You'll note that there is also options LKM and that all
filesystems are included in GENERIC. netbsd-5 is basically a
transition from LKM to kmod and has some support for both.
} lying around in my /stand/i386/5.0 ... Why install something that won't
} be used? But ok, I guess the modular vs. monolithic debate cared for some
It may be possible that if you remove filesystems from your
kernel, that they would get autoloaded. I don't recall if filesystem
autoloading is in netbsd-5 or not.
} hasted commits and less holistic design than usual for NetBSD. I just hope
} the steam cools off somewhen (maybe 2012?) and the devel community of
} NetBSD will return to its 'good design first' goal, rounding off whatever
} is delivered to the end-user...
kmods are a major improvement on LKMs. kmods as they sit, work.
The issue seems to be around usability. There also seems to be some
contention around a design point. kmods were designed to work with all
kernels of a particular version. Some people want them to be
associated with a particular kernel instead. This is more of a
subjective preference then a design issue. Either way can work and
function just fine for many purposes.
}-- End of excerpt from "Martin S. Weber"
--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-...@muc.de