Thunderbird 91.11.0 rc test post.

[WaltS48]

Name Thunderbird
Version 91.11.0
Build ID 20220622193640
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
OS Linux 5.18.5-100.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 16
14:44:38 UTC 2022

Hi Daniel!

[WaltS48]

So I downloaded all 16063 messages this group has, did a Quick Search on
Sender and I've been doing this since 2014.

Did I mention 91.11.0 looks ancient compared to the 102 beta.

[Daniel]

WaltS48 wrote on 24/6/22 2:21 am:

Are you and I the only people to hang out ...
On this NG??
On this server??
--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.9 Build identifier: 20210808200644

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.53.12 Build identifier: 20220502163924

[Daniel]

WaltS48 wrote on 24/6/22 2:37 am:

> On 6/23/22 12:21 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
>> Name     Thunderbird
>> Version     91.11.0
>> Build ID     20220622193640
>> User Agent     Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Thunderbird/91.11.0
>> OS     Linux 5.18.5-100.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 16
>> 14:44:38 UTC 2022
>>
>> Hi Daniel!
>
> So I downloaded all 16063 messages this group has, did a Quick Search on
> Sender and I've been doing this since 2014.

16063?? My NG account is only showing 2236 messages in this NG! Guess I
didn't 'Download All' when I set up this account. Yeap! Doing View -
All, the oldest on this NG is from 5/2/19!

> Did I mention 91.11.0 looks ancient compared to the 102 beta.

No, you didn't! But after, what, 3, 4, 5 years, anything would be!!

[WaltS48]

On 6/24/22 7:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
> WaltS48 wrote on 24/6/22 2:21 am:
>> Name     Thunderbird
>> Version     91.11.0
>> Build ID     20220622193640
>> User Agent     Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
>> Thunderbird/91.11.0
>> OS     Linux 5.18.5-100.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 16
>> 14:44:38 UTC 2022
>>
>> Hi Daniel!
>
> Are you and I the only people to hang out ...
> On this NG??
> On this server??

Probably.
--
OS: Fedora 35 Workstation - Gnome 41 Desktop
https://blog.thunderbird.net/2022/06/welcome-to-the-thunderbird-102-beta-resources-links-and-guides/
Same Nightmare, Different Day

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

WaltS48 wrote:
> On 6/24/22 7:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
>> WaltS48 wrote on 24/6/22 2:21 am:
>>> Name     Thunderbird
>>> Version     91.11.0
>>> Build ID     20220622193640
>>> User Agent     Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0)
>>> Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
>>> OS     Linux 5.18.5-100.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 16
>>> 14:44:38 UTC 2022
>>>
>>> Hi Daniel!
>>
>> Are you and I the only people to hang out ...
>> On this NG??
>> On this server??
>
> Probably.

Looking back at the older posts, there are a number of people - welcome
and unwelcome - I had forgotten about. Peter Potamus and GerardJan for
example, even the mad SPAMMER polluted this pool at times.

--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/

[Daniel]

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 25/6/22 12:44 am:

Peter Potamus ... missed.

GerardJan ... not so much!!

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

Daniel wrote:
> Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 25/6/22 12:44 am:
>> WaltS48 wrote:
>>> On 6/24/22 7:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>> WaltS48 wrote on 24/6/22 2:21 am:
>>>>> Name     Thunderbird
>>>>> Version     91.11.0
>>>>> Build ID     20220622193640
>>>>> User Agent     Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0)
>>>>> Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
>>>>> OS     Linux 5.18.5-100.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun
>>>>> 16 14:44:38 UTC 2022
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Daniel!
>>>>
>>>> Are you and I the only people to hang out ...
>>>> On this NG??
>>>> On this server??
>>>
>>> Probably.
>>
>> Looking back at the older posts, there are a number of people -
>> welcome and unwelcome - I had forgotten about.  Peter Potamus and
>> GerardJan for example, even the mad SPAMMER polluted this pool at times.
>>
> Peter Potamus ... missed.
>
> GerardJan ... not so much!!

Obviously.
Chris Ilias' moderation was not always particularly helpful, and
targeting PP was a bad move however you look at it.

[WaltS48]

It's been awhile but, I don't remember him moderating this group.

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

He did not, but I think he banned PP from the "support" group and that
drove him off altogether.
He threatened me once for joining a discussion about (I think) messages
disappearing from the support group, which probably meant he had deleted
them. We would all have loved to see the ITALIAN SPAM dropped but he
either gave up on that one or never started.

[Daniel]

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 26/6/22 6:06 am:

Yeap! Is ChrisI still involved with Mozilla or has he gone by the wayside??

>> It's been awhile but, I don't remember him moderating this group.
>
> He did not, but I think he banned PP from the "support" group and that
> drove him off altogether.
> He threatened me once for joining a discussion about (I think) messages
> disappearing from the support group, which probably meant he had deleted
> them.  We would all have loved to see the ITALIAN SPAM dropped but he
> either gave up on that one or never started.
>

About the Italian SPAM .... might it have originated from Google .. so
couldn't be touched??

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

It did. Google later banned mozilla.support.seamonkey for something
along the lines of "inappropriate content", content which was posted via
Google.

[Daniel]

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 26/6/22 10:27 pm:

Hmm! Does anyone else see a problem with Google's 'Policy"??