This is an interesting development! In a way, it's the opposite of
Express Stave, which has the 7-5 coloring and a chromatic staff, whereas
your new version of Classic Nydana has 6-6 coloring and a diatonic staff.
If you came up with a new name, "classic" could still refer to the
original version as one might expect. The new one could be called
Diatonic Nydana...
Doug
Now I finally realise the importance of your (bob's) remark: cipher
notation is probably of advantage in playing Jazz.
Jazz chord in HMN and conventional Europe and USA nomenclature
root
1 C 5 E 8 G 1 C
2 cis/des 6 F 9 gis/as 2 cis/des
3 D 7 fis/ges A A 3 D
4 dis/es 8 G B ais/b Bb 4 dis/es
5 E 9 gis/as 0 H(B) 5 E
6 F A A 1 C 6 F
7 fis/ges B ais/b Bb 2 cis/des 7 fis/ges
8 G 0 H(B) 3 D 8 G
9 gis/as 1 C 4 dis/es 7 fis/ges
A A 2 cis/des 5 E A A
B Bb 3 D 6 F B ais/b Bb
0 H(B) 4 dis/es 7 fis/ges 0 H(B)
1 C 5 E 8 G 1
I think that alternative notations should concentrate on going mainstream.
Christian P�rksen alias Robert Elisabeth Key
Your website is impressively thorough!
I am interested to know the background of the Summer Song you have used to
illustrate Nydana.
I made a reverse Express Stave transnotation of it!
Cheers, John K
Hi Doug,
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the forum of the
Music Notation Project (hosted by Google Groups).
To post to this group, send email to musicn...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
musicnotatio...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/musicnotation?hl=en
If noteheads are missing, I might have sent the wrong font. Did you install
this font before looking at the MUS file? If you already had an older
version of the font, some glyphs may have been missing.
Here is a PDF of my reverse ES transcription. Could you check whether it
agrees with the MUS file?
Thanks for you comments! I've enjoyed playing the piece a number of times.
Quite easy except where the left hand has some large leaps.
John K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Lindgren" <ny.d...@ownit.name>
To: "The Music Notation Project | Forum" <musicn...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:38 PM
Subject: [MNP] Re: "The best of two worlds"
Hi John,
Great!
Cheers,
Dan
--
I have been sending people the wrong version of the Express Stave font!
The MUS file looks ridiculous with it !
This is what i should have sent. Please, anyone trying to view any of my
Express Stave MUS files, replace the old version of the font "ESbigandsmall"
with this new version!
Very sorry for my mistake. I will have to email others as well.
Cheers, john K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Lindgren" <ny.d...@ownit.name>
To: "The Music Notation Project | Forum" <musicn...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:47 AM
Subject: [MNP] Re: "The best of two worlds"
Christian, I am among those who value and understand the advantages of
cipher notation, however it cannot be ignored also its disadvantages
vs. staff notation, especially for complex polyphonic forms of music.
So far all musical notations intended as general purpose systems could
be roughly classified into one of traditional methods, which are
staff, cipher and graphic notation; all of them having certain
advantage over the other, however the reference head notation is a new
method that brakes the boundaries of all three previous methods, what
makes it the most powerful foundation technology for notating music
ever.
I think after the RH notation it should be removed the focus on
comparing implementations of traditional methods to comparing methods
themselves, the differences among implementations may not be
significant enough, however the difference among methods it is, and it
is the foundation for constructing the alternative system.
B.R.
Enrique.
http://musicnotation.org/wiki/6-6_Colored_Traditional_%287-5%29_Keyboard
(And I see you show a keyboard like that in your .pdf file.)
Like John, I am always impressed by how thorough your website is.
Best regards,
-Paul