Importance and Urgency are 0.00000000 for all tasks after update to 4.2

52 views
Skip to first unread message

Matt Scales

unread,
Nov 10, 2013, 2:36:46 PM11/10/13
to mylifeo...@googlegroups.com
I have a couple of computers using cloud sync. I have updated one of them to 4.2 and ever since I can't sort by "computed-score" because all the importance and urgency fields displayed in the task properties (when I check "Show computed score values on task statistics") show up as 0.00000000. On my computer that is still at the last release level, my tasks show up with an numeric value there even for the same task.

Is this something with my install or maybe with the 4.2 update?

Thanks,
Matt

Stéph

unread,
Nov 12, 2013, 2:23:47 AM11/12/13
to mylifeo...@googlegroups.com
I've just tested this and have a different result: Although importance and urgency are set as 100 on all new items, they are not always displayed correctly in the Task Statistics.

I should also note that the importance and urgency scales are inconsistent between the General group and the Task Statistics group.

When I added a new task, it showed importance and urgency as 0.000000. However, in any filters or sorts I set up in a new tab, it acted as if it had importance and urgency set to 1.0000. At some point during my testing, the importance and urgency started getting displayed as 1.0000.

In my second test, I created another new item and, again, the importance and urgency were displayed as 0.0000. However, this time the importance and urgency for every single item was displayed as 0.000. This time, setting up new tabs with new sorts and shutting down / restarting MLO all have no effect - importance and urgency Statistics remain displayed as 0.000. Adjusting importance on the 0-200 scale slider in the General properties or in the urgency column in the main pane has no effect on the value shown in task statistics.

I'll report this on the JIRA beta-testing bug report site. Please would you do some further testing to see if your results match mine?

Stéphane

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages