Dear Aaron Andrew and Robert, as well as the rest of MELM group members,
Firstly I celebrate your New Year and hope that it brings along much goodness for everyone.
Coming to the matter of my sketchy Ultratonal Piano and Ratched Tuning Peg ideas:
1. Yes, I concur with you Aaron Andrew that these projects demand lot's of mechanical engineering calculations let alone all the required software/hardware coding plus beta-testing. They remain as cute ideas and their applicability to real-life requires much deliberation and planning aforehand. Still, I am confident that current technology and the suggested techniques are within the limits of practicability. People here might remember that I had had attempted to bend a bass string of my Hermann Mayer practice piano some years ago using a hydraulic piston (via a really amateurish contraption using a long stick tied to the piston drawing support from a wall). The results were indeed much to my satisfaction since the bending of the bass string was quick and accurate with no visible dent to the string itself - even after several trys. Hyraulichord is a major improvement on the same line of reasoning; viz. using the piston mechanism to directly change individual string tensions (conversion of translational motion to rotational force) instead of using pistons to apply presssure on the strings externally.
2. I agree fully with Robert that the master console commanding each Hydraulichord must accept incoming MIDI tuning table messages as well as SCALA scale file input among other things. The controller must function in such a manner as to automatically assure the total tension of strings on the piano frame remains under the designated excessive load given any selective/collective pitch changes, notwithstanding taking into account individual piano wire break strengths. I'm confident that all these can be automated after several tests if one ever comes to that.
3. Given the necessity to measure the frequency of each string on-the-fly, including also the harmonics of each string individually & collectively, I had had also come up with an idea which I christened the "Doppler Tonometer". I conceived this device as an array of mini-laser guns pointing and continously shooting at each string, all the while reading the light wave that bounces back from the vibrating wires. A Fast-Fourier transform or suchlike analysis of the reflected lightwave (the workable wavelength of which requires calculations) would then yield the spectral information of the string. A feedback loop can assure how far the fluid in the Hydraulichord must go before the desired frequency is reached. If it goes too far, and immediate automatic fluid flow counteraction could assure that we lock in on the desired pitch.
4. As could be discerned from my interest in the subject of auto-tunable piano, I did do some research and did indeed find many studies/applications some of which have been patented and even built. Certainly I know of the invention that heats up piano wires by Karl Ellison. It's clever, but obviously does not take into consideration the risks involved with metal fatigue. Piano wires are quite sensitive to rapid changes in temperature, and will definitely weaken when this method is constantly applied to tune the strings. This guy also introduced electromagnetic coils that come into resonance with the vibrating strings - which yields the frequencies of each and every one of them. Ingenious though, but I think my "Doppler Tonometer" approach is better (if it works at all), because it does not necessitate lengthy moments of pitch measurement via coils, but can be so designed as to yield the spectral information at light speed while the pianist plays on any tuning.
5. I am glad that Neil Sundberg in one of the links already mentions of the obvious next step: "improved pin block". Hydraulichord implies just that. Each pinblock of the piano will be delicately removed and replaced with parts holding as many Hydraulichords as needs to be housed in that particular section of the piano. The housing hosts all the tubes and whatnot to operate the Hydraulichords and must be so designed as to fit many piano brands. Possibly, just 4 housing models could suffice to convert any piano to an Ultratonal Piano. I also notice that another guy has suggested "electrical extremely heavy-duty servos" in place of the pins, which reminds me of the long nights of discussions we have pursued with Uğur Keçecioğlu on just the idea of suchlike torque motors! However, this might just be more applicable to the qanuns than pianos. I remember Ömer Tulgan along with a friend has once suggested movable frets under the strings.
6. Which brings me to Geoff Smith, whom I met this year in Hakan Ali Toker's house. The Fluidpiano he built is just that: a specially manufactured piano whose individualy strings can be re-tuned with slides under them acting as frets. As Aaron says, the strings involve much lower tensions compared to the piano, which allows one to slide the moving bridges under them without much effort. But this is a new instrument altogether. Robert is quite right in stating that it could be improved by building a mechanism that moves the slides without the players interventions. My approach is to convert any ordinary acoustical piano to a fully micro-tunable piano.
7. As for mixing the best of both worlds, if extreme torques create immense problems with the Hydraulichord, one can indeed try to boost up the tuning procedure by perhaps getting those ratchets as coarse tuning pins, and the Hydraulichords as precise tuning pins, both of them working in tandem.
Cordially,
Dr. Oz.