[Patent Pod] In re Kumar
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Andrew Lahser
Aug 22, 2005, 2:48:02 AM8/22/05
to mypat...@googlegroups.com
[http://www.patentpod.com/sound/2005/august/In-re-Kumar.mp3]
When the B.P.A.I., sua sponte, made its own calculations based on a prior art reference for the first time in its appeal decision, the B.P.A.I erred in not allowing the applicant to respond to this 'new ground of rejection.'
--
Posted by Andrew Lahser to Patent Pod at 8/21/2005 11:31:00 PM
When the B.P.A.I., sua sponte, made its own calculations based on a prior art reference for the first time in its appeal decision, the B.P.A.I erred in not allowing the applicant to respond to this 'new ground of rejection.'
- MP3: In re Kumar (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citations omitted)
- PDF: In re Kumar (Fed. Cir. 2005) (full text)
- Patently-O: Patent Board Erred By Creating New Grounds For Rejection
--
Posted by Andrew Lahser to Patent Pod at 8/21/2005 11:31:00 PM
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages