all. Ndi-Igbo, as a
group, are noted for their experiences and track records that qualify them as team players to having a
prominent role in the private sector in less than a decade.
Keep in mind that the theory of Unity of History states that ‘the past determines the present
and the present determines the future and these events occurring at any particular time are dependent
on the result of what has happened before and these things as they are today will follow into future
generations – the unvarying law of cause and effect.
Bibliography
Aboyade, O., Dudley, BJ, and O'Connell, J., eds., Nigeria 1965 – Crisis and Criticism (Ibadan: Ibadan
University Press, 1966).
Anene, J. C. “West Africa in the Nineteenth Century” in Anene and G. Brown, eds., Africa in the 19
th
and 20
th
Centuries (London: Nelson Publishers, 1979).
Dudley, BJ. Instability and Political Order: Politics and Crisis in Nigeria, (Ibadan: Ibadan University
Press, 1974).
Federal Republic of Nigeria, “Nigeria Enterprises Promotion Decree,” Official Gazette, Lagos: Federal
Republic of Nigeria, 1972.
http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Aro_people accessed on October 29, 2010
http://www.innosonivm.com/the_first_nigerian_car accessed on October 29, 2010
http://www.anammco.com/home accessed on October 30, 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._N._Okeke-Ojiudu accessed on October 28, 2010
Kilby, P. “Manufacturing in Colonial Africa in Gann and Duggan,” eds., Colonialism in Africa,
(Cambridge: University Press 1975).
Madiebo, A. The Nigerian Revolution and the Biafran Civil War, (Enugu: Forth Dimension Publishers,
1980).
Nnoli, O. Ethnic Politics in Nigeria, (Enugu: Fourth Dimension Publishers, 1978).
Nwaozichi, V., Nigeria-China Foreign Relations 1960-1999, (Michigan: Michigan University Press,
2000).
Nzimiro, I. Studies in Ibo Political System: Chieftaincy and Politics in Four Niger States, (Berkley and
Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1972).
Okeke, O. “The Politics of Revenue Allocation in Nigeria since 1969” in Okechukwu Okeke et al.,
eds., Issues in Contemporary Nigerian History, (Port Harcourt: Educational Books and Investments