While I'm asking questions, why can't the TB user-defined filters do
sensible tests like 'if there are five or more forwards in a header
somebody is trying to hide something so it is probably spam so send it off
to the junk folder'?
For more sophisticated filtering, I would consider a proxy with regex
and wildcards or some kind of add-on.
Native Tbird doesn't do regex or wildcards, which is very limiting.
--
Mike Easter
Can you suggest a proxy which is reliable, easy to set up, and preferably
free? I probably remember enough regex to get me going from my time with
Unix in the days of dinosaurs and dumb terminals although in this situation
a simple 1:1 match would do the job just fine.
Disclaimer: I'm not using any spamfilters currently, Tbird's or other.
When I did, I preferred the SpamPal choices over the Bayesian style,
even tho' SP also had a Bayesian plugin which I didn't use
I once used SpamPal (for email), but I don't know if it is still as well
supported as it was when I used it. It looks like some of its webpages
are now hosted at sourceforge instead of the way it used to be.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/spampal/ some old support
http://spampal.sourceforge.net/index2.html
I've never used SpamAssassin
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingOnWindows Using SpamAssassin on
Windows
... but I think SpamPal was easier.
I've read some good reviews about some Tbird plugins and there is a lot
of useful info on the page below.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Junk_Mail_Controls
* 6 Trusting SpamAssassin and SpamPal
o 6.1 SpamBayes
o 6.2 Spamato
* 7 Image spam
* 8 Problems with junk processing
* 9 Regular expressions - advanced
* 14 External links
o 14.1 Add-on to improve Thunderbird's junk processing
o 14.2 Add-ons interfacing to external services
--
Mike Easter