save

[zhang Mr]

Why are there differences in the number of simulated nanowire arrays save (m) and save (geom)? The first image shows save (m), and the second image shows save (geom)

[samm...@hotmail.com]

Hi!

It would be helpful if you would post your code :)

Sam

Op vrijdag 4 augustus 2023 om 04:22:01 UTC+2 schreef mrzha...@gmail.com:

[Jonathan Leliaert]

Geom is not a vector quantity, whereas the magnetization is. mumax-view was developed for vector quantities only, and  therefore does not really know what to do with geom and renders is several times.

Best,

Jonathan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mumax2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mumax2+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mumax2/5ca63fce-89f4-4cf3-9077-a3cb360b3b56n%40googlegroups.com.

[zhang Mr]

Ok, thank you very much!! So if you want to simulate nanowire arrays, can you only use transl() one by one? There is no other easy way. Thanks in advance!

[Josh Lauzier]

Hi,

If you want to make more than one copy in an array of wires, you can use the .repeat() method instead of .transl(). It would look something like:

SetGridsize(120,120,270)
SetCellsize(3e-9,3e-9,3e-9)

a:=cylinder(100e-9,800e-9)
b:=a.repeat(130e-9,130e-9,0)
setgeom(b)

m=uniform(1,0,0)

save(m)

You can also use transl() on combined shapes. For example on the shape you call e (which is a, b, and c added together), you could add another line saying "e.transl(0,-130e-9,0)" and  "e.transl(0,130e-9,0)", then add them to the shape respectively. When you add two shapes, the resulting object is also a shape and has the built in shape methods. For your use case, it sounds like repeat() is what you want.

Best,

Josh L.