[Patent Pod] Storage Technology v. Custom Hardware Engineering
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Andrew Lahser
Sep 14, 2005, 9:41:03 AM9/14/05
to mypat...@googlegroups.com
[http://www.patentpod.com/sound/2005/september/Storage-Technology-v-Custom-Hardware.mp3]
Custom Hardware Engineering repairs, on behalf of third-parties, data tapes manufactured by StorageTek. StorageTek asserted copyright infringement and certain D.M.C.A. claims because Custom Hardware made copies of tapes while repairing. The C.A.F.C. found that Custom Hardware's conduct may be within the scope of the copyright license granted to the third-party and the conduct may fall into the safe harbor provisions of the D.M.C.A.
See also,
--
Posted by Andrew Lahser to Patent Pod at 9/13/2005 10:55:00 PM
Custom Hardware Engineering repairs, on behalf of third-parties, data tapes manufactured by StorageTek. StorageTek asserted copyright infringement and certain D.M.C.A. claims because Custom Hardware made copies of tapes while repairing. The C.A.F.C. found that Custom Hardware's conduct may be within the scope of the copyright license granted to the third-party and the conduct may fall into the safe harbor provisions of the D.M.C.A.
See also,
- MP3: Storage Technology v. Custom Hardware (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citations omitted)
- PDF: Storage Technology v. Custom Hardware (Fed. Cir. 2005) (full text)
- Patently-O: Federal Circuit Broadly Interprets Copyright Safe Harbor for Computer Repair
- IP Law Observer: Repair Company Likely to Prevail in Defense of Claims on Copying of Software and Circumvention of Access Codes for Maintenance
- IPBiz: CAFC addresses injunction, DMCA issues in Storage Technology v. Custom Hardware
- SVML: Storagetek ruling on DMCA, software copyrights
- madisonian.net: StorageTek Troubles Me
--
Posted by Andrew Lahser to Patent Pod at 9/13/2005 10:55:00 PM
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages