[MSA-Talk] Substitution in Siderite

10 views
Skip to first unread message

ja...@ktgeo.com

unread,
Sep 17, 2013, 9:38:40 AM9/17/13
to MSA-...@lists.minsocam.org
Hello All,

I am looking at a set of XRD traces taken on shale samples from a well. I
have identified magnesite (MgCO3) in one of the samples. Some of the
other samples appear to have siderite. The main siderite peak and the
other siderite peaks I can see are shifted to higher 2 theta angles
(smaller d-spacings). In the past, I have seen a shift of siderite peaks
to lower 2 theta angles and have always assumed this to be a substitution
of Ca and or Mg into siderite. My question is, what element(s) commonly
substituted into siderite would cause this shift to higher 2 theta angles?

These samples also contain Dolomite (2-20%), Calcite (<1%), Pyrite,
Marcasite, occasional chlorite and of course Quartz and Illite.

Thanks in advance for your help.

James Talbot
K-T GeoServices, Inc.
www.ktgeo.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The MSA-Talk ListServer - Mineralogical Society of America

The MSA-Talk list is a forum created for members of MSA
to discuss topics of interest in the general areas of
mineralogy, petrology, and crystallography.

To Subscribe/Usubscribe - http://www.minsocam.org/MSA/MSA_Talk.html
To post a message you must subscribe first. You may not send
attachments. If you send attachments you will get an error message.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barry Bickmore

unread,
Sep 17, 2013, 10:16:32 AM9/17/13
to MSA-...@lists.minsocam.org
Hi James,

Higher 2-theta means shorter repeat distances, so you are looking for something smaller than Fe2+ that would lead to smaller unit cell dimensions.  Mg2+ substitution might be the culprit.  See this paper:



Barry Bickmore
Professor of Geological Sciences
Brigham Young University

Barry Bickmore

unread,
Sep 17, 2013, 10:22:35 AM9/17/13
to MSA-...@lists.minsocam.org
Also, I don't have time to look up papers on it, but it seems reasonable to suppose that Ca2+ (which is larger than Fe2+) would make the unit cell dimensions larger, and hence make the 2-theta angles smaller.  

Barry
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages