Hi Shaumik Lenka,
This aims to be a general answer to the question - I do not like the ODF I get from MTEX by reconstruction from pole figure data.
- Please look at the raw pole figure data. Do you observe any meaningful texture? If not do not expect MTEX to find one.
- Check you have set crystal symmetry and crystal axes length correctly.
- Check background and defocussing correction was done correctly.
- Check the reconstructed pole figure match the raw pole figures.
- Even for very pronounced pole figures the reconstruction problem is very ill posed. This means that there are different ODFs repoducing the same pole figures. In general you can not expect to recover small details from pole figure to ODF reconstruction. Please rely only on the main features. Best is to use volume portions to describe the ODF / texture.
In your specific case your raw data look quite bad. I hardly see any structure in your data. Furthermore, defocusing correction seems to went wrong as you have extremely low values at 90 degree. For cubic symmetry this is impossible.
You can set the contour levels, e.g. to 1,2,3,4 by
plotPDF(odf,Miller(1,0,0),'contour',[1,2,3,4]
I hope this helps.
Ralf.