Toshiba E Studio File Storage Error

[Hortense Malovich]

Wejust got a E-studio5520c to replace an older copier we had. We have about six copiers in total, most of them Konica Minoltas. We have network scanning through SMB setup on all copiers and working except this e-studio. No matter what options I select or change, it always gets the same error which I believe is an authentication error?

I have changed the save as file setting to use login user name and password instead of copier name and password. For the login name/password on the Remote 2 setting for each template, I have it using the same AD account and password that all the copiers are using.

Symptoms were that the scanner would not scan to file of a network location. It has previously always worked connected to the domain and configured in the SMB settings. username = domain\username. In order to get it working again, I had to configure it as a Workgroup and change; username = username@domain. Then everything started working fine.

These are located within the web settings of the printer. Open the web browser and navigate to the IP address of the printer. %uFEFFClick on Administration, then enter the correct username and password. Click on Network, then scroll down to the SMB Session settings group. Click on SMB Session. A new window will pop up and scroll down to the bottom. You will then see the SMB Signing settings within here.

This issue had me troubleshooting for over 30 minutes. I eventually removed the share, then went right back in and shared the folder the with the same permissions. As soon as this was created, scan to folder was back in business. Hopefully this helps others.

When you try to search for a network sharing on the server, an annoying file storage error appears out of nowhere.

Efficient Process to Resolve Scan File Storage Error Whenever this Toshiba Scan File Storage Error appears, you need to take care of a number of things. Disabling SMB packet and securing channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003 are the first things to do. But there is nothing to freak out about. The process is as simple as you can think. Avail help from the blog or else from Toshiba Customer Care Service to get to the roots of the error.

Based on Domain Controllers, you need to perform the following steps as mentioned:

Navigate to Domain Controller Security Policy using Administrative Tools.Next, you need to choose Security Settings and thus click on Local Policies.Open Security Option Folder and thus check its details pane.Double click on Microsoft Network Server: Digitally sign communications.Now prevent SMB packet signing by clicking on Disabled.After that, click on Ok.When the detail page opens, double-click on Domain member: Digitally encrypt or sign secure channel dataNow prevent secure channel followed by clicking on "Disabled".Click on Ok and restart the Domain Controller to apply the Group Policy change.Finally, press Enter after typing the "GP update" command.Source URL: Toshiba Scan File Storage Error

If you are scanning to folder, you will need to view scan log in top access for failure reason such as wrong username or path to the folder. You can log in to top access by entering the copier IP address on the web browser.

What I am trying to say is that many people use a RAID as their primary storage system, and have it configured either as a RAID 1 or 5, thinking that the redundancy of the RAID is a backup. THIS IS NOT A BACKUP SYSTEM. This was the point I was trying to make.

UPDATE: As for my current 2018 setup, I am running an iMAC with a Retina 5K Display and a 3.5GHz Processor with 1TB Storage. The daily work for the year is stored on an external 5TB drive. That drive is backed up daily using Time Machine. Every month or so (depending on workload) the backup is backed up to a WD My passport Drive and that copy is moved offsite to a safe deposit box.

The concept of a RAID is to combine multiple, less-expensive drives into a single, higher-capacity and/or faster volume. It is designed for redundancy so that the array and its data remain usable WHEN (NOT IF) a drive fails. The terms 1-disk or 2-disk redundancy refers to the number of drives that can fail with the array remaining usable.

RAID 0: Its primary purpose: faster performance. RAID 0 spreads the data across multiple drives. For example, block A is on drive 1, block B is on drive 2), and this permits increased write and read speeds. This is called striping.

RAID 0 offers no protection against drive failure, since this mode does not write any duplicate or parity information.

RAID 1: This mode writes and reads the same data to pairs of drives which is called mirroring. If either drive fails, you can continue working with the other until you can replace the bad one.

RAID 5: This mode is about both speed and redundancy. RAID 5 writes and reads from multiple disks, and it distributes parity data across all the disks in the array. Parity data is a smaller amount of data derived mathematically from a larger set that can accurately describe that larger amount of data, and thus serves to restore it. Since parity information is distributed across all the drives, any drive can fail without causing the entire array to fail.

So if you accidentally delete a file, it will instantly be removed from both mirrored copies. If your disk is corrupted by a software bug or virus, the corruption will be done to both mirrored copies simultaneously.

A BACKUP needs to be a complete and recoverable copy of your data that resides on a separate hard drive possibly even a RAID. Just DO NOT USE SOFTWARE THAT MIRRORS THE PRIMARY DRIVE TO THE BACKUP or you will run into the same problems as above with at RAID 1. Proper backup software will perform a full backup and then hourly or daily backups of changed files.

Images that are worked up for publication are exported from Adobe Lightroom and stored on my Photoshelter Archive. I trust Photoshelter and their geographically redundant archive to protect those images. If disaster were to strike, I could still export the images again from the backed up Lightroom archive.

Every year I rotate the oldest year off to a small portable drive. For these backups of the archives, I use Western Digital My Passport 2-terabyte drives. They are small and easily portable for off-site storage.

Would you be able to share what HD or SSD you chose for your work drive and daily backup drive? I think I would like the same setup because, you getting your livelihood from these files suggests to me your setup is good.

I see that WD My book Duo has a 28TB option for RAid 1 which would mean you have only one disk 14tb with a copy (Raid 1 by definition). The setup would cost me $1000. Is there a cheaper way to get massive amount of storage (two 14+, preferably 20TB) that I can do a Raid 1. Essentially the question is, I would like to have a cheaper version of the My book duo but with even more memory space, like two disks of 20TB each. and do a raid 1 configuration.

WHY? I use a RAID 5 10 TB with 2 hot spares on a NAS server. Not a bad setup with a GIGABIT LAN and GIGABIT to the Internet for Offsite backup. Use 25 year ago when I worked at John Space we used NAS server with RAID 5 for onsite backups then we would back up the NAS with a 10 tape DAT which would have tapes for the whole week used one tape a day. at the end of the week I would take the Sunday Tape home for offsite storage usually my safe that was suppose to with stand 1500 degrees fire. I would also so the the last day of the month tape in the same matter. Then after 6 months we had archival storage of the DAT tapes.

I think letting people understanding better to use more causal term, RAID is single version data forever all the time while backup is making versioning of data

For RAID 1,

it applies data changes to all copies on all disks at same time , which mean all copies are same version/identical.

The next step is redundancy. Drive enclosures system components are a common point of failure. Depending which enclosure and disks you compare, sometimes even more likely to fail than the disk itself. However, an enclosure with dual power supplies, drive controllers, IO interfaces, etc. is far less likely to experience an overall system failure than any disk.

As far as I know, there is no readily available drive enclosure with redundant components outside of a RAID. Which brings us back to my point of a viable brand-model of RAID that is properly configured.

1) Dual redundant power supplies, RAID controllers and IO interfaces (i.e. Thunderbolt BUSES, not just ports). Notice the mention of controller here explicitly implies against even considering a workstation-based software or motherboard-integrated RAID controller.

2) 8 or more, enterprise-class, 7200rpm or greater, 6GB SATA or better hard disk drives. The point here is either taking advantage of RAID level 50 (can fail up to two disks without data-loss), fast disk-rebuilds, the most reliable disks built to constantly run (consumer class, 5400rpm, low-throughput drives will keep you busy with IT instead of post), fast read and writes, etc.

4) Configuring the RAID to use RAID cache, BUT NOT DISK CACHE. Per disk cache in a raid offers a near guarantee of either a drive failure or worse when your power goes out, your kid turns off the RAID while in use or your UPS goes out (oh yeah it happens). RAID cache is reliable enough to enjoy the performance benefits, presuming you have a redundant backup of the component in your RAID.

We have a lot of data to be backed up, for a long time. So we have two NAS boxes, each set up as RAID 6. That means the drives will retain their integrity even if two drives fail before we get the replacement drives in place.

Using two separate RAID 1 arrays together act as RAID 10, simple solution, I have two different 20TB disk arrays, setting backup interval per minute mirroring, I also have disk fails on me average every two years for high usage as daily server storage, never had a single data loss at all.

3a8082e126