Butit's not just Nvidia - it seems like every time I've tried this on any driver for any hardware the numbers don't match. Am I missing something? Is there any way to compare versions short of installing both versions and comparing within Device Manager?
Unfortunately one is the internal version of the signed driver files and the other is the external version published and publicized by the company - and there is no onus placed on the developer or publisher for them to match.
The best you can do is approximately match the dates. Since the internal driver date will be timestamped by a CA server, it must be before the official release date on the site. Unfortunately, that can be anywhere from 3 months to 24 hours before the release date on the site, so it's not perfectly reliable.
This isn't just the case for drivers - right-click any exe and look at the "Details" tab (if it's there) - you'll see that there is file version info there that does not necessarily (and in fact almost never does) match up with the published release version on the website. It's just the way things are, unfortunately.
However, if you refer to the driver release notes and change history included with the download, it will often (though obviously not necessarily) contain a blurb/statement saying "driver updated to version xxxx" or similar, where that is the version number you are looking for. So your best bet is to check for and reference the release notes.
and I ran the setup file to install CUDA. I have Visual studio 2015 already installed on my system. and that message showed on the first window.
I will try to install everything under CUDA option only, after selecting custom installation instead of express.
For anyone else who finds this forum, accept the warning that it will install an older driver version and then pick custom install on the next screen. Each item shows new version to install and current version installed. Deselect anything that shows an older version than current.
I used to use the laptop for gaming about 2 years ago but stopped. Now I'm trying to get back into those same games and have found that they are incredibly slow - even with graphics at minimal. Some of the games tell me that my "graphics drivers are 597 days old" - which would match the date being shown as my driver date (5/19/2016). The problem is that when I go to intel to update my graphics driver, none of the ones I try (which I believe match my specifications) will successfully download because it tells me I don't "meet minimum requirements". When I try using the intel driver and support assistant, it tells me that there are no updates available. How can my graphics drivers be 597 days old with no updates available? Have intel stopped releasing graphics driver updates for my graphics card/processor?
I am resigned to the fact that I will probably have to purchase a new laptop in order to get a better gaming experience, but I just wanted to check whether I was missing anything obvious first. I'd appreciate any advice or assistance on whether I actually do have the most up to date graphics driver available to me or, if not, how I can go about installing one more up to date.
I have the same query and would like more info. My gaming manufacturer (Big Fish) after performing a diagnostics, directed me to an update for my Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Service Pack 1, Toshiba Portege that has the Intel (R) HD Graphics 3000 installed; Driver Date 7/13/2015, Version 9.17.104229. When I tried to make the recommended installation I received this error message: "This computer does not meet the minimum requirements for installing the win64_15.36344889.exe software." All devices I have checked say, "The device is working properly."
My real question is what, other than the graphics driver, would prevent my computer from downloading new games and not responding when clicking on a downloaded game. If the device is working properly, but is no longer supported by Intel, can that still be why I can no longer download and install these games?
As an aside, I ran this computer in Safe Mode and was able to open two games, Scrabble and Burger Shop 2. The former has no graphics to speak of. The latter has limited graphics. , Unfortunately, I do not know what to do with this information to fix the problem.
I have a 5 year old Inspiron laptop with the i3 2.40ghz 2370m processor and Intel HD 3000 graphics card. It NEVER made the list as being supported for Windows 10 by Dell or Intel. I UPGRADED ANYWAY to Windows 10 when it was released. I have had a great experience with only a few driver issues. Mostly during the first year W10 was released. Last few months I've been using a 4k HDR TV as my primary display w/HDMI. I noticed when I 1st connected it with the newer 2.0 HDMI cable the card read the resolutions it could use that my TV supports like wider xvYCC EXTENDED GAMUT. The result is a wider and deeper range of color overall.
