"Martin.G" <Martin....@gmail.com>: Sep 21 01:08AM -0700
I find that Wunderlist provides a good example of the sort of functionality
that is being requested. Everyone involved has to have the app installed
on a phone (or a PC version is available), and it allows you to share lists
and delegate tasks to others in the group. Other people can only see the
lists/tasks that you have allowed them to see.
But it really needs a decision to move away from a single-user concept to
shared task lists.
On Sunday, 20 September 2015 04:53:55 UTC+12, bs wrote:
|
pottster <kenwar...@gmail.com>: Sep 21 01:34AM -0700
I agree with you Martin. I'm using Wunderlist to share and delegate tasks
and find it easy and effective. Importantly, the people I use it with are
either already using it, or find it simple to understand.
It would be a very big decision for MLO to move from single-user to
collaborative. A better course to take may involve developing integration
through apps like ITTT and Zapier, or improving the export options e.g.
opml.
On Monday, 21 September 2015 09:08:44 UTC+1, Martin.G wrote:
|
pottster <kenwar...@gmail.com>: Sep 21 01:39AM -0700
I agree with you Martin. I'm using Wunderlist to share and delegate tasks
and find it easy and effective. Importantly, the people I use it with are
either already using it, or find it simple to understand.
It would be a very big decision for MLO to move from single-user to
collaborative. A better course to take may involve developing integration
through apps like IFTTT and Zapier, or improving the export options e.g.
opml.
On Monday, 21 September 2015 09:08:44 UTC+1, Martin.G wrote:
|
Jonathan <johannk...@gmail.com>: Sep 19 05:40PM -0700
In my opinion you're barking up the wrong tree in expecting MLO to
accommodate delegation. MLO is simply a database optimized for personal
task management. Project management beyond the individual level requires a
system incorporating a variety of tools. Maybe you should be using MS
Project, or developing your own database. MLO may be a useful cog in the
machine but don't expect it to be what it's not.
On Sunday, 20 September 2015 02:53:55 UTC+10, bs wrote:
|
Jonathan <johannk...@gmail.com>: Sep 19 04:35PM -0700
I'Being signed up to this group
On Sunday, 20 September 2015 02:53:55 UTC+10, bs wrote:
|
bs <bs...@yahoo.com>: Sep 21 08:18AM -0700
My interest is not nearly as elaborate as others are assuming. I'm not
looking for project management capability or any type of cross-user
interactivity. I'm really just looking for something as simple as a field
where I could enter the person (or persons) who are responsible for doing
something. Yes, I am aware of the workarounds that are listed here. Using a
context or including the name in the header is reasonable....but it's not
as elegant as having a dedicated field to assign ownership. With such a
field, I could more easily create reports, sort by owner, assign tasks,
etc. When I'm working on a project, I could see who all is doing things.
When I sit down with a person, I could easily see all the things that
person is responsible for doing.
It's really a simple need and pretty core to any task manager. I've used
MLO for a very long time. This has just been a notable gap in my mind. With
all the latest efforts, I was hoping that gap would be closed. Alas.
-bs
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 9:53:55 AM UTC-7, bs wrote:
|