Hello Dirk,
Thank you for bringing that up!
I have been thinking about the same thing!
Could you open a new issue on the tracker or send a pull request, please?
A few vague ideas about the new implementation:
Connection#createArrayOf()
.jdbcType
as the first argument if supplied and use the default mapping (i.e. Appendix B of the JDBC spec) as a fallback?java.sql.Array
, just call setArray()
to keep backward compatibility?Regards,
Iwao
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mybatis-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mybatis-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mybatis-user/aacae16e-133a-4595-a11d-82ab4c35e866%40googlegroups.com.
On 5/20/19 3:28 PM, Iwao AVE! wrote:
> Hello Dirk,
Hi Iwao,
Thanks for your feedback.
> Thank you for bringing that up!
> I have been thinking about the same thing!
> Could you open a new issue on the tracker or send a pull request, please?
I'm motivated to work on a PR but it'll take a while to make progress in
parallel to the day job.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mybatis-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mybatis-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mybatis-user/d03d7ec7-617f-4d96-b2b2-74a0163c64da%40googlegroups.com.