TODAY I SUCCESSFULLY SET A CUSTOM RESOLUTION WITHIN THE INTEL GRAPHICS AND MEDIA CONTROL PANEL TO 3840X21260, REFRESH 30HZ, CVT-RB TIMING. I tried many different refresh rates but 30hz is highest the card accepted. I'll see over the next few weeks how the lower refresh affects viewing. I HOPE THIS HELPS OTHERS WHO MIGHT HAVE A SIMILAR SITUATION! I WAS THINKING OF GETTING A NEWER COMPUTER THAT SUPPORTS 4K BEFORE I TRIED THIS! THE DRIVER IS 9.17.10.4459
Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.
I have some difficulties running a Cuda application inside a docker container on my Jetson TX2. The error message is CUDA Error: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version The Cuda version is 10.2 but I have no idea where I can find the driver version.
When you drill down to any particular release in that list it will mention which CUDA version it supports. If you simply recompiling for your GPU is not sufficient, then you will need to flash with the JetPack/SDKM release having the proper CUDA version.
Someone using docker would have to answer this, but do beware that any docker running on a Jetson has to specifically be customized with that in mind. The normal publicly available releases of docker container content for a PC would not be able to work with a Jetson. I think NVIDIA has releases specific to the Jetson, but since I have never used it, I have no way of giving advice on that.
Do you fix this issue yet?
Usually, insufficient error comes from the different version between GPU driver and CUDA library.
Please noticed that you need to use the container that built with the same L4T version as your device.
"Standard" refers to driver packages that predate the DCH driver design paradigm. Standard drivers are for those who have not yet transitioned to contemporary DCH drivers, or require these drivers to support older products.
background:
We get a random and seemingly irreproducible error saying "invalid number" when saving data (we guess it's the Timestamp). But it's not any particular statement. Most of the time, it saves just fine. Just once a month a harmless looking statement will fail.
Our product is run on databases maintained by our clients, i.e. whatever version and patch the clients have running is what it is.
So what driver do we use? The latest (Oracle 11g) - despite the fact that it's usually 9i and 10g databases?
The numbers in ojdbc14.jar, ojdbc5.jar, ojdbc6.jar, ojdbc7.jar and ojdbc8.jar refer to the version of the Java compiler that was used. With every version of Java come new JDBC APIs so these numbers are useful to know what to expect. For example in Java 8, there is a new method executeLargeUpdate in java.sql.PreparedStatement. This method will be implemented in ojdbc8.jar but not in ojdbc7.jar. Also if your runtime uses Java 7 then you know you can't use ojdbc8.jar otherwise you'll run into a java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError error. These are the reasons why Oracle includes these numbers in the jar's name. Also note that if you want to know from which Oracle Database release the jar comes from you can run java -jar ojdbc8.jar. Both the Database and the driver are backward compatible (up to 1 major release) so, even though it's recommended, you don't have to use the same version of the product on both tiers.
When we upgraded our Oracle database from 8.1.7 to 10.2.0, I was able to use the same Oracle jdbc driver (ojdbc14.jar). So their jdbc driver supports quite a few versions at the same time. Of course it's possible that some of the drivers are buggy, but the plan is to support more versions at the same time.
I am doing some troubleshooting with AsRock Rack and the X570D4U-2L2T and abysmal throughput performance under the latest 6.9.2 and 6.10 RC2 release. One question that is of course being asked is what driver am I using, and the basics I know are we are using the in-tree driver for what seems to be the 5.14.15 kernel. The board has built in dual Intel X550 NIC's, which I have disabled for the time being and am using an older X520 add-on card which works perfect (same driver).
But we quit doing this because often that driver would not build against the latest Linux sources. The best solution would be for Intel to quit maintaining their own proprietary driver and just keep the in-tree driver up-to-date. (Also get off sourceforge)
Our approach moving forward starting with 6.11 release is to create a category of apps called "proprietary modules". These will be individual plugins kept on github. Each time we update the Linux kernel we'll rebuild all the proprietary drivers, and if they build correctly, push the new module to the repo. Then OS Update will check your installed list of proprietary drivers and if they all were successfully updated then we'll proceed with update. I know this probably doesn't help you right now.
3a8082e126