Intel Visual Fortran Compiler 11.1.051 Professional Edition For Windows
Aquilino Neadstine
I am behind a web proxy that requires password authentication, so most of the install procedures that require an installer to automatically connect to the Internet do not work. I would like to do my installation pretending that my machine is disconnected from the Internet, especially since we will be later installing another copy of the software on a machine that actually IS disconnected from the Internet.
Intel Visual Fortran Compiler 11.1.051 Professional Edition for Windows
Download https://ssurll.com/2yMGoL
I installed the 30-day trial version license file (not just the serial number) in the proper location, but unfortunately the Intel License Manager doesn't seem to know about my license file. It keeps asking for my serial number, and when I provide it, the License Manager tries to access the internet and fails because it doesn't seem to know how to get past the authenticating proxy.
I downloaded the stand-alone installer (all 3 GB of it) and the installation appeared to complete successfully (except for the VTune Amplifier, which I decided to skip for now). Unfortunately there was no Fortran integration in Visual Studio 2017 or 2019, and when I looked for installed components under Help --> About Visual Studio I saw Visual C++, Intel Advisor, and Intel Inspector along with several third-party products such as Visual Assist X and Qt Visual Studio Integration, but no Intel Visual Fortran.
After much trial and error I was able to install the Intel Visual Fortran integration by following the steps for Issue 8 and for Issue 1, in that order, in -us/articles/intel-software-development-tools-integration-to-vs2017-issue
It has been a few years since I was involved with this, but when you install a purchased version, one of the "alternative" activation methods supports doing so when not connected to the Internet. I don't think this works with a trial version, but I am unsure.
Hi Intel Support,
1) I uninstalled "Intel Parallel Studio XE Composer Edition for Fortran Windows* ".
2) I uninstalled "Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 Professional".
3) I want to start from a "clean slate".
4) What is the exact procedure for installing the above 2 SWs and making them work properly with each other?
Please clarify. Thank you.
Hi Steve,
I followed the instructions in above link.
1) I first removed from my LT all Microsoft VS versions and also Intel-PSXE.
2) Then, i installed Microsoft-VS-2019-Professional.
3) Then, i installed Intel-PS-XE. It ended with a message that "integration with Microsoft VS is unsuccessful"
4) So i repaired the installation by following instructions in -us/articles/troubleshooting-fortran-integration-issues-with-visual-studio/ .
4a) Upon right-click on file C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Intel\shared files\VS Integration\VS16\Intel Fortran\VFPackages\VFProj.dll and checking its properties, i see Details File version = 19.1.55.16.
4b) Text in link " -us/articles/troubleshooting-fortran-integration-issues-with-visual-studio/" says "Right click on VFProj.dll and select Properties, then click on the Version tab. Look at the "File Version" displayed. It will be in the form of 11.1.3464.2008. The first two numbers (11.1 here) indicate the compiler version. These must match that of the most recent version of the compiler installed. The last number (2008 here) indicates the Visual Studio version this DLL is for. If the compiler version does not match, uninstall Intel Visual Fortran, delete the entire "Intel Fortran" folder under the appropriate Microsoft Visual Studio folder, then reinstall Intel Fortran."
At this point I suggest you open a ticket with the Intel Online Service Center. I do note that you didn't say that you followed the instructions in the link I posted above. Is your system connected to the Internet? If so, the "workaround" for offline systems does not apply to you.
Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.
I'm compiling a Fortran DLL to deploy on a PXI for use with the LabVIEW Real Time Module. Following the good advice here -us/forums/intel-visual-fortran-compiler-for-windows/topic/451870, I've been able to remove all problematic dependencies except one: GetFileAttributesExA (When I run the LabVIEW RT DLL Checker, the one "Bad Import" is GetFileAttributesExA from kernel32.dll.)
Are there any suggestions for how I can get around this? I assume this function just isn't in the real time system's version of kernel32.dll. I'm using Intel Visual Fortran Compiler Professional Edition 11.1.048, for what it's worth.
Have you tried compiling with gfortran in MinGW using the flags mentioned in the forum post you linked? It sounds like Valentin had the same GetFileAttributesExA issue as you are currently experiencing and was able to resolve it using that method.
Thanks for the suggestion, Kelle. I'd tried compiling with different versions of gfortran last year, and wasn't able to get a working version. I suspect that the result may depend on the version of gfortran and I simply wasn't using the right one. But the larger problem is that gfortran is known to be several times slower than Intel's compiler for the application I am compiling.
I have now had success compiling with Intel but it took using a very old version (10.1) and also an older version of Visual Studio for linking. It's too bad National Instruments doesn't support a more up-to-date function set on the real time operating system!
Pharlap ETS is not a Windows replacement and never tried to be one. It supports a subset of Windows APIs to make porting of software to it easier but it has no intentions to support every new feature or API of Windows. That is more the aim of the Wine project, which is an entirely different beast.
The problem you experience is that the Intel Fortran Compiler uses in its runtime library, that it links your code with, various Windows APIs. Every new compiler version usually comes with new "improved" runtime libraries that handle things like memory managemen, code initialization, etc. and may be written to use certain OS API functions.
You get the same problem when using Visual C to compile C code, except that NI has ported the Microsoft C runtime library to their realtime target for two versions of Visual C. (Visual C++ .NET 2003 and I believe Visual C 2008). If you use one of these compilers and your own code does not make use of unsupported APIs then the DLL is fine since the ported C runtime library on the target will work with the APIs available. With other compiler versions it is usually not possible to create a working DLL since you either have to link your DLL statically with the Visual C runtime library which will generally make use of new Windows APIs that are not available on Pharlap ETS (anyone thinking there is any intention from Microsoft in this runtime compatibility mess should check with his psychologist about paranoia ), or if you leave the C runtime library as dynamic dependency it will not find that library on the Pharlap ETS target and you cannot install the Microsoft standard C runtime distributable since it is not compatible for that target.
Pharlap ETS is in the modern market of realtime OSes a somewhat old animal and its strong Windows/x86 biased fundament is not really suited to face the modern requirements of many realtime targets which are often ARM based rather than x86 and because of that couldn't care less about Win32 API compatibility either. So while Interval Zero does maintain and support it, most of their effort has shifted to other venues and further substantial improvment of it is not that likely. NI might be able to make such changes themselves depending on their license agreement with Interval Zero, but diverging sources would make further maintenance with patches and fixes from Interval Zero more and more of a problem.
Also note that NI has more or less ended NI Pharlap ETS for any new realtime platforms since about two years. Even their x86_64 based target use NI Realtime Linux now. Old platforms running Pharlap ETS will likely continue to be supported for quite a few more LabVIEW versions, but new hardware products using NI Pharlap ETS are not very likely to appear on the market anymore.
Hello everyone, thanks for opinion, it was really interesting. Have you ever problem with missing kernel32 dll error? If like me you have, then I want to recommend a next website: deleted. where I found it, there are also some others dll files you can find.
First those Windows DLLs are very tightly coupled with the Windows kernel itself. Since their lower API to various kernel space APIs like ntdll.dll are for the most part not documented at all, Microsoft is completely free to make changes to that API at will so that a system dll for Windows version 7.0.10xx might fail on Windows 7.0.11xx and even more so if you change major Windows versions. In fact the Pharlap OS doesn't have a physical kernel32.dll and user32.dll and some other dlls at all, but it is all contained in the pharlap kernel itsel and any requests for functions in these dlls are automatically redirected to link to the pharlap kernel functions. It also doesn't contain any exports for the ntdll.dll and other private kernel space APIs at all, since it does not attempt to copy these undocumented Windows APIs at all. Them being undocumented makes this not only very hard but in general a bad idea.
Since these dlls are not being physcically present in Pharlap, putting them there you would create a good chance to mess up the OS pretty good. Either the Pharlap kernel redericts all calls to kernel32.dll to its own module and won't ever attempt to link to kernel32.dll even if there is such a file on the system, still failing the loading of your own dll, or it will use that dll file when it is there also for other functions that your rtexe and other DLLs are using and fail catastrophally since the kernel32.dll of any Windows version simply can't properly work on a Pharlap system.
b1e95dc632