Mails exchanged after Prakash Agarwal, a member of Mimosa misinterpreted the

168 views
Skip to first unread message

Lavita Powell

unread,
Jul 27, 2015, 11:39:33 PM7/27/15
to NaharPets Group


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Arnav Roy <arna...@gmail.com>
Date: 27 July 2015 at 10:48
Subject: Re: MOST IMPORTANT
To: Prakash Agrawal <prakas...@gmail.com>


Dear Mr.Prakash Agarwal,

Please feel happy and thankfull to us that things didn't go to that extent that you and your fellow associates would have been charged and been behind bars for obstruction of a police investigation.

We were twice asked by the Police personnel if they should call in their Police Van with more backup to control the people obstructing the investigation and search the premise for the guard who was kept hidden from us and whom YOU MR.PRAKASH AGARWAL FALSELY claimed was not on duty but was finally found to be very well within the premise and on duty in his uniform which can be verified on the recoreded CCTV footage.

It was only once we assured the POLICE to give us a chance to convince you all to handover the guard in question did they give us a chance and things didnt go to that extent.

YOU HAD LIED TO A POLICE PERSONNEL on duty conducting an investigation Mr.Agarwal that the guard was not on duty. Be happy and thankfull to us and also count your lucky stars things didn't go to that extent!!!!!

Regards,
Arnav.
YYV.

On 27-Jul-2015 10:10 am, "Prakash Agrawal" <prakas...@gmail.com> wrote:

IF WE OBSTRUCTED LAW IN THE PRESNECE OF THE POLICE WHY HAS THE POLICE LEFT THE PREMISES WHEN WE QUESTIONED THEM ABOUT THE AUTHANTICITY OF ALLEGATION AND THE SEARCH WARRANT FOR ENTERING OUR PREMISES.

 

WHY NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE POLICE AGAINST US FOR OBSTRUCTING THEM..

 

 

Why

Why

Why

 

Rumours

Rumours

Rumours

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Arvinder Ahluwalia <ahluwali...@gmail.com>
Date: 27 July 2015 at 12:03
Subject: The incident of hitting a stray dog by memosa lobny guard on 25th july 15
To: Prakash Agrawal <prakas...@gmail.com>

Dear Mr Prakash,
I appreciate your concern regarding the incident on 25th july.
Pls understand that the intention behind calling the cops n ngo was only to make the guards aware of the consequences of hitting or beating stray dogs.
I want to reiterate that had u not intervened that day with the police and ngo's investigation things would have been smooth.
I read all the mails concerned with this issue and was perturbed to read about the false allegations against our dear friend lavita.
Your last mail showing sympathy for humans more than animals shows ur concern for them.
We too r human beings and mind u that these lovely animals experience the same pain when hit as we do,
In the end i  would like to say that you left no stones unturned to make this incident a big issue by sending negative mails to so many people.
Regards
Arvinder Ahluwalia

On Jul 27, 2015 10:05 AM, "Prakash Agrawal" <prakas...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear All,

 

In spite of the facts being known to Ms. Powell she has been communicated that it has been proven by the CCTV footage that the guard sanjay did not beat the dog. She still continues to victimise the poor guard in the name of noble social service, which is pathetic and condemnable.

 

Not all are interested in her dog statistics, we have lot of human problems to deal with. They are different school of thoughts but the number of people I met in my building are more conceren about human beings and their safety over the safety dogs.

 

It is wrong that I have any time been informed that guards or any residents. I am not much concerned about it as I value humans more and India is full of human beings with problems. Though I never am judgemental about her beliefs.

 

It is wrong that I am any ad hoc committee member.

 

But her beliefs do not give her liberty to enter the premises without permission, even when accompanied by the police. Even her colleague Ms. Anjali admitted that we had offered to sit down and understand her problem peacefully. This is on record while she for reasons best known to her wants to deny it and quote otherwise.

 

She has Met mr. Ravin Chalke (she does not even spell his name correctly) in person before this incident. She is also in touch with Mr. Prakash Makwana. Mr. Sunil is again a very small and insignificant security personnel in the complex. Instead of approaching the concerned authorities she prefers to victimise Mr. Sunil who is again a very poor and insignificant person.

 

Please stay away from such rumours and false propaganda. We have already banned them into entering our building, We have informed the Nahar Management and our security to prohibit them in futue as we wish to live peacefully.

 

Kind Regards

 

Praksah Agrawal


Dear Mr.Prakash Agarwal,


This is Arnav Roy from YYV. Let me clear a few things you are misquoting. What happened yesterday was a authourised police investigation. You have very conviniently forgotten to mention that two POLICE personnel were present with us and Me, Lavita madam, Anjali madam and Mona madam and the NGO personnel who were assisting an on going police investigation with authorisation of the Police who asked us to help them indentify the culprit.


You Mr.Prakash and your fellow associates obstructed us and thereby obstructed an on going POLICE investigation!!! Hooliganism is something to discribe an illegal activity. We members entered the premise when the POLICE of INDA personnel asked us to enter and help them identify the guard in question.


Obstructing a POLICE investigation is illegal and can be rightly termed as hooliganism and so who the real hooligans are can be seen as you said in the CCTV camera footage!!!!


Mind you what happened was a Legal POLICE investigation and nobody is above the LAW of the MOTHERLAND INDIA!!!!!!!!

And my fellow audiences I am happy to inform you all inspite of all the obstruction to the Legal POLICE INVESTIGATION caused by the respected Hooligans of the buildings, Law was upheld and the culprit guard guard was found GUILTY and he was fined LEGALLY under various sections of the Indian Penal Codes by the POLICE at SAKINAKA POLICE Station.

If anybody feels justice was not done is free to challenge the POLICE action leagally in court rather than defaming people who assisted a INDIAN POLICE INVESTIGATION.


Regards,


Arnav
YYV.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Mr Makhwana and all fellow residents,


Let me introduce myself. I am Anjali resident of nahar amrit shakti. 

The incident for which our mail boxes are being bombarded are not once mentioning the real issue.

On Friday evening a message had come in regards with misbehavior  of a guard with a lady (Mona) when she tried to stop him from beating a stray. The message as below sent to us by Mona;

Guys tdy one of the dogs i feed was hit on the leg and was in.grt pain.
As i was leaving i saw the guard on duty (memosa lobby) cmng to hit the same injured dog.I ran to save him and also took his pic,after warning him.
Dint see a sign of guilt on his face.
This is the same guard who was on duty when the dog found badly injured outside memosa lobby.

Pawa ngo was approached to come and speak to the guard on animal cruelty issue and warn him.
The ngo workers never enter a premise without being accompanied with police.
When they arrived, they went to the lobby and inquired about this particular guard along with Ms Mona who was the complainant .Mr Agarwal and Mr Vikrant who were also there inquired on what was happening and they were told about the incident, which Mr Agarwal admitted was very wrong and immediately asked the staff to ask the errant guard to come, who apparently had gone into hiding . Mr Agrawal told us not to worry as he did not tolerate such behaviour from his staff, we thanked him for his support.

Till this time everyone was very understanding and calm. We kept waiting, but the guard did not show up. This infuriated the ngo staff and something happened between the four people , that is Mr Agarwal, Mr Vikrant and the two ngo workers. It soon turned very ugly, to be honest even i am not aware what transpired between them!

After that there was a total mayhem.
There were only 3 ladies and one gentleman and not a band of 12 lady hooligans as stated earlier. 2 ngo members ( one man and one woman) 
All this while the police were present .

Lavita has been known in nahar as person of very strong values, she has worked hard in maintaining a fine balance between animal lovers and non animal lovers. To the extent she is trying to get pet owners to be more responsible with their pets when it comes to picking up their poop, walking on leash and muzzling aggressive dogs.

