Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
OT: MS C++.net vs Borland Builder (with Linux support in future)
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Paul McHale
Sep 4, 2002, 7:47:38 PM9/4/02
to
Hi,
I have to decide between Borland C++ builder and MS.NET for a relatively
simple windows GUI development. Given there are quite a few very
experienced developers here, I thought some of you may have preferences.
I am new to C++ and builder looks much simpler to develop for. Any
recommendations welcome. One strong motivation for Borland builder is the
impending Linux version. Is this real? Will it actually be cross platform
compatible?
Many thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Russell
Sep 4, 2002, 8:42:19 PM9/4/02
to
Paul McHale wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have to decide between Borland C++ builder and MS.NET for a relatively
> simple windows GUI development. Given there are quite a few very
> experienced developers here, I thought some of you may have preferences.
>
> I am new to C++ and builder looks much simpler to develop for. Any
> recommendations welcome. One strong motivation for Borland builder is the
> impending Linux version. Is this real? Will it actually be cross platform
> compatible?
>
> Hi,
>
> I have to decide between Borland C++ builder and MS.NET for a relatively
> simple windows GUI development. Given there are quite a few very
> experienced developers here, I thought some of you may have preferences.
>
> I am new to C++ and builder looks much simpler to develop for. Any
> recommendations welcome. One strong motivation for Borland builder is the
> impending Linux version. Is this real? Will it actually be cross platform
> compatible?
Borland has a dedicated news-server for various builder topics that
would be worth subscribing to. See borland.com
0 new messages