Hi Sir, interesting read.... just to let you know, the car does not need to go for inspection through our company. and you can renew the roadtax at the local post office..
best regards
Robbie Krishnan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM, SooJin Lim <msv...@gmail.com> wrote:My Dear Fellow Old Car Owners,
--
Robbie Krishnan
251 Jalan Tun Razak,
50400, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
+603 21421066 (O)
+603 21417578 (F)
+60123776776 (M)
www.amcmotorsasia.com
Hello my dear Buddy Lim,
It's so nice to read an interesting message/email, especially one that's so informative and precise !!
You write very well and as such, you should provide your services for a fee to the govt.'s call to improve the standard/command of English for our younger generation !!
Fortunately or maybe unfortunately, i didn't experience any probelm in getting a 3rd party insurance coverage for my Classic cars and that's simply because my nephew runs an insurance agency.
My nephew claims that it's the insurance co./agency concerned who has the sole discretion whether to accept/issue 3rd party insurance coverage. The decision is based solely on feasibility/profits. The insurance co.s personnel cannot differentiate between JUNK and CLASSIC/VINTAGE!!! This is the result when you get butchers to work as barbers !!!
Just sidetrack for a moment, for those of you who have had their health insurance policies/hospitalisation benefits rejected because of previous claims or have been asked to pay more or ' loading ' because they are in a high risk group, they definitely need urgent assistance ! Imagine having paid the insurance co. for years uptil retirement and then this same co. tells you that after retirement, you are now immediately placed in the high risk group !! The Insurance co.'s reason/excuse is that you are getting older and most probably your health will deteriorate! Isn't this the same reason itself that we purchase such insurance policies ?????
Do any of you know of anyone, other than THE FANTASTIC FOUR, who grows older but gets stronger/heathier at the same time and likewise continuously enjoys receiving improved income ?????
Have a good day and i hope that you have enjoyed reading this bit of pent-up frustration which has finally found an avenue to release !!
|
Some observations from my side [please don't flame me too much!!]
The fundamental problem is that 3rd Party insurance rates have remained static for 30 years (as mentioned in Star newspaper), it appears the insurance companies have reached a point where 3rd party insurance makes no economic sense [the cost of claims rising year on year].
The current 'safety net' using the MMIP (or whatever it's called) is bound to fail: it's the same insurance companies contributing to it and with increasing demand (now virtually all 3rd party ins done this way), it's liabilities will soon exceed it's 'capitalisation' and government intervention would be neccessary.
What to do?
1) The government must revise 3rd party insurance rates to ensure that the offering of insurance by a business is economically viable.
2) as others have pointed out, there's some value in the creation of a 'classic car' insurance scheme that's separated from the usual 'old banger' 3rd party business. The problem here is how to define a classic car?? anything more than 25 years old?? [surely not as that includes bangers] Membership of a classic car club? [dare i say-open to fraud!!] Limited mileage? [wind-back merchants] Some inspection & judgement by puspakom to defimne as classic?? Special usage restriction (like singapore)? -- All sound difficult to administer.
We need to be careful what we ask for: if we ask for classic car status we may find that our usage of the cars is restricted (mileage or days of week) or some expensive inspection requirements are introduced.
The Puspakom inspections sound like a good idea for the 'old banger' business - there is currently have no roadworthiness requirements before tax & insurance can be purchased, so there are a lot of dangerous-to-drive bangers on the road having accidents! Most european countries have a annual roadworthiness test, the USA only tests emissions. The problem for Malaysia is that the sheer volume of >25 year old cars is mushrooming ( a ~25 year lag on the economic boom of 70's & 80's) and *most* are in rather poor condition [contributing heavily to 3rd party claims]
In short, I think you must be prepared to pay a little more for 3rd party insurance in future... the only other way would be government subsidy....and potentially a regular Puspakom inspection will be needed. Paying a little more and retaining unrestricted use of the cars may well turn-out to be the best compromise.
any other ideas??
David @ Penang
(your www.msvcr.com webmaster)
----- Original Message -----
From: SooJin Lim [mailto:msv...@gmail.com]
To: msv...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:03:13 +0800
Subject: RENEWING ROADTAX IN JULY 2009
My Dear Fellow Old Car Owners,
Old Cars refers to our cars by some of the insurance companies. When my car
was due for renewal of the roadtax, I was informed by my regular insurance
agent that he cannot renew my 3rd party cover anymore because he told me
that the government have limited the cover on 'OLD CARS' to 2 companies.
From other sources I was told that the insurance companies were not making
money so are introducing ways to make profits due to the amount of claims. I
have not claimed a cent for the past at least 30 years or as far as I can
remember. Whomever is making regular claims only the Insurance companies
know but not taking action if it is illegal. I also went to Post Office,
because someone told me that it is easier in the post office. I was given a
list of documents that I will have to make copies of and present to them and
they will then proceed with the process. Also because I am over 65 years
young, I will have to get a doctor to certify that I am fit to drive.
Anyway I am only an ordinary *citizen* of this country, uninfluential nor