Example of Sections 2 & 3 filled in
Note how, for sections 2 & 3 you should be:
1. Narrow, niche and (almost) nerdy in focus.
2. Ruthlessly focused by a specific FORM (it has to either exist or be credible), explicit PURPOSES (explicitly use "purpose verbs" - see next) and carefully identified AUDIENCE.
3. Employ 'Purpose' verbs from the following list: inform / explain / describe / analyse / review / comment / argue / persuade / advise
4. Reliant on an intelligent range of sources: (eg: magazine article / video / broadsheet newspaper article / blog / chapter from a text book / interview / poll / graph or chart or visual source / history / diary / etc...)
Bad title: Write an article about climate change
Good title: Your local council are considering building a wind farm in the area to help provide electricity. Write a letter to the chairperson of the council explainingyour views on the wind farms, arguing either for or against the proposal.
Bad title: Write an article about your favourite musician
Good title: The Music Magazine, Mojo, is asking writers to contribute articles which analyse and review the merits of a particular group or musician and attempt to persuade the readers to vote for them in a forthcoming poll. Write the words of this article.
Punctuation tutorial: you HAVE to show that you can master language.
5 weeks to get the Project done. Remember the three crucial sections:
1. Reflection on your reading (type and use of sources)
2. The Assignment
3. Reflection on your writing
As an example of making use of sources in an argue/persuade/advise piece from a broadsheet newspaper this is very useful:
Please post a link to your draft in here. (Post as Google Doc and remember to 'share' it so others can read.)
An informative article to be posted in a blog
Nanotechnology: where is the medical industry heading?
Over the past century nanotechnology has become a major part of millions of people’s lives across the globe. This has given them access to resources that before were previously only available to the military and the extremely wealthy. Today, there is more processing power in a smart phone than there was in a super computer during the 20th century. As a result of this rise in quality and demand of technology, scientists are beginning to adapt it into different areas of society. Cars and housing were the first to be effected with new media systems that people can watch films on and surf the internet, and alarm systems that can identify a person from just seeing their face. Now as the nanotechnology has progressed even further, the medical industry is becoming a very important branch of it. New nanotechnologies are being tested every day in the medical industry to try and eliminate the epidemics and life threatening conditions of the modern world.
The principles of nanotechnology are simple in that it is trying to cure illnesses by creating alternate and more effective methods of introducing medicine into the targeted cells in the human body. This can be done in many ways and there are many varieties of nanotechnology in medicine. Current nanotechnologies are attaching drugs for treating cancer used in chemotherapy (that would usually have to be taken in through a drip and effect all the cells that they come in contact with) onto tiny proteins that are 1 billionth of a meter in size (hence the name Nano) that are attracted to the sites of tumours or cancerous cells. This means that the treatment is much more focussed which makes it more effective, less damaging to healthy cells and possibly most importantly in the future, cheaper because it means that less of the drugs need to be used which means that more people can be treated by the same volume of medicine that would previously cure one person. In the future, scientists will have developed tiny Nano robots that can be programmed to fight illnesses. This is in its early stages but it is a very promising prospect for world health and the elimination of the current epidemics.
As a relatively new branch of medicine, it has been welcomed by some people but rejected by others. This is due to the bad reputations that it has got from the film and sci fi industry. Where nanotechnology in the case of G.I Joe Rise of The Cobra is used for world terror and used to both control people (turning them into mindless robots) and completely change their looks and the way they think as a person. However this is not what any of the nanotechnology in medicine of today and tomorrow are trying to do.
Is Tiger Woods the Greatest Golfer Ever?
It is widely proclaimed that Tiger Woods can only be matched in terms of ability by Jack Nicklaus, the man with a record 18 major championship wins. I have found statistics, facts and a range of sources to help me find the tie breaker between the two giants in the game of golf. I have put together a website, illustrating Tiger Woods’ illustrious career and early life and using it to depict how he towers over all the big names in the history of golf.
Jack Nicklaus has been watching Tiger since Tiger was a teen, winning numerous junior golf championships and setting records from day one. Nicklaus was and is Tiger’s idol; Tiger still tries to mold his golf in the image of Jack. In many ways I regard Jack as the greatest gentleman ever in the game of golf due to his tremendous fortitude and grace in defeat. I also respect the way he has taken Tiger under his wing and his hoping for Tiger to beat his major record.
Tiger Woods has undoubtedly dominated the game of golf, having a ten-year spell at being the number one golfer in the world, more than double of the previous record of four-years, held by Greg Norman. Tiger had an 81% win rate per season in his prime, an astounding record to have, thus showing how he dominated the golfers of his generation.
Woods has overtaken Nicklaus in terms of winning rate and financial success although he has only had half of the career length that Nicklaus had, as he is not finished with the task at hand to overtake Jack’s major feat.
Even though Jack has more major wins, Woods has beaten him in every other category there is such as scoring records in every major, his cumulative wins on the PGA Tour and their statistics on and around the greens.
I feel that the best way to compare Tiger to Jack is by using Tiger’s current statistics and compare them to Jack’s statistics at Tiger’s age (37 years) Tiger had shadowed Jack on the PGA tour by tournaments won with 77 against Jack’s 66 wins. There was a tie on majors won at the age of 37, both of them with 14 in the bag. This means that they were tied in terms of major winning% with 23.3, illustrating that they had an outstanding average of around 1 major per year. But Jack showed that he was more consistent in majors with 13 consecutive top 10s to Tigers 8 consecutively. Tiger was still the more dominant in PGA Tour events, by being the tour money leader on 9 different occasions to Jack’s 8.
In 2001, Tiger Woods conquered the world of golf with what was called the Tiger Slam. In golf there are 4 majors per year and if someone were to win all of those titles in one year, it is called the Grand Slam of Golf. Tiger nearly did it in one year by winning 3 of the majors, but unfortunately he couldn’t win the 4th, however the following year, he won the first major, meaning he won all for majors in a 12 month period, thus it was named the Tiger Slam. No one else in the history of the game has accomplished anything like this.