Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)

1,157 views

Skip to first unread message

Michael DiMartino

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 10:42:10 AM3/4/11

Qmail Users

All mail delivers accept mail to *@hudsonstreet.us. How can this be corrected?

2011-03-04 10:36:13.063166500 new msg 1757690

2011-03-04 10:36:13.063169500 info msg 1757690: bytes 459 from <ro...@monitor.hudsonstreet.us> qp 14415 uid 509

2011-03-04 10:36:13.064262500 starting delivery 4: msg 1757690 to remote ad...@hudsonstreet.us

2011-03-04 10:36:13.064264500 status: local 0/10 remote 2/20

2011-03-04 10:36:13.156432500 delivery 4: deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/

Philippe Ratté

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 11:48:24 AM3/4/11

Hello Michael,

You will most likely need the "oversize DNS patch"

See http://www.memoryhole.net/qmail/#oversize-dns

Available here: http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Michael DiMartino [mailto:mic...@hudsonstreet.us]
Envoyé : Friday, March 04, 2011 10:42 AM
À : qmail List
Objet : CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)

Qmail Users

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-...@muc.de

Davis Sylvester

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 12:40:42 PM3/4/11

I fixed this issue by installing and running DNScache.

Point your email server's DNS entry (etc/resolv.conf) to the cache server.

This should fix the problem. Follow the instruction at http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/dnscache.html to install the DNSCache server.

Hope this helps!

2011/3/4 Philippe Ratté <pra...@cybergeneration.com>

Andy Bradford

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 10:36:45 PM3/4/11

Thus said Michael DiMartino on Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:42:10 EST:

> All mail delivers accept mail to *@hudsonstreet.us. How can this be
> corrected?

I see you're using Google as your MX. Maybe they have some kind of
problem with their DNS records. The response they send back is only 361
bytes:

This is not nearly enough data to trigger any DNS problems. By the way,
if you get this email, then clearly it is not a DNS problem with
qmail/djbdns. I run qmail (no DNS patches) and dnscache (unpatched) and
have no problems.

Andy

0 new messages