As stated in the mail , it is deeply hurtful to see such mails with such words being used for someone who has worked selflessly for all of us. Who has made it safer for our children not only by getting dogs vaccinated and neutered but also got speed breakers made on roads so that our children were safer.

Regards
Anjali 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________




Nothing explains your unauthorized entry. Please let Santosh Rane, Anjali Dawar and Ms. Ahluwalia support your action in writing. Are you the power of attorney holder for all three who are silent. I have clearly alledged that you are taking these names to suit your convenience while I am sure none of them support the hooliganism.

Being an NGO does not allow you to take laws in your hands.

You cannot enter any premises on any baseless assumption, it has been established in CCTV footage that no such act was conducted by the guards.

How can anybody be allowed free access in any area where you are not authorized to access. You should have sought due permission from the authorities.

You cannot enter any premises in large groups like this. The guard was so terrfied that he started crying, this all is in record in CCTV footage....

Whom are you trying to fool, I never opposed your views on dogs does not imply that I supported you ever. Please stop assuming and own up responsibility for the mess you have created.

Regards

Prakash Agarwal


On 26-Jul-2015 9:36 am, "Lavita Powell" <lavita...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Makwana,

First of all the NGO did not come to meet Prakash Agarwal and other committee members. The soul intention was to meet the guard educate him and caution him against such activities.

We (4 members of Nahar Pet Club) and PAWA (2 members from NGO) were intercepted by Prakash Agarwal and other committee members who began obstructing them from meeting the guard. 

Prakash Agarwal is fully aware of the cruelty happening and about the hate mails being circulated by many members. He himself has communicated this to me.  He claimed to the NGO members that instead of directly coming to meet the guard he should have been informed about it and he would take the action to prevent the cruelty. Mr. Makwana, for your information, Mr.Prakash and I have been discussing the cruelty and the hate mails since 3/4 months. He even advised me to target only those members who are sending hate mails and not to target the society in general. Hence this NGO, simply wanted to meet this guard and not any committee member. Why did Prakash Agarwal intercept and put obstacles in meeting the security guard. If he had the power and authority to correct this guard, why didnt he do earlier? Once again it is Prakash Agarwal who has advised me to send notices on cruelty to those members who are sending hate mails. He has even gone on to say that since he is not in eight towers group he will access the hate mails through some other source and forward to me which he has done already.

Prakash Agarwal writes that it is under my leadership and I have been abusively pushy. Mr. Makwana, you have the cctv footage with you, please check if I was abusive or pushy. 

He has incorrectly stated that, I have blamed Mr. Santosh Rane for not approaching them. This incident happened on 24th evening, where Ms. Mona Ahluwalia, one of the nahar pet club member caught the guard red handed and informed us.  Santosh Rane volunteered to go down and inform the Supervisor Sunil. And Santosh instructed Sunil to inform Mr.Ravi Salkhe which probably he didnt hence Mr.Ravi Salkhe was not aware that the NGO  was suppose to come the next day to caution and educate the security guard. On the contrary, when I was narrating what happened, he stated that "Santosh Rane is the most corrupt person" which was highly uncalled for. 

Mr.Makwana, this entire incident could have been avoided if Prakash Agarwal did not intervene and obstruct the NGO from meeting the guard. The guard would have just been cautioned and they would have left. 

With warm regards,
Lavita Powell




Dear Mr. Makwana,

I am foorwarding My origonal Mail and Powells reply to my mail. I had equested you to take struct action against the mob of antoscial elements and hooligans under her leadership who invaded our lobby yesterday.

My basic concern relates to the law and order, peace and harmony, mutual respect for others, dignity of the poor. None of them have been replied by her in the mail. She is taking pretence under strange imagination where she quotes very precise sections of law. She forgets that " She has to be law abiding and respectting in order to be championing" . Beung abusevely pushy and arrogant will not purify her of her unholy hooliganism in our lobby.

She says that she is supported by the other residents, Yes. Ms. Anjali Dawar and Ms. Mona , did accompany her. We were a number of residents in the lobby. We requested all of tthem to sit down peacefully and let us understand what the problem is. Ms. Anjali and Ms. Mona were very decent and was ready for a discussion on the issue peacfully. But Ms. Powell with the help of the outside rogues imported by her, had been abuusively arrogant and did not want to diiscuss peacefully. The other two ladies expressed their sorrow at the unholy way in which the events were unfolding. While Ms. Powell remained remorseless.
She quoted name of Santosh Rane, We are yet to hear from any support from him on this act of hooilgism.

While she says that she is an association and acting for a cause, i feel that she needs to be examined medically if she still does not have the reaonsbility to apologise for the icident. I had in front of the other two ladies who are a member of the R12 complex confronted and shared that she had the contact details of Messers Prakash Makwana and Mr. Ravin Chalke. She then blamed Santosh Rane for being the reason of not approaching them, While Rane remians silent. her statement when told that she will leave a poor opinion about herself " i care hoots of what people think about me".

This is not any association. Its a pure menace where men yesterday were "WOMANHANDLED" by woman goons imported from outside by her. Please let me know what laws appply for protection to a man if "WOMANHANDLED".

The entire act is under CCTV footage. We have also verified and seen the video footage, which i am told has been shown to you too, that the basic complaint that the gurad beat the dog with a stick and made him breathless 'IS A PROVED AND ESTABLISHED AS BLATANT LIE"

What did she get by creating a ruckus:

1)Victimising the guard and making him deposit a sum of Rupees 2500 in police station without it being proved that he is at fault.

2)Spoling peace and tranquility in the bulidng even so that a heart patient was just returning from the hospital, was terrorised and her family pleading for peace, which was conveyed to her, was not sufficeint for her to control the hooligans she was mis"LEADING".

3) After the crowd left she wanted to enter the building with Ms. Anali, which was stopped by us. It is a pity that we have to refuse people from the R12 towers from entering the building as we see the entire community as one large family.

WE REQUEST YOU TO TAKE STRICT ACTION AGSINST HER AND MORE SPECIFICALLY ON HER CONTINUUED ARROGANCE TO DEFEND HER RUCKUS AND HOOLIGANISM.  IF YOU DO NOT ACT AND RESTRICT HER HOOLIGANISM TO HER OWN FLAT, WE WILL BE CONTSRAINED TO TTAKE STRICT LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE NAHAR MANAGEMENT WHO CONTROL THE COMMAN AREA AND ARE MORALLY RESOPNSIBLE TO MANTAIN LAW & ORDER, PEACE & HARMONY IN THE R12 COMPLEX.

Regards

Prakash Agrawal


LAVITA POWELLS REPLY
Dear Residents & Prakash Agarwal
 
This is in reply to Mr.Prakash Agarwal's totally incorrect representation of the truth.  
 
It is known that in R12 complex, there are some people who are instigating and threatening the security guards into committing inhumane acts on the stray dogs. These inhumane act include beating them with lathis, thereby breaking their legs, dislocating their spine, gorging out their eyes and poisoning them by feeding them poison laden food.
 
The consequences of these acts are, constantly whining and howling dogs, wounds getting infested with maggots, which are totally sinful and uncalled for.  We have been noticing these acts since 2010. We understand there are many residents who have phobia towards stray dogs but by beating them and leaving them in grievously injured with parts of their bodies rotting due to their open injuries is a larger risk to residents because they get aggressive due to the pain they are suffering. 
 
We from the Nahar's Pet Club have taken the initiative to deal with the stray population in a humane manner. It is a known fact that these strays are territorial. By beating them we will not succeed in getting rid of them, because they will return to the original territory no matter how much they are beaten or tortured.
 
As a civilised society, we have to decide which path to choose. Torturing and maming them or neutering them so that they don't reproduce and lose the aggression and vaccinating them so that they do not get sicknesses. We from the Nahar's pet Club have chosen the path of neutering them and vaccinating them. We are a self funding group and have achieved 99% sterilsation of R12 sector strays.
 
We humbly appeal to all to support this cause whereby we can co exist peacefully.
 
