Just an update: I tried Michael Hitch's recommended USRSTACK and MAXDSIZ
changes (finally!), and while it didn't compile directly, it compiled when
I built sqlite3.lo with -O instead of -O2. (Before it wouldn't compile
with -O0!)
Interestingly, top didn't show cc1 going past 64 megs:
Memory: 85M Act, 11M Inact, 976K Wired, 10M Exec, 19M File, 6568K Free
Swap: 378M Total, 19M Used, 359M Free
...
1702 root 27 0 60M 59M RUN 12:46 97.22% 97.22% cc1
0 root 126 0 0K 27M pgdaemon 2:36 0.00% 0.00% [system]
...
Now I'm building the rest of php53...
Thanks,
John
--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-...@muc.de
> Just an update: I tried Michael Hitch's recommended USRSTACK and
> MAXDSIZ changes (finally!), and while it didn't compile directly, it
> compiled when I built sqlite3.lo with -O instead of -O2. (Before it
> wouldn't compile with -O0!)
>
> Interestingly, top didn't show cc1 going past 64 megs:
>
> Memory: 85M Act, 11M Inact, 976K Wired, 10M Exec, 19M File, 6568K Free
> Swap: 378M Total, 19M Used, 359M Free
> ...
> 1702 root 27 0 60M 59M RUN 12:46 97.22% 97.22% cc1
> 0 root 126 0 0K 27M pgdaemon 2:36 0.00% 0.00%
> [system] ...
>
> Now I'm building the rest of php53...
Did it work?
When your system runs better than before I would clearly vote to commit
those changes.
--
Frank Wille
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Frank Wille wrote:
> John Klos wrote:
>
> > Just an update: I tried Michael Hitch's recommended USRSTACK and
> > MAXDSIZ changes (finally!), and while it didn't compile directly, it
> > compiled when I built sqlite3.lo with -O instead of -O2. (Before it
> > wouldn't compile with -O0!)
...
> When your system runs better than before I would clearly vote to commit
> those changes.
The change to USRSTACK has already been done, and a pullup request to
netbsd-5 and netbsd-4 have been submitted.
Mike