domain / range of mo:similar_to

[Kurt J]

Hello,

I've just noticed the domain/range of mo:similar_to includes mo:Genre,
mo:Signal, and foaf:Agent. I think mo:Signal should really be
replaced by mo:MusicalExpression. This accomadates the rather common
scenario where an individual, perhaps in a blog post, states that
"Track A is similar to Track B" - the individual is refering to the
mo:Track here not really the mo:Signal imho. Similar scenarios might
exist for mo:Record's or mo:Score's

Alternatively the domain/range could be left completely open.

Happy new year mo'ers.

-Kurt J

[Yves Raimond]

Hello!

> I've just noticed the domain/range of mo:similar_to includes mo:Genre,
> mo:Signal, and foaf:Agent.  I think mo:Signal should really be
> replaced by mo:MusicalExpression.  This accomadates the rather common
> scenario where an individual, perhaps in a blog post, states that
> "Track A is similar to Track B" - the individual is refering to the
> mo:Track here not really the mo:Signal imho.  Similar scenarios might
> exist for mo:Record's or mo:Score's

True, although I am guessing we need to add mo:Track explicitly to its
domain/range (as it is a subclass of mo:MusicalManifestation, not
MusicalExpression) - can you add it to the TODO list?

>
> Alternatively the domain/range could be left completely open.
>

Indeed (owl:Thing as domain/range). Not sure what is best, really.

Cheers,
y

> Happy new year mo'ers.
>
> -Kurt J
>

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Music Ontology Specification Group" group.
> To post to this group, send email to music-ontology-sp...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to music-ontology-specific...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group?hl=en.
>
>
>
>