Now regarding this incident which Mr.Prakash Agarwal has totally twisted, turned and completely misrepresented. There is one guard who is still indulging in acts of brutality in spite of him being advised and counselled by us from Nahar Pet's Club.. We had found number of strays again with broken limbs and two paralysed with their back bone broken. We found these dogs howling and writhing in pain. We took them to In Defense of Animals (IDA) Hospital where the doctors told us that all these dogs brought have been brutally beaten with lathis. On our investigation, and catching him red handed in the act by one of our members yesterday evening, we found out it was done by Sanjay Haldar who is posted on duty at Mimosa and Mirabilis. When confronted by this member, Haldar was very rude and refused to stop beating the stray dog. Hence we informed this and former incidents to Pawa India, a NGO who fights cruelty towards strays.
 
The intent of PAWA volunteers to enter Mimosa area and meet this Haldar who was posted on duty there and to educate and warn him against such acts in the future. As we entered Mimosa, we met Mr.Prakash Agarwal and Mr. Vikranth Thakur and another gentleman who were sitting in the lobby. They intercepted us and enquired the purpose of our visit which we explained to him. He and other two got very aggressive and prevented us from meeting the guard. This was an act of interference in the work of the NGO.  These NGOs work along with the local police station. and when they do their work they take along a Police Sub Inspector and a Hawaldar with them. With such an arrangement how can Mr.Prakash Agarwal claim hooliganism on our part? Will the police stand silent, if we behave like hooligans?
 
Dear Residents, we have a choice of setting an example of civilised behaviour for our children. Either we set an example of being inhuman and beat the daylights of the strays or use our intelligence and civilised behaviour by taking the trouble and neutering, vaccinating and there by limiting their population. Hiranandani complex has achieved this with the help of the builder. Why should Nahar Complex not achieve the same? Why should we become inhuman?
 
During this incident Mr.Prakash Agarwal, threatened to spoil my friend Anjali and my name. This letter from him is a proof of it. Considering his age, I had a very high regard for him. After this behaviour and email, he has lost all that respect.  
 
With warm regards,
Lavita Powell
Anjali Dawar
 
cc to:  Mr.Santosh Rane, Founder of Nahar's Pet Club


MY ORIGONAL MAIL<
Dear Residents,

Today at around 12 noon.  A croud of over twelve people entered our lobby and started abusing residnts and employees both physically and verbally. When we stopped them that this is forcible unautharised entry. They were led by tow known ladies viz, Ms. Lavita Powell of YYV and Ms. Anjali of Lilum Lantana.

These ladies armed with a group of hooligans who were coordinated yesterday by Mr, Santosh Rane ( as told by these ladies to me).

We totally oppose this act and would request Nahar management to take strict action against them for thsi act of lawlessness. They have committed the following offences:

1) Unlawful Entry
2) spoiling peace and tranqility in the building
3)Abusing Verbaly
4) Abusing phisyically by lady hooligans to male residents so that the male residents attcked cannot react tp support them. This was as startegic act to proveoke the menfolk to react and then they lodge and FIR against us for abusing them.
5) Victimising and terrorising the securty staff in the building to carry  out their lawful activities.

THEY WERE ALL QUOTING HIGH COURT ORDERS. PLEASE LET ME KNOW UNDER WHICH ORDERS OF THE HIGH COURT THEY ARE LAWFULLY ALLOWED TO TAKE LAW IN THEIR HANDS.

We have already met and requested the representative of builder to take strict action against them. Such persosns should be exterend from living in such a large society, as they constitute a severe threat to the safety and security to the rsidents.

Howsoever holy the cause, if they are talking about laws and fairness, humanity and good conduct does not permoit them to take laws in their own hands. Such groups under the guise of noble causes are engaging in these unlawful activety.

Request you to examine the CCTV footage. Lodge an FIR against the accused foor the above offences. Initiate externment proccedings against these people who have taken law in their hands.

Regards
10:31 (40 minutes ago)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages