I made some small changes overall. Feel free to improve as you see
fit.
My biggest change was around the somewhat obscure forest analogy. I
included the entire section to hopefully provide a more relevant
perspective:
Who are the reviewers?
Reviewers are anonymous, but they still have a past.
And a reputation. You can read their earlier reviews,
and vote them up if you liked them. Down if you didn't.
You can check if they just began, or posted for years...
All of us can choose to be reviewers and report our
experiences both good and bad of the sites we visit.
Our reviews are anonymous but are public for the world to see.
Make your reviews credible and consistent with the facts.
An analogy - Imagine the Net as a forest:
As trees we may be anonymous, but our fruits are public.
Consider that anonymous is not nameless.
Our online identity need not be physical and tangible,
only consistent, with a history of credibility...
Click on
http://groups.google.com/group/mywot/web/rewiewing-advices -