M11 is Searchable!

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Adam Blinkinsop

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 3:53:17 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Caught Archenemy in the pull, too.
--
Adam Blinkinsop <bli...@acm.org>

nash

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 7:38:41 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Nice! :-)

Archenemy is fun stuff.

-n

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Cauldron" group.
> To post to this group, send email to mtgca...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> mtgcauldron...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mtgcauldron?hl=en.
>

Tim Haloun

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 7:44:00 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Here's an interesting bug:


works for volcanic fallout too.

Adam Blinkinsop

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 7:52:05 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com

Where's the bug? Also, don't know if it handles single quotes...

On Jul 8, 2010 4:44 PM, "Tim Haloun" <tha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's an interesting bug:
>
> http://www.mtgcauldron.com/search?q=set:'magic+2011'+rare+angel&order=collector
>
> works for volcanic fallout too.
>

> <http://www.mtgcauldron.com/search?q=set:'magic+2011'+rare+angel&order=collector>


>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:38 PM, nash <nas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nice! :-)
>>
>> Archenemy is fun stuff.
>>
>> -n
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Adam Blinkinsop <bli...@mtgcauldron.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Caught Archenemy in the pull, too.
>> > --
>> > Adam Blinkinsop <bli...@acm.org>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> > "Cauldron" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to mtgca...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

>> > mtgcauldron...@googlegroups.com<mtgcauldron%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>


>> .
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/mtgcauldron?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Cauldron" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to mtgca...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

>> mtgcauldron...@googlegroups.com<mtgcauldron%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>

Tim Haloun

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 7:53:32 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Serra angel is uncommon.  But at times it was rare?

Adam Blinkinsop

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 7:55:04 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com

That is correct. It has been rare before, so it shows. Unexpected? Undesirable?

>> <mtgcauldron%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com<mtgcauldron%252Buns...@googlegroups.com>


>> >
>>
>> >> .
>> >> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/mtgcauldron?hl=en.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> >> "Cauldron" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to mtgca...@googlegroups.com.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> mtgcauldron...@googlegroups.com<mtgcauldron%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>

>> <mtgcauldron%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com<mtgcauldron%252Buns...@googlegroups.com>

Tim Haloun

unread,
Jul 8, 2010, 7:57:07 PM7/8/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Maybe it should only take in the latest printing?  Not sure.  Maybe instead having the set/rarity icon be a list corresponding to all the reprints would be cool : )

Adam Blinkinsop

unread,
Jul 9, 2010, 10:44:06 AM7/9/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Ah, yeah, that's a feature I've been meaning to add.

nash

unread,
Jul 9, 2010, 12:10:40 PM7/9/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
I think the confusing part is that you're searching "within M11" but
rarity isn't based on M11. Perhaps the right thing to do is check the
query for a specific set or sets and, if found, limit the rarity
criteria to just those sets.

--nash

Adam Blinkinsop

unread,
Jul 9, 2010, 12:29:22 PM7/9/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
That index would be insane, but if it's a useful feature, I can do it. Do
you guys think it'd be that useful?

Tim Haloun

unread,
Jul 9, 2010, 1:01:28 PM7/9/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
no, probably not :D

--

James Lee

unread,
Jul 9, 2010, 4:22:14 PM7/9/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
I'd say the best thing is to limit rarity searching to the latest set in which a card is available but also to show all sets with their respective symbols and rarity historically. There are not too many things that Gatherer does well, but this is definitely one of them. - James.

Adam Blinkinsop

unread,
Jul 9, 2010, 10:02:13 PM7/9/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com

Ah, see, that'd be a cinch. Any objections from the list?

Joshua Ventura

unread,
Jul 10, 2010, 11:22:40 AM7/10/10
to mtgca...@googlegroups.com
Sounds great to me.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages