Hi,
It is indeed possible. If you can give some more details on how you tried to implement them, we can give some more specific suggestions? It is hard to give general suggestions without some further context on what you got stuck on.
When you implement custom fields, there should be both a torque/field term (via AddFieldTerm), and the energy density (via AddEdensTerm). Mumax mostly (with a few exceptions) works with the torques. When you implement a customfield you should be using both, not just the energy.
Separately, you may also be interested in
mumaxplus. The implementation there is the full DMI tensor. I haven't tested it for this use case specifically, but I believe it allows setting all the tensor elements separately. It should allow for anisotropic DMI more easily, without having to fiddle with things like custom fields or the source code.
Best,
Josh L.